簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林季瑤
Chi-Yao Lin
論文名稱: 數位導入國中家政實作課程對自我效能及學習成效之影響
The effect of technology integration in the psychomotor domain of Home Economics on junior high school students’ self-efficacy and learning performance
指導教授: 陳秀玲
Hsiu-ling Chen
口試委員: 洪煌堯
Huang-Yao Hong
翁楊絲茜
Cathy Weng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 116
中文關鍵詞: 數位導入教學電子書數位歷程記錄自我效能學習成效
外文關鍵詞: Personal technology integration into instruction, E-books, E-portfolio, Self-efficacy, Learning performance
相關次數: 點閱:477下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討數位導入家政實作課程對自我效能與學習成效之影響,進而發展出以Bandura自我效能論與Mayer多媒體學習認知理論為設計基礎之數位導入教學方案。本研究採準實驗研究法;對象為國中七年級學生,控制組143人,實驗組144人,接受為期四週的實驗教學;實驗組接受支援個人化學習之數位導入教學,2人1組使用平板電腦觀看電子書,並以網路平台進行同儕回饋及數位歷程紀錄;控制組接受傳統數位導入教學,全班1台筆記型電腦觀看電子書,使用學習單進行同儕回饋及學習歷程紀錄。兩組皆以量表問卷評估自我效能之展現,並使用基礎手縫單元作品分級評量規準評估成品;本研究亦運用開放性問答題及以教學觀察了解學生學習狀況,以充實訊息之全貌。研究結果發現:(一) 國中生接受不同的數位導入教學策略對自我效能的影響未達顯著差異;(二)具備較高先備能力之學習者擁有較高的自我效能,而個人化數位導入教學能幫助低成就學習者展現較佳的自我效能;(三)女性學習者擁有較高的自我效能,而接受個人化數位導入教學可縮小性別差異;(四) 國中生接受個人化數位導入基礎手縫單元教學後在學習成效的表現比接受傳統數位導入教學來得好;(五)具備較高先備能力之學習者亦展現較高的學習成效,而個人化數位導入教學能幫助低成就學習者展現較佳的學習成效;(六)女性學習者表現出較佳的學習成效,而接受個人化數位導入教學可縮小性別差異;(七)自我效能與學習成效成正相關。


    This study aims to explore the effects of personal technology integration into the psychomotor domain of Home Economics on students’ self-efficacy and learning performance and to further develop technology integration into curriculum based on Bandura’s self-efficacy theory and Mayer’s cognitive theory of multimedia learning.
    This study adopted the quasi-experimental design whose target subjects were seventh graders in municipal junior high school in Taipei city. A four week learning activity was conducted. A total of 143 students belonged to the control group, while other 143 students were in the experimental group. Students in the experimental group learned with the proposed personal technology integration approach in which students were paired up sharing one tablet for e-book reading and gave peer feedback via the Internet platform for collecting e-portfolio. On the other hand, students in the control group received the traditional technology integration mode in which students learned with one classroom computer for e-book reading and gave peer feedback via the worksheets for collecting learning records. While students in both groups took the self-efficacy questionnaire of psychomotor domain to evaluate self-efficacy, students’ learning performance was measured based on the ranking criteria for basic sewing skills. Open-ended questions were provided in the questionnaire to collect students’ perceptions toward technology integration learning approach. Teaching observations were also conducted to gather complete information about students’ learning situations during the learning activity.
    The research findings were as follows: There was no significant effect on self-efficacy after junior high school students received different types of technology integration into instruction for basic sewing skills;learners with better prior knowledge possessed higher degree of self-efficacy and the proposed approach was able to help low achievers gain better self-efficacy;female students had higher degree of self-efficacy and the proposed approach could shorten gender differences regarding self-efficacy;junior high school students in the experimental group showed significant improvement in learning performance compared with those using the traditional mode ;those having better prior knowledge also showed better learning performance and enabled low achievers to have better learning performance with the proposed approach;female students also had better learning performance and the proposed approach could shorten gender differences in terms of learning performance; lastly, self-efficacy and learning performance displayed positive correlation.

    中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………………………………ii 目 錄…………………………………………………………………………………………………………iii 表 目 錄……………………………………………………………………………………………………………ⅴ 圖 目 錄……………………………………………………………………………………………………………ⅶ 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………………………………………3 第三節 研究問題…………………………………………………………………………………………4 第四節 研究假設…………………………………………………………………………………………4 第五節 研究之重要性…………………………………………………………………………………5 第六節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………………………………………………6 第七節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………………………………8 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………………………………10 第一節 自我效能…………………………………………………………………………………………10 第二節 數位導入之教學面向……………………………………………………………………18 第三節 數位導入之學習面向……………………………………………………………………24 第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………………………………28 第一節 研究設計………………………………………………………………………………………28 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………………………………………………32 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………………………………………………33 第四節 研究流程與架構…………………………………………………………………………50 第五節 資料分析與處理…………………………………………………………………………52 第四章 研究結果………………………………………………………………………………………57 第一節 數位導入教學方案對自我效能的影響…………………………………57 第二節 數位導入教學方案對學習成效的影響…………………………………73 第三節 自我效能與學習成效的相關性………………………………………………91 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………………………………98 第一節 結論與討論…………………………………………………………………………………98 第二節 建議……………………………………………………………………………………………104 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………………………………106 附錄一………………………………………………………………………………………………………………112 附錄二………………………………………………………………………………………………………………113

    吳心楷、辛靜婷(2012)。數位學習研究中質性資料的管理與分析:以NVivo軟體的使用為例。載於宋曜廷 (主編),數位學習研究方法(239-269頁)。臺北市:高等教育。
    李堅萍(2006)。工藝技能學習成效與自我效能之相關性研究。藝術教育研究,12,39-64。
    周杏樺(2006)。數位導入家政教學之規劃與應用分析。菁莪季刊,18(4),40-46。
    林青肯(2013)。數位影片融入國中家政教學之成效研究---以基本手縫教學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。吳鳳科技大學,嘉義縣。
    林寶山(2005)。實用教學原理。臺北市:心理。
    社團法人中華民國資訊學會(2008)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書2008-2011。臺北市:教育部。
    邱皓政(2013)。量化研究與統計分析 (基礎版)-SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    哈瑪星科技(2013年11月24日)。SimMAGIC eBook【網站文字資料】。取自http://www.hamastar.com.tw/tw/www/CP.aspx?s=202&pa=10056&pt=產品服務
    施如意(2002)。家政專業課程網路教學發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    翁穎哲、譚克平(2008)。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育,307,15-30。
    教育部(2009)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要: 綜合活動學習領域。臺北市:教育部。
    教育部(2012)。教育施政理念與政策【pdf】。取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/
    20130109145427/10109教育施政理念與政策_上網版.pdf
    陳月娥(2010)。建構聽障生縫紉教材之研究---以台北啟聰為例(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。
    陳振宇主持(2011)。不同輸出模態下語詞產製的詞形編碼歷程:口說、打字、與寫字之跨語言比較(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC100-2410-H006-023-MY3)。臺南市:成功大學心理學系。
    陳德懷(2009)。一對一數位學習的研究。數位學習科技期刊,1(2),106-111。
    陳德懷(2011)。數位科技與台灣未來二十年教學的趨勢 How Digital Technology Changes Taiwan's Education in the Next 20 Years。前瞻科技與管理,1(1),1-13。
    湯仁燕、林葦玲(2013)。從教師鷹架到學生自主—探析交互教學中的學習責任移轉。載於洪仁進、方永泉(主編),從內變革—開創教與學的主體行動(115-141頁)。臺北市:中華教育協會。
    湯志民(2008)。未來學校: 學校建築規劃。敎育研究,165,63-80。
    楊孟欣(2013)。手工藝書籍之觸感及互動設計研究-以縫紉刺繡書為例(未出版之碩士論文)。崑山科技大學,臺南市。
    廖英美(1971)。如何促進國中縫紉教學的發展。家政教育通訊,5(3),11-12。
    蕭建華、張俊彥(2012)。介入自我效能對不同學生「自我學習評估」與「學習成效」之影響—以高一地球科學為例。科學教育月刊,352,28-34。
    簡大為、林素徽(2009)。不同性別高中職學生數學素養、焦慮、自我效能對成就影響之探討。中華民國第25屆科學教育學術研討會,532-538。
    羅綸新、齊瑮琛(2012)。多媒體教材解釋模式對文言文學習成效之影響。華語文教學研究,9(3),1-29。
    籃玉如(2012)。設計式研究方法在數位學習研究的應用。載於宋曜廷(主編),數位學習研究方法(239-269頁)。臺北市:高等教育。
    Babic, S. (2011, May). E-learning environment compared to traditional classroom. Paper presented at the MIPRO, 2011 Proceedings of the 34th International Convention.(pp. 1299-1304). IEEE.
    Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-559.
    Bandura, A. (1994). Self‐efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
    Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, Interactive, and Reflective eLearning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 181-190.
    Blahova, V., Sivy, I., Michalko, M., & Szalay, Z. (2013, Oct.). Pedagogical visions for designing future classroom with iTEC project. Paper presented at the Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), 2013 IEEE 11th International Conference on.
    Bray, B. & McClaskey, K. (n.d.). Creative Personalized Learning. Retrieved May 18,
    2014 from http://creativeeducator.tech4learning.com/2012/articles/Creative
    _Personalized_Learning
    Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of educational computing research, 12(2), 147-158.
    Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. The Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723-723.
    Chan, T. W. (2010). How East Asian classrooms may change over the next 20 years. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 28-52.
    Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
    Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational technology research and development, 42(2), 21-29.
    Connaway, L. S. (2003). Electronic books (e-Books): Current trends and future directions. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 23(1) , 13-18.
    Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131-151.
    Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e‐learning: online participation and student grades. British journal of educational technology, 36(4), 657-663.
    Fortes, P. C., & Tchantchane, A. (2010). Dealing with Large Classes: A Real Challenge. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 272-280.
    Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3), 287-299.
    Hutchins, H. M. (2004). Enhancing skill maintenance through relapse prevention strategies: A comparison of two models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.
    Lin, S.-S., & Fang, K.-T. (2008). Success factors of E-learning system based on students’ perspectives. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008. IEEM 2008. IEEE International Conference on.
    Lockyer, L., & Patterson, J. (2008, July). Integrating social networking technologies in education: a case study of a formal learning environment. Paper presentation presented at the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 529-533.
    Mahini, F., Forushan, Z. J.-A., & Haghani, F. (2012). The Importance of Teacher's Role in Technology-Based Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1614-1618.
    Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations For Learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction III: Conative and Affective Process Analyses (223-253). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Mayer. (2009). Multimedia learning: NY: Cambridge University Press.
    McIntyre, S., & Watson, K. (2011). Using Blogs for peer feedback and discussion-Case study. Retrieved January 8, 2014 from http://vm-jorum.ds.man.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/10949/14601
    McMahon, T. (2006). Teaching for more effective learning: Seven maxims for practice. Radiography, 12(1), 34-44.
    Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
    Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30.
    Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2006). Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 310-322.
    Nicolaidou, I. (2013). E-portfolios supporting primary students’ writing performance and peer feedback. Computers & Education, 68, 404-415.
    Notar, C. E., Wilson, J. D., & Montgomery, M. K. (2005). A distance learning model for teaching higher order thinking. College Student Journal, 39(1), 17-25.
    Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45(3), 255.
    Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research, 66(4), 543-578.
    Ronghuai, H., Nian-Shing, C., Myunghee, K., McKenney, S., & Churchill, D. (2013, July). The Roles of Electronic Books in the Transformation of Learning and Instruction. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on.
    Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education & Behavior, 15(2), 175-183.
    Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22(2), 208-223.
    Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Gender, self-regulation, and motivation.Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications, 339-367.
    Schwier, R. A. (1993). Interactive multimedia instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Education Technology Publication.
    Sepic, T., Pogarc, I., & Raspor, S. (2010, May). eLearning: The influence of ICT on the style of teaching. Paper presented at the MIPRO, 2010 Proceedings of the 33rd International Convention.
    Simon, S. J., & Werner, J. M. (1996). Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 648.
    Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2012). Instructional technology and media for learning (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
    Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
    Sutherland, S., & Powell, A. (2007). Cetis SIG mailing list discussions. Retrieved January 8, 2014 from http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/cetis-portfolio.html
    Wade, A., Abrami, P., & Sclater, J. (2005). An electronic portfolio to support learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 31(3). Retrieved November 18, 2013, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/94/88.
    Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 345-376.
    Wu, W.-H., Jim Wu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817-827.
    Yuen, A. H., Law, N., & Wong, K. (2003). ICT implementation and school leadership: Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 158-170.
    Zheng, R., McAlack, M., Wilmes, B., Kohler‐Evans, P., & Williamson, J. (2009). Effects of multimedia on cognitive load, self‐efficacy, and multiple rule‐based problem solving. British journal of educational technology, 40(5), 790-803.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of educational Psychology, 82(1), 51.

    QR CODE