簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 詹國燕
Ricky - Kurniawan
論文名稱: 建築耗能最佳化策略模擬研究─以美國、台灣與印度尼西亞的商業辦公空間為例
Optimization Strategies for Office Building’s Energy Efficiency in U.S.A, Taiwan, and Indonesia – A Simulation Study
指導教授: 邱韻祥
YUN-SHANG CHIOU
口試委員: 江維華
Wei-Hwa Chiang
杜功仁
Kung-Jen Tu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 建築系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 106
中文關鍵詞: Energy EfficiencyBuilding Energy SimulationOffice BuildingOccupant Behaviorand Climates
外文關鍵詞: Energy Efficiency, Building Energy Simulation, Office Building, Occupant Behavior, and Climates
相關次數: 點閱:420下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • The total energy consumption is one of the important parameters to be considered and understood in this new era of energy efficiency and green building. Nowadays, energy efficiency has become a critical issue and people start to think about the new approach to reduce energy consumption. This research uses an office building as the subject of study because of the rise of this type of the building around the world.
    The basic methodology in this research is simulation, yet, based on the real world characteristics, conditions, and also the understanding of the building parameters. Different gradation of location such as Chicago in U.S.A, Taipei in Taiwan, and Jakarta in Indonesia has been scrutinized in this research. They represent different characteristic of climate, people, and building design. The building’s systems, and building environment and operation are made to represent the actual condition of the real building in the world. Common green building features are also implemented in this simulation research to understand the problems and characteristics of each location.
    The simulation results indicate that the energy consumption of each country depends on the problems of each location. The different problems need different approaches to solve for maximum energy saving. Daylight, green building features, and window percentage are a good option to reduce energy consumption. Daylight becomes the best solution to reduce energy consumption (in every country) and followed by design features (based on each location). Office’s cultural behavior also has big influenced to the energy consumption. The results indicate that developed country will consume more energy than developing’s country because of people’s different behavior inside the office.


    The total energy consumption is one of the important parameters to be considered and understood in this new era of energy efficiency and green building. Nowadays, energy efficiency has become a critical issue and people start to think about the new approach to reduce energy consumption. This research uses an office building as the subject of study because of the rise of this type of the building around the world.
    The basic methodology in this research is simulation, yet, based on the real world characteristics, conditions, and also the understanding of the building parameters. Different gradation of location such as Chicago in U.S.A, Taipei in Taiwan, and Jakarta in Indonesia has been scrutinized in this research. They represent different characteristic of climate, people, and building design. The building’s systems, and building environment and operation are made to represent the actual condition of the real building in the world. Common green building features are also implemented in this simulation research to understand the problems and characteristics of each location.
    The simulation results indicate that the energy consumption of each country depends on the problems of each location. The different problems need different approaches to solve for maximum energy saving. Daylight, green building features, and window percentage are a good option to reduce energy consumption. Daylight becomes the best solution to reduce energy consumption (in every country) and followed by design features (based on each location). Office’s cultural behavior also has big influenced to the energy consumption. The results indicate that developed country will consume more energy than developing’s country because of people’s different behavior inside the office.

    Abstract iv Acknowledgment v Table of Contents vi List of Figures ix List of Tables xii Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2. Objective and Research Outcomes 3 1.3. Research Approach 4 1.4. Chapter Overview 6 Chapter 2. Literature Review 7 2.1 Literature Overview 7 2.2. Simulation Model as Basic Building Standard 7 Chapter 3. Specification of Building's Systems 13 3.1 Building’s System Overview 13 3.2. Weather Data – Locations Characteristics 13 3.3. Building Locations Configurations 14 3.3.1. Floor Plan Configuration 15 3.3.2. CORE Configurations (of Square Floor Plan) 16 3.3.3. Exterior Wall Application 17 3.3.4. General Lighting Simulation 19 3.3.5. HVAC Application (VAV System) 22 3.3.6. Standard Office Equipment 23 3.3.7. Window Percentage Application 24 Chapter 4. Specification of Building's Environment and Operation 26 4.1 Building’s Environment Overview 26 4.2. Standard Office Occupancy 26 4.3. Standard Office Operation Hour/ Schedule 27 4.4. Human Comfort and Metabolic Rate 28 4.5. Fresh Air Requirement 29 4.6. Indoor Human Comfort Conditions 29 4.7. Clothing Assumption 31 Chapter 5. Application of Design Strategies 36 5.1 Design Strategies Overview 36 5.2. Design Features 36 5.3. Details of Design Strategies 37 5.3.1. Daylight Control 37 5.3.2. Simple Design Features 39 5.4. Building Simulation Model 42 5.4.1. Simulation Model Detail – Building Shell 43 Chapter 6. Results and Analysis 44 6.1 Results and Analysis Overview 44 6.2. Understand Location-related Problems 44 6.3. Results and Analysis Scenario 45 6.4. Comparison A: Location and Characteristics 45 6.4.1. Simulation 1 (Square Floor Plan) 45 6.4.2. Simulation 2 (Rectangle Floor Plan) 54 6.5. Comparison B: Cross Location (Weather Conditions) 63 6.5.1. Simulation 1 (Square Floor Plan) 63 6.5.2. Simulation 2 (Rectangle Floor Plan) 69 6.6. Comparison C: Per Person and Per m2 (Culture) 74 Chapter 7. Conclusion 78 7.1 Overview 78 7.2. Summary of Findings 78 7.3. Future Work 80 Table of Reference 81 List of Appendix 82

    [1] Neufert, E., & Neufert, P. (2012). Architects' data. John Wiley & Sons.
    [2] Eisele, J., & Kloft, E. (2003). High-rise manual: typology and design, construction and technology. Birkhauser.
    [3] Marmot, A., & Eley, J. (2000). Office space planning: designing for tomorrow's workplace. McGraw-Hill.
    [4] Handbook, A. S. H. R. A. E. (2001). Fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, 111.
    [5] Adak, M. F., Duru, N., & Duru, H. T. (2013). Elevator simulator design and estimating energy consumption of an elevator system. Energy and Buildings,65, 272-280.
    [6] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1990). Ventilation and Air Quality in Offices.
    [7] California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research Program. (2005). Integrated Office Lighting System.
    [8] Hwang, R. L., & Cheng, M. J. (2007). Field survey on human thermal comfort reports in air-conditioned offices in Taiwan. Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 1, 8-13.
    [9] Karyono, T. H. (2000). Report on thermal comfort and building energy studies in Jakarta—Indonesia. Building and environment, 35(1), 77-90.
    [10] Roetzel, A., & Tsangrassoulis, A. (2012). Impact of climate change on comfort and energy performance in offices. Building and environment, 57, 349-361.
    [11] Human comfort and Health Requirements [Lecture notes]. (2013). Retrieved from http://courses.washington.edu/me333afe/Comfort_Health.pdf
    [12] Rubino, M., Cruz, A., Garcia, J. A., & Hita, E. (1994). Discomfort Glare Indices: A Comparative Study. Applied Optics.

    QR CODE