本研究目的主要研究繪圖應用程式於智慧型平板裝置之使用性，透過問卷調查法與實驗法進行，本研究包含兩個部分：(1)第一階段，先探討現有的繪圖應用程式的使用現況：包含使用者的操作滿意度與使用性之績效調查，並透過觀察，了解使用者在操作上的問題，進而找出影響使用性的因素；(2)第二階段實驗，乃是依據前導性實驗的結果，採用2(快捷環工具有無) x 3(工具列選單模式)混和雙因子實驗設計，進行介面模擬實驗與驗證，包含操作任務時間績效、系統易用性尺度量表(SUS)以及尼爾森系統可用性量表，將實驗結果做個別與整體分析探討，並提出結論與建議。
從研究成果可以歸納出下列成果：(1)無論有無快捷環工具，給予「頂部固定式工具列選單」之操作滿意度皆為最佳，且與其他工具列選單模式之間有顯著差異，表示「工具列選單模式」對使用者滿意度有所影響；(2)「頂部固定式工具列選單」適合被設計於功能較多，且工具列與功能選項之間需要頻繁切換的應用，介面上具有良好的空間導覽，對使用者而言，只需透過感官記憶便能直覺性地操作，使用者的記憶負擔最低；(3)快捷環工具的有無，對於與主觀感受關聯性中，介面的彈性與效率面向的評價，有相同的趨勢，以「頂部固定式工具列選單」得到的評價最高，其次是「頂部滑出式工具列選單」，而以「側邊隱藏式工具列選單」所得到的評價最低。

The main purpose of the research is the graphical application of the smart tablet devices pertinent to interface usability. By means of questionnaires and experimental methods, this study consists of two phases: (1) The first phase of the experiment is to investigate the use status of existing graphical application including the user's task performance and usability satisfaction surveys. In addition, the observation technique is used to help understand the user's problem in the operation, and then identify the impact of use factors; (2) The second phase of the experiment is to conduct a 2 (quick tools) x 3 (menu styles) mixed factorial design experiment based on the results from the pretest.

The generated research results can be summarized as follows: (1) "The menu style" have an impact on user satisfaction; (2) The "top fixed menu style" can meet the needs of the application functionality, support frequent switch between functions, have a good spatial navigation interface for users, operate through the senses and memory intuitively, and minimize the user's memory burden; (3) No matter the existence of quick tools for the evaluation of use satisfaction, the "flexibility and efficiency" has the same trend. The highest rating is the "top fixed menu style" followed by the "top slided menu style", and the "side hided menu style" is the lowest.

中文文獻：
1.卓耀宗(譯)，(原作者：Norman, D. A.)著(2007)。設計&日常生活。台北：遠流出版。
2.卓耀宗(譯)，(原作者：Norman, D. A.)著 (2011)。好設計不簡單。台北市：遠流出版。
3.方裕民 (2003)。人與物的對話。台北：田園。
4.Stanton N.(2003)。消費產品之人因工程(Human Factors in Consumer Products)。(張文德譯) 台北市：六合。
5.葉謹睿 (2010)。互動設計概論 (後數位時代的網站；介面；產品及軟體設計
的原則）。台北市：藝術家出版社。
6.Best J. B.(2009)。認知心理學 ( Cognitive Psychology, fifth edition )。(黃秀瑄譯) 台北市：心理出版社。(原作1999 年出版)。
7.Norman, D. A.(2014)。設計的心理學：人性化的產品設計如何改變世界（The Design of Everyday Things, Revised and Expanded Edition）。（陳宜秀譯）。台北市：遠流。(原作2013 年出版)。
8.Norman, D. A.(2008)。情感設計：我們為何喜歡(或討厭)日常用品（Emotional design：Why we love（or hate）everyday things）。（王鴻祥、翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑譯）。台北市：田園城市。(原作2005年出版)。
9.鄭麗玉 (1993)。認知心理學。五南。

英文文獻：
1.Benjamin, W. (1986) Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
2.Kraft, C. (2012). User experience innovation: User centered design that works. New York: Apress.
3.Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2013) Measuring the user experience : collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics 2nd edition. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
4.Garrett, J. J. (2004). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the Web and Beyond. Indianapolis, Ind.: New Riders.
5.Levitin D. J. (2002) Foundations of Cognitive Psychology: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.Mayer, R.E., (1981). The promise of cognitive psychology. San Francisco:W. H.Freeman and Company.
7.Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
8.Fogg, B. J. (2002) Persuasive Technology: using computers to change what we think and do. New York: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
9.Rogers, Y., Sharps, H., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design beyond human-computer interaction 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
10.Kristof, R., & Satran, A. (1995). Interativity by Design Mountain View, CA：Adobe Press.
11.Nielsen, J. (1995, January 1). 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface, Retrieved December 22, 2013, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
12.Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observation on mental models. In A. L. Stevens & D. Gentner (Eds.), Mental models (pp.7-14). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.Norman, D. A. (2002). Emotion & design: attractive things work better. Interactions, (4) 36-42.
14.Shneiderman B. (1983). Direct Manipulation. A Step Beyond Programming Languages. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 16(8), 57–69.