在目前多變的資訊科技環境中，企業經營充滿著未知的變數和速度的考驗，為了因應環境快速變化所帶來的衝擊，如何提升組織的敏捷性，是企業求生存和求發展的重要課題。
新創企業和中、小型企業發展過程中因資源限制和困乏，需更重視資源策略和改變資源的思維，重新審視企業資源環境，利用和整合手邊資源(如：原有關係網絡、核心能力等)，以別人認為無用的資源中創造新的價值或以手邊資源換取新能力或新資源，以補本身資源的不足。
本研究從資源拼湊的三大特性（包含手邊的資源、整合資源用於新的目的與將就）探討在企業發展過程中，因資源限制和困乏，如何利用手邊的資源以無成本或低成本方式交換新資源和創造新能力。本研究以一家資訊服務廠商作為個案研究對象，透過深度訪談的資料整理與本研究者的参與觀察，分析與觀察企業的發展歷程，本研究發現個案公司，各階段利用手邊資源拼湊新資源和新能力時，皆以雙贏為基礎，在展現或驗證核心能力後，形成雙方需求互補性的關係，而建立協同運作模式，而開發出新資源與新能力，進而達到組織的敏捷性，此模式可供其他組織對於發展組織敏捷性參考。

In the changing IT environment, business operation is facing the test of uncertainties and instant reactions. In order to re-act the impacts accompanied with unpredictable environment, the agile organization is the key to survive and thrive for business.
Startups and small sized of enterprises are lack of resources in their developing process. They have to pay attention to think the strategy and substitution for resources. Integrating the possessed resources which are considered useless by others can evolve new value to supplement the lack of resource themselves.
The Resources at hand, Combination of resources for new purposes and Making do are three factors in resource pastiche. We will leverage these three factors to discuss how the business lack of resource through cost free or low cost integrates its possessed resources to create or change new resources in its developing process. We select one IT service company as the subject in this thesis. By in-depth interviewing and participant observation, we analyze the company and find out this company uses win-win strategy step by step to transform its possessed resources into new resources and capabilities. When core capabilities are under tested and verified, they will complement each other and found new cooperative model. These outcomes not only make this company agilely but provide concepts to other organizations who would like to develop agile structures.

中文部分
1.莊衍松，「軟體業沒希望！–台灣亟待痛定思痛。施振榮：40年來產值還非常小–一堆軟體公司賺不到錢」，(2004)，電子時報。
2.嚴祥鸞，「參與觀察法」，胡幼慧主編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：巨流 (1996) 。
3.吳思華，策略九說，臉譜文化出版社（1996）
4.司徒達賢，「資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告(1995)。
5.游麗馨，『科技創業過程之多重適配模式研究－以意藍為例』，碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所，臺北(2009)。
6.葉立宸，資訊系統統包方案協同治理－以台北捷運公司為例，未出版碩士論文(2009)
7.周和榮，『敏捷企業理論研究綜述』，中國科技論壇，第九期(2007)
8.林志明,,以設計科學角度探索知識管理系統開發: 以MIC為例，未出版碩士論文(2010)
9.程文郁，「以質性研究方法探討消費者選擇行動電話服務業者之行為」，碩士論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系 (2002)。
10.文崇一、李亦園、楊國樞、吳聰賢，「社會及行為科學研究法」，台北：東華(1978)
11.吳重禮、楊樹源，「台灣地區縣市層級『分立政府』與『一致政府』之比較：以新竹縣市與嘉義縣市為例」，人文及社會科學集刊，13 卷3 期，頁251-305(2001)
12.陳菁雯、葉銘元、許文柏、陳義彥譯，「政治學方法論」，David Marsh，Gerry Stoker 著，台北：韋柏文化(1998)。
13.王文科，「教育研究法」，台北：五南(2000)
14.陳意文，創新產品的資源拼湊與價值實現之研究：採新資源基礎觀點之定性與定量分析(2009)。

英文部分
1.Aaker, D. A.. Managing assets and skill the key to a sustainable competitive advantage. California Management Review, Winter, pp. 91-106. (1989)
2.Aoki H., Yamazaki H., Yoshino T. and Akagi T.,“Effects of static magnetic fields on membrane permeability of a cultured cell line”, Research Communications in Chemical Pathology and Pharmacology 69 (1), pp.103- 106,(1990)
3.Baker,Ted and Nelson,R.E. Creating Something from Nothing:Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly,50(2005):329-366(2005).
4.Barney JB.. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99–120(1991).
5.Bessant, J., Brown, S., Francis, D., Meredith, S. and Kaplinsky, R. “Developing Manufacturing Agility in SMEs,” International Journal of Technology Management (22), pp: 28-52 (2001)
6.Bogdewic, S.P.. Participant observation. In B. F. Crabtree＆W. L. Miller, Doing Qualitative research, Newbury Park, pp.45-69(1992)
7.Baker, T., A. Miner, and D. Eesley "Improvising firms: Bricolage,retrospective interpretation and improvisational competenciesin the founding process." Research Policy,32: 255-276 (2003) .
8.Collis, D. J.. A Resource-Based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings ( 1991)
9.Devor, R., Graves, R.and Mills, J. “Agile Manufacturing Research: Accomplishments and Opportunities, ” IIE Transactions, pp:813-823(1997)
10.Levi-Strauss,C.. The savage Mind. Chicago:University of ChicagePress (1967) .
11.Lanzara, G. F. "Between transient constructs and persistent structures:Designing systems In action." Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8:331-349 (1999).
12.Lau, R. S. M. and Hurley, N. M. “Creating Agile Supply Chains for Competitive Advantage,” South Dakota Business Review (60:1), pp:1-5(2001)
13.Krotov, V. and Junglas, I. “Mobile technology as an enabler of organizational agility,” in: International Conference on Management of Mobile Business, Copenhagen, Denmark (page 20).Washington, DC: IEEE-CS Press.( 2006).
14.Grant RM.. The resource-base theory of competitive advantage: mplications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3):114-135.( 1991)
15.Gay, L. R., Education research：Competencies for analysis and application, 4th Ed., New York：Merrill, pp.235-236 (1992)
16.Nagel, R. and Dove, R. “21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy: An Industry Led View of Agile Manufacturing,” Iacocca Institute, Lehigh University, Volumes I and II,(1991)
17.Henderson Rebecca M. & Kim.B.Clark., “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, No.35 (March), pp. 9-30(1990)
18.Penrose, E.. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press: New York. (1959)
19.Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., “Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques”, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA (1990)
20.Tomer, J. F.. Organizational capital: The path to higher productivity and well-being. New York: Praeger (1987).
21.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A, “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:7, pp. 509-533. (1997)
22.Thompson C. B., & Walker, B. L., "Basics of Research (Part 12): Qualitative Research," Air medical journal, Vol.17, Iss.2 , pp.65-70 (1998)
23.Miner, A. S., P. Bassoff, and C.Moorman "Organizational Improvisation and learning: A field study."Administrative Science Quarterly,46: 304-337( 2001).
24.Wernerfelt, Birger, “A Resource-based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171-180 (1984).
25.Yin, R. “Case Study Research: Design and Methods （2nd ed.）”,Sage publication, (1994)

網站部分
1.聯銓資訊。(2010)
http://www.lcnet.com.tw
2.Ithome/李延華(2009/2)。宅經濟來臨，RIA網站應用趁勢起飛http://www.ithome.com.tw/itadm/article.php?c=53451
3.薛如珊。商業智慧的十八年。台灣IDC。(2007)
http://www.idc.com.tw
4.行政院主計處，95年工商及服務業普查，(2008)，資料來源
http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=532&ctNode=542。