近年來，在互動領域當中，除了功能性、使用性與愉悅性的探討之外，互動美學的研究已引起相當多的關注，為了超越互動美學的研究現況，本研究提出一個充滿挑戰機會的設計方向：詩意互動設計。根據巴舍拉現象學的方法為根基，並以其中提出的詩意互動設計應從想像力、表達式以及運算物件開始著手，此挑戰包含著當使用者與之互動時，如何讓互動過程保持在一個語言的觸發狀態，以及如何設計成功的迴盪與詩意意象的讚嘆等等概念為主要觀點論述。此外，引述雷可夫藉由檢視空間中的隱喻，將詩意互動分類為詩意互動空間與詩意互動物品兩個部份作為探討，再加上完形心理學的基礎，企圖呈現與探索詩意互動設計的可能方向，並透過兩個現有的設計案例勾勒出詩意意象與表達式之間的關係。最後，透過一個設計實作：「Whisper」，借以揭露與探索上述的概念性架構，以及透過質性實驗評估此階段的發現；至此，從參與者身上獲得許多正面的回應與印象，包含透過物件與空間之間含蓄性的表達方式以傳遞詩意意象。

另一方面，即使上一階段所提出的詩意是透過表達式中留白的方式創造，且藉由使用者的反思與想像力傳遞；然而，詩意互動對於設計師而言，仍然是一個相當抽象的概念，以致於無法確切地掌握與運用。為了處理這項挑戰，此階段根據行動研究方法，透過反覆地執行過程，發展出四個詩意互動原則；且為了進一步驗證原則，本文建立第二個設計實作：「Scentonight」，並透過一個組內的量化實驗，用以評估在使用的脈絡當中，所帶給參與者的影響。最後實驗結果顯示指出，參與者傾向認為一個日常生活物品與想像力的連結能勝過於原始的功能。因此，本論文研究運用循序漸進的實踐方法，證實了詩意互動設計發展理論的系統化過程，並著重於描述詩意互動設計的初探研究。

In recent years, an amount of research has risen growing concern of designing aesthetics of interaction in addition to function, usability, and pleasure of it. Beyond aesthetic interaction, we propose poetic interaction as a promising design genre. Based on Bachelard’s phenomenological approach, we suggest that poetic interaction design begin with imagination and expression-making of both material and computational things. The challenges include how to design successful reverberation and admiration of poetic images while one interacts and reflects. Examining spatial metaphors, we classify poetic interaction into poetic space and interactive artifacts. With gestalt psychology, we present practical guides for designing poetic interaction. Two examples illustrate the relationship between poetic images and expression-making. Finally, we implement a design work, Whisper, to explore the framework, as well as validate our findings via a qualitative experiment. Participants were positively impressed that interaction could deliver experience of poetic images with artifacts and space of implicit expression.

On the other hand, even thought we propose that poetic image could be created through leaving blanks in the design expression, and be delivered via users’ reflection and imagination, the concept of Poetic Interaction however is abstract for designers to apply in practice. To address this challenge, we developed four principles by performing the process iteratively according to action research method. For further validation of the principles, we built a design work, Scentonight, to evaluate the influences brought to the users in the context of usage. A within-subject experiment was performed. The result shows a significant difference that the participants tend to think of an everyday object in terms of its imaginary linking rather than its function. This thesis demonstrates a systematic process of developing the theory of Poetic Interaction Design in a pragmatic manner.

Abowd, D. G., Dey, K. A., Brown, J. P., Davies, N., Smith, M., & Steggles P. (1999). Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, 304-307.

Ambient Orb. (2002). Retrieved April 22, 2010, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ambientdevices.com/

Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space. Beacon Press.

Bosco, H. (1952). Monsieur Carre-Benoit a la campagne. Roman.

Deway, J. (1959). Moral principles in education. New York: Philosophical Society.

Djajadiningrat, P. J., Gaver, W. W., & Fres, W. J. (2000). Interaction relabeling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, 66-71.

Dourish, P. (2001). Seeking a Foundation for Context-Aware Computing. Human-Computer Interaction, 229-241.

Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. (2001). At Home with Ubiquitous Computing: Seven Challenges. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 256-272.

Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Brown University.

Freiesleben, T., Knapek, M., & Moberg, H. (2001). Hazed Windows. Retrieved February 02, 2011, from http://webzone.k3.mah.se/kid01016/projekt_forskningstema.htm.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 74, No. 6,1464-1480.

Hallnas, L. (2011). On the Foundations of Interaction Design Aesthetics: Revisiting the Notions of Form and Expression. International Journal of Design, Vol. 5, No. 1, 73-84.

Hallnas, L., & Redstrom, J. (2001). Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 5, No. 3, 201-212.

Hallnas, L., & Redstrom, J. (2002). From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 9, No. 2, 106-124.

Hashim, W. N. W., Noor, M. L. M., & Adnan, W. A. W. (2009). The design of aesthetic interaction: towards a graceful interaction framework. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, 69-75.

Heidegger, M. (1993). Basic Writings: from Being and Time to The Task of Thinking. Harper-Collins, New York.

Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S. D., Leduc, N., Hagstrom, E. A., & Bayley, O. (2001). Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 325-332.

Hirahara, M. (2009). Bright Blind. Retrieved April 16, 2011, from http://webzone.k3.mah.se/kid01016/projekt_forskningstema.htm

Hothersall, D. (2003). History of Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 234-241.

Jordan, P.W. (2002). Designing Pleasurable Products. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Kolko, J. (2007). Thoughts on Interaction: A Collection of Reflections. Design Brown Bear LLC.

Kooijmans, T., & Rauterberg, M. (2007). Cultural Computing and the Self Concept: towards Unconscious Metamorphosis. Entertainment Computing ICEC 2007, 171-181.

Koppel, M. A. J. t., Walmink, W., Amiralis, Z., Ruiter, H. J., & Gennip, D. A. P. v. (2005) . Proceedings Desform 2005 conference on Design and semantics of form and movement, 103-109.

Lai, W. Y., & Wu, M. C. (2010). Anature Light. Red dot award.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 2, No. 4, 34-46.

Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., Jung, H., & Donaldson, J. (2007). Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, 239-254.

Locher, P., Overbeeke, C. J., & Wensveen, S. A. G., (2010). Aesthetic interaction: a framework. Design Issues, 26(2), 70-79.

Lowgren, J. (2007). Fluency as an experiential quality in augmented spaces. International Journal of Design, Vol.1, No. 3, 1-10.

Nakatsu, R., Rauterberg, M., & Salem, B. (2006). Forms and theories of communication: from multimedia to Kansei mediation. Multimedia Systems, 11(3), 304-312.

Norman, D. (2005). Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. 1st edn. Basic Books, New York.

PEGA D&E. (2008). Tech Tap. Retrieved April 09, 2010, from the World Wide Web: http://www.pegadesign.com/

Plurk. (2008). Retrieved February 02, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://www.plurk.com

Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2010). Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, Vol. 4, No. 2, 3-13.

Rafael, L. M. (2006). Pulse Room. Retrieved April 16, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/

Scherini, T., Melo, P., Craenendonck, V. T., Zou, W., & Kaptein, M. (2010). Enhancing the sleeping quality of partners living apart. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 171-174.

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.W. (2003). Discourses in place: language in the material world. Routledge, New York.

Salem,B., Rauterberg, M., & Nakatsu, R. (2006). Kansei Mediated Entertainment. Entertainment Computing ICEC 2006. Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4161, No. 103-116.

Twitter. (2006). Retrieved July 08, 2010, from the World Wide Web: http://twitter.com

Techart Group. (2006). Office Live 4πversion. Retrieved April 09, 2010, from the World Wide Web: http://www.techartgroup.com/

Visser, A., & Tol, B. v. (2002). Window drops. Droog Accessories. Retrieved Aprol 16, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://www.droog.com/

Visser, T., Vastenburg, M., Keyson, D. (2010). SnowGlobe: the development of a prototype awareness system for longitudinal field studies. DIS'10 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 426-429.

Waddell, G. (2008). What is Action Research? Retrieved February 02, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://www.slideshare.net/Gregwad/action-research

Weiser, M. (1991). The Computer for the 21st Century, Scientific American, Vol. 265, No. 3, 94-104.

Wellner, P. (1993). Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 7, 87-96.

Wu, C., T. (2002). Moonlight Festival. Windmusic.

Zaccai, G. (1995). Art and technology: aesthetics redefined. In Discovering Design-Explorations in Design Studies, 3-12.