簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蕭羽筑
Yu-Chu Hsiao
論文名稱: 我國專利發明人獲得適當報酬之實證研究
An Empirical Study of Patent Inventors Obtaining reasonable remuneration in Taiwan
指導教授: 耿筠
Keng Yun
口試委員: 蔡鴻文
HONG-WUN CAI
袁建中
JIAN-JHONG YUAN
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 應用科技學院 - 專利研究所
Graduate Institute of Patent
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 43
中文關鍵詞: 專利申請人力資本合理報酬發明人
外文關鍵詞: Patent filing, human capital, reasonable remuneration, inventor
相關次數: 點閱:207下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 企業為了提高競爭力與公司經營績效,除了從外部獲取各種資源或技術移轉
    外,對於企業內部投入之研發經費與活動亦能換取經營所需之技術性資產,其中
    包含研發人員將創新技術知識資產化之成果。曾有學者研究表示,智慧資本與創
    新能力有關,而人力資本於企業創新能力是具有關鍵性的影響力,專利申請之發
    明人,是具有技術創新能力之代表。
    在法規上,各國亦有針對發明人之研發而進行薪資補償所設立的專利制度,
    規範了雇主在發明人申請專利後應提供合理報酬,眾多學者表明員工薪酬為影響
    企業績效的重要因素,更從公司專利與薪資差距資料發現,發明創新與職位提升、
    薪資收入有關,但過去相關學者之研究幾乎都著重於研發經費的投入,而缺乏研
    發人員薪資之相關議題討論,因此本研究將以研發活動與公司經營績效、專利制
    度對於發明人的薪資補償、研發人員的激勵因素、專利成果與員工收入的關係等
    推論本研究之議題與待驗證關係之合理性。
    本研究以台灣證券交易所發行量加權股價指數之前十大產業中的非擔任主
    管職務之全時員工薪資資訊做為應變數,並使用歐洲專利檢索系統 Espacenet 取
    得上市公司之專利數為本研究之自變數,建立上市公司專利數與非主管員工平均
    薪資之相關性假說。
    本研究係使用迴歸分析法進行研究假說之檢定,研究結果顯示,台灣技術密
    集產業之專利數與非主管員工平均薪資具有正向相關性。


    In order to improve competitiveness and performance, companies may obtain
    research resources or technology transfer from external entities. Additionally,
    companies can also acquire technical assets by internal investment in research and
    development activities, which include intellectual capitalization of R&D outcomes.
    Some researches indicate that intellectual capital is related to innovation of a company,
    and specifically, human resource has critical influence over innovation of a company.
    In the meantime, inventors of patent applications are representatives of technology
    innovation.
    In aspects of law, regulations which state that employers should provide
    reasonable remuneration for inventors after patents are filed are set for salary
    compensation for inventors in many countries. Many studies have shown that
    employee salary is an important factor of business performance, and also found out that
    innovation is related to promotion and income of employees from patent and salary of
    companies. However, most of the relevant studies were focused on the investment of
    R&D activities, and lack of discussion on the salary of R&D personnel. Therefore,
    this study will discuss the relationship between R&D activities, company performance,
    the salary compensation for inventors in regulation, incentive factors of R&D personnel,
    patent application, and employee income to validate the inference of this study.
    This study takes the salary data of full-time employees in non-administrative
    positions in the top ten industries of the Taiwan Capitalization Weighted Stock Index
    as the dependent variable, the number of patents obtained from Espacenet, the patent
    search system provided by European Patent Office, as the independent variable to
    establish the correlation hypothesis between the number of patents of listed companies
    and the average salary of non-executive employees.
    In this study, regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis. The results show
    that the number of patents of technology-intensive industries in Taiwan is positively
    correlated with the average salary of non-executive employees.

    摘要 II Abstract II 致謝 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第一章 、緒論 1 第一節 、研究背景 1 第二節 、研究動機 2 第三節 、研究目的 3 第四節 、研究架構 4 第五節 、研究貢獻性 5 第二章 、文獻探討 6 第一節 、研發活動與公司經營績效 6 第二節 、研發人員的激勵因素 6 第三節 、專利成果與員工收入的關係 8 第四節 、專利制度對於發明人的薪資補償 9 第三章 、研究方法 11 第一節 、概念性架構 11 第二節 、建立假說 12 第三節 、變數定義 14 (一)、 應變數 14 (二)、 自變數 14 第四節 、收集資料 15 (一)、 樣本資料來源 15 (二)、 樣本篩選 15 (三)、 檢索流程 17 (四)、 樣本最後檢索時間 18 第五節 、資料分析方法 18 (一)、 迴歸分析 18 (二)、 迴歸分析基本統計假設 19 (三)、 迴歸分析結果判斷基準 19 第四章 、研究結果 21 第一節 、專利範圍檢索之相關性分析 21 第二節 、非技術密集產業之迴歸分析結果 26 第三節 、小節 26 第五章 、結論與建議 27 第一節 、結論與建議 27 第二節 、研究限制 27 第三節 、未來研究方向 28 參考資料 29 中文期刊論文 29 外文期刊論文 29 網頁資料 32

    中文期刊論文
    程毅豪, & 林惠文. (2006). 二階段抽樣設計下的迴歸分析: 回顧與展望. 中國統計學報, 44(1), 79-90.
    黃俊英. 企業研究方法. 中華民國99年9月第四版.
    楊通軒. (2005). 勞工創作物權益歸屬與競業禁止關係之研究. 臺大法學論叢, 34(3), 333-400.
    劉國讚 (2008年9月). 論職務發明之相當對價請求權-以日本訴訟實務為中心.智慧財產權月刊117期.
    蕭文龍. 統計分析入門與應用:SPSS中文版+SmartPLS 3(PLS-SEM)第三版. 2020年10月初版.
    外文期刊論文
    Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. (2018, May). On the returns to invention within firms: Evidence from Finland. In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. 108, pp. 208-12).
    Alessandri, T. M., & Pattit, J. M. (2014). Drivers of R&D investment: The interaction of behavioral theory and managerial incentives. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 151-158.
    Arqué-Castells, P., Cartaxo, R. M., García-Quevedo, J., & Godinho, M. M. (2016). Royalty sharing, effort and invention in universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain. Research Policy, 45(9), 1858-1872.
    Baldini, N. (2010). Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy. Technovation, 30(2), 109-116.
    Card, D., Cardoso, A. R., & Kline, P. (2016). Bargaining, sorting, and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women. The Quarterly journal of economics, 131(2), 633-686.
    Chen, C., Chen, Y., Hsu, P. H., & Podolski, E. J. (2016). Be nice to your innovators: Employee treatment and corporate innovation performance. Journal of corporate finance, 39, 78-98.
    Chu, A. C. (2010). Effects of patent policy on income and consumption inequality in a R&D growth model. Southern Economic Journal, 77(2), 336-350.
    Chu, A. C., & Cozzi, G. (2018). Effects of patents versus R&D subsidies on income inequality. Review of economic dynamics, 29, 68-84.
    Das, R. C. (2020). Interplays among R&D spending, patent and income growth: new empirical evidence from the panel of countries and groups. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 1-22.
    Depalo, D., & Di Addario, S. L. (2014). Shedding light on inventors' returns to patents. Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano Development Studies Working Paper, (375).
    Do, M. H., Thanh Tam, V., & Kim-Duc, N. (2022). Investigating intellectual capital: The role of intellectual property rights reform. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2106630.
    DO, T. T. (2020). Critical factors affecting the salaries of employees of manufacturing enterprises in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 485-494.
    Farre‐Mensa, J., Hegde, D., & Ljungqvist, A. (2020). What is a patent worth? Evidence from the US patent “lottery”. The Journal of Finance, 75(2), 639-682.
    Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Syverson, C. (2008). Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection on productivity or profitability?. American Economic Review, 98(1), 394-425.
    Giummo, J. (2010). German employee inventors’ compensation records: A window into the returns to patented inventions. Research Policy, 39(7), 969-984.
    Gloor, A. (2010). Levelling the global field: a case for mandatory employee compensation in Canadian patent law. Intellectual Property Journal, 23(1), 37.
    Hall, B. H., Thoma, G., & Torrisi, S. (2007, August). The market value of patents and R&D: Evidence from european firms. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2007, No. 1, pp. 1-6). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
    Harhoff, D., & Hoisl, K. (2007). Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity—patent value and the German Employees’ Inventions Act. Research Policy, 36(8), 1143-1162.
    Harhoff, D., & Hoisl, K. (2007). Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity—patent value and the German Employees’ Inventions Act. Research Policy, 36(8), 1143-1162.
    Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations Hillsdale. New Jersey: LEA.
    Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2014). Performance management in the public sector: Does it decrease or increase innovation and performance?. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(14), 1011-1023.
    Jäger, Simon, How Substitutable Are Workers? Evidence from Worker Deaths (January 14, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2925897 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2925897.
    Kanama, D., & Nishikawa, K. (2017). Does an extrinsic reward for R & D employees enhance innovation outcomes? Evidence from a J apanese innovation survey. R&D Management, 47(2), 198-211.
    Kerr, W. R., & Fu, S. (2008). The survey of industrial R&D—patent database link project. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(2), 173-186.
    Kline, P., Petkova, N., Williams, H., & Zidar, O. (2019). Who profits from patents? rent-sharing at innovative firms. The quarterly journal of economics, 134(3), 1343-1404.
    Kong, D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2020). Efficiency wages as gift exchange: Evidence from corporate innovation in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101725.
    Liu, C. C., & Stuart, T. (2014). Positions and rewards: The allocation of resources within a science-based entrepreneurial firm. Research Policy, 43(7), 1134-1143.
    Lu, X., Sheng, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). The influence of executive compensation incentives on R&D investment: the moderating effect of executive overconfidence. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(10), 1169-1181.
    Lui, A. K., Ngai, E. W., & Lo, C. K. (2016). Disruptive information technology innovations and the cost of equity capital: The moderating effect of CEO incentives and institutional pressures. Information & Management, 53(3), 345-354.
    Luttmer, E. G. (2007). Selection, growth, and the size distribution of firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1103-1144.
    Lutze, O. (2016). Incentives for Chinese inventors: A proposal for a new inventor remuneration scheme with German elements. In Economic impacts of intellectual property-conditioned government incentives (pp. 157-175). Springer, Singapore.
    Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Douglas, S. C. (2007). The role, function, and contribution of attribution theory to leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 561-585.
    Onishi, K. (2013). The effects of compensation plans for employee inventions on R&D productivity: New evidence from Japanese panel data. Research Policy, 42(2), 367-378.
    Onishi, K., Owan, H., & Nagaoka, S. (2021). How Do Inventors Respond to Financial Incentives? Evidence from Unanticipated Court Decisions on Employees’ Inventions in Japan. The Journal of Law and Economics, 64(2), 301-339.
    Ouellette, L. L., & Weires, R. (2019). University patenting: Is private law serving public values?. Mich. St. L. Rev., 1329.
    Rao, J., Yu, Y., & Cao, Y. (2013). The effect that R&D has on company performance: comparative analysis based on listed companies of technique intensive industry in China and Japan. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(4), 1-8.
    Sauermann, H. (2018). Fire in the belly? Employee motives and innovative performance in start‐ups versus established firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.
    Sauermann, H., & Cohen, W. M. (2008). What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation (No. w14443). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Saul Lach & Mark Schankerman, (2004). Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities, 2 J. EUR. ECON. ASSOC. 252, 253–55
    Si, K., Xu, X. L., & Chen, H. H. (2020). Examining the interactive endogeneity relationship between R&D investment and financially sustainable performance: Comparison from different types of energy enterprises. Energies, 13(9), 2332.
    Somaya, D., Williamson, I. O., & Zhang, X. (2007). Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance. Organization Science, 18(6), 922-937.
    Svačina, P., & Antošová, G. (2018). Searching for Today’s Purpose of Remunerating Employee Inventions Through Grounded Theory. In The Impact of Globalization on International Finance and Accounting (pp. 217-227). Springer, Cham.
    Teitel, S. (1994). Patents, R & D expenditures, country size, and per-capita income: An international comparison. Scientometrics, 29(1), 137-159.
    Van De Voorde, K., & Beijer, S. (2015). The role of employee HR attributions in the relationship between high‐performance work systems and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1), 62-78.
    Van Reenen, J. (1996). The creation and capture of rents: wages and innovation in a panel of UK companies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(1), 195-226.
    Zhou, B., Li, Y. M., Sun, F. C., & Zhou, Z. G. (2021). Executive compensation incentives, risk level and corporate innovation. Emerging Markets Review, 47, 100798.
    網頁資料
    KSIP,專利簡介,http://www.ksip-ip.com/professional-know/patent/s,最後瀏覽日:112/1/1。
    WIPO, World Intellectual Property Indicators 2021,https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4571&plang=EN
    中國專利法,https://www.6laws.net/6law/law-gb/%E4%B8%AD%E8%8F%AF%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9C%8B%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9%E6%B3%95.htm,最後瀏覽日:111/12/1。
    日本特許法,https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=334AC0000000121,最後瀏覽日:111/12/1。
    台灣專利法,https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0070007,最後瀏覽日:112/1/1。
    永析,簡單線性迴歸分析(Simple regression analysis)-統計說明與SPSS操作。https://www.yongxi-stat.com/simple-regression-analysis/,最後瀏覽日:111/12/12。
    林國清職務發明之適當報酬:我國與日本之實務見解簡介,https://www.saint-island.com.tw/Tw/Knowledge/Knowledge_Info.aspx?IT=Know_0_1&CID=569&ID=1812,最後瀏覽日:112/1/1。
    法國專利法,https://www.lavoix.eu/en/news/482/invention-de-salaries-la-cour-de-cassation-affine-sa-jurisprudence,最後瀏覽日:111/12/1。
    英國專利法,https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-patent-act-1977/section-40-employees-inventions-compensation-of-employees-for-certain-inventions,最後瀏覽日:111/12/1。
    智財局,2021年我國與WIPO受理發明專利申請趨勢比較分析,https://www.tipo.gov.tw/tw/cp-174-219414-a1c98-1.html
    德國雇員發明法,https://www.uni-wuppertal.de/en/transfer/business-start-ups-patents/patents-and-inventions/42-of-the-german-employee-inventions-act/,最後瀏覽日:111/12/1。

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/01/16 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/01/16 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/01/16 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE