筆記型電腦產業在過去十年蓬勃發展，然而，在全球電腦產業削價競爭下造成利潤不斷下滑。各公司無不想盡辦法以求生存。筆記型電腦的系統代工廠，過去是較不受重視的，通常，在企業內相關資源與人力的配置上也相對有限。但2011年Intel Ultrabook大力推展下逐漸受到重視，主要原因是輕、薄、短、小的設計為主,其系統代工製造有一定的門檻。
新科技產業由整合趨於分工，專注於企業的核心競爭力，將無效能的工作委外代工製造。採購策略確立後，企業須建立一套有效的評比機制，能快速客觀的篩選出最能符合企業策略的系統代工製造供應商。
本研究運用分析層級程序法(AHP)， 企圖建構出筆記型電腦的系統代工廠供應商的遴選模式，透過相關供應商遴選的文獻整理與業界的專家初步訪談，歸納出筆記型電腦系統代工廠的供應商遴選系統，應考量到的4個準則，分別為成本、品質、技術能力與營運作業，以及其下一階之12個屬性。再針對實務界專家進行訪談與問卷調查，彙整專家意見後，歸納出各準則及屬性之間的權重高低，以供企業在遴選筆記型電腦系統代工廠ODM供應商時之參考。

The notebook computer industry has flourished and grown in the past ten years; however, with the global computer industry cutting prices to compete, profits continue to slip. Every company must think up ways to survive. The OEM system suppliers of notebook computers in the past did not con-tain as much value. Typically, the companies allocate relatively limited resources and manpower. Yet in 2011, under the popularization of the Intel Ultrabook, the OEM suppliers gradually earned more value, mainly because the design of the notebook was light, thin, short and small. The OEM system suppliers of the Intel Ultrabook manufacture it with certain standards.
The trend of the new technology industry conforms to a division of labor, focusing on the core competitive strengths of the enterprise and outsourcing inefficient work to OEM suppliers for manu-facture. After procurement strategy has been established, the company must lay out a set of effective evaluation mechanisms to be able to objectively filter out which OEM system manufacturers are most suitable for the company's strategy.
In this research, we apply the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to attempt to construct a selec-tion method for OEM system suppliers. Through organizing relevant documents on the selection of suppliers and initial interviews with experts in the industry, we came up with a selection system for OEM system supplier factories and the 12 attributes of its next phase. We then conducted interviews and questionnaire surveys aimed at practical experts. After collecting and organizing the experts' opinions, we determined the weight and height between each norm and attribute to provide com-panies with a reference when selecting OEM system factories and ODM suppliers for notebook computers.

一、中文文獻：
1.王文博(2004), “以平衡計分卡的觀念及層級分析法所建立的相連部件供應商篩選模式–個案研究”, 中央大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班。
2.余佩佩(2002), “全面品質管理、供應商選擇、供應商參與、資訊運籌管理與組織績效關係之研究-台灣、香港之比較分析”, 成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
3.吳俊誼(2001), ”採購部門參與、供應商選擇標準、供應商發展活動與新產品開發績效關係之研究”, 國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
4.吳昭仁(2004), “運用品質機能展開管理企業運籌活動”, 國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
5.周重憲(2004), “台灣汽車業全球供應鏈管理之國內外供應商評選要素研究”, 中央大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班
6.林千仁(2000), “供應商選擇標準與供應商發展活動對製造績效影響之研究” 中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文
7.洪振傑(2004), “供應商遴選準則對供應鏈存貨政策之影響”, 逢甲大學工業工程研究所碩士論文
8.許政傑(1997), “全球供應鏈管理策略之研究—以台灣電腦業為例”, 國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
9.陳振祥 (1996), “ODM 策略之理論架構與實證”, 國立台灣大學商學系博士論文
10.陳曉琪(2001), “供應商遴選之決策支援系統之研究”, 義守大學工業工程管理學系碩士論文
11.陳燕美(2006),”國際企業建構供應商評選系統之研究-以被動元件為例”, 大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
12. 徐燕娟(2007), “以 AHP法探討供應商遴選關鍵決定因素權重之研究 -以筆記型電腦週邊配件為例”
13.曾國雄、鄧振源(1989)，「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」，中國統計學報，第27卷第6期，p.5-22。
14.湯明哲、李吉任，1999年12月，「外包與專業製造廠商-雙贏的策略」，遠見雜誌。
15.黃揚期 (2005), “品牌與代工的經營策略研究 -以台灣筆記型電腦為例”

二、英文文獻：
1.Andi Cakravastia, Isa S Toha, Nobuto Nakamura (2002), “A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks”, International Journal of Production Econom-ics. Vol. 80, Iss. 3; p.231
2. C Hakan Kagnicioglu (2006), “A Fuzzy Multiobjective Programming Approach for Supplier Selection in a Supply Chain” the Business Review, Cambridge. Holly-wood. Vol. 6, Iss. 1; p.107 - 115
3. Chian-Son Yu, “Fuzzy AHP-based GDM Method for Assessing and Selecting Marketing Strategies”, Journal of Management & Systems Vol. 12, No. 2, April 2005; p. 123-150
4. Daniel & Michael (1993), “Total cost supplier selection model: A case study”, In-ternational Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 29, Iss. 1; p. 42
5. De Boer, L.; Labro, E.; Morlacchi, P. (2001), “A review of methods supporting supplier selection”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management; p. 75-89
6. Demski, Joel S., Sappington, David E. M., Spiller, Pablo T.(1987), “Managing Supplier Switching”, The Rand Journal of Economics. Mount Morris, Vol. 18, Iss. 1; p. 77
7. Dickson, Gary W. (1966), “An Analysis of Supplier Selection Systems and Deci-sions”, Journal of Purchasing, vol.2 p;p.5-17
8. F T S Chan, H K Chan, R W L Ip, H C W Lau. (2007), “A decision support sys-tem for supplier selection in the airline industry”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. London. Vol. 221, Iss. B4; p. 741
9. Ghodsypour, S.H.; O’Brien, C. (1998), “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear program-ming”International Journal of Production Economics; p. 199-212
10. Grittner, Peter (1996), “Four elements of successful sourcing strategies”, Man-agement Review. New York. Vol. 85, Iss. 10; p. 41-46
11. Hakan Hakansson and Bjorn Wootz (1975), “Supplier selection in
an international environment “An experimental study”, JMR, Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986). Chicago. Vol. 12, Iss. 000001; p. 46-52
12. Houshyar, A. and David, L. (1992), “A Systematic Selection Procedure”, Com-puter and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1-4 ;p.173-176.
13. http://www.bizwaremagic.com/notebook-computer-history.htm
14. John, Yuva (2002), “Collaborative Logistics: Building a United Network”, Inside Supply Management, Vol 13, No.5 ;p.50
15. Kasilingam, R.G.; Lee, C.P. (1996), “Selection of vendors—a mixed integer pro-gramming approach”, Computers and Industrial Engineering; p. 347-350
16. http://pc-daily.blogspot.tw/2012/10/news-ultrabook2013nb.html