本研究以個人任職筆記型電腦公司並且有相關市場、科技、運籌策略管理模式經驗，此篇論文是探討筆記型電腦供應商以核心優勢和OEM/ODM客戶關係以及與供應商彼此之間的相互關係、探討在未來發展新產品建言。
筆記型電腦代工產業的競爭優勢取決重要因素之一就是核心技術，以既有經驗配合價值創新，如此才能提升企業競爭優勢。目前，台灣筆記型電腦製造廠商已全部移到大陸，其中十大廠商中有八家落戶長江三角，在產能供過於求狀態下，毛利率是逐漸下滑，因而為企業長期發展，必須要用策略管理模式、善用既有產品開發優勢和經驗，整合與筆記型電腦相關產業IT新產品和市場技術，是筆記型電腦企業近年來營運發展重要Business Model模式。
LCD( Liquid Crystal Display)是台灣近年來光電產業中最重要的一項產業，筆記型電腦需要大量的液晶面板及其它原物料，於是類似相關液晶面板(LCD)新產品( TFT LCD TV, Low Cost NB, UMPC) 與原來筆記型電腦生產、製造、採購、維修和技術經驗又有密不可分關係、又可以帶動臺灣液晶面板的生產與出口，一切分析，對筆記型電腦只有加乘效果。
另一方面，世界上有誰是比臺灣是更好的工廠建造者和管理者？臺灣過去幾十年先是在傳統製造業上，後來是在資訊產品製造業上，都為全世界扮演成本效率最高的提供者；現在，臺灣人把工廠建在大陸，臺灣企業對世界的影響力是與日俱增的。
臺灣的筆記型電腦工業是很好的一個啟示，如果臺灣原有的製造生產管理技術，適當結合中國大陸的土地、人力資源，臺灣在國際上的競爭力會明顯地提高，而其他擁有相同製造管理技術的國家社會，論地緣的關係、論傳統文化的了解，是很難和臺灣爭取同樣的優勢的。
台灣電腦科技和TFT LCD科技產業從萌芽到成為全球數位產品發展重鎮，從早期的生產製造到現在積極邁入設計研發及品牌行銷的過程，配合台灣產業的升級與轉型，在台灣的電腦和TFT LCD營運項目中，也由業務行銷拓展到技術支援及研發創新的領域，對台灣電腦和TFT LCD產業的製造廠更具有競爭優勢與未來實際的延伸發展。
利用台灣電腦科技優勢來觀察和規劃全球需求數位市場，並善用快速進入量產經濟規模，在預期產業成長下的螢幕文化，台灣傳統電視大廠與PC廠商相繼投入液晶數位產業，然PC與TFTLCD產品、架構、市場畢竟有所相同，原PC產業的IT廠商，在現在及未來一定會跨入液晶螢幕文化領域中，如同在PC產業般順利透過低成本策略，良好運籌機制、開發優勢及技術升級，贏得傲視全球之成果。

The purpose of the research is to generate valuable suggestions that can be applied in managing the relationship among Notebook PC manufacturer’s core compete; customers and components/parts supplier. The study built the foundation on case company’s market related factors; technology level and logistics strategy to sketch the business model that is suitable for future development.
One of the competitive advantages in Notebook PC OEM/ODM industry is core technology, and it can be valued the innovation associated capabilities.
At current stage, All Taiwan based Notebook PC manufacturers migrated to China and eight out of ten are located in east China area. Due to the fact of over supply business environment, profitability is under strong pressure, therefore, in view of long term development, strategy management model; make the best use of experience and advantage; integration of Notebook PC production and associated industries is the business model critically important for this industry.
The performance in traditional manufacturing shows Taiwan manufacturers are extremely cost effective and it applies again to today’s IT industry as well. The competitive advantages that are consisted by Taiwan manufacturers’ core competences, competitive land and HR costs in China, its will be definitely strengthened Taiwan manufacturers’ competitiveness in the business world.
As a result of continuously efforts devoted by IT and LCD manufacturers, the business model has been successfully transforming from OEM production to R&D and brand marketing. Without pounding too long in that level, Taiwan manufacturers are marching toward the level which enables them to secure the foothold in system supporting and technology innovation field. Looking back on the path that IT industry went through, it is obvious that the methodology will, to some extend, recurrent in digital product market. Cost leadership strategy; outstanding logistics mechanism; R&D capability and technology innovation will lead the way to another success in this industry.

中文資料：
1. 信音企業股份有限公司公開說明書。民國95年
2. 昇貿科技股份有限公司公開說明書。民國93、94年

英文資料：
1. Adner, Ron (2006) ，”Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem”， Harvard Business Review，vol.84, No4，pp.98-107
2. Anthony, Scott D. ，Eyring, Matt & Gibson ,Lib (2006)，” Mapping Your Innovation Strategy”， Harvard Business Review， vol.84, No5，pp.104-113
3. Andrew, James P. ， Sirkin, Harold L. (2003)，” Innovating for Cash”， Harvard Business Review，vol.81, No9，pp.76-83
4. Andrew Hargadon, Robert I. Sutton (2000), “Building an Innovation Factory”, Harvard Business Review on Innovation.
5. Eric Von Hippel, Stefan Thomke, Mary Sonnack (1999), “Creating Breakthroughs at 3M”, Harvard Business Review on Innovation
6. Fernando Suarez（2005），“The Half-Truth of First-Mover Advantage”, Harvard Business Review (April 2005)
7. Drucker, Peter (2002)，”The Discipline of Innovation”，Harvard Business Review，vol.80, No8，pp.95-103
8. Gary Hamel (2006), “The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation”, Harvard Business Review (February 2006)
9. “Game Issue Report”，Korea IT Industry Promotion Agency(KIPA)，Serial Number 21，March 2005
10. Govindarajan , Vijay ， Trimble, Chris (2005)，”Building Breakthrough Businesses Within Established Organizations” ，Harvard Business Review，vol.83, No5，pp.58-68
11. Geoffrey A.Moore（2004）“The old Innovation Stategy”, Harvard Business Review (August 2004)
12. Hammer, Michael (2004)，”Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company” ，Harvard Business Review，vol.82, No3，pp.84-93
13. http://www.innocentive.com/
14. http://www.ninesigma.com/
15. http://www.yet2.com/
16. http://www.yourencore.com/
17. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss (2006)，”Innovation: The Classic Traps “，Harvard Business Review，vol.84, No11，pp.72-83
18. Kim , W. Chan & Mauborgne, Renee (1999)，“Creating New Market Space”,，Harvard Business Review，vol.77, No1，pp.83-93
19. Kim, W. Chan & Mauborgne, Rene (2000)，“Knowing a Winning Business Idea When You See One”，Harvard Business Review，vol.77, No5，pp.129-138
20. Kim, W. Chan & Mauborgne, Rene (2004)，Blue Ocean Strategy，Harvard Business Review Article，vol.82, No10，pp.76-84
21. Larry Huston, Nabil Sakkab (2006), “Connect and Develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation”, Harvard Business Review (March 2006)
22. Laurie , Donald L. ， Dos, Yves L. & Sheer, Claude P. (2006)，” Creating New Growth Platforms”， Harvard Business Review，vol.84, No5，pp.80-90.
23. Lencioni, Patrick M. (2002)，”Make Your Values Mean Something” ，Harvard Business Review，vol.80, No7，pp.113-117
24. Magidson, Jason ， Brandyberry, Gregg (2001)，”Putting Customers in the "Wish Mode" ”， Harvard Business Review，vol.79, No8，pp.26-26
25. Moore, Geoffrey A. (2004)；”Darwin and the Demon: Innovating Within Established Enterprises”， Harvard Business Review，vol.82, No7/8，pp.86-92
26. Narayandas, Das (2005)，”Building Loyalty in Business Markets”， Harvard Business Review，vol.83, No9，pp.131-139
27. Philip Kotler (2003), A Frame Work for Marketing Management, Second Edition.
28. Quan, Daniel (2004)，”Online Game Market in China Analysis & Prospect”，KIPA，October 2004
29. Roberts, Morgan (2005)，”A Study of The Massively Mupltiplayer Online Business Model Within The Interactive Entertainment Industry”，San Francisco State University，December 2005
30. Robert F. Bruner, Joseph R. Perella (Foreword by)(2004), Applied Mergers and AcquisitionsPhilip
31. Selden , Larry ， MacMillan, Ian C. (2006)，”Manage Customer-Centric Innovation -- Systematically”，Harvard Business Review，vol.84, No4，pp.108-116
32. Thomke, Stefan , Hippel , Eric Von (2002)，”Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value”，Harvard Business Review，vol.80, No4，pp.74-81
33. W. Chan Kim, Renee Mauborgne (1997), “Value Innovation: The Strategic Logic of Hih Growth”, Harvard Business Review on Strategies for Growth.
34. Ulwick, Anthony W. (2002)，” Turn Customer Input into Innovation”， Harvard Business Review，vol.80, No1，pp.91-97.
35. Wolpert, John D. (2002)，”Breaking Out of the Innovation Box”，Harvard Business Review， vol.80, No8，pp.77-83
36. Zook ,Chris & Allen , James (2003)，” Growth Outside the Core”， Harvard Business Review，vol.81, No12，pp.66-73