簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳佳家
Jia-Jia Wu
論文名稱: 翻轉教室融合批判思考教學 對高中生批判思考與學習感受之影響
The Influence of Flipped Classroom Integrating Critical Thinking Instruction on High School Students’ Critical Thinking and Learning Perceptions
指導教授: 陳秀玲
Hsiu-Ling Chen
口試委員: 翁楊絲茜
Cathy Weng
洪煌堯
Huang-Yao Hong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 105
中文關鍵詞: 翻轉教室電腦輔助協作學習批判思考團體探究現象圖學法
外文關鍵詞: Flipped Classroom, CSCL, Critical Thinking, Community of Inquiry, Phenomenographic Analysis
相關次數: 點閱:786下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究探討在電腦輔助協作學習的情境下,透過Google Classroom實施翻轉教室融入批判思考教學,對高中生批判思考技巧、批判思考意向、對學習批判思考之概念與學習感受之影響。研究情境實施在台灣北部某兩所高中之課程-想想烏托邦,教學課程為期8週,參與者為46位高中生。本研究採用混合研究設計,蒐集問卷調查(批判思考意向、團體探究、學習動機、課程滿意度與認知負荷)、批判思考測驗與半結構式訪談等方式,深入了解翻轉教室融入批判思考教學之有效性。量化資料之測驗與問卷調查結果以描述性統計、信度分析、獨立樣本T檢定、皮爾森積差相關分析呈現。質性資料採用現象圖學法,將半結構式訪談之文本進行內容分析。最後,本研究根據分析結果擬出相關建議,以供教育現場教師及未來相關研究之參考。
研究結果顯示,高中生在批判思考意向的表現上有顯著的提升。然而,在批判思考技巧的方面,卻只有批判思考高分組有顯著的進步。問卷結果顯示,高中生對於「想想烏托邦」課程給予高度正向的評價,在團體探究中的教學、認知、社會及學習者呈現皆抱持正向的學習感受;也擁有高度的學習動機。在課程滿意度方面,參與者非常認同課程活動與教材設計;學生們也認為他們接受到適當的認知負荷。在學習感受的變項中,團體探究與學習動機、課程滿意度與批判思考意向呈現正相關,因此團體探究在提升批判思考技巧與意向扮演著重要的角色。現象圖學法的結果中,本研究共將高中生對於學習批判思考的概念分成五個層級式的類別:蒐集資料、辨認資料、分析資料、評斷資料與辯論議題。與量化結果呼應,批判思考高分組的學生確實具有較高層級的概念。最後,本教學模式設計能有效提升學生批判思考意向、批判思考技巧與學習感受。因為批判思考是一種高層次認知技巧,建議未來研究可以增長實驗期程,並採用本研究所分類之批判思考概念類別,設計教材以符合學生學習需求。


The present study aims to investigate high school students’ critical thinking and their learning perceptions about flipped classroom integrating critical thinking instruction in the computer-supported collaborative an online discussion system via “Google Classroom”. This study is implemented at two public high school in Taiwan with 46 students, 26 male and 20 female, across an eight-week “Thinking Utopia” course. The present research applied a mixed methodology, which includes survey questionnaires (critical thinking disposition, revised community of inquiry survey, learning motivation, course satisfaction and cognitive load), critical thinking measurement as well as semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics, T-test, Pearson product-moment correlation were adopted to analyze the quantitative results. Phenomenographic analysis as well as qualitative content analysis were also used to analyze qualitative data.
The results showed that the high school students had significant improvement in critical thinking dispositions. However, only the participants in High Critical Thinking Group made progression in critical thinking skills. Concerning the survey questionnaires, the students were positively in favor of our proposed instructional approach and held positive attitude toward Revised Community of Inquiry. Regarding the course satisfaction, participants were highly agree with the proposed instructional approach. The present study also found out that RCOI had significant correlation with learning motivation, course satisfaction and critical dispositions, revealing that RCOI might play an important role on students’ critical thinking skills and dispositions. As for phenomenographic analysis, the students were classified into five hierarchical category regarding to students conceptions of learning critical thinking: gathering information, identifying information, analyzing information, judging information and debating. Moreover, echoing with quantitative result, the students’ who possessed higher-level of conception contribute to better critical thinking skills learning. Finally, the research results provided suggestions for instructor as well future study about implementing flipped classroom for facilitating students’ critical thinking.

誌謝 1 中文摘要 I Abstract II Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Purpose and Questions 4 1.3 Terminology 4 1.3.1 Flipped Classroom 4 1.3.2 Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 4 1.3.3 Critical Thinking 5 1.4 Significance of the Study 5 1.5 Scopes and Limitations 6 Chapter 2 Literature Reviews 7 2.1 Flipped Classroom 7 2.2 Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 8 2.3 Critical Thinking 9 2.4 CSCL and Critical Thinking 10 2.5 Community of Inquiry Framework 11 2.6 Cognitive Load Theory 14 2.7 Phenomenography 16 Chapter 3 Methodology 18 3.1 Research Method 18 3.2 Research Design 18 3.3 Participants 19 3.4 Instructional Context 20 3.4.1 Course Background 20 3.4.2 CSCL Context 20 3.5 Instructional Design and Procedure 20 3.6 Research Procedure 23 3.7 Instructional Tools 24 3.7.1 Kahoot! 24 3.7.2 Google Classroom 27 3.8 Research Tools 30 3.8.1 Measurement 30 3.8.2 Survey Questionnaires 30 3.8.3 Semi-structured Interviews 32 3.9 Data Collection and Analysis 32 3.9.1 Measurement 32 3.9.2 Survey Questionnaires 33 3.9.3 Semi-structured Interviews 33 Chapter 4 Study Results and Discussions 36 4.1 Results of Critical Thinking 36 4.2 Summary and Discussion of the Critical Thinking 40 4.3 Results of Learning Perceptions 41 4.3.1 Revised Community of Inquiry (RCOI) Questionnaire 41 4.3.2 Learning Motivation Questionnaire 47 4.3.3 Course Satisfaction Questionnaire 48 4.3.4 Cognitive Load Questionnaire 48 4.4 Summary and Discussions from Survey Questionnaires 50 4.5 Results of Phenomenographic analysis 54 4.5.1 The categories of conceptions of learning critical thinking 54 4.5.2 The distribution of conceptions toward learning critical thinking 59 4.5.3 The tree of students’ conceptions toward learning critical thinking 63 4.6 Summary and Discussion of phenomenographic analysis 65 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Suggestions 67 5.1 Summary of the Conclusion 67 5.2 Suggestions for Future Study 70 References 72 APPENDIX 84 Appendix A 84 Appendix B 85

中文文獻
教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。台北:教育部。
英文文獻
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
Akyol, Z., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2009). A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 23(2), 123-136.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.
Altinay, L., & Paraskevas, A. (2007). A computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) approach in teaching research methods. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(3), 623-644.
Anderson, L. D. Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. U.S.: Addison WesleyLongman, Inc.
Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context, 5(2) Retrieved May21, 2017, from http://auspace.athabascau.ca/bitstream/2149/725/1/assessing_teaching_presence.pdf
Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40-56.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2)Retrieved May21, 2017, from http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/the-flipped-class-conversation-689.php.
Baker, R. S., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. JEDM-Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3-17.
Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459-472.
Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2012). The flipped class: Myths versus reality. The Daily Riff. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/the-flipped-class-conversation-689.php.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2008). Remixing chemistry class: Two Colorado teachers make vodcasts of their lectures to free up class time for hands-on activities. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(4), 22-27.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: Internal Society for Technology in Education.
Bharali, R. (2014). Enhancing Online Learning Activities for Groups in Flipped Classrooms. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Technology-Rich Environments for Learning and Collaboration (pp. 269-276). Springer International Publishing.
Brew, L. S. (2008). The role of student feedback in evaluating and revising a blended learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 98-105.
Butchart, S., Forster, D., Gold, I., Bigelow, J., Korb, K., Oppy, G., & Serrenti, A. (2009). Improving critical thinking using web based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2).
Cela, K. L., Sicilia, M. Á., & Sánchez, S. (2015). Social network analysis in e-learning environments: A Preliminary systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 219-246.
Chan, T. W. (2010). How East Asian classrooms may change over the next 20 years. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 28-52.
Chang, P., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). EFL doctoral students' conceptions of authorial stance in academic knowledge claims and the tie to epistemic beliefs. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(5), 525-542.
Chen, Y., Chen, N. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1155-1166.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
Cheong, C. M., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Online discussion and critical thinking skills: A case study in a Singapore secondary school. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 556-573.
Chiu, T. K., & Churchill, D. (2016). Design of learning objects for concept learning: Effects of multimedia learning principles and an instructional approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1355-1370.
Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential Negative Effects of Mobile Learning on Students' Learning Achievement and Cognitive Load-A Format Assessment Perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332-344.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627.
Dam, G., Ten, T. M., & Volman, M. L. (2003). A life jacket or an art of living: Inequality in social competence education. Curriculum Inquiry, 33(2), 117-137.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
DeLoach, S. B., & Greenlaw, S. A. (2005). Do electronic discussions create critical thinking spillovers?. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(1), 149-163.
Ellis, R. A., & Calvo, R. A. (2006). Discontinuities in university student experiences of learning through discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 55-68.
Ennis, R. (1991). Critical thinking. Teaching philosophy, 14(1), 5-24.
Ennis, R. H., Millman, J., & Tomko, T. N. (1985). Cornell critical thinking tests level X & level Z: Manual. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
Facione, P. A. (1990). The California critical thinking skills test (CCTST): Form A. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 356-366.
Fulton, K. P. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20–24.
Fung, D., & Howe, C. (2014). Group work and the learning of critical thinking in the Hong Kong secondary liberal studies curriculum. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 245-270.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7-23.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The internet and higher education, 13(1), 31-36.
Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: face-to-face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 187-200.
Heckman, R., & Annabi, H. (2005). A content analytic comparison of learning processes in online and face‐to‐face case study discussions. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 10(2), article 7. Retrieved May 21, 2017, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00244.x/full
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 53(4), 449.
Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving critical thinking: Effects of dispositions and instructions on economics students' reasoning skills. Learning and Instruction, 29, 31-42.
Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Improving Social Studies Students’ Critical Thinking. In Using Blended Learning (pp. 59-78). Springer Singapore.
Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96.
Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(4), 338-354.
Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
Icard, B. (2014). Educational technology best practices. International Journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 11(3), 37-41.
Kaddoura, M. A. (2011). Critical thinking skills of nursing students in lecture-based teaching and case-based learning. Learning, 5(2), 20.
Kalelioglu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The Effect of Instructional Techniques on Critical Thinking and Critical Thinking Dispositions in Online Discussion. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 248-258.
Kim, C., Park, S. W., & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 171-185.
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
King, A. (1995). Designing the instructional process to enhance critical thinking across the curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 13-17.
Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and instruction, 12(1), 1-10.
Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research.Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 1-8.
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16-31.
Kucuk, S., & Sahin, I. (2013). From the perspective of community of inquiry framework: An examination of Facebook uses by pre-service teachers as a learning environment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 142-156.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson's Research Reports, 6, 40-41.
Lau, J. Y. (2017). Reflections on the Umbrella Movement: Implications for civic education and critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-12.
Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3-13.
Lee, H., Parsons, D., Kwon, G., Kim, J., Petrova, K., Jeong, E., & Ryu, H. (2016). Cooperation begins: Encouraging critical thinking skills through cooperative reciprocity using a mobile learning game. Computers & Education, 97, 97-115.
Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191-220.
Lee, M. H., Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Proving or improving science learning? Understanding high school students’ conceptions of science assessment in Taiwan. Science Education, 97(2), 244-270.
Lee, S. M. (2014). The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 41-52.
Lee, Y. H. (2015). Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script: enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 88, 182-191.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior research methods, 45(4), 1058-1072.
Liao, Y. W., & She, H. C. (2009). Enhancing Eight Grade Students' Scientific Conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning through a Web-based Learning Program. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 228-240.
Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Bridging the Gap: Technology Trends and Use of Technology in Schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59-68.
Lin, H. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Conceptions of learning management among undergraduate students in Taiwan. Management Learning, 39(5), 561-578.
Lin, H. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). College students' conceptions of learning management: the difference between traditional (face-to-face) instruction and Web-based learning environments. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(4), 437-452.
Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1-13.
Marshall, D., Summer, M., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Students' conceptions of learning in an engineering context. Higher education, 38(3), 291-309.
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28 - 49.
Marton, F. (1992). Phenomenography and “the art of teaching all things to all men'’. Qualitative studies in education, 5(3), 253-267.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Mayordomo, R. M., & Onrubia, J. (2015). Work coordination and collaborative knowledge construction in a small group collaborative virtual task. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 96-104.
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in science education, 37(4), 353-369.
Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597-599.
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in science education, 37(4), 353-369.
Oliver, R. (2005). Quality assurance and e-learning: blue skies and pragmatism. Research in Learning Technology, 13(3).
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st Century learning. Retrieved February 23, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1.__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf.
Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M. (2011). Good practice report: Blended learning.
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 429.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2001). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts & tools. Foundation Critical Thinking.
Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students' conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238-250.
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
Richardson, J. T. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of educational research, 69(1), 53-82.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J., Whighting, M., & Nisbet, D. (2016). The Predictive Relationship Among the Community of Inquiry Framework, Perceived Learning and Online, and Graduate Students’ Course Grades in Online Synchronous and Asynchronous Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3).
Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44.
Rosen, Y., & Tager, M. (2014). Making student thinking visible through a concept map in computer-based assessment of critical thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(2), 249-270.
Salpeter, J. (2003). 21st century skills: Will our students be prepared? Technology and learning-dayton, 24(3), 17-29.
Sendag, S., & Odabas, H., F. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 53(1), 132-141.
Setiani, M. Y., & MacKinnon, A. M. (2015). A community of inquiry-based framework for civic education at Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia. Distance Education, 36(3), 351-363.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543-553.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a community of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 1721–1731.
Shea, P., Hayes, S., Smith, S. U., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Pickett, A., ... & Jian, S. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 89-95.
Simpson, E., & Courtney, M. (2008). Implementation and evaluation of critical thinking strategies to enhance critical thinking skills in Middle Eastern nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 14(6), 449-454.
Sinatra, G. M. (2001). Knowledge, beliefs, and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 321–323.
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The internet and higher education, 7(1), 59-70.
Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer‐assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 79-90.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251-296.
Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464-476.
Ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies. Learning and instruction, 14(4), 359-379.
Tomory, A., & Watson, S. L. (2015). Flipped Classrooms for Advanced Science Courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 875-887.
Tsai, C. C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733-1750.
Tsai, C. C. (2009). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: The differences revealed by college students. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1092-1103.
Tsai, C. C., Chuang, S. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, M. J. (2011). Self-efficacy in Internet-based Learning Environments: A Literature Review. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 222-240.
Tsai, C. C., & Kuo, P. C. (2008). Cram school students’ conceptions of learning and learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 353-375.
Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. H. (2011). College students’ conceptions of context-aware ubiquitous learning: A phenomenographic analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 137-141.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1).
Tu, Y. W., Shih, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Eighth graders’ web searching strategies and outcomes: The role of task types, web experiences and epistemological beliefs. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1142-1153.
Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational psychology review, 17(2), 147-177.
Vijayaratnam, P. (2012). Developing higher order thinking skills and team commitment via group problem solving: A bridge to the real world. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 53-63.
Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and instruction, 11(4), 381-419.
Warner, A. G. (2016). Developing a community of inquiry in a face-to-face class: How an online learning framework can enrich traditional classroom practice. Journal of Management Education, 40(4), 432-452.
Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.
Walker, S. A. (2004). Socratic strategies and devil's advocacy in synchronous CMC debate. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 172-182.
Walker, S. E. (2003). Active learning strategies to promote critical thinking. Journal of Athletic Training, 38(3), 263.
Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students' regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189-217.
Yang, S. C., & Chung, T. Y. (2009). Experimental study of teaching critical thinking in civic education in Taiwanese junior high school. British journal of educational psychology, 79(1), 29-55.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Chou, H. A. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 666-684.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Empowering students through digital game authorship: Enhancing concentration, critical thinking, and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 68, 334-344.
Yang, Y. F., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72-83.
Yeh, K. H., & She, H. C. (2010). On-line synchronous scientific argumentation learning: Nurturing students' argumentation ability and conceptual change in science context. Computers in Education, 55(2), 586–602.
Yeh, Y. C. (1999). A study of substitute teachers’ professional knowledge, personal teaching efficacy, and teaching behavior in critical-thinking instruction. Journal of Chengchi University, 78, 55-84.
Yeh, Y. C. (2003). The manual of critical thinking test, level I. Taipei: Psychological Publishing.
Yeh, Y. C. (2005). Integrating e-learning into teacher education curriculum: Its effects on improving preservice teachers’ ability to teach critical thinking. Taipei: National Council of Science. (NSC93–2520-S-004–002).
Yeh, Y. C. (2007). Aptitude-treatment interactions in preservice teachers’ behavior change during computer-simulated teaching. Computers & Education, 48(3), 495-507.
Yeh, Y. C. (2012). A co-creation blended KM model for cultivating critical-thinking skills. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1317-1327.
Yue, M., Zhang, M., Zhang, C., & Jin, C. (2017). The effectiveness of concept mapping on development of critical thinking in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 52, 87–94..
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & education,42(3), 289-314.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2023/02/10 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE