簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳季庭
Ji-Ting Wu
論文名稱: 以行動研究探討樂齡中心課程設計──以行動裝置課程為例
Action Research to explore the Curriculum Design for Senior Citizens Learning Center——A Case for Mobile Device Course
指導教授: 董芳武
Fang-Wu Tung
口試委員: 唐玄輝
Hsien-Hui Tang
曾元琦
Yuan-Chi Tseng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 設計系
Department of Design
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 106
中文關鍵詞: 行動研究行動裝置樂齡中心課程設計
外文關鍵詞: Action Research, Mobile Device, Senior Citizens Learning Center, Curriculum Design
相關次數: 點閱:351下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著資訊科技的發展改變高齡者的生活型態,不論是社交或休閒娛樂皆與行動裝置有著密不可分的關係,但年齡增長身理的退化,學習與操作介面不易,為了讓高齡者順應資訊社會的轉變,樂齡中心開始設立行動裝置相關課程,協助長輩降低數位落差、提升資訊素養,本研究旨在探討高齡者參與行動裝置課程的目的與目標,並在執行教學的過程中,探索、修正並發展適合樂齡中心行動裝置課程的規劃模式。本研究採用行動研究法,以新北雙連社福中心為研究場域,探索樂齡中心行動裝置課程,參與課程與問卷填答的高齡者共有23位,課程結束後對15位高齡者進行訪談,以質性訪談探索高齡者行動裝置學習目的、使用習慣以及對課程的想法,由行動研究初步結果提出課程規劃架構與教具設計,並進行另一個行動研究循環。研究結果發現,高齡者參與行動裝置的主要目的為提升使用能力,並藉由學習科技增進與親友、社會的連結;參與課程後高齡者獲得獨立自主解決問題的能力,減少對他人的依賴,除了基本操作外,也能運用資訊科技傳達自身經驗影響他人獲得成就感。在教學面中,高齡者對操作步驟記憶有困難,不容易熟練,課後難以持續使用,因此,行動裝置課程綜合講述、練習教學法,有助於加強高齡者對操作步驟的印象及熟悉度;另外,高齡者重視教學內容的實用性,收集高齡者的學習需求,有助於規劃符合他們生活所需的課程,最後基於本研究結果,針對樂齡中心行動裝置課程規劃與教材開發提出建議。


    As the development of information technology has changed the lifestyle of the elderly, social and leisure entertainment, there is an inseparable connection with mobile devices. However, as they age, their physical and mental deterioration makes learning and operating the devices challenging. To help them adapt to the changes in the information society, the Senior Citizens Learning Center has started to offer mobile device courses to help them reduce the digital divide and improve information literacy. This study aims to investigate the purpose of the elderly's participation in the mobile device program to attain the goal. During the implementation of the teaching process, an appropriate planning model for the mobile device program at the Senior Citizens Learning Center was explored, refined, and developed. Action research was adopted for this study, and Suang Lien Xinzhuang Social Welfare Center in New Taipei City was chosen as a research site. Twenty-three seniors participated in the course and questionnaire survey, and 15 elderly participants were interviewed after the course. The interview was conducted to understand the elderly's learning objectives, usage habits, and perceptions of the curriculum. According to the preliminary results, this study proposed a curriculum planning framework and teaching aids. Another round of action research was then conducted. The study found that the main objectives of the elderly to participate in the mobile device are to obtain the capability of using mobile devices and increase their connection with friends, family, and society through the learning of technology. After taking the course, the elderly gained the ability to solve problems independently. In the course, the elderly have difficulty in memorizing the operation instructions, making it difficult for them to continue using the device after the course. Therefore, the mobile device course is a combination of didactic and practice instruction, which helps to enhance the impression of the elderly. Furthermore, the elderly value the practicality of the course content, and collecting the learning needs of the elderly can help plan courses that meet their needs in their lives. Finally, the findings of this study offer suggestions for curriculum planning and materials development for mobile devices in the Senior Citizens Learning Center.

    第一章 緒論1 1.1研究背景1 1.2研究動機與目的2 1.3研究範圍3 1.4名詞釋義3 1.5研究流程4 第二章 文獻探討6 2.1 高齡學習6 2.1.1高齡學習需求與動機6 2.1.2高齡教育8 2.2 高齡社區型態學習9 2.2.1高齡學習社區化9 2.2.2臺灣政策 — 長照2.0社區關懷據點10 2.3 行動裝置11 2.3.1 高齡者行動裝置學習與使用11 2.3.2 高齡者行動裝置學習困難13 2.3.3 高齡者行動裝置教育相關研究14 2.4 教學方法與課程發展16 2.5 文獻小結18 第三章 研究方法19 3.1 研究步驟19 3.2 研究方法19 3.2.1 行動研究法19 3.2.2 觀察法20 3.2.3 訪談法21 3.3 研究對象22 3.4 研究工具22 3.4.1 前期問卷調查22 3.4.2 觀察紀錄22 3.4.3 訪談大綱23 3.5 行動裝置課程規劃24 3.5.1 課程規劃理念24 3.5.2 第一次課程規劃24 3.5.3 第二次課程規畫28 第四章 研究結果32 4.1 問卷調查結果32 4.2 行動研究執行歷程37 4.3 觀察結果39 4.3.1 整體學員觀察39 4.3.2 整體課程觀察39 4.4行動裝置使用習慣與影響40 4.4.1 主要使用功能40 4.4.2 行動裝置對生活的影響42 4.5對行動裝置課程的看法43 4.5.1 參與行動裝置課程的動機43 4.5.2 學習行動裝置對生活的改變45 4.5.3 行動裝置學習困難47 4.5.4 對現有課程的建議48 4.5.5 講義的教學形式50 4.6教學者觀點51 4.7課程設計53 4.7.1教學內容53 4.7.2課程流程54 4.7.3第二次教學內容與課堂流程規劃54 4.8教材開發57 4.8.1課程講義57 4.8.2記憶考驗互動59 4.9後續訪談62 4.9.1 課程前_教學內容規劃62 4.9.2 課程中_課程流程安排64 4.9.3 圖標配對版65 4.9.4 圖標聯想記憶法67 4.9.5「圖標配對版」與「圖標聯想記憶法」比較67 4.9.6 講義內容編排與設計69 4.9.7 參與行動裝置課程對生活的影響70 4.9.8 推薦他人參與行動裝置課程考量的因素71 4.9.9 對後續課程的建議73 4.10訪談小結74 第五章 研究結論與建議76 5.1結論76 5.2研究限制與後續研究建議81 參考文獻83 附錄89

    英文文獻
    1.Caprani, N., O'Connor, N. E., & Gurrin, C. (2012). Touch screens for the older user. Assistive technologies, 95-118.
    2.Chao, J. Y., Kao, H. C., & Yeh, Y. H. (2018). Learning Outcomes of Mobile and Tablet Application Courses for Taiwanese Older Adults. 2nd International Conference on Information, Communication and Engineering, 159-162.
    3.Chiu, C. J., Tasi, W. C., Yang, W. L., & Guo, J. L. (2019). How to help older adults learn new technology? Results from a multiple case research interviewing the internet technology instructors at the senior learning center. Computers & Education, 129, 61–70.
    4.Connolly, B.(2010). Community Based Adult Education. International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed), 120-126.
    5.Cresci, M. K., Yarandi, H. N., & Morrell, R. W. (2010). Pro-nets versus no-nets: Differences in urban older adults' predilections for Internet use. Educational Gerontology, 36(6), 500–520.
    6.Damant, J., & Knapp, M. (2015). What are the likely changes in society and technology which will impact upon the ability of older adults to maintain social (extra-familial) networks of support now, in 2025 and in 2040?. Future of Ageing: Evidence Review. London: Government Office for Science.
    7.Demarrais, K. (2004). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. In: Demarrais K and Lapan SD (eds) Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 51-68.
    8.Duay, D. L., & Bryan, V. C. (2008). Learning in later life: What seniors want in a learning experience. Educational Gerontology, 34(12), 1070-1086.
    9.Fabiana M. Gatti, Eleonora Brivio, & Carlo Galimberti (2017).“The future is ours too”: A training process to enable the learning perception and increase self- efficacy in the use of tablets in the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 43(4), 209–224.
    10.Findsen, B., & Formosa, M. (2011). Lifelong Learning in Later Life: A Handbook on Older Adult Learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    11.Gao, S., Yang, Y., & Krogstie, J. (2015). The adoption of smartphones among older adults in China. In International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, 112-122.
    12.Hazwani, M. M., & Nazlena, M. A. (2014). A Study of Smartphone Usage and Barriers Among the Elderly. In 2014 3rd international conference on user science and engineering , 109-114.
    13.Huang, H., Yang, M., Yang, C., & Lv, T. (2019). User performance effects with graphical icons and training for elderly novice T users: A case study on automatic teller machines. Applied Ergonomics, 78, 62–69.
    14.Kim, A., & Merriam, S. B. (2004). Motivations for learning among older adults in a learning in retirement institute. Educational Gerontology, 30 (6), 441-455.
    15.Lu, S.C., Wen, T.N., & Chang, P.L. (2017). The Study of Smartphone Usage Competency Assessment and Training for the Elderly. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 245, 161–165.
    16.Ma, Q., Chan, A. H., & Chen, K. (2016). Personal and other factors affecting acceptance of smartphone technology by older Chinese adults. Applied Ergonomics, 54, 62–71.
    17.Maulod, A., & Lu, S. Y. (2020). “I’m slowly ageing but I still have my value”: challenging ageism and empowering older persons through lifelong learning in Singapore. Educational Gerontology, 46 (10), 628 – 641.
    18.McClusky, H. Y. (1971). Education: background issues. White House Conference on aging. Washington, D.C.
    19.Mitzner, T.L., Fausset, C. B., Boron, J. B., Adams, A. E., Dijkstra, K., Lee, C. C., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2008). Older adults’ training preferences for learning to use technology. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 52nd annual meeting, 52 (26), 2047–2051.
    20.O'Dowd, M. (2005). Learning from childhood to mature adulthood: What makes people want to learn to learn and keep on learning? Compare, 35 (3), 321-338.
    21.Rau, P. L. P., & Hsu, J. W. (2005). Interaction devices and web design for novice older users. Educational Gerontology, 31 (1), 19-40.
    22.Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., McLaughlin, A. C., & Pak, R.(2005). Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job. Human Factors, 47 (2), 271–288.
    23.Sakdulyatham, R., Preeyanont, S., Lipikorn, R., & Watakakosol , R. (2018). Smartphone usage capabilities among younger and elderly users. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26 (1), 181–198.
    24.Somekh, B. (2010). The Collaborative Action Research Network: 30 years of agency in developing educational action research, Educational Action Research, 18 (1), 103-121.
    25.Toyota, Y., Sato, D., Kato, T., & Takagi, H. (2014). Easy Handheld Training : Interactive Self-learning App for Elderly Smartphone Novices. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction , 203–214.
    26.Tyle, M., De George-Walker, L., & Simic, V. (2020). Motivation matters: Older adults and information communication technologies. Studies in the Education of Adults, 52 (2), 175-194.
    27.Vasconcelos, A., Silva, P. A., Caseiro, J., Nunes, F., & Teixeira, L. F. (2012). Designing tablet-based games for seniors. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fun and Game, 1–10.
    28.Wang, M. W.(2017). The Study of Teaching the Smartphone Using in Taiwan’s Elderly Population—A Case Study in Learners of the Senior Citizens Academy in a City of Taiwan. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, 477-485.
    29.World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework (No. WHO/NMH/NPH/02.8). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    中文文獻
    1.王昭正、朱瑞淵(譯)(1999)。參與式觀察法(原作:Jorgensen, D. L.)。臺北市:弘智文化。(原著出版年:1989)
    2.王文科(2007)。課程與教學論。臺北市:五南。
    3.王智弘、王文科(譯)(2011)。精進教學使用的行動研究(原作:Henning, J. E., Stone, J. M., & Kelly, J. L.)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2009)
    4.行政院(2015)。高齡社會白皮書核定本。臺北市:行政院。
    5.李曼曲(2014)。學習困難學生內在動機之策略初探。特殊教育發展期刊,58 ,23-40。
    6.林進財、林香河(2019)。教學原理。臺北市:五南。
    7.邱炳坤、李俊杰、李欣霓、黃美珍、楊宗文、陳子軒、李建興、陶以哲、楊啟文、高麗娟、姜敏君、顏伽如(譯)(2018)。質性研究設計與施作指南 (原作者: Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J.)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2009)
    8.邱靜如(2019)。高齡社會中資訊科技如何幫助老年生活? 從台灣老人的視角和其經驗探討。台灣老年學論壇,42,1-30。
    9.徐以臻、陸清達、王玲玲(2017)。年長者於數位遊戲使用現況之探討。福祉科技與服務管理學刊。5(3), 179-190。
    10.張春興(2007)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
    11.張倩萍(2017)。使用智慧型手機的社區老人與其幸福感的相關性探討(未出版碩士論文)。中臺科技大學,台中。
    12.教育部(2006a)。邁向高齡社會老人教育政策白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
    13.陳啟明、邱政鋒(2009)。成人參與高等回流教育學習動機之量表建構與現況之研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報,28(3),93-110。
    14.黃富順(2004)。高齡社會與高齡教育。臺北市:師大書苑。
    15.黃富順(2008)。高齡學習。臺北市:五南。
    16.黃富順(2008)。高齡教育學。臺北市:五南。
    17.楊國德(2012)。建構社區化高齡者終身學習平臺芻議。成人及終身教育,38,2-12。
    18.蔡承家(2003)。創新社區學習文化:臺灣社區教育教育典範發展與實踐。社區發展季刊,104,433-442。
    19.蔡承家(2010)。建構活躍老化的樂齡學習社區。老人服務事業管理系會議論文。美和科技大學。
    20.蔡清田(2007)。課程行動研究的實踐之道。課程與教學,10(3),75-89。
    21.衛生福利部(2015)。長期照顧2.0整體規劃事項2.0整體規劃事項、長照據點 A、B、C 試辦籌備進度與失能身心障礙者之服務規劃礙者之服務規劃專題報告。社會福利及衛生環境委員會第9次全體委員會議。臺北市:衛生福利部。
    22.賴弘基(2016)。高齡者數位學習課程設計:教學者觀點之分析。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,4(3),367-376。
    23.魏惠娟(2012)。臺灣樂齡學習。臺北市:五南。

    網路資料
    1.行政院國家發展委員會(2020)。高齡化時程。
    取自:https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=695E69E28C6AC7F3
    2.財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2019)。2019台灣網路報告。取自:https://report.twnic.tw/2019/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_2019_CH.pdf
    3.國家發展委員會(2019)。108年持有手機民眾數位機會調查報告。取自:
    https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL2NrZmlsZS9hZjg2Nzg1Ny01YWE0LTRjZTYtODQ3OS00NzVhMWY5NTkyOGMucGRm&n=6ZmE5Lu2OS0xMDjlubTmiYvmqZ%2Fml4%2FmlbjkvY3mqZ%2FmnIPoqr%2Fmn6XloLHlkYot5YWs5ZGK54mILnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=.pdf
    4.教育部樂齡學習網(2020)。110年樂齡學習計畫。
    取自:https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/About-1
    5.衛福部長照專區(2018)。普設社區照顧關懷據點,廣布多元長照服務據點。
    取自:https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-3641-38136-201.html

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2022/08/25 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/08/25 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/08/25 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE