研究生: |
俞琪葳 Chi-Wei Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
個人文化價值、家庭影響與商業道德認知之關聯性 The Relationship between Personal Cultural Inclinations, Family and Business Ethics Awareness. |
指導教授: |
陳崇文
Chung-Wen Chen |
口試委員: |
郭啟賢
Chii-Shyan Kuo 張譯尹 Yi-Yin Chang 陳崇文 Chung-Wen Chen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理系 Department of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 56 |
中文關鍵詞: | 社會失序理論 、成就主義 、金錢唯物主義 、商業道德認知 、個人文化價值 、家庭 |
外文關鍵詞: | personal cultural dimensions achievement, negative business ethics awareness |
相關次數: | 點閱:347 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近期研究中,社會失序理論相繼被驗證適用於社會學、管理學對個人偏差行為的影響,以及國家文化對企業偏差行為的影響,本研究為了擴展社會失序理論的應用,試圖從個人角度探討文化價值觀(成就主義、金錢唯物主義)與商業道德認知的關係.再者,本研究以家庭為調節變項,檢驗其對個人文化價值觀與商業道德認知的調節效果.在研究方法上,本研究以台灣科技大學管理學院的學生為研究對象,採問卷調查的方式,總計回收220份有效樣本.研究結果顯示 : 成就主義及金錢唯物主義與商業道德認知有負向關係.研究結果之意涵.限制以及未來研究方向將在最後提出討論.
In recent research, drawing from anomie theory to the management and sociology, we find support for country-level cultural to individual-level deviance behavior, and to firm-level deviance behavior. In order to expand the application of the anomie theory, we want to confirm anomie theory is applicable to the management, and it support for individual-level cultural to individual-level deviance behavior. This study investigates the relationship between cultural value (achievement, pecuniary materialism) and business ethics awareness. This study also explores the moderating role of family on the above relationship. Results from a sample of 220 students indicate that: achievement and pecuniary materialism are negatively related to business ethics awareness. Implications, limitations, and future research directions based on the study results are discussed.
一、 中文部分
吳成豐, & 鄭國鴻. (2005). 公司治理與組織績效之相關性研究―以台灣中小企業為研究對象.
王斯賢.(2012). 個人文化, 職場偏差行為之關係: 收入等級之調節效果, 以奧地利林茲地區為例. 2012. PhD Thesis.
吳宗祐(2014),調節與中介效果的統計驗證:理論與實作。
沈六(民91年2月),道德發展的家庭脈絡因素。公民訓育學報,第11輯,1-38。
柯秋萍. (2005). 價值觀, 道德發展期及職業道德知覺關聯性之研究—以金融相關從業人員為例. 中原大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-83.
姜思吟.(2012). 個人文化與負面商業道德行為之關係: 個人傳統性之調節效果. 2012. PhD Thesis.
陳婉容.(2016). 個人文化傾向, 家庭影響與個人辯解道德嫌疑行為意願之關聯性.
黃政傑. (1996). 道德與社會科教學法. 台北: 師大.
楊逸君.(2014). 組織成員位階與商業道德認知之關係—五大人格特質-親和性, 審慎性之調節效果.
蔡宗霖. (2005). 違反企業道德的行為者, 決策者及行為類型對道德判斷的影響 (Doctoral dissertation).
Kknwes. (2017)” 華為6員工疑泄密被抓 盤點企業因員工泄密而撕逼的十大著名事件”from https://read01.com/2BRDL8.html
二、 英文部分
Attia, A., Shankarmahesh, M. N., & Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Marketing ethics: a comparison of American and Middle-Eastern marketers. International Business Review, 8(5), 611-632
Bame-Aldred, C. W., Cullen, J. B., Martin, K. D., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2013). National culture and firm-level tax evasion. Journal of Business Research, 66: 390-396. .
Bouffard, L. A., & Muftic, L. R. (2006). The “rural mystique”: Social disorganization and violence beyond urban communities. Western Criminology Review, 7(3), 56-66.
Christie, P. M. J., Kwon, I. G., Stoeberl, P. A., & Baumhart, R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3): 263–287.
Chen, C. W. (2014). Are workers more likely to be deviant than managers? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2): 221-233.
Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (1995). Assessing Messner and Rosenfeld's institutional anomie theory: A partial test. Criminology, 33(3), 411-429.
Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2014). National rates of opportunity entrepreneurship activity: Insights from institutional anomie theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 775-806.
Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Hoegl, M. (2004). Cross-national differences in managers’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behavior: A test of institutional anomie theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3): 411-421.
Durkheim, E. 1897/1966. Suicide: A study in sociology. New York: Free Press.Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 265-279
Fassin, Y. (2005). The Reasons behind Non-ethical Behavior in Business and
Johnson, J. L., Martin, K. D., & Saini, A. (2011). Strategic culture and environmental dimensions as determinants of anomie in publicly-traded and privately-held firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3): 473-502.
Gift, M. J., Gift, P., & Zheng, Q. (2013). Cross-cultural perceptions of business ethics: Evidence from the United States and China. Journal of business ethics, 114(4), 633-642.
Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in psychology and education 4th Ed.
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification.
Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. Morality, moral behavior, and moral development, 52, 73.
Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L, & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influence on briery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1401-1422.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American sociological review, 3(5), 672-682.
Messner, Steven F., and Richard Rosenfeld. Crime and the American dream. Cengage Learning, (2012).
Nam, D., Parboteeah, K. P., Cullen, J. B., & Johnson, J. L. (2013). Cross-national differences in firms undertaking innovation initiatives: An application of institutional anomie theory. Journal of International Management.
Rosenfeld, R., & Messner, S. (1997). Market, morality, and an institutional anomie theory of crime. In N. Passas & R. Agnew (Eds.), The future of anomie theory: 207-224. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Sauser, W. I. (2005). Ethics in business: answering the call. Journal of business ethics, 58(4), 345-357.
Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38(4), 1021-1042.