本研究主旨在探討大學生閱讀社會性科學議題時，認知風格與情緒對於他們道德判斷之影響。本研究目的為：一、探討認知風格與情緒對於道德判斷之關係。二、探討在閱讀並進行道德判斷的思考過程中，反應時間的情況為何。三、探討在閱讀並進行道德判斷的思考過程中，凝視區域的分布情況為何。在本研究中認知風格指的是一個人偏向場獨立或場依賴類型。外在因素為外在敘述中的情緒字眼，以引起人們對於一件事情或情況的直覺性感受，分為正向情緒和負向情緒。
本研究透過使用滑鼠追蹤系統，閱讀農業，食品，環境和醫藥四種不同主題的社會科學議題，以道德判斷測驗作為研究工具，在測驗中給予受試者涉及道德判斷的句型來做辨別，調查164人的道德判斷結果與57人的反應時間以及凝視區域。綜合整體研究，結果顯示：（1）不同認知風格的大學生在道德判斷的過程中，道德判斷的結果與反應時間並沒有達到顯著差異。但所有學生都會受到不同議題主題或情緒題目的影響，但與認知風格無關。（2）在進行社會性科學議題的道德判斷時，在醫藥類主題較長，環境類主題花費的反應時間較短。議題主題熟悉度可能會影響反應時間的長短。（3）在進行社會性科學議題的道德判斷時，題目帶有情緒文句的凝視區域得到較多的凝視時間。

This study aims to unravel the relationship between cognitive style, emotional valence, and moral judgment while reading socio-scientific issues. This study also investigates the cognitive process of users by examining the reaction time and fixation around specified areas of interest. The cognitive style used in this study is the field dependent-independent style, because it shows how people are affected by external cues. The emotional valences embedded in the socio-scientific issues are broken down into positive and negative valence.
The reaction time and fixation are measured by a mouse tracking system. The socio-scientific scenarios include four different topics: agriculture, food, environment, and medicine. The participants read each scenario and rate it as moral, non-moral, or immoral. Of the 164 participants, 57 of them volunteered to do the moral test on computers with the mouse tracking system. Results indicate cognitive style has no effect on moral judgement or reaction time. All students are affected by the emotional valence of each scenario. The topic of scenario also affects the reaction time, as medical questions take the longest, while environmental questions are the shortest. Further analysis does find a significant portion of attention to the text containing emotional valence.

參考文獻
一、中文部分
林明錚（1999）。認知型態對國小學生在資訊擷取能力、空間能力影響之探索研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所，碩士論文，未出版。
劉湘瑤, 李麗菁, & 蔡今中（2007）。科學認識觀與社會性科學議題抉擇判斷之相關性探討。科學教育學刊，15（3），335-356。
靳知勤, 楊惟程, & 段曉林（2010）。國小學童的非形式推理之研究–以生物複製議題之引導式論證為例。課程與教學季刊，13（1），209-232。
教育部（2011）。97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要（一百學年度實施）。2012年3月27日上網取自http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326。
翁福元（2015）。教育政策社會學：教育政策與當代社會思潮之對話。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
 
二、英文部分
AAAS科學素養指標(2008年新版線上)：
http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/index.php?home=true
Agle, B. R., Hart, D. W., Thompson, J., & Hendricks, H. M. (Eds.). (2014). Research companion to ethical behavior in organizations: Constructs and measures. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Allport, G. W.(1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
Arroyo, E., Selker, T., & Wei, W.(2006, April). Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks. Extended Abstracts of CHI'06, ACM, 484-489.
Avramova, Y. R., & Inbar, Y. (2013). Emotion and moral judgment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(2), 169-178.
Aylward, J., & Robinson, O.(2016). Towards an emotional stress test: A reliable, non-subjective cognitive measure of anxious responding. bioRxiv, 2-19.
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(1), 104-128.
Bertini, M. (1986). Some implications of field dependence for education. In M. Bertini, L. Pizzamiglio, & S. Wapner (Eds.), Field Dependence in Psychological Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 93–106), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bi, X., & Yang, Z. (2016). Embodied effect occurs in the early phase of emotional cognitive processes. Advances in Psychology 6(5), 576-587.
Birch, A., & Hayward, S. (1994). Individual differences. The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Bloomberg, M., & Soneson, S. (1976). Effects of locus of control and field dependence-independence on moral reasoning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 128(1), 59-66.
Chang, W. H., & Tsai, C. W. (2016). College students' moral judgment about socio-scientific issues- An fMRI study. Paper presented at the 2016 Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education, Tokyo, Japan.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215-224.
Chen, M. C., Anderson, J. R., & Sohn, M. H. (2001, March). What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. In CHI'01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 281-282). ACM.
Cheng, Y. J. (1996). Embedded Figure Test- Validated Chinese version. Department of Biology, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa Jr, T. R. (2014). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Coco, M. I., & Duran, N. D. (2016). When expectancies collide: Action dynamics reveal the interaction between stimulus plausibility and congruency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(66), 1-12.
Collette, A. T. & Chiappetta, E. L. (1989). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. (2th ed.), London: Merrill Publishing Company.
Dawson, V. (2007). An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students' understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 59-73.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York, Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue.
de Haan, G. (2010). The development of ESD - related competencies in supportive institutional frameworks. International Review of Education, 56(2), 315 - 328.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Rucker, D. D., Wegener, D. T., & Braverman, J. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 43.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Drowatzky, J. N. (1975). Motor learning principles and practice. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Burgess Publishing Company.
Entwistle, N. J. (1985). Cognitive style and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol.2) New York: Pergamon Press.
Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296.
Freeman, J., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(59), 1-6.
Gibbs, J. C., Clark, P. M., Joseph, J. A., Green, J. L., Goodrick, T. S., & Makowski, D. G. (1986). Relations between moral judgment, moral courage, and field independence. Child Development, 57(1) 185-193.
Goodenough,D.R. (1986) .History of the field dependence construct .In M. Bertini ,L.Pissamiglio & S. Wapner ( Eds.) .Field Dependence in Psychological Theory ,Research , and Application . New Jersey , Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Green, KE. (1985). Cognitive style: A review of the literature. Chicago, IL, Johnson O’Connor Research Foundation, Human Engineering Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 289 902): 38.
Green, P., & Bowden, J. A. (2015). Moral compass framework: Individual and collective decision-making in some complex doctoral education scenarios. International Journal for Researcher Development, 6(1), 9-23.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108.
Greene, J., & Haidt, J.(2002).How(and where) does moral judgment work?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517-523.
Guildford, J. P. (1980), Cognitive styles: What are they? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 715-735.
Guisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F., Tinajero, C., & Almeida, L. S. (2007). Field dependence independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema, 19(4), 572–577.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.
Hehman, E., Stolier, R. M., & Freeman, J. B. (2015). Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(3), 384-401.
Hergovich, A. (2003). Field dependence, suggestibility and belief in paranormal phenomena. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(2), 195-209.
Hibbeln, M., Jenkins, J. L., Schneider, C., Valacich, J. S., & Weinmann, M. (2017). HOW IS YOUR USER FEELING? INFERRING EMOTION THROUGH HUMAN–COMPUTER INTERACTION DEVICES. MIS Quarterly, 41(1).
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 963.
Horne, Z., & Powell, D. (2016). How large is the role of emotion in judgments of moral dilemmas?. PloS one, 11(7), 1-19.
Huang, J., White, R., & Buscher, G. (2012). User see, user point: Gaze and cursor alignment in web search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1341-1350). New York, NY: ACM.
Jeong, S. Y., & Kim, C. H. (2015). Comparing the Ethical Knowledge, Ethical Values and Class Satisfaction by Students' Cognitive Style to Develope the Convergent Nursing Ethic Class. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(11), 205-216.
Jime´nez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171-1190.
Johnson, A., Mulder, B., Sijbinga, A., & Hulsebos, L. (2012). Action as a window to perception: measuring attention with mouse movements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 802-809.
Palmquist, R. A., & Kim, K. S. (2000). Cognitive style and on‐line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 558-566.
Kleinginna Jr, P. R., &Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(4), 345-379.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310.
Kolsto, S. D. (2001b). 'To trust or not to trust,…'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877-901.
Koop, G. J., & Johnson, J. G. (2011). Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 750-758.
Korchin, S. J. (1986). Field dependence, personality theory, and clinical research. In M. Bertini, L. Pizzamiglio, & S. Wapner (Eds.), Field dependence in psychological theory, research, and application: Two symposia in memory of Herman A. Witkin (pp. 45-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio‐scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201-1224.
Lin, W. Y., Chiu, T. Y., & Chang, W. H. (2013). Writing to argue in socioscientific issues instruction. Poster presented at the 3rd Biennial Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education, Hong Kong.
Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Soriano, M. F. (2006). Memoria operativa y control ejecutivo: procesos inhibitorios en tarea de actualización y generación aleatoria. Psicothema, 18(1), 112–116.
Magill, R.A. (1993). Motor learning: Concepts and applications (4th ed.). Madison, WI: Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc.
Magnuson, J. S. (2005). Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29), 9995-9996.
Mancas, M., & Ferrera, V. P. (2016). How to Measure Attention?. In From Human Attention to Computational Attention (pp. 21-38). Springer New York.
Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S. Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning (pp. 4–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74.
Morgan, H. (1997). Cognitive styles and classroom learning. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Navalpakkam, V., & Churchill, E. (2012, May). Mouse tracking: measuring and predicting users' experience of web-based content. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2963-2972). ACM.
Neta, M., & Tong, T. T. (2016). Don’t Like What You See? Give It Time: Longer Reaction Times Associated With Increased Positive Affect. Emotion, 16(5), 730-739.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 947-967.
Olatunji, B. O., & Puncochar, B. D. (2016). Effects of disgust priming and disgust sensitivity on moral judgement. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 102-108.
Osman, M. (2015). Dynamic moral judgments and emotions. Psychology, 6(8), 922-931.
Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411-423.
Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students’ argumentation in decision making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754
Papesh, M. H., & Goldinger, S. D. (2012). Memory in motion: Movement dynamics reveal memory strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 906-913.
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(2), 148-158.
Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing more than feeling? The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30(4), 355-375.
Rajeev, P. N. (2012). Correlates of ethical intentions: A critical review of empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of International Business Ethics, 5(1), 3-17.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
Ronning, R. R., McCurdy, D., & Ballinger, R. (1984). Individual differences: A third component in problem‐solving instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(1), 71-82.
Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Koch, G., van Aalst, C., Pinto, Y., Matzke, D., & Sasiadek, A. (2015). On the automatic link between affect and tendencies to approach and avoid: Chen and Bargh (1999) revisited. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(335), 1-12.
Sadler, T. D. (2002). Socioscientific issues and the affective domain: Scientific literacy's missing link. 2002 Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Kennesaw, GA.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323-346.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4-27.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93.
Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488.
Sagaspe, P., Schwartz, S., & Vuilleumier, P. (2011). Fear and stop: a role for the amygdala in motor inhibition by emotional signals. Neuroimage, 55(4), 1825-1835.
Satterly, D. J. (1985). Cognitive style. In T.Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 2). New York: Pergamon Press.
Schachter, S. (1970). The assumption of identity and peripheralist-centralist controversies in motivation and emotion. Feelings and Emotions, 111-121.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and Learning: A behavior emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human kinetics.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8) 1096-1109.
Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Kühberger, A., & Ranyard, R. (2011). The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 733-739.
Smith, P. L. (1984). Cognitive Styles Research: Implications for Instructional Design? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Dalas, TX, Jan 20-24,1984).
Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 903-927.
Sutcliffe, A., & Namoun, A. (2012). Predicting user attention in complex web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(7), 679-695.
Szekely, R. D., & Miu, A. C. (2015). Incidental emotions in moral dilemmas: The influence of emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 64-75.
Teper, R., Zhong, C. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2015). How emotions shape moral behavior: Some answers(and questions)for the field of moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(1), 1-14.
Tiedemann, R. (1989). Graft union development and symplastic phloem contact in the heterograft Cucumis sativus on Cucurbita ficifolia. Journal of Plant Physiology, 134(4), 427-440.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973.
Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-617.
Watson, J. A. (2015). Indecisiveness: measuring individual differences with mouse tracking software (thesis). Ball State University, Indiana, United States.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1976). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. ETS Research Report Series, 1976(1).
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R (1977a). Field dependence revisited (ETS RB 77-16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977b). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive Styles Essence and Origins: Field Dependence and Field Independence, Psychological Issues 51,New York: International Universities Press.
Yamamoto, N., Incera, S., & McLennan, C. T. (2016). A reverse Stroop task with mouse tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(630), 1-12.
Zhang, L. F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? — Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 1295–1311.
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 342-367.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377.
Zelniker, T. (1989). Cognitive style and dimensions of information processing. Cognitive style and Cognitive Development, 172-191.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.