簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊可歆
Ko-Hsin Yang
論文名稱: 企業虛實整合商業模式研究-以A潛水業者經營為例
A Case Study of Click-and-Mortar Business Model in A Diving Company
指導教授: 盧希鵬
Hsi-Peng Lu
口試委員: 劉代洋
Day-Yang Liu
游慧茹
Huei-Ju Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 管理學院MBA
School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 虛實整合商業模式線上至線下模式潛水
外文關鍵詞: Clicks-and-Mortar, Business Model, Online to Offline, Diving
相關次數: 點閱:494下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 虛實整合經營模式結合實體與虛擬銷售平台,整合內容觸及通路、品牌、流程與顧客等面向,此一概念並非全新議題,部分電子商務討論亦著重虛實通路整合與發展。受惠於近年行動裝置應用熱潮,行動連網功能更模糊了虛實通路之間的界線,隨著虛實整合商業模式成功案例增加,普遍認為成功的虛實整合得以提高顧客滿意度,並為企業創造高營運效率,但論及兩者結合可創造的綜效,仍必須仰賴企業整合與管理的能力才可能產生,既然整合有其必要性,也就表示虛、實通路之間存在許多差異,是故企業不能將既定的經營模式與經驗直接複製到另一型態的通路。
    本研究透過次級資料蒐集、深度訪談,以單一個案研究方式深入瞭解,討論個案公司虛實整合後在商業模式上創造的綜效成果,期能給予面臨虛實整合經營議題之業者良好建議。
    研究結果顯示,企業執行虛實整合模式無論是往整合或分離方向發展都各有優、缺點產生,因之思考哪種整合程度更適合企業自身發展才至關重要。虛實整合非一蹴可及,發展成效亦非短時間內可以顯現,企業不能相應趨勢以通路擴張的概念進行虛實整合,若然如此,便會陷入虛實整合迷思,反致喪失原實體店之經營基礎與優勢。企業應檢視可利用的有限資源,審慎評估發展節奏,尋求最大可能性發展。中、小型企業若有發展成本上的考量與限制,應以更兼容開放的態度,考慮與第三方虛擬資訊平台與支付系統業者進行合作,避免資源的分化與浪費。企業主須擁有更寬廣的思維與胸襟,以創造更新、更好、更完備的核心價值為目標,保持企業在虛實整合模式中應具備的彈性與耐力,不斷強化並提升企業跨通路顧客服務的能力,最終同時帶動兩端營運效益,才真正達成虛實整合經營目標。


    Click and Mortar Business Model is a business model integrated virtual and physical channels with the aspects as brands, processes and customers. This concept is not a new topic, since some e-commerce discussion also focused on the integration and development of virtual and physical channels. Due to the boom of mobile device applications in recent years, mobile networking features blurred the boundaries between virtual and physical channels even more. By the success of the gradually increased actual virtual and physical integration business model cases, it is generally considered that a successful virtual and physical integration can improve customers’ satisfaction, and bring high operational efficiency for enterprises. However, the synergy applications and benefits by the integration must rely on the “integrating” skill of operators to bring it to the reality. Since there is necessity of integration, there must be differences occur between virtual and physical channels, which mean the companies can’t directly copy the original set store management experience to another type of channels.
    The subject of the case study is a company in tourism services industry and the in-depth understanding of this single case was gained through secondary data collection and in-depth interviews. Discussions were done on the case study company’s synergy applications and benefits brought by the business model after virtual and physical integration, hoping to propose good suggestions to companies facing virtual and physical integration operation.
    Studies have shown that whether there is integrate or separate virtual and physical channel integration model when implementing, there are both advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the very first consideration is how to approach the suitable integrating level to company itself. Virtual and physical channel integration can’t be succeed in at the first try and its development effectiveness can’t appear in a short time, either. Thus, companies cannot process virtual and physical channel integration with the concept of channel expansion by corresponding tendency. If so, the company will fall into the myth of integration and lost the operating basis and advantages of the original physical store. Companies should check the limited resources available, carefully assess the pace of development and seek for the possibility of maximized development. If there is development cost considerations and limitations in small and medium enterprises, they should be more compatible with an open mind and consider the collaboration possibility with the third-party virtual information platforms and payment systems industry to avoid differentiation and resource wasting. Business owners must have a broader thinking and mind in order to have creating newer, better and more comprehensive core values as the goal to keep the flexibility and endurance a company should have during virtual and physical integration model. The company should also be supportive to have the management team develop better management capabilities and have high control skill on both virtual and physical channels and continuously strengthen and enhance the company’s cross-channel customer service ability to ultimately activate the operational efficiency of both ends at the same time and actually reach the business goals of virtual and physical integration.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌謝 IV 目錄 V 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究定義與範圍 3 第四節 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 虛實整合經營模式 5 第二節 商業模式 6 第三節 實體虛擬整合構面 12 第四節 虛實整合效益 18 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 研究架構 22 第二節 研究設計 24 第三節 個案訪談 25 第四章 個案分析 29 第一節 休閒潛水產業環境介紹 29 第二節 個案公司簡介 33 第三節 個案公司虛實整合經營模式發展歷程 38 第四節 個案公司商業模式檢視 46 第五節 個案公司實體虛擬整合構面分析 50 第六節 個案公司虛實整合效益分析 54 第七節 總結 58 第五章 結論與建議 60 第一節 結論 60 第二節 中、小型企業虛實整合發展建議 62 第三節 研究限制與未來建議 64 第六章 參考文獻 65

    一、 中文文獻
    1. 李明儒、陳元揚、陳宏斌(2003)。休閒潛水者的風險管理之研究。戶外遊憩研究,16 (2),49-67。
    2. 李信興、劉常勇(2008)。「系統性「商業模式」之觀念架構」。創業管理研究,3卷3期,119-145。
    3. 劉常勇(2004)。為新事業設計商業模式。財金資訊,37,34-38。
    4. 謝新曦(2001)。臺灣潛水發展史漫談。春刊,52-54。
    5. 成章瑜(2008)。由虛實整合探討媒體顧問業之創新經營模式—以A公司為例。國立交通大學/管理學院高階主管管理碩士學程/研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    6. 李浚維(2002)。虛實企業整合之策略規劃:行銷通路協商導向。國立中正大學/資訊管理學系/研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
    7. 沈愛玲(2011)。台灣零售業虛實整合商業模式研究:以7-11與7net為例。國立交通大學/企業管理碩士學程/研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    8. 黃華泰(2000)。網站經營模式與企業實體價值鏈整合之探討。銘傳大學/資訊管理研究所/研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    9. 梁哲誠(2002)。以交易成本理論分析虛擬與實體通路整合-台灣便利商店在電子商務的優勢。高雄第一科技大學/行銷與流通管理系/研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    10. 陳信宏(2010)。虛實整合通路下的經營模式—以台灣某知名傢俱居家修繕中心為例。國立台北科技大學/工業工程與管理研究所/研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    11. 游哲豪(2009)。運用網路行銷策略達成虛實整合經營模式之個案研究。彰化師範大學/企業管理學系/研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
    12. 盧希鵬(2011),從理論到模式:談企業經營模式,經理人。
    13. 盧希鵬(2011),價值模式:你為什麼買這本雜誌?,經理人。
    14. 盧希鵬(2011),網路行銷:連結經濟下的社交網路數位革命,雙葉書廊。
    15. 盧希鵬(2012),戰略模式(9):策略是一種生態思維,經理人。
    16. 盧希鵬(2014),電子商務戰略模式CRM策略:讓客戶毫不費力,經理人。
    17. 國立海洋生物博物館(2013)。海洋生物愛拍照:海水魚類。屏東縣:國立海洋生物博物館。
    二、 英文文獻
    1. Alt, R., & Zimmermann, H. (2001). Preface: Introduction to Special Section-Business Models. Electronic Markets, 11(1), 3-9.
    2. Afuah, A. (2003). Business models: A strategic management approach. New York: cGraw-Hill.
    3. Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2003). Internet business models and strategies: Text and case. New York: McGraw-Hill, Irwin.
    4. Adelaar, T., Bouwman, H., & Steinfield, C. (2004). Enhancing customer value through click-and-mortar e-commerce: implications for geographical market reach and customer type. Journal Telematics and Informatics - Special issue: Electronic markets in post euphoric phase, 21(2), 167-182.
    5. Ab, H., Noor, R., & Akhir, R. M. (2013). Beyond technology-based customer relationship management - it is total customer experience management. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 8, 1-15.
    6. Bakos, J.Y., & Treacy, M. E. (1986). Information technology and corporate strategy: A research perspective. MIS Quarterly, 10(2), 107-119.
    7. Coates, V. (1998). Buying and Selling on the Internet: Retail Electronic Commerce. The Institute for Technology Assessment, Washington , D.C.
    8. Chan, Peng S., & Pollard, D. (2003). Succeeding in the Dotcom Economy: Challenges for Brick & Mortar Companies. International Journal of Management, 20(1), 11-16.
    9. Cho, Y. C. (2013). Exploring Relationship Among Customer Dissatisfaction, Complaints, And Loyalty In The Virtualized Environment: Roles Of Advanced Services. The International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online), 12.11.
    10. Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M., (2009). What do Business Models do? Innovation Devices in Technology Entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559-1570.
    11. Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business Model Evolution: in Search of Dynamic Consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 227-46.
    12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Research, 41(4), 532-550.
    13. Friedman, L. G., & Furey, T. R. (1999). The Channel Advantage: Going to Market with Multiple Sales Channels to Reach More Customers, Sell More Products, Make More Profit. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
    14. Fisher, R. (2001). Building customer relationships in a networked economy. Ivey Business Journal , Sep/Oct, 57-63.
    15. Gulati, R., & Garino, J. (2000). Get the right mix of bricks and clicks. Harvard Business Review, 78, 107-114.
    16. George, G., & Bock, A. J. (2011). The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83-111.
    17. Hanson, W. (2000). Principles of Internet Marketing. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
    18. Hoque, Z., Mia, L., & Alam M. (2001). Market competition, computer-aided manufacturing and use of multiple performance measures: an empirical study. British Accounting Review, 33, 23-45.
    19. Johnston, H. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1988). Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 153-165.
    20. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your Business Model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50-9.
    21. Jang, Y. T., Chang, S. E., & Chen, P. A. (2015). Exploring social networking sites for facilitating multi-channel retailing. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(1), 159-178.
    22. Konczal, E. F. (1975). Models Are For Managers, Not Mathematicians. Journal of Systems Management, 26(1), 12.
    23. Levary, R. R., & Mathieu, R. G. (2000). Hybrid retail: integrating e-commerce and physical stores. Industrial Management, 42(5), 6-13.
    24. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75.
    25. Magretta, J. (2002). Why Business Matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86-93.
    26. Otto, J., and Chung, Q. (2000). A framework for cyber-enhanced retailing: Integrating electronic commerce retailing with brick and mortar retailing. Electronic Markets, 10(4), 185-191.
    27. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). An E-Business Model Ontology for Modeling E-Business. 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Slovenia
    28. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 1-25.
    29. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    30. Online shopping - what's in store. (2014, Sep 15). The Business Times. Singapore: The Financial Times Limited.
    31. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining superior pertormance. New York: Free Press.
    32. Robey, D., Schwaig, K. S., & Jin, L. (2003). Intertwining material and virtual work. Information and Organization, 13(2), 111-129.
    33. Stabell, C. B., & Fjeldstad, O. D. (1998). Configuring Value For Competitive Advantage: On Chains, Shops and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 413-437.
    34. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    35. Steinfield, C., & Whitten, P. (1999). Community level socio-economic impacts of electronic commerce. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5(2).
    36. Sengupta, S. (2000). Strategic Options for the Click and/or Walks. Supply Chain Management Review, July/Aug, 58-63.
    37. Steinfield, C. (2002). Understanding Click and Mortar E-Commerce Approaches: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(2) 1-10.
    38. Steinfield, C., & Bouwman, H., & Adelaar, T. (2002). The dynamics of click-and-mortar electronic commerce: opportunities and management strategies. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(1), 93-119.
    39. Stahler, P. (2002). Business Models as an Unit of Analysis for Strategizing. Journal of Business Venturing, 26-41.
    40. Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The Power of Business Models. Business Horizons, 48(3), 199-207.
    41. Sinfield, J. V., Calder, E., McConnell, B., & Colson, S. (2012). How to Identify New Business Models. Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 85-90.
    42. Snyder, R. (2013). E-Commerce and Supply Chain Management. American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 20(1), 237-242.
    43. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-306.
    44. Timmers, P. (1998). Business Models for Electronic Markets. Journal on Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3-8.
    45. Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J. K., Liang, T. P., & Turban, D. (2009). Electronic Commerce, 2010: A managerial perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    46. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business Model, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
    47. Tan, T. (2014). Redefining and Repurposing Content as We Go Along: Digital Solutions in India 2014. Publishers Weekly, 261.19.
    48. Venkatraman. (1991). The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    49. Whinston, A., Stabl, D., & Soon-Yong, C. (1997). The Economics of Electronic Commerce. Indianapolis: Macmillan Technical Publishing.
    50. Ward, M. R. (2001). Will online shopping compete more with traditional retailing or catalog shopping? Netnomics, 3(2), 103-117.
    51. Willcocks, L. P., &Plant, R. (2001). Pathways to e-business leadership: getting from bricks to clicks. Mit Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 50-59.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2020/01/26 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/01/26 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/01/26 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE