簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡明傑
Ming Chieh Hu
論文名稱: 教育落差偵察系統建置之研究
A Study Of Developing An Education Gap Detection System
指導教授: 李國光
Gwo-Guang Lee
口試委員: 周子銓
Tzu-Chuan Chou
白榮吉
Jung-Chi Pai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 教育落差教學績效資訊品質Kirkpatrick model
外文關鍵詞: education gap, teaching performance, information quality, Kirkpatrick model
相關次數: 點閱:226下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

資訊發展的快速增加了資訊產業中人力需求的敏感度,在過去的研究中發現企業傾向於雇用新職員以獲取新的技術,但可以觀察到的是資訊產業對人才的渴求與現今台灣社會上高失業率的矛盾情況同時存在,顯示學生無法透過教育獲得足夠職能進入職場,學校與企業間對於學生應有的知識與技能存在落差。然而學校的教學績效評估中卻未考慮是否能夠反應產業需求,因此本研究提出以教育落差做為教學績效評估之指標,協同外部企業以客觀的角度進行教學績效評估。

研究採用系統建構與展示法進行,規劃協同外部企業以教育落差為指標之評估模式,並初步建立一電子化平台進行資料蒐集,透過配對問卷攫取學生與其就業單位主管之評估資料,檢驗兩組對職能表現之認知,進行教育落差之分析與展示,經過資訊品質驗證,發展Kirkpatrick model的行為層次與結果層次,將學校教育與企業人力需求接軌。

系統以國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系為對象實施,進行雛型之模擬,引用教育部UCAN計畫辦公室研究與發展出之職能測驗問卷來進行教育落差之調查,並經過分析後得到以下結論:1.本系統能夠偵測出落差所在之職能落點與趨勢。2.本系統能夠透過樣本屬性分析挖掘隱藏的落差。3.教育落差適合做為教學績效的評估指標。4.本系統能夠提供有效資訊以輔助決策。

經過系統的實施與展示,本研究確立了系統的實用與可行性,並達成以下貢獻:1.彙整與分類過去教學績效評估相關之研究。2.確立以教育落差為外部績效之評估模式。3.經過資訊品質驗證完成了教育落差偵察系統之建置。4.提供教育決策上的管理依據。


The development of IS/IT raise the sensitivity of human resource requirement. Early literature has mention that IS recruiters are always looking for new-hires with substantial knowledge of specific software and can utilize it for carrying out the job assigned immediately. And one wondering thing is that both high human resource requirement and high unemployment rate are observed in Taiwan. It means that our students can’t learn enough skills or knowledge to do their job well after long time academic career. There are perception gaps in the required skills and knowledge of students between academia and industry. However, there aren’t any indices can reflect this fact in teaching performance evaluation in academia. The study using “education gaps” as outside index of teaching performance evaluation and concert with enterprise to evaluate teaching outcome in industry view.

This study use system development and presentation method to construct a framework to evaluate teaching performance with outside corporations by analysis education gaps as an index. We built an electronic system as analytical platform and coded paired-questionnaire in the system to collected data, compared results of student and their mentor, analysis the gaps and then display. We demonstrated information quality and developed the third and forth level of Kirkpatrick model in the end.

We asked students who has studied in NTUST dep.MIS as our sample, and quoted UCAN occupation-questionnaire to investigate education gaps then we got conclusions below: (1) The system can find out the gaps of skills/knowledge and their trend. (2) The system can find out the hidden gaps by using sample attribute analysis. (3) Education gap fits for teaching performance evaluation. (4) The system provides effective information to help decision making.

After run system and displayed, we achieved following contribution: (1) Arrange and classify the literature of teaching performance evaluation. (2) Constructs a framework to evaluate teaching performance. (3) Building the education gaps analysis system and demonstrate information quality. (4) Provides information for education decision making.

摘要 Abstract 致謝 目錄 圖目錄 表目錄 第一章 緒論 1.1 研究動機與目的 1.1.1 研究背景與動機 1.1.2 研究目的 1.1.3 預期貢獻 1.2 研究方法 1.3 論文架構 1.4 研究限制 第二章 文獻探討 2.1 教育落差 2.1.1 教育落差之概念 2.1.2 教育落差的範疇 2.1.3 教育落差評估方式及其現況 2.2 績效評估 2.2.1 教學績效評估 2.2.2 主觀性SETs之評估 2.2.3 客觀性教學績效之評估 2.3 Kirkpatrick four-level model 2.3.1 Four-level of Kirkpatrick 2.3.2 Kirkpatrick 模型目前的應用 2.4 資訊品質 2.4.1 資訊品質評估 2.4.2 資訊品質評估面向 2.5 總結 第三章 研究設計與系統架構 3.1 教育落差偵查流程設計 3.1.1 研究架構 3.1.2 產出之報表 3.1.3 UCAN職能測驗問卷 3.2 系統架構分析與設計 3.2.1 系統架構 3.2.2 資料庫設計 3.2.3 使用者介面 3.3 總結 第四章 系統實施與驗證 4.1 樣本說明與分析 4.1.1 樣本蒐集 4.1.2 樣本分析 4.2 一般分析與落差分析 4.2.1 一般分析:學生自評職能分析 4.2.2 一般分析:企業評量職能分析 4.2.3 一般分析:優劣勢能力分析 4.2.4 一般分析:職能走勢分析 4.2.5 落差分析:職能認知落差分析 4.2.6 落差分析:職能走勢落差分析 4.3 系統驗證 4.3.1 系統驗證流程 4.3.2 系統驗證問卷構面與問項設計 4.3.3 驗證結果統整 4.4 分析與驗證結果討論 4.5 總結 第五章 結語與建議 5.1 研究貢獻 5.2 未來研究與建議 中文參考文獻 英文參考文獻 附件一 UCAN產業與職業總表 附錄二 學生自評職能總表 附錄三 企業評量職能總表 附錄四 系統實施成效驗證問卷

中文參考文獻
1. 吳有龍、張啟瑞、林寶安,「警察機關「受理報案e化資訊系統」員警使用滿意度之研究」,經營管理論叢,第七卷,第一期,第1-18頁,2011。
2. 林沛昀,「院務績效管理與學習成效確保系統建置之研究」,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士學位論文,2011。
3. 洪銘鴻,「國民小學學校行政管理資訊系統與學校效能關係之研究」,國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,2005。
4. 梁定澎,「資訊管理研究方法總論」,資訊管理學報資訊管理實證研究方法研討會特刊,第四卷,第一期,第1-6頁,1997。
5. 施清珍,「會診資訊系統實施成效分析-以中部不同屬性醫學中心為例」,南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,2004。
6. 邱千芳,「線上旅遊網站品質與使用者接受度之研究」,國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,2005。
7. 郭仁宗,「知識管理績效評估系統建構之研究」,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士學位論文,2003。
8. 曾繁絹、李宗翰,「圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統評估之研究」,圖書資訊學刊,第六卷,第1/2期,第111-142頁,2008。

英文參考文獻
1. Abernathy, D.J., “Thinking outside the evaluation box,” Training & Development, Vol.53, pp.18-23(1999).
2. Cashin, W.E., “Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited,” Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Vol.32, pp.1-10(1995).
3. Ding, X., Wardell, D. and Verma, R., “An Assessment of Statistical Process Control-Based Approaches for Charting Student Evaluation Scores,” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Vol.4, pp.259-372(2006).
4. Esposto, A. and Abbott, M., “Human Capital: A Comparative Study of the Skill and Knowledge Intensity of Work in Australia and New Zealand,” New Zealand Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol.9, pp.25-45(2011).
5. Ferguson, J., “An Overview and Discussion of Research Supporting the Concept of a Generic ‘Soft’ Skills Framework in Tertiary Education towards Bridging the Gap between Education and Employment,” New Zealand Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol.8, pp.59-74(2010).
6. Georged, A. and Elizabeth, J., “Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: thirty years later,” Personnel Psychology, Vol.42, pp.331-342(1989).
7. Gorman, M.F., “A Case Study in Effectively Bridging the Business Skills Gap for the Information Technology Professional,” Journal of education for business, Vol.86, pp.17–24(2011).
8. Gramlich, E.M. and Greenlee, G.A., “Measuring Teaching Performance,” Journal of Economic Education, Vol.24, pp.3-13(1993).
9. Grimes, P.W., Millea, M.J. and Woodruff, T.W., “Grades-Who’s Blame Student Evaluation of Teaching and Locus of Control” Journal of Economic Education, Vol.35, pp.129-147(2004).
10. Guerci, M., Bartezzaghi, E. and Solari, L., “Training evaluation in Italian corporate universities: a stakeholder-based analysis,” International Journal of Training and Development, Vol.14, pp.291-308(2010).
11. Jackson, D. and Chapman, E., “Non-technical skill gaps in Australian business graduates,” Education + Training, Vol.54, pp.95-113(2012).
12. Kettinger, W.J. and Lee, C.C., “Zones of tolerance: Alternative scales for measuring information systems service quality,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, pp.607-623(2005).
13. Kirkpatrick, D., “Great ideas revisited,” Training & Development, Vol.50, pp.54-59(1996).
14. Kirkpatrick, D., Evaluating Training Programs, Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development (1975).
15. Kirkpatrick, D., Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler (1996).
16. Kirkpatrick, J. and Kirkpatrick, W., “Training on Trial,” Journal for Quality & Participation, Vol.33, pp.26-31(2010).
17. Lee, S., Koh, S., Yen, D.C. and Tang, H.L., “Perception gaps between IS academics and IS practitioners: an exploratory study,” Information & Management, Vol.40, pp.51-61(2002).
18. Lien, Y.H., Hung, Y.Y. and McLean, G.N., “Training evaluation based on cases of Taiwanese benchmarked high-tech companies,” International Journal of Training & Development, Vol.11, pp.35-48(2007).
19. Mustafa, S.T. and Chiang, D., “Dimensions of Quality in Higher Education: How Academic Performance Affects University Students' Teacher Evaluations,” The Journal of American Academy o f Business, Vol.8, pp.249-303(2006).
20. Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A. and Wixom, B.H., “Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol.21, pp.199-235(2005).
21. Ravichandran, T. and Rai, A., “Total Quality Management in Information Systems Development: Key Constructs and Relationships,” Journal of Management Information System, Vol.16, pp.119-155(2000).
22. Reed, T.F. and Dawn, K., “The skills gap in the Irish software industry,” Irish Journal of Management, Vol.23, pp.96-109(2003).
23. Rodin, M. and Rodin, B., “Student Evaluations of Teachers,” Journal of Economic Education, Vol.5, pp.5-9(1973).
24. Sabarudin, Z. and Wan, Y. and Wan, F., “Outcome-Based Education in a Private HIL: Perceptions of Students,” Advances in Management, Vol.3, pp.48-51(2010).
25. Simon, H.A., L.P., Bradshaw, G.L. and Zytk, J.M., Scientific discovery: computational exploration of the creative process, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press(1987).
26. Tawil, I., Gonzales, S.M., Marinaro, J., Timm, T.C., Kalishman, S. and Crandall, C.S., “Do Medical Students Understand Brain Death? A Survey Study,” Journal of Surgical Education, Vol.23, pp.320-325(2012).
27. Watson, R.T., Pitt, L.F. and Kavan, C.B., “Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case studies,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.22, pp.61-79(1998).
28. Westhead, P., Storey, D.J. and Martin, F., “Outcomes reported by students who participated in the 1994 Shell Technology Enterprise Programme,” Entrepreneurship & Regional development, Vol.13, pp.163-158(2001).
29. Wetzstein, M.E., Broder, J.M. and Wilson, G., “Bayesian Inference and Student Evaluations of Teachers and Courses,” Journal of economic education, Vol.15, pp.40-45(1984).
30. Xu, H. and Koronios, A., “Understanding Information Quality In E-Business,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol.45, pp.73-82(2005).
31. Yamarik, S., “Does Cooperative Learning Improve Student Learning Outcomes?,” Journal of Economic Education, Vol.38, pp.259-277(2007).
32. Yen, D.C., Chen, H.G., Lee, S. and Koh, S., “Differences in perception of IS knowledge and skills between academia and industry findings from Taiwan,” International Journal of Information Management, Vol.23, pp.507-522(2003).

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2017/06/18 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE