研究生: |
賴國銘 Guo-ming Lai |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
價值創新之策略佈局與應用-跨產業領先使用者學習模式 A Case Study for Strategy and Application of Enterprise Value Creation by Lead User Model |
指導教授: |
梁瓊如
Chiung-Ju Liang |
口試委員: |
紀佳芬
Chi,Chia-Fen 翁文彬 Weng, Wen-Pin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
論文出版年: | 2008 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 63 |
中文關鍵詞: | 價值創新 、策略佈局 、領先使用者 |
外文關鍵詞: | Value innovation, Strategy, Lead user |
相關次數: | 點閱:292 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
企業依據自身具備的核心能力以及經營策略,考量產品的生命週期,以架構包含破壞性創新、應用創新以及產品創新等不同規模的創新策略。創新的驅動力來自於外部市場的需求,最終目的是滿足顧客需求、解決顧客問題。從價值鏈觀點,企業的活動皆是價值鏈上的一點。企業偵測到外部市場的需求,而開發出新的產品或服務還需要價值鏈上各點活動的配合,產業始有延長生命之機會。
國際大廠面對產品走到成熟期的時候,必須尋求下一個尚未成熟之新興市場,積極的創新手法除能拉高價值外更能讓其繼續生存且與對手一較高下。MICROSOFT成立於1975 年,為軟體界的領導廠商,其作業系統的普及率也高達九成。除了電腦作業系統外,近幾年也致力於搶攻智慧型手機的內建作業系統Windows Mobile市場。GOOGLE成立於1998年,為網路世界的巨擘,其網路搜尋量高居世界第一。近幾年也積極做產品的水平延伸,以增加其品牌價值,APPLE成立於1976年以麥金塔電腦起家,卻從音樂播放器重新出發再回頭發展電腦,進而轉向數位通訊市場,這些大廠皆瞄準全球數位行動通訊市場,並由其核心能力出發以不同方式及路徑攻城掠地搶奪全球通訊市場之寶座。
本研究以個案公司為實證案例,探討其如何成功地利用核心能力,聯合週邊廠商合力結盟擴大市場,並利用創新網絡化模式達成目的,探討其於數位市場佈局之策略,進而推測其發展佈局之路徑,最後再以學理論述引證此創新模型。
本研究透過包括各大媒體的新聞、產業分析、官方資料文獻等的分析,深入研究國內個案公司的經營策略。探討各集團如何在既有基礎之上再發展,並說明在通往數位通訊生活之途徑中,彼此交手時所採取之競爭策略。
Enterprises ,based on their core competencies and business strategy, consider the life cycle of products to include destructive innovation, the application of innovation and product innovation, such as the innovative strategies of different sizes. The driving force of innovation from the external market demand, with the ultimate aim is to meet customer needs, solve customer problems. At the point of view , the enterprise's activities are all on the points of value chain. Enterprises to detect the external market needs, and develop new products or services also need the points on the value chain of activities with industry before they have the opportunity to extend life.
When International manufacturers face products coming to maturity, they have to find the next emerging market in before.Positive addition to the innovative approach can increase value, and survive with rivals. MICROSOFT established in 1975 year, the industry leader in software, and operating system's penetration rate is as high as 90%. In addition to computer operating systems, in recent years also committed to attack smart phone's built-in Windows Mobile operating system market. GOOGLE was established in 1998, as the world's giant network, the Internet search of the first highest in the world. In recent years has actively extended to the level of products, to increase its brand value, APPLE, founded in 1976 started to Macintosh computers, music players, from re-starting to turn around development of computer and then to digital communications market, these manufacturers are Aim at the global digital mobile communications market by starting its core competencies in different ways and paths to snatch the global communications market.
In this study, the empirical case for the company example, on how successfully used its core capability, peripheral manufacturers joint efforts alliance to expand the market, and use of innovative network model aims to reach and explore its market in digital distribution strategy, further speculation The layout of their development path, and then to quote this reference to the theories of innovation model
In this study, through various media including news, industry analysis, documentation and other official information analysis, in-depth study of domestic cases of the company's operating strategy. Discussion on how the existing groups on the basis of further development, and explain to the digital communications in the way of life, each other when dealing taken by the competition strategy.
1.Adner, Ron (2006) ,”Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem”, Harvard Business Review,vol.84, No4,pp.98-107
2.Anthony, Scott D. ,Eyring, Matt & Gibson ,Lib (2006),” Mapping Your Innovation Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, vol.84, No5,pp.104-113
3.Andrew, James P. , Sirkin, Harold L. (2003),” Innovating for Cash”, Harvard Business Review,vol.81, No9,pp.76-83
4.Andrew Hargadon, Robert I. Sutton (2000), “Building an Innovation Factory”, Harvard Business Review on Innovation.
5.Eric Von Hippel, Stefan Thomke, Mary Sonnack (1999), “Creating Breakthroughs at 3M”, Harvard Business Review on Innovation
6.Fernando Suarez(2005),“The Half-Truth of First-Mover Advantage”, Harvard Business Review (April 2005)
7.Drucker, Peter (2002),”The Discipline of Innovation”,Harvard Business Review,vol.80, No8,pp.95-103
8.Gary Hamel (2006), “The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation”, Harvard Business Review (February 2006)
9.“Game Issue Report”,Korea IT Industry Promotion Agency(KIPA),Serial Number 21,March 2005
10.Govindarajan , Vijay , Trimble, Chris (2005),”Building Breakthrough Businesses Within Established Organizations” ,Harvard Business Review,vol.83, No5,pp.58-68
11.Geoffrey A.Moore(2004)“The old Innovation Stategy”, Harvard Business Review (August 2004)
12.Hammer, Michael (2004),”Deep Change: How Operational Innovation Can Transform Your Company” ,Harvard Business Review,vol.82, No3,pp.84-93
13.http://www.innocentive.com/
14.http://www.ninesigma.com/
15.http://www.yet2.com/
16.http://www.yourencore.com/
17.Kanter, Rosabeth Moss (2006),”Innovation: The Classic Traps “,Harvard Business Review,vol.84, No11,pp.72-83
18.Kim , W. Chan & Mauborgne, Renee (1999),“Creating New Market Space”,,Harvard Business Review,vol.77, No1,pp.83-93
19.Kim, W. Chan & Mauborgne, Rene (2000),“Knowing a Winning Business Idea When You See One”,Harvard Business Review,vol.77, No5,pp.129-138
20.Kim, W. Chan & Mauborgne, Rene (2004),Blue Ocean Strategy,Harvard Business Review Article,vol.82, No10,pp.76-84
21.Larry Huston, Nabil Sakkab (2006), “Connect and Develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation”, Harvard Business Review (March 2006)
22.Laurie , Donald L. , Dos, Yves L. & Sheer, Claude P. (2006),” Creating New Growth Platforms”, Harvard Business Review,vol.84, No5,pp.80-90.
23.Lencioni, Patrick M. (2002),”Make Your Values Mean Something” ,Harvard Business Review,vol.80, No7,pp.113-117
24.Magidson, Jason , Brandyberry, Gregg (2001),”Putting Customers in the "Wish Mode" ”, Harvard Business Review,vol.79, No8,pp.26-26
25.Moore, Geoffrey A. (2004);”Darwin and the Demon: Innovating Within Established Enterprises”, Harvard Business Review,vol.82, No7/8,pp.86-92
26.Narayandas, Das (2005),”Building Loyalty in Business Markets”, Harvard Business Review,vol.83, No9,pp.131-139
27.Philip Kotler (2003), A Frame Work for Marketing Management, Second Edition.
28.Quan, Daniel (2004),”Online Game Market in China Analysis & Prospect”,KIPA,October 2004
29.Roberts, Morgan (2005),”A Study of The Massively Mupltiplayer Online Business Model Within The Interactive Entertainment Industry”,San Francisco State University,December 2005
30.Robert F. Bruner, Joseph R. Perella (Foreword by)(2004), Applied Mergers and AcquisitionsPhilip
31.Selden , Larry , MacMillan, Ian C. (2006),”Manage Customer-Centric Innovation -- Systematically”,Harvard Business Review,vol.84, No4,pp.108-116
32.Thomke, Stefan , Hippel , Eric Von (2002),”Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value”,Harvard Business Review,vol.80, No4,pp.74-81
33.W. Chan Kim, Renee Mauborgne (1997), “Value Innovation: The Strategic Logic of Hih Growth”, Harvard Business Review on Strategies for Growth.
34.Ulwick, Anthony W. (2002),” Turn Customer Input into Innovation”, Harvard Business Review,vol.80, No1,pp.91-97.
35.Wolpert, John D. (2002),”Breaking Out of the Innovation Box”,Harvard Business Review, vol.80, No8,pp.77-83
36.Zook ,Chris & Allen , James (2003),” Growth Outside the Core”, Harvard Business Review,vol.81, No12,pp.66-73