簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Lekissa Alemayehu
Lekissa Alemayehu
論文名稱: 以自我導向學習預測高等教育學生在線上學習環境中的學習自我效能和學習參與: SEM 分析
SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING AS A PREDICTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ LEARNING SELF-EFFICACY AND LEARNING ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A SEM ANALYSIS
指導教授: 陳秀玲
Husiu-Ling Chen
口試委員: HUANG-YAO HONG
HUANG-YAO HONG
梁至中
Jyh-Chong Liang
Chen sufen
Chen sufen
翁楊絲茜
Sz-Chien Wengyang
Chen Hsiu-Ling
Chen Hsiu-Ling
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 91
中文關鍵詞: online learningself-directed learninglearning self-efficacylearning enagagement
外文關鍵詞: online learning, self-directed learning, learning self-efficacy, learning enagagement
相關次數: 點閱:391下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

  • The development of Internet and Web 2.0 technologies has changed the provision of
    education. The online learning environment is the product of these changes where learners
    are at their home far from school. In online learning where there is no instructor or classmates,
    students’ self-directed learning, learning self-efficacy, and learning engagements are
    important variables to be successful in their academic performance and to minimize dropout
    rates from the program. This study aimed to investigate the prediction of demographic factors
    and SDL variables on students’ learning self-efficacy and student engagement and to validate
    the prediction of learning self-efficacy on students’ learning engagement in online learning
    environments. This study used a cross-sectional survey design, specifically an online survey,
    to collect data from students of higher education institutions in Taiwan. Data were collected
    from 354 participants from higher education students of different fields and years of study.
    For data analysis, an independent t test and ANOVA were used to answer the question of
    whether gender and years of study had a different effect on students’ learning self-efficacy
    and learning engagement in online learning environments, and the remaining research
    questions were analyzed using two-step structural equation modeling (SEM). These are (1)
    confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; measurement model) to determine how well the latent
    variables (motivation, self-monitoring, self-management, learning self-efficacy, and learning
    engagement) (constructs) are based on indicators (items) as measurement methods and (2)
    structural equation modeling (SEM) to evaluate the research model and the hypotheses, to
    assess one or more contingent relationships connecting the constructs of the hypothesized
    model using Mplus. The result of the study showed that demographic factors do not predict
    students’ learning self-efficacy and engagement of higher education students in online
    iv
    learning environments. From the SDL components, motivation directly positively predicted
    learning self-efficacy, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement significantly.
    Similarly, self-monitoring directly positively predicted learning self-efficacy and all three
    components of learning engagement. However, self-management positively and directly
    predicted learning self-efficacy significantly but did not predict any of the three components
    of learning engagement. The result of the study also showed that learning self-efficacy
    partially mediated the effect of motivation and self-monitoring on learning engagement and
    fully mediated the effect of self-management on learning engagement of higher education
    students in online learning environments. Finally, necessary discussion and implications of
    the study for practice are given.

    ntent Page Dedication.................................................................................................................................i Acknowledgment .....................................................................................................................ii Abstract...................................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents....................................................................................................................v List of Figures.........................................................................................................................ix Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................x CHAPTER ONE......................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................1 1.1. Background of the study ...............................................................................................1 1.2. Statement of the problem ..............................................................................................5 1.3. Purpose of the study ......................................................................................................7 1.4. Research questions........................................................................................................8 1.5. Significance of the Costudy...............................................................................................9 1.6. Scope of the study .........................................................................................................9 1.7. Definitions of important terms......................................................................................9 1.8. Chapter summary ........................................................................................................11 CHAPTER TWO ...................................................................................................................13 LITERATURE REVIEW...................................................................................................13 2.1. Online learning and higher education .........................................................................13 2.2. Benefits and challenges of online learning .................................................................16 2.3. Supporting online learners ..........................................................................................18 vi 2.4. Self-Directed Learning: An overview.........................................................................19 2.4.1. The Emergence of Self-Directed Learning...........................................................20 2.4.2. Self-Directed Learning Characteristics ................................................................21 2.4.3. SDL in online learning contexts...........................................................................23 2.4.4. Self-Directed Learning Dimensions.....................................................................24 2.5. Learning Self-Efficacy in Online Learning Environments.........................................26 2.6. Students’ engagement in online learning environments .............................................28 2.6.1. Student engagement in online learning and self-determination theory (SDT).....29 2.7. Hypotheses development and Conceptual framework ............................................30 2.7.1. Students’ motivation, learning self-efficacy and engagement in online learning environments ..................................................................................................................30 2.7.2. Students’ self-monitoring, learning self-efficacy, and learning engagement in online learning environments .........................................................................................32 2.7.3. Students’ self-management, learning self-efficacy, and learning engagement in online learning environments .........................................................................................34 2.7.4. Students’ learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in online learning environments ..................................................................................................................35 2.7.5. Conceptual Model of the Study............................................................................36 2.8. Chapter summary ........................................................................................................38 CHAPTER THREE ...............................................................................................................41 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................41 3.1. Context of the study and participants..........................................................................41 3.2. Procedures...................................................................................................................41 3.3. Research Tools and Measurements.............................................................................43 3.3.1. Measurements of students’ motivation, self-monitoring and self-management...43 3.3.2. Measurements of students’ learning self-efficacy................................................43 3.3.3. Measurements of students’ learning engagements...............................................44 3.4. Research Design..........................................................................................................44 vii 3.5. Data Analysis ..............................................................................................................44 3.6. Chapter Summary........................................................................................................45 CHAPTER FOUR..................................................................................................................47 RESULTS ..............................................................................................................................47 4.1. Sample size and descriptive statistics..........................................................................47 4.2. Effects of gender and year of studies..........................................................................49 4.2.1. Learning self-efficacy and learning engegement differences depending on gender ........................................................................................................................................49 4.2.2. Learning self-efficacy and learning engegement differences depending on year of study................................................................................................................................50 4.3. Measurement model ....................................................................................................50 CHAPTER FIVE ...................................................................................................................58 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION, AND IMPLICATIONS ....................................................58 5.1. Discussion ...................................................................................................................58 5.1.2. Motivation prediction of higher education students’ learning self-efficacy and engagement in online learning environments.................................................................59 5.2. Conclusion and implications.......................................................................................65 5.3. Study limitations and future research..........................................................................67 6. References..........................................................................................................................68

    Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M. D., Infinite-Moro, J. C., & Ruipérez García, G. (2020).
    Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global
    research trends. Sustainability, 12(5), 2107. https://doi.org/10. 3390/su12052107
    Abdullah, M. H. (2001). Self-directed learning. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and
    Communication. Retrieved 26 January 2005 from www.eric.ed.gov.
    Aguilera-Hermida, A. P., Quiroga-Garza, A., Gómez-Mendoza, S., Villanueva, C. A. D. R.,
    Alecchi, B. A., & Avci, D. (2021). Comparison of students’ use and acceptance of
    emergency online learning due to COVID-19 in the USA, Mexico, Peru, and Turkey.
    Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.
    Ainoda, N., Onishi, H., & Yasuda, Y. (2005). Definitions and goals of" self-directed learning"
    in contemporary medical education literature. Annals-Academy of Medicine
    Singapore, 34(8), 515-35.
    Akhtar, M. (2008). What is self-efficacy? Bandura’s 4 sources of efficacy beliefs. Positive
    Psychology: UK
    Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as
    69
    an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner
    self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in
    Education, 52(3), 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
    Aldhafeeri, F. M., & Khan, B. H. (2016). Teachers’ and students’ views on E-Learning
    readiness in Kuwait’s secondary public schools. Journal of Educational Technology
    Systems, 45(2), 202–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516646747.
    Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face
    classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with
    self-efcacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior,
    102, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018
    Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance
    learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary
    Educational Technology, 2(2), 118-134.
    Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of
    effective teacher–student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting
    student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system secondary.
    School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98.
    Alqurashi, E. (2016). Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review.
    Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 9(1), 45-52.
    Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: MacMillan.
    Annually, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd edn). New York: McGraw-
    Hill.
    Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). An exploratory study of the effects of gender on student learning and
    class participation in an Internet-based MBA course. Management Learning, 31(4),
    70
    503-519.
    Arnott, L., & Yelland, N. (2020). Multimodal life worlds: Pedagogies for play inquiries and
    explorations. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 9(1), 124–146.
    Aydın CH, & Tasci D. (2005). Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an
    emerging country. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 244-257.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive Theory.
    Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Kawecki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating
    student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic
    review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational
    Technology, 36(4), 126–150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
    Bentler, P. M., & D. G. Bonett. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis
    of Covariance Structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
    Bentler, P. M.(1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin,
    107, 238–246.
    Bolhuis, S. (1996). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: a
    multidimensional perspective. Learning and instruction, 13(3), 327-347.
    Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital
    transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and
    usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
    Education, 15(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
    Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher
    education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher education, 18(5), 529-549.
    71
    Borotis S, & Poulymenakou A. (2004). E-learning readiness components: Key issues to
    consider before adopting e-learning interventions. In: Association for the
    Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). In E-Learn: World Conference on
    E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp.1622-
    1629).
    Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on
    theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
    Brookfield, S. D. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. New york: John Wiley &
    Sons.
    Brown, J. S. (2008). Growing up digital: how the web changes work, education, and the ways
    people learn. In P. F. Murphy & K. Hall (Eds), Learning and practice: agency and
    identities (pp. 193–201). Los Angeles, CA, London: SAGE Publications Ltd
    Burckhardt, C. S. (2005). Educating patients: self-management approaches. Disabil Rehabil,
    27(12), 703-709. doi:10.1080/09638280400009097.
    Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts,
    Applications and Programming (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Routledge.
    Caffarella, R. S., & O'Donnell, J. M. (1987). Self-directed adult learning: A critical paradigm
    revisited. Adult Education Quarterly, 37(4), 199-211.
    Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2019). Making sense of change management: A complete guide
    to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page
    Publishers.
    Capper, J. (2001). E-learning growth and promise for the developing world. TechKnowLogia,
    May/June. . Retrieved July 20, 2007.
    72
    Carey, K. (2020). Is everybody ready for the big migration to online college? Actually, no.
    The New York Times.
    Carr, M. E., Moore, D. W., & Anderson, A. (2014). Self-management interventions on
    students with autism: A meta-analysis of single-subject research. Exceptional
    Children, 81, 28–44. https://doi. org/10.1177/0014402914532235.
    Celikkaleli, O. (2014). The relation between cognitive flexibility and academic, social, and
    emotional self-efficacy beliefs among adolescents. Egitim ve Bilim (Education and
    Science), 39, 347–354.
    Chen, C. H., Chen, K. Z., & Tsai, H. F. (2021). Did Self-Directed Learning Curriculum
    Guidelines Change Taiwanese High-School Students’ Self-Directed Learning
    Readiness? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-18.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00582-w
    Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A
    top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 524–
    537. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12432
    Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2016a). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in
    teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2),
    317–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015. 1113709
    Chou, P. N. (2012). The relationship between engineering students self-directed learning
    abilities and online learning performances: A pilot study. Contemporary Issues in
    Education Research (CIER), 5(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v5i1.6784
    Chu, R. J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Self‐directed learning readiness, Internet self‐efficacy and
    preferences towards constructivist Internet‐based learning environments among
    73
    Higher‐aged adults. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 489-501
    Cussó-Calabuig, R., Farran, X. C., & Bosch-Capblanch, X. (2018). Effects of intensive use
    of computers in secondary school on gender differences in attitudes towards ICT: A
    systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2111–2139.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9706-6
    Curtin, R. B., Walters, B. A., Schatell, D., Pennell, P., Wise, M., & Klicko, K. (2008). Self-
    efficacy and self-management behaviors in patients with chronic kidney disease.
    Advances in chronic kidney disease, 15(2), 191-205.
    Cynthia, L. S. (2015). The future of learning: What kind of learning for the 21st century?
    Paris, France: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight. ERF Working Papers
    Series, No. 14.
    Daniel J. (2010). Why universities need technology strategies. Change: The Magazine of
    Higher Learning, 29(4), 10-17. doi: 10.1080/00091389709602322.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality.
    In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation, Vol. 38.
    Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990: Perspectives on motivation (p. 237–288).
    University of Nebraska Press.
    Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). Damask Covid-19 Terhadap Implementasi Pembelajaran Daring Di
    Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 55–61. Google Scholar.
    Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Online Learning in Higher Institutions
    of Education: A Survey of the Perceptions of Ghanaian International Students in
    China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3).
    doi:10.29333/ojcmt/8286.
    74
    Discenza, R., Howard, C., & Schenk, K. (2003). The design and management of efective
    distance learning programs. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19
    pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review,
    118, 105-440.
    Duffin, E. (2019). Opinions of online college students on quality of online education U.S.
    2019.https://www.statista.com/statistics/956123/opinions-online-college-studentsquality-online-education/
    Dullas, A. R. (2018, April 4). The Development of Academic Self-Efficacy Scale for Filipino
    Junior High School Students. Retrieved from Frontiers in Education:
    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2018.00019/full#B5
    Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (Eds.). (2010). The nature of learning: Using
    research to inspire practice. Washington: Organization for Economic Cooperation &
    Development. Retrieved from
    http://encompass.library.cornell.edu/cgibin/checkIP.cgi?access=gateway_standard%
    26url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789 264086487-en.
    du Toit-Brits, C., & van Zyl, C. M. (2017). Self-directed learning characteristics: making
    learning personal, empowering and successful. Africa Education Review, 14(3-4),
    122-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1267576
    Dutton, J., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal
    of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169–190.
    Elmaadaway, M. A. N. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom approach on class
    engagement and skill performance in a blackboard course. British Journal of
    75
    Educational Technology. doi: doi:10.1111/bjet.12553.
    Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival in the digital
    era. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
    Estira, K. L. A. (2020). Online distance learning readiness of business administration students
    in one state university in the Philippines. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (12), 826-
    832. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.12.146
    Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised
    edition). Cambridge, MA: Bradford books/MIT Press.
    Fan W, Williams CM. (2010).The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-
    Efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educ Psychol, 30 (1):53–74.
    Fisher, M. J., & King, J. (2010). The self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing
    education revisited: A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Education Today, 30(1),
    44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.020.
    Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumfield, P., Krajick, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a
    framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning
    Sciences, 13, 43–76. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable
    variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
    Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research
    in education (Vol. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Franklin, T. O., Burdette, P., East, T., & Mellard, D. F. (2015). Parents’ roles in their child’s
    online learning experience: State education agency forum proceedings series.
    (Report No.2). Retrieved from Lawrence, KS
    76
    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of
    the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
    Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult
    Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103.
    Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based
    environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher
    Education, 2(23), 1-19.
    Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. Handbook of distance
    education, 161-168.
    Gist, M.E, &Mitchell, T.R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants
    and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 12, 472-485.
    Gould, D., & Chung, Y. (2004). Self-regulation skills in young, middle, and older adulthood.
    In M. Weiss (Ed.), Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan
    perspective (pp. 383–402). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
    Gove, M., Vacca, J. A. L., Vacca, R. T., Burkey, L. C., Lenhart, L. A., & McKeon, C. A.
    (2011). Reading and learning to read (7th ed.). Pearson: Allyn and Bacon.
    Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. Handbook of
    Educational Psychology, 4, 63–84.
    Guglielmino, L. M. (1978). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale
    (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts
    International, 38, 6467A.
    Hagaman, J. L., & Reid, R. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading
    comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and
    Special Education, 29, 222-234.
    77
    Hiemstra, G. (1982). Teleconferencing, concern for face, and organizational culture.
    Annals of the International Communication Association, 6(1), 874-904.
    Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. (2010). Multivariate
    Data Analysis with Readings (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
    Harris, K. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students.
    Focus Except Children, 15(2), 1-16.
    Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in online education. Singapore: Springer.
    Hartnett, M. K. (2015). Influences that undermine learners’ perceptions of autonomy,
    competence and relatedness in an online context. Australasian Journal of Educational
    Technology, 31(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet. 1526
    Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback
    in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44.
    Harish, J. (2013). Online Education: A Revolution in the Making. Cadmus Journal, 2(1), 26-
    38
    Hasri, S. A., Basori, B., & Maryono, D. (2019). Game Based Learning Effectiveness with the
    Kahoot Application Viewed from Learning Interests and Learning Outcomes of
    Learners in Digital Simulation Subjects. IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics
    Education), 3(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v3i1.32116
    Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for
    understanding and engagement. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
    Hoban, S., & Hoban, G. (2004). Self-esteem, self-efficacy and self-directed learning:
    Attempting to undo the confusion. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning,
    1(2), 7-25.
    78
    Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between
    emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, (March 27,
    2020). https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-differencebetween-emergency-
    remote-teaching-and-online-learning
    Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-
    determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment.
    Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159-2174.
    Hsu, Y. C., & Shiue, Y. M. (2005). The effect of self-directed learning readiness on
    achievement comparing face-to-face and two-way distance learning instruction.
    International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(2), 143-158.
    Huang, S., & Fang, N. (2013). Predicting student academic performance in an engineering
    dynamics course: A comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models.
    Computers & Education, 61, 133–145.
    Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure
    Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation
    Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
    Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. Z. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement
    and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 124–131.
    Joshi, O., Chapagain, B., Kharel, G., Poudyal, N. C., Murray, B. D., & Mehmood, S. R.
    (2020). Benefits and challenges of online instruction in agriculture and natural
    resource education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12.
    http://doi.org/10. 1080/10494820.2020.1725896
    Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student
    engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity. Educational
    79
    Technology Research & Development, 65(1), 203–218.
    Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher
    Education, 38(5), 758–773.
    Kaplan, R. W., and D. P. Saccuzzo. (1982). Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications,
    and Issues. Monterey, CA: Brooks & Cole.
    Karatas, K., & Basbay, M. (2014). Predicting self-directed learning readiness level in terms
    of critical thinking disposition, general self-efficacy and academic achievement.
    Elementary Education Online, 13(3), 916- 933.
    https://hdl.handle.net/11492/4010Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of
    instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),
    Keller, J. M. (2006). What is motivational design. Florida: Florida State University.
    Kenny, J. (2003). Effective project management for strategic innovation and change in an
    organizational context. Project Management Journal, 34(1), 43-53.
    Key, K. (2020). Going Back to School Online Amidst the Pandemic. Retrieved from:
    https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/counseling-keys/202003/going-back
    school-online-amidst-the-pandemic
    King, K. P. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional
    development. Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 231-246.
    Khurana, C. (2016). Exploring the role of multimedia in enhancing social presence in an
    asynchronous online course. (Doctoral Dissertation). The State University of New
    Jersey, Rutgers, U.S, Retrieved from https://search-proquest-
    com.simsrad.net.ocs. mq.edu.au/docview/1844392065?pq-origsite=primo
    Kline RB. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd edn). New
    80
    York (NY): The Guilford Press; DOI:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
    Knowles, M., (1975). Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers.
    Follet, Chicago: Jossey-Bass.
    Kopp, M., Gröblinger, O., & Adams, S. (2019, March 11–13). Five common assumptions that
    prevent digital transformation at higher education institutions. INTED2019
    Proceedings (pp. 1448–1457). https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019
    Kuh, G. D. (2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and
    overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Center
    for Postsecondary Research.
    Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks
    for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2),
    24–32.
    Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student
    engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.
    Lee, E., Pate, J. A., & Cozart, D. (2015). Autonomy support for online students. TechTrends,
    59(4), 54–61. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0871-9
    Leszczyński, P., Charuta, A., Łaziuk, B., Gałązkowski, R., Wejnarski, A., Roszak, M., &
    Kołodziejczak, B. (2018). Multimedia and interactivity in distance learning of
    resuscitation guidelines: A randomised controlled trial. Interactive Learning
    Environments, 26(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1337035
    Liaw, S. S. (2007). Understanding computers and the Internet as a work assisted tool.
    Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 399–414.
    Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender
    81
    gap in student engagement: The role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and
    involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 498–518.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12095
    Li, C. & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic has changed education forever. Here's
    how: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from:https://www.weforum.org/agenda/
    2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
    Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. T. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review.
    Computers & Education, 37(3-4), 377-386.
    Littlefield, J. (2018). The difference between synchronous and asynchronous distance
    learninghttps://www.thoughtco.com/synchronous-distance-learning-
    asynchronous distance learning 1097959
    Liu, O. L., Bridgeman, B., & Adler, R. M. (2012). Measuring learning outcomes in higher
    education: Motivation matters. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 352–362.
    http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12459679.
    Long, H. B. (1998). Theoretical and practical implications of selected paradigms of
    Self-directed learning. In H. B. Long & Associates (Eds.), Developing paradigms for
    Self-directed learning (pp. 1-14). Norman, OK: Public Managers Center at
    University of Oklahoma.
    Lumsden, L. (1999). Student motivation: Cultivating a love of learning. Eugene, OR: ERIC
    Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction
    Service No. ED443135).
    Luo, H., Koszalka, T. A., Arnone, M. P., & Choi, I. (2018). Applying case-based method in
    designing Self-directed online instruction: A formative research study. Educational
    82
    Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 515–544.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9572-3.
    MacCallum, R. C., M. W. Browne, & H. M. Sugawara. (1996). Power Analysis and
    Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological
    Methods, 1 (2), 130–149.
    Maltby JR, & Whittle J. (2000). Learning programming online: Student perceptions and
    performance. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2000 Conference.
    Manullang, S. O., & Satria, E. (2020). The Review of the International Voices on the
    Responses of the Worldwide School Closures Policy Searching during Covid-19
    Pandemic. Jurnal Iqra': Kilian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 1-13.
    https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i2.1036
    Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and
    Switching of in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and
    disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology,
    104, 1–18.
    Martin F, & Bolliger DU. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the
    importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online
    Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
    Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence
    based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning
    studies.US Department of Education Retrieved from
    http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824
    Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. New
    83
    York: John Wiley & Sons.
    McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in Factorable Domains: Domain Validity and
    Generalizability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38 (1), 75–79.
    MacDonald K, & Greggans A.(2010). Cool friends’: an evaluation of a community
    befriending programme for young people with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Nurs, 19, 2406–
    14.
    Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert
    scale items? Study1: reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological
    Measurement, 31, 657-674.
    Naidu, S. (2016). Mainstreaming open, flexible, and distance learning. In K.-W. Lai, S. Stein,
    P. Field, & K. Pratt (Eds.), our world in your place: 30 years of distance learning
    and teaching at the University of Otago (pp. 92–108). Otago: University of Otago,
    Distance Learning Office.
    National Academy for Educational Research. (2018). Curriculum guidelines for 12-year basic
    education: General guidelines [English version]. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of
    Education.
    Nistor, N. (2013). Stability of attitudes and participation in online university courses: Gender
    and location efects. Computers & Education, 68, 284–292.
    Nouwen, M., & Zaman, B. (2018). Redefining the role of parents in young children's online
    interactions. A value-sensitive design case study. International Journal of
    Child Computer Interaction, 18, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.001.
    OECD. (2005). E-learning in Tertiary Education. Policy Brief .Retrieved June 2008 from.
    http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/25/359611 32.pdf).
    O'Doherty, D., Dromey, M., Lougheed, J., Hannigan, A., Last, J., & McGrath, D. (2018).
    84
    Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative
    review. (Report). BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 130–141.
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909- 018-1240-0
    O’ Sullivan, P.B. (2000). Communication technologies in an educational environment:
    Lessons from a historical perspective. Issues in web-based pedagogy: A critical
    primer, 49-64. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    Pardo, A., Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2017). Combining University Student Self-Regulated
    Learning Indicators and Engagement with Online Learning Events to Predict
    Academic Performance. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 82-92.
    doi:10.1109/tlt.2016.2639508
    Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web based virtual learning environments: A
    research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills
    and training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–427.
    Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital
    literacy and self-efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. Internet and
    Higher Education, 29, 91–97.
    Prussia, G.E; Anderson, J.S, Manz, C.C. (1998). Self-leadership and performance outcomes:
    The Mediating influence of self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19,
    523- 538.
    Purarjomandlangrudi, A., & Chen, D. (2020). Exploring the Influence of Learners’ Personal
    Traits and Perceived Course Characteristics on Online Interaction and Engagement.
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–23.
    Radesky, J. S., Eisenberg, S., Kistin, C. J., Gross, J., Block, G., Zuckerman, B., & Silverstein,
    M. (2016). Overstimulated consumers or next-generation learners? Parent tensions
    85
    about child mobile technology use. Annals of Family Medicine, 14(6), 503–508.
    https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1976.
    Ray, A. E., Greene, K., Pristavec, T., Hecht, M. L., Miller-Day, M., & Banerjee, S. C. (2020).
    Exploring indicators of engagement in online learning as applied to adolescent health
    prevention: a pilot study of REAL media. Educational technology research and
    development. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09813-1.
    Reese, S. A. (2015). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs.
    dissociation. Education and information technologies, 20(3), 579-588.
    Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the
    COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. Retrieved from
    https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/ framework_guide_v2.pdf
    Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by
    empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
    Learning.https://doi. org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
    Ruey, S. (2010). A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online
    learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 706-720.
    Ryan, A. M., & H. Patrick. (2002). the Classroom Social Environment and Changes in
    Adolescents’ Motivation and Engagement during Middle School. American
    Educational Research Journal, 38 (2), 437–460.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination
    theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions.
    Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101-860.
    Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Living well: A self-determination theory
    86
    perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170
    Lehmann, H. (2017). Digital transformation in higher education – the role of
    enterprise architectures and portals. Digital Enterprise Computing (DEC 2017).
    Sandars, J., Correia, R., Dankbaar, M., de Jong, P., Goh, P. S., Hege, I., ... & Webb, A.
    (2020). Twelve tips for rapidly migrating to online learning during the COVID-19
    pandemic. MedEdPublish, 9(1), 82-97.
    https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000082.1
    SCANS (1991). What work requires of schools. A scans report for America 2000. The
    Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills US Department of
    Labor. Retrieved from http://wdr.doleta.gov/SCANS/whatwork/whatwork.pdf
    Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. J.
    Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student
    engagement (pp. 219–235). New York: Springer.
    Serdyukov, P., & Serdyukova, N. (2012). Time as factor of success in online learning. Journal
    of Information Technology and Application in Education, 1(2), 40–46.
    Shen, D., Cho, M. -H., Tsai, C. -L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning
    experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet
    and Higher Education, 19, 10–17.
    Silverman, A. (2020). Play, child development, and relationships: A preschool teacher in
    China shares her virtual teaching experience. Teaching Young Children, 13(4). 80-95.
    Simmering, M. J., Posey, C., & Piccoli, G. (2009). Computer Self-Efficacy and Motivation
    to Learn in a Self-Directed Online Course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative
    Education, 7(1), 99-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00207.x
    87
    Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A
    systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American
    Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.
    2019.1663082.
    Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and
    disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?. Journal of
    educational psychology, 100(4), 765-783.
    Smith, R. M., & Haverkamp, K. K. (1977). Toward a theory of learning how to learn. Adult
    Education, 28(1), 3-21.
    Song, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from
    online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1205838.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838
    Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning
    in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.
    Stajkovic, A. &Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis,
    Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.
    Starcher, K., & Proffitt, D. (2011). Encouraging students to read: What professors are (and
    aren’t) doing about it. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher
    Education, 23(3), 396–407.
    Steiger, J. H., and J. C. Lind. (1980). Statistically Based Tests for the Number of Common
    Factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa
    City, IA, May 30.
    88
    Sun, J. C. Y., and R. Rueda. (2012). Situational Interest, Computer Self-efficacy and Self-
    regulation: Their Impact on Student Engagement in Distance Education. British
    Journal of Educational Technology, 43 (2), 191–204.
    Sun, Y. Ni, L. Zhao, Y. Shen, X. L & Wang, N. (2019). Understanding Students’ Engagement
    in MOOCs: An Integration of Self-Determination Theory and Theory of
    Relationship Quality. British Journal of Educational Technology. 50 (6), 3156–
    3174.
    Sze-yeng, F., & Hussain, R. M. R. (2010). Self-directed learning in a socio constructivist
    learning environment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1913–1917.
    Taskin, B. (2019). Analysis of computer literacy in terms of self-directed learning: A
    cognitive ethnographic study [Ph.D. Thesis]. Hacettepe University.
    Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and
    challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational
    Technology, 46(3), 472-487.
    Tough, A. (1971). The adult is learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in
    adult education. Toronto: OISE.
    Tseng, H., Kuo, Y.-C., & Walsh, E. J. (2020). Exploring first-time online undergraduate and
    graduate students’ growth mindsets and flexible thinking and their relations to online
    learning engagement. Educational technology research and development, 68(5),
    2285-2303. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09774-5.
    Tucker, L. R., and C. Lewis. (1973). A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood
    Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 38 (1), 1–10.
    89
    Tyler-Smith, K. (2012). Workplace-based learning: Introducing a new applied degree
    paradigm, Otago Polytechnic, National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence.
    Availableat:https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-7/workplace-basedlearningintroducing-a-new-applied-degree-paradigm.pdf [15 May 2018]
    UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery UNESCO. Retrieved May 24,
    2020, from https://en. unesco.org/covid19/education response
    Walker CO, Greene BA, Mansell RA. (2006). Identification with academics,
    Intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive
    engagement. Learn Individual Differences, 16(1):1–1.
    Wang, J., and X. Wang. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus.
    West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
    Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic
    engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional
    perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
    Wang, W., Guo, L., He, L., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Effects of social-interactive engagement on
    the dropout ratio in online learning: insights from MOOC. Behaviour & Information
    Technology, 38(6), 621-636.
    Waschull, S. B. (2005). Predicting success in online psychology courses: Self-discipline and
    motivation. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 190–192.
    Watkins R, Leigh D, & Triner D. (2004). Assessing readiness for e-learning. Performance
    Improvement Quarterly, 17(4), 66-79.
    Williamson, S. N. (2007). Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse
    90
    Researcher, 14(2), 66–83.
    Wu, H., Li, S., Zheng, J., & Guo, J. (2020). Medical students' motivation and academic
    performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Med Educ
    Online, 25(1), 1742964. doi:10.1080/10872981.2020.1742964
    Hu, X., & Xie, Z. (2020). On the advantages and challenges of online teaching & learning in
    universities & colleges under the epidemic. China Higher Education Research, 36(4),
    18–22
    Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA:
    Sage.
    Yoany, B. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student
    interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153.
    Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic self-efficacy and academic performance in online learning:
    A mini review. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 27-94.
    Young, R. K., West, R. P., Li, L., & Peterson, L. (1997). Teaching self-management skills to
    students with learning and behavior problems. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 6(2),
    90–96.
    Yun, H., & Park, S. (2018). Building a structural model of motivational regulation and
    learning engagement for undergraduate and graduate students in higher education.
    Studies in Higher Education, 1-15.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1510910.
    Yustina, Y., Halim, L., & Mahadi, I. (2020). The Effect of ‘Fish Diversity’ Book in Kampar
    District on the Learning Motivation and Obstacles of Kampar High School Students
    through Online Learning during the COVID-19 Period. Journal of Innovation in
    91
    Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 7-14.
    https://doi.org/10.46843/JIECR.V1I1.
    Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Yuan, K., & Zhang, L. (2019). Understanding student
    engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study. Assessment
    & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 50-65.
    Yu, Z. (2021). The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning
    outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational
    Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-17.
    Zaheer M, Babar ME, Gondal UH, & Qadri MM. (2015). E-learning and student satisfaction.
    In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open
    Universities: New frontiers in ODL (pp.275-285).
    Zalaznick, M. (2019). Online service intends to expand pre-K access. (EQUITY). District
    Administration, 55(8), 12-27.
    Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and
    truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.
    Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2020). Self-directed learning in MOOCs: Exploring the
    relationships among motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management.
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-21.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020- 09747-8

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/08/04 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/08/04 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/08/04 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE