簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 阮氏芳草
NGUYEN THI PHUONG THAO
論文名稱: THE EFFECT OF M&A ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN VIETNAM BANKING SECTOR
THE EFFECT OF M&A ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN VIETNAM BANKING SECTOR
指導教授: 徐中琦
Jonchi Shyu
口試委員: 劉邦典
Pang Tien Lieu
郭啟賢
Chii-Shyan Kuo
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 40
中文關鍵詞: Merger and AcquisitionMalmquist TFPFinancial performance,Paired Sample t-test
外文關鍵詞: Merger and Acquisition, Malmquist TFP, Financial performance, Paired Sample t-test
相關次數: 點閱:241下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

This study examines the impact of M&A on the financial performance of banks
in Vietnam. The financial data of four banks namely BIDV bank, SACOM bank,
SHB bank and SCB Bank were used in this study. For the analysis of pre and
post-Merger and Acquisition performance, eleven ratios were used in the
study. The selected ratios for indicated bank over a period of six quarters
before (-6,- 5,-4,- 3,-2,- 1) and six quarters after (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) the merger
event had been announced. The Paired sample t-test analysis was used to
compare the significant difference between pre and post-M&A performance.
The overall results show that there are only three ratios witnessed the
significant difference after merger namely Revenues, Total Deposits/ Total
Assets and Total Debts/ Total Deposit. The rest eight out of eleven financial
ratios did not experience any significant difference after merger.
Furthermore, the Malmquist index TFP was used to compare the total factor
productivity between pre and post - M&A. The Malmquist TFP results point
out that M&A did not help improve the total factor productivity thanks to
expanded scale as generally believed among Vietnam Banking sector.


This study examines the impact of M&A on the financial performance of banks
in Vietnam. The financial data of four banks namely BIDV bank, SACOM bank,
SHB bank and SCB Bank were used in this study. For the analysis of pre and
post-Merger and Acquisition performance, eleven ratios were used in the
study. The selected ratios for indicated bank over a period of six quarters
before (-6,- 5,-4,- 3,-2,- 1) and six quarters after (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) the merger
event had been announced. The Paired sample t-test analysis was used to
compare the significant difference between pre and post-M&A performance.
The overall results show that there are only three ratios witnessed the
significant difference after merger namely Revenues, Total Deposits/ Total
Assets and Total Debts/ Total Deposit. The rest eight out of eleven financial
ratios did not experience any significant difference after merger.
Furthermore, the Malmquist index TFP was used to compare the total factor
productivity between pre and post - M&A. The Malmquist TFP results point
out that M&A did not help improve the total factor productivity thanks to
expanded scale as generally believed among Vietnam Banking sector.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 SCOPE OF RESEARCH........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 RESEARCH FLOWCHART ....................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................................................. 6 2.1 SYNERGY THEORY............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 THE EMPIRICAL STUDY RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 3: THE VIETNAM BANKING SECTOR AND M&A SITUATION....................................................... 9 3.1 THE VIETNAM BANKING SECTOR........................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Types of Vietnamese Banks ...................................................................................................... 9 3.2 CROSS-OWNERSHIP AMONG VIETNAM BANKING SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 12 3.3 VIETNAM BANKING MERGER AND ACQUISITION SITUATION...................................................................... 15 3.3.1 M&A deals.............................................................................................................................. 15 3.3.2 Complimentary Takeover by Vietnam State Bank .................................................................. 17 CHAPTER 4: METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................. 20 4.1 PAIRED SAMPLE T-TEST...................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.1 Hypothesis .............................................................................................................................. 22 4.2 MALMQUIST TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY INDEX (MALMQUIST TFP) ....................................................... 23 4.3 DATA COLLECTION............................................................................................................................ 24 4.4 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 5: DATA ANALYSIS & RESULTS ................................................................................................ 26 5.1 PAIRED SAMPLES T-TEST ................................................................................................................... 26 5.1.1 BIDV ........................................................................................................................................ 26 5.1.2 Sacombank ............................................................................................................................. 27 5.1.3 SCB.......................................................................................................................................... 29 5.1.4 SHB.......................................................................................................................................... 30 5.1.5 Averages Means of four bank................................................................................................. 31 5.2 MALMQUIST INDEX TFP .............................................................................................................. 33 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 36 6.1 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................... 36 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................. 37 6.3 LIMITATION AND FURTHER RESEARCH................................................................................................... 40

[1] A. Badreldin and C. Kalhoefer, “The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on
Bank Performance in Egypt,” J. Manag. Technol., no. 18, p. 15, 2009.
[2] A. Broderick, G. Hooley and K. Möller, “Competitive positioning and the
resource-based view of the firm, Journal of Strategic Marketing”, Vol. 6 (2), pp. 97-
116, 1998.
[3] A. Estache, B. T. de la Fé, and L. Trujillo, “Sources of efficiency gains in port
reform: A DEA decomposition of a Malmquist TFP index for Mexico,” Util. Policy,
vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 221–230, 2004
[4] A. Seth, “Value Creation In Acquisitions: A Re- Examination Of Performance
Issues,” Management, vol. 11, no. November 1988, pp. 99–115, 1990
[5] B.Hellgren, J. Löwstedt and A.Werr, “The reproduction of efficiency theory:
The construction of the AstraZeneca merger in the public discourse”, International
Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 6 (5), pp. 16-27 ,2011.
[6] C. P. Maquieira, W. L. Megginson, and L. Nail, “Wealth creation versus
wealth redistributions in pure stock-for-stock mergers,” J. financ. econ., vol. 48, no.
1, pp. 3–33, 1998.
[7] D.Amel, C.Barnes, F.Panetta and C.Salleo, "Consolidation and Efficiency in
the Financial Sector: A Review of the International Evidence", J. Banking Finan,
vol.28 no.10, pp.2493-2519,2004.
[8] F. Trautwein, “ Merger motives and merger prescriptions”, Strategic
Management Journal,Vol. 11, pp. 283-295, 1990.
[9] H. A. Krishnan, R. Krishnan and C. E. Lefanowicz, “Market perception of
synergies in related acquisitions”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, Vol.
8, pp. 99-119, 2009.
[10] J. Okpanachi, “Effects of Financial Products Marketing Management on
Profitability of Some Banks in Nigeria”, ABU J. Mark. Manage, vol. 1 (11), June 2006.
[11] J.M.Campa and I. Hernando, "M&As Performance in the European Financial
Industry", Journal of Banking and Financial, vol. 30, pp.3367-3392, 2006.
[12] K. P. Ramaswamy and J. F. Waegelein, “Firm financial performance
following mergers,” Rev. Quant. Financ. Account., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2003.

[13] L. T. Phuong, “Technical Efficiency of the Vietnamese Banking Sector : An
Empirical Analysis Encompassing Pre- and Post-WTO Entry,” Doctor of Philosophy
thesis, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of Wollongong,
2016.
[14] Leung, “ Banking and financial sector reforms in Vietnam”, ASEAN
Economic Bulletin, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 44-57,2009.
[15] M. Bradley, A. Desai, and E. H. Kim, “Synergistic gains from corporate
acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring
firms,” J. financ. econ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3–40, 1988.
[16] O. Olalekan, O. Adebayo,"An Analysis of the Impact of Mergers and
Acquisitions on Commercial Banks Performance in Nigeria", Research Journal of
Finance and Accounting, vol. 3 (7),pp.91-101, 2012.
[17] Q. Abbas, A. I. Hunjra, R. I. Azam, M. S. Ijaz, and M. Zahid, “Financial
performance of banks in Pakistan after Merger and Acquisition,” J. Glob. Entrep.
Res., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 13, 2014.
[18] R. G. Hubbard and D. Palia, “Understanding the Determinants of Manager
Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Firm Performance”, Journal of
Financial of Economics, vol.53, pp. 353-384, 1999.
[19] R. Kouser and I. Saba, “Effects of Business Combination on Financial
Performance: Evidence From Pakistan’S Banking Sector,” Aust. J. Bus. Manag.
Resear, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 54–64, 2011.
[20] R. M. Said, F. M. Nor, S. W. Low, and A. A. Rahman, “The efficiency effects
of mergers and Acquisitions in Malaysian banking institutions,” Asian J. Bus.
Account., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–66, 2008.
[21] S. Chatterjee, “Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of
acquisitions on merging and rival firms,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 119–
139, 1986
[22] S. Devarajappa, “Mergers in Indian Banks: A Study on Mergers of HDFC Bank
Ltd And Centurion Bank Of Punjab Ltd, International Journal of Marketing,
Financial Services & Management Research, Vol.1 (9), p33-42, 2012.
[23] T. Coelli, An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, vol. 41.
2005.

[24] T.S. Ong and P.P. Ng, “Capital Structure Before and After Merger and
Acquisition: Banking Industry in Malaysia”, International Journal of Management
Sciences and Business Research, vol. 2(1), pp. 1-22, 2013.
[25] Tu.Le, “The Efficiency Effects of Bank Mergers: An Analysis of Case Studies
in Vietnam Risk Governance & Control”, Financial Markets & Institutions, vol.7,
no.1, Winter 2017.
[26] Y. Altunbaş and D. Marqués, “Mergers and acquisitions and bank
performance in Europe: The role of strategic similarities,” J. Econ. Bus., vol. 60, no.
3, pp. 204–222, 2008.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2023/01/29 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE