簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Edi Djunaedi
Edi Djunaedi
論文名稱: 整合重要-表現程度分析法與狩野模式 於品質機能展開以探討測試實驗室之服務
Integrating Importance-Performance Analysis and Kano Model into Quality Function Deployment for Testing Laboratory Services
指導教授: 林希偉
Shi-Woei Lin
李強笙
Chiang-Sheng Lee
口試委員: 林希偉
Shi-Woei Lin
李強笙
Chiang-Sheng Lee
郭人介
Ren-Jieh Kuo
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 96
中文關鍵詞: 重要-表現程度分析法狩野模式IPA–Kano 模型品質機能展開服務品質測試實驗室服務
外文關鍵詞: importance–performance analysis, Kano model, IPA–Kano model, Quality Function Deployment, service quality, testing laboratory services
相關次數: 點閱:456下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究針對測試 實 驗室之 服務 ,採用 IPA–Kano 模型(importance
    performance analysis and Kano model)來診斷與分類服務品質屬性,並且為
    每個類別的屬性提供特定管理策略。IPA–Kano 模型避免了狩野模式(Kano
    Model)會忽略屬性績效與重要度之侷限性,同時消除了重要-表現程度分析
    法(IPA)僅能考慮一維品質之缺點,且透過品質機能展開(quality function
    deployment, QFD)整合狩野模型和重要-表現程度分析法以轉譯為具創新性
    與競爭力之策略。本研究提出之模型讓管理者更易於掌握用戶感知的品質屬
    性與相應之因應策略。本研究以測試實驗室的服務案例來呈現其有效性,藉
    由所提出的 IPA–Kano 模型應用於品質機能展開,可依據服務接觸得到的每
    一種服務品質屬性提出適當行動策略,測試實驗室之管理者亦能夠藉此提升
    服務品質以維持競爭優勢。


    This study proposes the IPA–Kano model (importance-performance analysis and Kano model) as a new tool for categorising and diagnosing service quality attributes and providing specific strategies for attributes in each category. The IPA–Kano model avoids the limitation of the Kano model in neglecting the attribute performance and importance and eliminates the weakness of the IPA model in considering only one-dimensional qualities, and QFD functions to translate the integration of the Kano-IPA model into an innovative and competitive strategy. The proposed model can enable managers to easily grasp accurate user perceptions of a quality attribute and corresponding coping strategies. The effectiveness of this model implementation is later presented with an example of testing laboratory service quality. By applying the proposed IPA–Kano model into QFD, the appropriate action strategy for each service quality attribute can be acquired in any service encounters and thus enables testing laboratory managers to improve service quality and to achieve a competitive advantage.

    摘要………… .......................................................................................................... i ABSTRACT… ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. vi LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................................................... vii Chapter 1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 1.1. Research Background and Motivation .............................................. 1 1.2. Research Problem and Research Question ........................................ 3 1.3. Research Objectives .......................................................................... 3 1.4. Research Contribution ....................................................................... 3 1.5. Organization of Thesis ...................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review ................................................................................ 5 2.1. Service Quality .................................................................................. 5 2.1.1. Service Quality Measurement ............................................. 5 2.1.2. Determinants of Service Quality Dimensions ..................... 6 2.1.3. SERVQUAL Model ............................................................ 7 2.2. Laboratory Service Quality ............................................................... 8 2.2.1. Service Quality Measurement in Testing Laboratory.......... 9 2.2.2. Research Position .............................................................. 10 Chapter 3 Methodology......................................................................................... 13 3.1. Determination of Service Attributes ............................................... 14 3.2. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA), Kano model and IPA-Kano Model ........................................................................................... 17 3.2.1. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) .......................... 17 3.2.2. Kano Model ....................................................................... 20 3.2.3. IPA-Kano Model ............................................................... 22 3.3. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) ............................................. 28 Chapter 4 Analysis Results and Discussions ..................................................... 34 4.1. The Expert Involvement .................................................................. 34 4.2. Determination of service attributes ................................................. 35 4.3. The Results of Data Processing by IPA .......................................... 37 4.4. The Results of Data Processing by Kano Model ............................ 38 4.5. Integration of IPA and Kano methods ........................................... 40 4.6. Data Analysis for QFD ................................................................... 43 4.7. Discussion ....................................................................................... 47 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Research ..................................................... 49 5.1. Conclusions ..................................................................................... 49 5.2. Managerial implication ................................................................... 50 5.3. Theoretical implications .................................................................. 50 5.4. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research .......................... 50 References…. ........................................................................................................ 52 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................... 57

    Abu-El Samen, A. A., Akroush, M. N., & Abu-Lail, B. N. (2013). Mobile SERVQUAL: a comparative analysis of customer’s and manager’s perceptions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30, 403-425. Akao, Y. (1990). QFD: integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, MA. Baki, B., Sahin Basfirinci, C., Murat ar, I., & Cilingir, Z. (2009). An application of integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for logistics services:A case study from Turkey. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(1), 106–126. Banahene, S., Ahudey, E., & Asamoah, A. (2017). Analysis of servqual application to service quality measurement and its impact on loyalty in ghanaian private universities. Journal of Management and Strategy, 8(4), 8–33. Berger, C., Blauth, R., & Boger, D. (1993). Kanos Methods for Understanding Customer-Defind Quality. Bertrand, K. (1989). In service, perception counts. Business marketing, 74(4), 4450. De Stefanie, M., Gemmel, P., Vlerick, P., Van Rijk, P., & Dierckx, R. (2002). Patients’ and personnel’s perceptions of service quality and patient satisfaction in nuclear medicine. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 29(9), 1109–1117. El-hashmi, K. N., & Gnieber, O. K. (2013). Kano’s Model for Clinical Laboratory. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 7(10), 1994–1998. Grönroos, C. (1978). A Service Oriented Approach to Marketing of Service. European Journal of Marketing, 12(8). Hosseini, S. Y., & Bideh, A. Z. (2014). A data mining approach for segmentationbased importance-performance analysis (SOM–BPNN–IPA): a new framework for developing customer retention strategies. Service Business, 8(2), 295–312.

    53

    Hsu, C. H., Wang, S. Y., & Lin, L. T. (2007). Using data mining to identify customer needs in quality function deployment for software design. development, 6, 7. Huang, P. L., Lee, B. C. Y., & Chen, C. C. (2019). The influence of service quality on customer satisfaction and loyalty in B2B technology service industry. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 30(13–14), 1449–1465. Kabadayi, N., & Cirpin, B. K. (2016). Service Quality Analysis with Using a Fuzzy AHP Methodology: A case study in Veterinary Hospital in Turkey. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management USA. Kano, N. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control), 14, 39–48. Khatibi, A.A., Ismail, H., dan Thyagarajan, V. (2002). What drives customer loyalty : an analysis from the telecommunications industry. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11(1), 34-44 Knutson, B. J., Stevens, P., & Patton, M. (1996). DINESERV: Measuring service quality in quick service, casual/theme, and fine dining restaurants. Journal of hospitality & leisure marketing, 3(2), 35-44. Kumar, A., Chaudhuri, S., dan Biswal, B.K. (2018). Service quality scales – a review. International Journal of Mechanic Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 497-505. Kuo, Y. F., Chen, J. Y., & Deng, W. J. (2012). IPA-Kano model: A new tool for categorising and diagnosing service quality attributes. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 23(7–8), 731–748. Lehtinen, U., & Lehtinen, J. R. (1982). Service quality: a study of quality dimensions. Service Management Institute. Lewis, B.R. (1989). Quality in the Service Sector – A Review. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 7(5). Lockyer, K. (1986). Service – A Polemic and Proposal. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 6(3), 5-9. Löfgren, M., & Witell, L. (2008). Two decades of using Kano’s theory of attractive quality: a literature review. Quality Management Journal, 15(1), 59–75.

    54

    Margolies, J. M. (1988). When good service isn’t good enough. Dallas, TX: Price Waterhouse. Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25–38. Moore, C.D., (1987). “Outclass the Competition with Service Distinction”, Mortgage Banking, 47(11). Ojo, T. K., Mireku, D. O., Dauda, S., & Nutsogbodo, R. Y. (2014). Service quality and customer satisfaction of public transport on Cape Coast-Accra Route, Ghana. Developing Country Studies, 4(18), 142-149. Ong, J. O., & Pambudi, J. (2014). Analisis kepuasan pelanggan dengan Importance Performance Analysis di SBU Laboratory Cibitung PT Sucofindo (Persero). UNDIP: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 9(1), 1-10.. Pakizehkar, H., Sadrabadi, M. M., Mehrjardi, R. Z., & Eshaghieh, A. E. (2016). The application of integration of Kano's model, AHP technique and QFD matrix in prioritizing the bank's substructions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 159-166. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing, 49(4), 41-50. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perc. Journal of retailing, 64(1), 12. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. (1991). Understanding, measuring and improving service quality: Findings from a multiphase research program. Service quality: Multidisciplinary and multinational perspectives, 4, 27-37. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: a comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of retailing, 70(3), 201-230. Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 25(2), 154.

    55

    Pawitra, T. A., & Tan, K. C. (2003). Tourist satisfaction in Singapore–a perspective from Indonesian tourists. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. Peprah, A.A., dan Atarah, B.A. (2014). Assesing patient’s satisfaction using servqual model: a case of Sunyani Regional Hospital, Ghana Putra, N. U., & Wang, F. K. (2018). Integrating quality function deployment and failure mode and effect analysis in subcontractor selection. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-20. Rao, A. (1996). Total quality management: a cross functional perspective. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated. Roelofse, F. (2007). An Exploratory Study into the Multidimensional Nature of Quality in Analytical Laboratory: Managerial Implications. Quality Management Journal, 14(3), 7–14. Russell, R. S., & Taylor III, B. W. (2003). Operation Management. Fourth. NJ: Prentice Hall. Sampson, S. E., & Showalter, M. J. (1999). The performance-importance response function: Observations and implications. Service Industries Journal, 19(3), 1– 25. Shahin, A., & Zairi, M. (2009). Kano model: A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20(9), 1003–1028. Shen, X.-X., Tan, K. C., & Xie, M. (2000). An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano’s model and QFD. European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), 91–99. Singhaputtangkul, N., Low, S. P., Teo, A. L., & Hwang, B. G. (2013). Knowledgebased decision support system quality function deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes. Automation in Construction, 35, 314–328. Tan, K. C., & Pawitra, T. A. (2001). Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for service excellence development. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 11(6), 418–430.

    56

    Tontini, G. (2007). Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18(6), 599– 612. Van De Poel, I. (2007). Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development. Research in Engineering Design, 18(1), 21–36. Webb, C., & Kevern, J. (2001). Focus groups as a research method: A critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(6), 798–805. Yusof, N. A., Abd Rahman, F., Che Jamil, M. F., & Iranmanesh, M. (2014). Measuring the quality of ecotourism services: Case study–based model validation. Sage Open, 4(2). Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/07/13 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/07/13 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/07/13 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE