團隊工作模式已成企業組織主要運作模式。但是，如何設計一個與團隊運作相互搭配之管理制度，學術界仍缺乏相關之研究。根據誘因強度準則(Incentive-intensity principle)，本研究探討任務互依性及任務產出能否客觀的量化，如何影響績效獎勵制度的設計，特別是這些任務特徵如何影響團隊績效及個人績效的相對權重。

Team work has been the main organizational form in business world. However, there is little research works that aim at what performance evaluation could match this team organizational form. Our research explores how the characteristics of tasks af-fect the performance evaluation system. Specifically, we are interested in how the task interdependence and output measurability affect the relative weights between group and individual measures.

英文文獻
1.Anderson, Lisa R. & Stafford, Sarah L., (2003). “Punishment in a Regulatory Set-ting: Experimental Evidence from the VCM,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 24 (1), 91-110.
2.Anne M. Saunier, Elizabeth J. Hawk, (1994). “Realizing the Potential of Teams Through Team-Based Rewards,” Compensation & Benefits Review, Vol. 26 (4), 24-33.
3.Astley, W. G., & Zajac, E. J. (1990). “Beyond Dyadic Exchange: Functional Inter-dependence and sub-Unit Power,” Organization Studies, Vol. 11 (4), 481-501.
4.Bird, A., & Beechler, S. (1995). “Links between business strategy and human re-source” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 26 (1), 23-46.
5.Brickley, Smith, Zimmerman (2009). “Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture Fifth Edition.”
6.Decker, T., Stiehler, A. & Strobel, M. (2003). “A Comparison of Punishment Rules in Repeated Public Good Games-An Experimental Study,” journal of conflict res-olution, Vol. 47, 751-772.
7.Edward P. Lazear & Robert L. Moore, (1988). “Pensions and Turnover,” NBER Chapters, in: Pensions in the U.S. Economy, 163-190. National Bureau of Eco-nomic Research, Inc.
8.House, R. J, Shapiro, & M. A. Wahba (1974). “Expectancy Theory as a Predictor of Work Behavior and Attitudes: A Re-Evaluation of Empirical Evidence,” Decision Sciences, 481-506.
9.DeMatteo, J. S., Eby, L. T. & Sundstrom, E. (1998). “Team-based rewards: Current mpirical evidence and directions for future research,” research in organizational behavior, Vol. 20, 141-183.
10.Junichiro Ishida, (2006). “Team Incentives under Relative Performance Evalua-tion,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Blackwell Publishing, Vol. 15 (1), 187-206, 03.
11.Eisenhardt, K. M. & Bourgeois, L. J. (1998). “Politics of Strategic Decision Mak-ing in High Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory” Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 31, 737-770.
12.Kaplan, R. S. & D. P. Norton. (1992). “The balanced scorecard-Measures that drive performance.” Harvard Business Review (January-February): 71-79.
13.Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1993). “The discipline of teams.” Har-vard Business Review, Vol. 71 (March-April), 111-146
14.Kohn, A. (1993). “Why incentive plans cannot work.” Harvard Business Review (September-October): 54-63.
15.Lawler, & Cohen, S. G. (1992). “Designing a Pay System for Teams.” American Compensation Association Journal, Vol. 1 (1), 6-19.
16.Milgrom, Paul and Roberts, John (1992). “Motivation: Contracts, Information and Incentives.” In Economics, Organization and Management. New Jersey: Pren-tice-Hall. 154-159.
17.Mohamed E. Abul-Ezz, & John W. Dickhaut (1993). “Incentive Structure and Group Performance Expectations in a Budgeting Setting: A Descriptive Stud-yAccounting.” Auditing & Accountability Journal.
18.Nelson and Winter (1982). “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.”
19.Oyer, P. (2004). “Why Do Firms Use Incentives That Have No Incentive Effects,” Journal Of Finance, Vol. 59 (4), 1619-1649.
20.Shaw, G. D. & Schneier, C. E. (1995). “Team measurement and rewards: How some companies are getting it right.” Human Resource Planning, 34-39.
21.Shih-jon wang (2009). “Interdependence and organizational citizenship behavior: exploring the Mediating effect of group cohesion in Multilevel analysis.” The journal of psychology, Vol. 143 (6), 625-640.
22.Thompson, J. D. (1967). “Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Ad-ministrative Theory.” New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989). “Agency theory: An assessment and review Academy of Management.” Vol. 14 (1), 57-74.
24.Van de Ven et al., (1976). “Coordination Patterns Within an Inter-organizational,” Network Human Relations, Vol. 32 (1), 19-36.
25.Van de Ven, A. H., A. L. Delbecq & R. Koenig Jr. (1976). “Determinants of coor-dination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41, 322-38.
26.Venkatraman, N. & V. Ramanujam (1986). “Measurement of Business Perform-ance on Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Manage-ment.
27.Vroom, V. H. (1964), “Work And Motivation,” New York: John Wiley.
中文文獻
1.陳慧娟(2009)，程序擔責與參考架構訓練對績效考核正確度之影響-動機與能力整合觀點之實驗設計。
2.鍾亦筑(2007)，誘因制度的激勵作用之實驗研究。