「原限定做為農業使用的土地做為非農業使用」係為現今台灣土地使用的一個現象，農地之買賣移轉或農舍建築之市場熱度逐年提高，甚至在鄉村地區更是房地產之交易熱門商品，例如農舍在宜蘭縣即是主流產品之一。
本研究從居住環境的角度，以實地訪查為方法，並整合「WHOQOL-100」、「經濟學人的宜居城市評價項目」、「台灣生活品質指標」及「中國科學院的宜居城市客觀評價指標」等4種專業機構的居住環境評價項目，加以歸納整合出適宜農舍類型之居住選擇關聯因素；研究對象係以宜蘭縣前3大的農舍交易熱區-冬山鄉、員山鄉與三星鄉-為調查區域。
在實地訪查的過程中，瞭解農舍使用者及所有權人的居住選擇所面臨的各種因素，並發現到宜蘭縣的農舍的買賣及產權主要族群為「本地購屋」及「退休人事」2大類型，其共同的特徵有1.具備鄉村生活的經驗、2.以家庭永久居住為考量、3.在經濟(收入)與生、心理(身體與心理健康)上都能獨立自主；造成他們購買農舍的「外部因素」的遠因為：1.農業用地所有權的分散、2.農村基礎設施完備、3.農業創造的收益顯著低於其他產業；近因為：1.法規允許、2.交通改善；在「自身因素」-同時也是造成他們最終判斷決定購買農舍的關鍵因素-因族群不同而有所差異，在退休族群著重在：1.住家外觀符合預想形象、2.60分鐘內可到達台北市區等影響因素；在本地購屋族群則著重在：1.不鄰近風化區等有潛在犯罪疑慮處、2.室內空間有充足的通風採光、3.周邊環境寧靜等等影響因素。
透過本研究，不但總整了近年來宜蘭縣農舍房地產化的量化資料與發展背景，更透過居住環境相關因素的分析，瞭解空間與族群間的喜好與特性，當然，更重要的是據此提供由下而上的政策修正或查核土地管理方向的調整，來形塑更符合當地、或居住人口的環境條件或相關設施，以建立人與土地與環境的良性互動。

“The agricultural land be used to non-agricultural use” is a phenomenon of land use in Taiwan today. The market price of agricultural land or farmhouse . has increased year by year, and even in rural areas, it is a hot commodity for real estate transactions. For example, Farmhouse in Yilan County is one of the mainstream products.
This study, from the perspective of the living environment, field visits, and the integration of "WHOQOL-100", "EIU's Evaluation of Liveable City ", "Taiwan's quality of life indicators" and "CASS's livable city objective Evaluation index " four professional association of the living environment assessment project, to sum up the integration of the appropriate types of accommodation for the choice of accommodation factors; the object of the study to Yilan County, the first three major farmhouse hot areas - Dongshan , Yuanshan and Wujie Township - for the survey area.
In the process of field visits, we learned about the various factors faced by the choice of residence of the farmhouse users and the owners. We found that the main ethnic groups in the estate and property of Yilan County were " Local independent-living groups " and "Retired group" , The common characteristics of 1. Have the experience of rural life, 2. Family permanent residence for consideration, 3.have well condion in the economy (income) and health, psychological (physical and mental health); The key factors that cause them to make this decision are divided into two parts: "External key factors - ultimate ": 1. Agricultural land ownership is decentralized, 2. Rural infrastructure is complete, 3. The benefits of agricultural creation are significantly lower than those of other industries; "External key factors - proximate ": 1. Laws and regulations permit, 2. Traffic improvement; Their own factors - also to cause them to determine the final decision to buy farmhouse key factors - due to different groups differences vary in"Retired group"focus on: 1. home appearance in line with the expected image, 2.60 minutes to reach the impact of Taipei City Factors; in the " Local independent-living groups " focus on: 1. Not close to the weathering area and other potential criminal concerns, 2.The interior has plenty of ventilation and light., 3.In calm zone.
Through this study, we will not only summarize the quantitative data and development background of the farmland real estate in Yilan County in recent years, but also understand the preferences and characteristics of space and ethnic groups through the analysis of the relevant factors of living environment. Of course, it is more important to provide The bottom of the policy to amend or check the direction of land management to adjust to shape more in line with local, or living environment of the environmental conditions or related facilities to establish a benign interaction between people and land and the environment.

1.Alain Pinsonneault And Kenneth L. Kraemer：Journal of Management Information Systems Volume 10 Issue 2 - Special section: Strategic and competitive information systems Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment，1993。
2.郭大宏：本國地理-自然、社會與空間的圖像，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2009。
3.李冠儀：以蘭陽平原弄的變遷與農舍興建模擬之研究，國立台北大學，都市計畫學系(碩士倫文)，2011。
4.林永松：從農地交易行為探討不動產仲介業之策略創新國立宜蘭大學，人文及管理學院高階經營管理碩士在職專班(碩士倫文)，2015。
5.廖正宏：人口遷移，三民書局，1995。
6.林哲宇：農舍管制政策之探討-管制失靈為觀點，國立臺北大學，公共政暨政策學系(碩士倫文)，2000。
7.內政部主計處：農業統計年報2014，內政部，2014。
8.內政部主計處：農業統計年報2016，內政部，2016。
9.全國區域計畫：內政部，2013。
10.WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION：WHOQOL User Manual，DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND PREVENTION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE，2012
11.徐魁甲：農地管制的起源到衰頹：本國戰後農地施出政策的歷史制度論分析1948-2007，東海大學，社會學系(碩士倫文)，2011。
12.謝英灶：影響民眾到鄉村購地意願之研究，逢甲大學，土木工程學系(碩士倫文)，2013。
13.顏愛靜：台灣集村興建農舍政策之檢視與展望，地政學訊 第11期，2008。
14.姚開屏：台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介。中華公共衛生雜誌，19(4)，315-324，2000。
15.宜蘭縣政府主計處：宜蘭縣統計年報2012，宜蘭縣政府，2012。
16.宜蘭縣政府主計處：宜蘭縣統計年報2014，宜蘭縣政府，2014。
17.張文忠、余建輝、湛東昇、馬仁鋒等：中國宜居城市研究報告，科學出版社，2016。