研究生: |
彭鈺婷 Yu-Ting Peng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
利用石墨烯轉移層直接成長二硫化鉬異質結構應用於光催化二氧化碳還原 Direct Growth of MoS2 on Graphene via Transfer Supporting Layer for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction |
指導教授: |
王丞浩
Chen-Hao Wang 林麗瓊 Li-Chyong Chen 陳貴賢 Kuei-Hsien Chen |
口試委員: |
王丞浩
林麗瓊 陳貴賢 黃炳照 林昇佃 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工程學院 - 材料科學與工程系 Department of Materials Science and Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 83 |
中文關鍵詞: | 化學氣相沉積法 、石墨烯 、二硫化鉬 、異質結構 、光催化二氧化碳還原 |
外文關鍵詞: | CVD, graphene, MoS2, heterostructure, photocatalytic CO2RR |
相關次數: | 點閱:281 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以化學氣相沉積法,合成高品質石墨烯薄膜,並成功藉由石墨烯轉移支撐層作為鉬前驅物,直接成長二硫化鉬於石墨烯上,形成異質結構,應用於光催化二氧化碳還原。此成長方式和粉末作為前驅物的方法相比,因為不需要去除支撐層,除了能減少製程的步驟與時間,更可有效地避免粉末前驅物不易成核於石墨烯上的問題。經由拉曼光譜儀鑑定,光譜顯示出石墨烯及二硫化鉬之特徵峰,證實二硫化鉬/石墨烯異質結構成功被合成。
本研究分別以1 mM、2.5 mM以及5 mM三種不同濃度的前驅物,合成二硫化鉬/石墨烯異質結構。透過原子力顯微鏡檢測異質結構之厚度,觀測到二硫化鉬厚度約為一至三層。藉由X射線光電子能譜分析,比較鉬原子峰值位置,顯示異質結構往低束縛能位移,表示有電子轉移至鉬原子端,證實有電子轉移之機制。
此外,本研究亦探討異質結構對於光催化二氧化碳效率的提升。三種濃度所合成之異質結構,在產物的選擇性發生改變,其原因可能來自於二硫化鉬層數之改變。量子轉換效率於濃度2.5 mM與5 mM分別提高二倍及四倍,其效率提升之原因可能來自於石墨烯/二硫化鉬異質結構,降低二硫化鉬載子複合率,幫助電子電洞分離,達到提高催化活性之目的。
In this research, we achieved direct growth of MoS2/graphene heterostructure via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method as photocatalyst for photocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction (CO2RR) by utilizing graphene transfer supporting layer as molybdenum precursor. Compared to conventional powder-based CVD growth method, this method could simplify manufacturing steps and effectively solve the difficulties of powder precursor nucleating on graphene. Raman spectra of synthesized thin film clearly show the characteristic peaks of graphene and MoS2, indicating the successful synthesis of MoS2/graphene heterostructure.
In this study, 1 mM, 2.5 mM and 5 mM precursors concentration are used to synthesize MoS2/graphene heterostructure, respectively. By AFM analysis, we could observe that the thickness of MoS2 vary from monolayer to tri-layer. In XPS spectra, we noticed that the MoS2/graphene heterostructure Mo peaks shifted to lower binding energy compared with pure MoS2. The shift could assign to charge transfer to molybdenum atom. Moreover, We found that the CO2RR selectivity of products changed when precursor of different concentration was utilized. This result might result from the changes of number of layers of MoS2. Quantum efficiency of CO2RR doubled and quadrupled while using 2.5 mM and 5 mM precursor, respectively. The improvement of efficiency might be attributed to the heterostructure could facilitate the separation of excited electron-hole pair, which could reduce the possibility of carrier recombination and enhance photocatalytic activity.
1. Shen, H., et al., Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 by Metal‐Free‐Based Materials: Recent Advances and Future Perspective. Solar RRL, 2020. 4(8).
2. Shehzad, N., et al., A critical review on TiO2 based photocatalytic CO2 reduction system: Strategies to improve efficiency. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2018. 26: p. 98-122.
3. Bushuyev, O.S., et al., What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule, 2018. 2(5): p. 825-832.
4. Shit, S.C., et al., Integrated nano-architectured photocatalysts for photochemical CO 2 reduction. Nanoscale, 2020. 12(46): p. 23301-23332.
5. Ola, O. and M.M. Maroto-Valer, Review of material design and reactor engineering on TiO2 photocatalysis for CO2 reduction. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, 2015. 24: p. 16-42.
6. Huang, Y.-F., et al., Thickness-Dependent Photocatalysis of Ultra-Thin MoS2 Film for Visible-Light-Driven CO2 Reduction. Catalysts, 2021. 11(11): p. 1295.
7. Swain, G., S. Sultana, and K. Parida, A review on vertical and lateral heterostructures of semiconducting 2D-MoS2 with other 2D materials: a feasible perspective for energy conversion. Nanoscale, 2021. 13(22): p. 9908-9944.
8. Yang, M.-Q. and Y.-J. Xu, Photocatalytic conversion of CO 2 over graphene-based composites: current status and future perspective. Nanoscale Horizons, 2016. 1(3): p. 185-200.
9. Xiang, Q., B. Cheng, and J. Yu, Graphene‐based photocatalysts for solar‐fuel generation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015. 54(39): p. 11350-11366.
10. Fujishima, A. and K. Honda, Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature, 1972. 238(5358): p. 37-38.
11. Halmann, M., Photoelectrochemical reduction of aqueous carbon dioxide on p-type gallium phosphide in liquid junction solar cells. Nature, 1978. 275(5676): p. 115-116.
12. Sun, Z., et al., g-C3N4 based composite photocatalysts for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Catalysis Today, 2018. 300: p. 160-172.
13. Xie, S., et al., Photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2 using heterogeneous catalysts with controlled nanostructures. Chem Commun (Camb), 2016. 52(1): p. 35-59.
14. Liu, L., et al., Surface sites engineering on semiconductors to boost photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nano Energy, 2020. 75.
15. Curtiss, L.A., et al., Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of enthalpies of formation. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1997. 106(3): p. 1063-1079.
16. Alvarez, A., et al., CO2 Activation over Catalytic Surfaces. Chemphyschem, 2017. 18(22): p. 3135-3141.
17. Fu, J., et al., Product selectivity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. Materials Today, 2020. 32: p. 222-243.
18. Dou, W., et al., Time-Domain Ab Initio Insights into the Reduced Nonradiative Electron–Hole Recombination in ReSe2/MoS2 van der Waals Heterostructure. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2021. 12(10): p. 2682-2690.
19. Su, Q., et al., Heterojunction Photocatalysts Based on 2D Materials: The Role of Configuration. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 2020. 4(9).
20. Novoselov, K.S. and A. Geim, The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater, 2007. 6(3): p. 183-191.
21. Zhou, Y., et al., Engineering 2D Photocatalysts toward Carbon Dioxide Reduction. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021. 11(8).
22. Ong, W.J., L.K. Putri, and A.R. Mohamed, Rational Design of Carbon-Based 2D Nanostructures for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: A Dimensionality Perspective. Chemistry, 2020. 26(44): p. 9710-9748.
23. Ganji, P., et al., Toward Commercial Carbon Dioxide Electrolysis. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 2020. 4(8).
24. Dean, C.R., et al., Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nature nanotechnology, 2010. 5(10): p. 722-726.
25. McManus, D., et al., Water-based and biocompatible 2D crystal inks for all-inkjet-printed heterostructures. Nature nanotechnology, 2017. 12(4): p. 343-350.
26. Fu, D., et al., Molecular beam epitaxy of highly crystalline monolayer molybdenum disulfide on hexagonal boron nitride. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017. 139(27): p. 9392-9400.
27. Jie, W., et al., Observation of room-temperature magnetoresistance in monolayer MoS2 by ferromagnetic gating. ACS nano, 2017. 11(7): p. 6950-6958.
28. Li, M.-Y., et al., Epitaxial growth of a monolayer WSe2-MoS2 lateral pn junction with an atomically sharp interface. Science, 2015. 349(6247): p. 524-528.
29. Zhang, Z., et al., Robust epitaxial growth of two-dimensional heterostructures, multiheterostructures, and superlattices. Science, 2017. 357(6353): p. 788-792.
30. Zhang, T. and L. Fu, Controllable Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Two-Dimensional Heterostructures. Chem, 2018. 4(4): p. 671-689.
31. Yoon, D., Y.-W. Son, and H. Cheong, Negative Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Graphene Measured by Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Letters, 2011. 11(8): p. 3227-3231.
32. Low, J., J. Yu, and W. Ho, Graphene-based photocatalysts for CO2 reduction to solar fuel. The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2015. 6(21): p. 4244-4251.
33. Li, X. and H. Zhu, Two-dimensional MoS2: Properties, preparation, and applications. Journal of Materiomics, 2015. 1(1): p. 33-44.
34. Toh, R.J., et al., 3R phase of MoS2 and WS2 outperforms the corresponding 2H phase for hydrogen evolution. Chem Commun (Camb), 2017. 53(21): p. 3054-3057.
35. Yazyev, O.V. and A. Kis, MoS 2 and semiconductors in the flatland. Materials Today, 2015. 18(1): p. 20-30.
36. Jaramillo, T.F., et al., Identification of active edge sites for electrochemical H2 evolution from MoS2 nanocatalysts. science, 2007. 317(5834): p. 100-102.
37. Wang, H., et al., Structural and electronic optimization of MoS2 edges for hydrogen evolution. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019. 141(46): p. 18578-18584.
38. Dong, N., et al., Optical limiting and theoretical modelling of layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Scientific reports, 2015. 5(1): p. 1-10.
39. Sun, L., et al., Chemical vapour deposition. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2021. 1(1): p. 1-20.
40. Siegbahn, K., Electron spectroscopy for atoms, molecules, and condensed matter. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1982. 54(3): p. 709.
41. Cho, Y.C. and S.I. Ahn, Fabricating a Raman spectrometer using an optical pickup unit and pulsed power. Scientific reports, 2020. 10(1): p. 1-8.
42. Binnig, G. and H. Rohrer, In touch with atoms, in More Things in Heaven and Earth. 1999, Springer. p. 543-554.
43. Maver, U., et al., Polymer characterization with the atomic force microscope. Polym. Sci, 2013. 4: p. 113-131.
44. Malard, L., et al., Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Physics reports, 2009. 473(5-6): p. 51-87.
45. Zhang, Z., et al., Rosin-enabled ultraclean and damage-free transfer of graphene for large-area flexible organic light-emitting diodes. Nat Commun, 2017. 8: p. 14560.
46. Hao, Q., et al., Boosting the Photoluminescence of Monolayer MoS2
on High-Density Nanodimer Arrays with Sub-10 nm Gap. Advanced Optical Materials, 2018. 6(2).
47. Goswami, T., et al., Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics of the Exciton and Trion in MoS2 Monolayers Followed by Dissociation Dynamics in Au@MoS2 2D Heterointerfaces. J Phys Chem Lett, 2019. 10(11): p. 3057-3063.
48. Kumar Singh Patel, S., et al., Synthesis of α-MoO3 nanofibers for enhanced field-emission properties. Advanced Materials Letters, 2018. 9(8): p. 585-589.
49. Eda, G., et al., Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2. Nano letters, 2011. 11(12): p. 5111-5116.
50. Golovynskyi, S., et al., Exciton and trion in few-layer MoS2: Thickness-and temperature-dependent photoluminescence. Applied Surface Science, 2020. 515: p. 146033.
51. Luo, S., et al., Investigation of growth-induced strain in monolayer MoS2 grown by chemical vapor deposition. Applied Surface Science, 2020. 508: p. 145126.
52. Huang, S., et al., Probing the interlayer coupling of twisted bilayer MoS2 using photoluminescence spectroscopy. Nano Lett, 2014. 14(10): p. 5500-8.
53. Wang, Z., Q. Chen, and J. Wang, Electronic structure of twisted bilayers of graphene/MoS2 and MoS2/MoS2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015. 119(9): p. 4752-4758.
54. Lu, C.-I., et al., Moiré-related in-gap states in a twisted MoS2/graphite heterojunction. npj 2D Materials and Applications, 2017. 1(1).