複合材料產業之韌性供應鏈衡量指標探討 : 應用 FAHP 及 VIKOR 分析法

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	施姵瑜 Pei-Yu Shih
論文名稱：	複合材料產業之韌性供應鏈衡量指標探討 : 應用 FAHP 及 VIKOR 分析法 A Study of Resilient Supply Chain Evaluation Indicators for the Composite Materials Industry: Using FAHP and VIKOR Analysis Methods
指導教授：	曹譽鐘 Yu-Chung Tsao
口試委員:	曹譽鐘 Yu-Chung Tsao 許嘉裕 Chia-Yu Hsu 何建韋 Chien-Wei Ho
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	管理學院 - 管理學院MBA School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年：	2023
畢業學年度：	111
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	56
中文關鍵詞：	韌性供應鏈、複合式材料產業、FAHP 、VIKOR
外文關鍵詞：	Resilient supply chain, Composite materials industry, FAHP, VIKOR
相關次數：	點閱：233 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

全球供應網目前面臨著一系列的挑戰和障礙，包括新冠疫情、美國升息和通脹問題，以及美中貿易衝突、蘇伊士運河封鎖、俄羅斯與烏克蘭之間的衝突等。全球供應鏈還受到物流限制、材料短缺和生產能力問題的嚴重阻礙。地緣政治考慮也可能導致貿易衝突和關稅戰爭，對部分國家和地區的生產和物流產生不利影響。
本研究基於文獻研究和分析，擬定複合材料行業建立具有彈性供應鏈的四個核心能力、十個關鍵成功要素和三十二個衡量指標。利用 FAHP 分析方法確認上述項目之權重，再運用 VIKOR 分析方法，觀察複合材料企業是否具備本研究擬定之衡量指標所提及之能力來建立具有韌性的供應鏈。

The global supply network is currently dealing with a number of challenges and impediments, including the COVID-19 pandemic, rising US interest rates, and inflation, as well as trade conflicts between the US and China, the blockade of the Suez Canal, conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, and the blockade of the Suez Canal. The worldwide supply chain has also been severely hampered by logistical constraints, a lack of materials, and production capacity issues. Geopolitical considerations can also result in trade conflicts and tariff wars, which have a detrimental effect on production and logistics in some nations and areas.
This study has identified four core competencies, ten critical success elements, and thirty-two evaluation indicators for developing resilient supply chains in the composite materials sector based on literature evaluation and analysis. To assess the efficiency of expert judgment and determine the ultimate absolute weights for criteria, an FAHP questionnaire was created. The study applies the VIKOR analysis approach to determine if composite material firms have the potential to create resilient supply chains using the resilience supply chain evaluation indicators created by this study.

摘要    I
Abstract    II
1. Research Background and Motivation    1
1.1. General Background Information    1
1.2. Composite Industry    2
1.3. Research Purpose    3
1.4. Research Process    5
2. Literature Review    7
2.1. Supply Chain Disruption    7
2.2. Supply Chain Resilience    8
3. Research Design and Methods    10
3.1. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, FAHP    10
3.2. VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, VIKOR    12
3.3. Evaluation indicators    14
4. Analysis of Questionnaire and Results    27
4.1. Information of Experts Tested for FAHP Questionnaire    27
4.2. FAHP Questionnaire Data Analysis    28
4.3. FAHP Questionnaire Data Analysis Result    34
4.4. VIKOR Questionnaire Data Analysis    37
4.5. VIOKR Questionnaire Data Analysis Result    41
5. Discussion    43
5.1. Conclusions    43
5.2. Limitation and Recommendations for Future Study    45
6. References    46
List of Tables
Table 1. Resilience metrics for the composite materials industry supply chain    23
Table 2. Weights and rankings of Capabilities    28
Table 3. Weights and rankings of Key Success Factors    29
Table 4. Weights and rankings of Evaluation indicators.    29
Table 5. VIKOR Performance Evaluation Matrix    38
Table 6. VIKOR Normalized Performance Evaluation Matrix    39
Table 7. VIKOR Weighted Normalized Performance Evaluation Matrix    40
Table 8. Value of S sets, R sets, Q, and Ranking    41
 
List of Figure
Figure 1. Research Process    6


                                

Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. J. (2014). Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34(1), 111–122.
Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55–73.
Rice, J. B., Jr, & Caniato, F. (2003). Building a secure and resilient supply chain. Supply Chain Management Review 7; 7, 22–30.
Chen, X., Xi, Z., & Jing, P. (2017). A Unified Framework for Evaluating Supply Chain Reliability and Resilience. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 66(4), 1144–1156.
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2014). Reducing the Risk of Supply Chain Disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 73–80.
Hohenstein, N., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L. C. (2015). Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 90–117.
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. A. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174.
Katsaliaki, K., Galetsi, P., & Kumar, S. (2021). Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda. Annals of Operations Research, 319(1), 965–1002.
Pereira, C., Christopher, M., & Da Silva, A. L. (2014). Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of procurement. Supply Chain Management, 19(5/6), 626–642.
Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). ENSURING SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21.
Ponis, S. T., & Koronis, E. (2012). Supply Chain Resilience: Definition Of Concept And Its Formative Elements. Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(5), 921.
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143.
Datta, P. P., Christopher, M., & Allen, P. J. (2007). Agent-based modelling of complex production/distribution systems to improve resilience. International Journal of Logistics, 10(3), 187–203.
Rajesh, R. (2019). A fuzzy approach to analyzing the level of resilience in manufacturing supply chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 224–236.
Pereira, C., Christopher, M., & Da Silva, A. L. (2014b). Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of procurement. Supply Chain Management, 19(5/6), 626–642.
Caniato, F., Fleck, J., Rice, J. B., & Sheffi, Y. (2003). Supply Chain Response to Global Terrorism: a Situation Scan. EUROMA/POMS Conference, 291–300.
Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., & O’Grady, P. (2007). Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(7), 1665–1682.
Tang, C. S., & Brian, T. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 12–27.

全文公開日期 2033/07/12 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館：臺灣博碩士論文系統)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文