簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳柏鈞
Bo-Chun Chen
論文名稱: 調和家族企業中長期目標和短期壓力之間的矛盾:雙元性觀點
Reconciling the Tension between Long-term and Short-term Considerations in Family Firm: An Ambidexterity Perspective
指導教授: 葉峻賓
Chun-Bing Yeh
黃振皓
Chen-Hao Huang
口試委員: 鍾璧輝
Pi-Hui Chung
蕭義棋
Yi-Chi Hsiao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 家族企業雙元性長期經營導向
外文關鍵詞: Uncertain time
相關次數: 點閱:200下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 組織,尤其是家族企業,面臨著適應迅速變化的世界的挑戰。家族企業的特點包含其傳承給未來世代的長期營運目標,並平衡其商業和家族系統,而當環境變得越來越不可預測時,這一挑戰變得更加困難。如COVID-19迫使企業在沒有準備的情況下對新的生活方式做出反應和適應,這使得家族企業克服不確定性和時間壓力愈趨重要。
    家族企業與其他傳統企業存在差異,因為它們大多是在沒有專業協助的情況下建立的。此外,他們更關注公司是否能夠在其他家庭成員準備好承擔責任之前生存下去;換句話說,長期視角對於家族企業至關重要。在獲利和產生社會影響之間,家族企業在商業決策上相對更注重後者-非經濟目標。然而,環境變得越來越難以預測和準備,這使得家族企業重新思考他們的營運方針,開始更多地考慮短期生存策略。過去,組織雙元性被用來應對平衡兩種對立觀點。然而,在這個動態環境下,本研究認為原本的雙元性策略可能不足以應對。因此,在面對更加難以預測的的困難時,本研究討論了不同形式的雙重能力以解決對立力量的平衡。本研究採用質性方法,以研究家族企業如何在充滿挑戰的時代中同時把握有價值的商業機會和提高內部運作效率,實現長期運營。
    本研究以新東陽股份有限公司作為例子,分析了該企業在不同危機中實現不同形式的雙元性策略。通過分析該企業的雙元性策略,本研究提出了一個框架作為其他家族企業在各種程度的緊迫和不確定性情況下有效平衡短期和長期目標的參考。


    Organizations, particularly family firms, face the challenge of adapting to the rapidly changing world. Family firms, with their long-term perspective of passing down legacies to future generations, have always struggled to balance their business and family systems, which becomes even more difficult as the environment becomes increasingly unpredictable. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic forced enterprises to react and adapt to a new way of living without preparation, making it more critical for family firms to overcome the pressure of uncertainty and time.
    Family firms have their differences opposing other traditional businesses because they are mostly built without professional assistance. Also, they put more focus on whether the company can survive until other family members are ready to take on the responsibility; in other words, long-term perspectives are critical to family firms. Between making profits and making social impacts, family firms make business decisions relatively more on the latter, which represents non-economic goals. However, the environment becomes harder and harder to predict and prepare for, which makes family firms rethink their approach to doing business and start to give more thought to the short-term survival strategy. In the past, organizational ambidexterity has been addressing the difficulties in balancing the two opposing perspectives. However, it may not be enough to counter this dynamic environment. Thus, different forms of ambidexterity are discussed to address the balance of opposing forces when the obstacles become more difficult to foresee. This study employs a qualitative approach to examine how family firms can achieve long-term operation in challenging times by seizing valuable opportunities and enhancing internal operative efficiency simultaneously.
    The study uses Hsin Tung Yang, one of the largest food processing family firms, as an example to analyze how it achieved different forms of ambidexterity in different crises. By analyzing the firm's ambidextrous strategies, this study proposes a framework as a reference for other family firms to balance short-term and long-term goals effectively under circumstances with various levels of urgency and uncertainty.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT II TABLE OF CONTENTS III LIST OF FIGURES V LIST OF TABLES VI Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background and research motivation 1 1.2. Research questions and purpose 3 1.3. Research scope and process 5 1.4. Research structure 7 Chapter 2. Literature Review 8 2.1. Family Firm 8 2.1.1 Family Firm’s Characteristics 10 2.1.2 Comparing Family Firms and Non-Family Firms 13 2.1.3 Long-term Orientation of Family Firm 17 2.2. Organizational Ambidexterity in Family Firms 20 2.2.1 Organizational Ambidexterity in Dynamic Environment 22 2.2.2 Organizational Ambidexterity and Family Firm 25 Chapter 3. Methodology 28 3.1. Research Methodology 28 3.2. Research framework 31 3.3. Research focus 33 3.4. Research subject 34 3.5. Data collection and analysis 35 3.5.1 Data collection 35 3.5.2 Data analysis 38 Chapter 4. Case Description 40 4.1. Industry background 40 4.2. Hsin Tung Yang – Company description 43 Chapter 5. Case Analysis 45 5.1. Enhanced Ambidexterity in the 2014 Taiwan Food Scandal 45 5.1.1 Unbundling of the event – The 2014 Taiwan Food Scandal 45 5.1.2 Resolving the Dilemma – Choosing between Ethics and Profitability 48 5.1.3 Ambidextrous strategy in the 2014 Taiwan Food Scandal 50 5.1.4 Enhanced ambidexterity in an uncertain circumstance 51 5.2. Enhanced Ambidexterity in COVID-19 53 5.2.1 Unbundling of the event – COVID-19 53 5.2.2 Resolving the Dilemma – Choosing between stability and creativity 55 5.2.3 Ambidextrous strategy in COVID-19 57 5.2.4 Enhanced ambidexterity in an urgent circumstance 59 5.3. Enhanced Ambidexterity in the highway service areas contractual issue 62 5.3.1 Unbundling the event – The highway service area's contractual issue 62 5.3.2 Resolving the Dilemma – Choosing between Investment and Maintenance 65 5.3.3 Ambidextrous strategy in the highway service areas contractual issue 67 5.3.4 Enhanced Ambidexterity in an uncertain and urgent circumstance 69 5.4. Discussion 72 5.4.1 The balance of the short-term and long-term goals 72 5.4.2 The development of enhanced ambidexterity 75 5.4.3 Enhanced ambidexterity in the dynamic environment 80 Chapter 6. Conclusion 81 6.1. Research Contribution and Conclusion 81 6.2. Limitations and future research 83 REFERENCES 85 APPENDICES 93

    Acquaah, M., Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Jayaram, J. (2011). Resilience in family and nonfamily firms: an examination of the relationships between manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5527-5544.
    Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68.
    Amann, B., & Jaussaud, J. (2012). Family and non-family business resilience in an economic downturn. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(2), 203-223.
    Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
    Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717.
    Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73-95.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Camilleri, M. A., & Valeri, M. (2021). Thriving family businesses in tourism and hospitality: a systematic review and a synthesis of the relevant literature. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(3), 555-576.
    Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family–controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249-265.
    Casson, M. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 47(1), 10-23.
    Castillo, J., & Wakefield, M. W. (2006). An Exploration of Firm Performance Factors in Family Businesses: Do Families Value Only the" Bottom Line"? Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 37-52.
    Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61.
    Cheng, Y.-T., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1996). Learning the innovation journey: order out of chaos? Organization Science, 7(6), 593-614.
    Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 467-472.
    Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family–centered non–economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267-293.
    Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. (2005). Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 237-247.
    Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. (2011). Resilience of family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1107-1119.
    Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chan, K. C., & Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23(1), 9-26.
    Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976-997.
    Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Bergiel, E. B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 355-372.
    Colli, A., Pérez, P. F., & Rose, M. B. (2003). National determinants of family firm development? Family firms in Britain, Spain, and Italy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Enterprise & Society, 4(1), 28-64.
    Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (2018). Toward a stewardship theory of management. In Business Ethics and Strategy (pp. 473-500). Routledge.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543-576.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
    Erdogan, I., Rondi, E., & De Massis, A. (2020). Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: A family imprinting perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(1), 20-54.
    Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
    Fylan, F. (2005). Semi-structured interviewing. A Handbook Of Research Methods For Clinical And Health Psychology, 5(2), 65-78.
    Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
    Gephart Jr, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. In (Vol. 47, pp. 454-462): Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
    Gibb Dyer Jr, W. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253-273.
    Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
    Goh, S. H., & Eldridge, S. (2019). Sales and Operations Planning: The effect of coordination mechanisms on supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 214, 80-94.
    Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81-95.
    Gomez‐Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family‐controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223-252.
    Groenendaal, J., & Helsloot, I. (2020). Organisational resilience: Shifting from planning-driven business continuity management to anticipated improvisation. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 14(2), 102-109.
    Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451-465.
    Hadida, A. L., Tarvainen, W., & Rose, J. (2015). Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 437-459.
    Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 743-784.
    Handler, W. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37-52.
    He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
    Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
    Herrero, I. (2011). Agency costs, family ties, and firm efficiency. Journal of Management, 37(3), 887-904.
    Huang, P.-Y., Pan, S. L., & Ouyang, T. H. (2014). Developing information processing capability for operational agility: implications from a Chinese manufacturer. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 462-480.
    Iborra, M., Safon, V., & Dolz, C. (2020). What explains the resilience of SMEs? Ambidexterity capability and strategic consistency. Long Range Planning, 53(6), 101947.
    Kollmann, T., & Stöckmann, C. (2014). Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1001-1026.
    Kraus, S., Clauss, T., Breier, M., Gast, J., Zardini, A., & Tiberius, V. (2020). The economics of COVID-19: initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 1067-1092.
    La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
    Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management annals, 4(1), 109-155.
    Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2011). Commentary: Family firms and the advantage of multitemporality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1171-1177.
    Lee, S. M., & Rha, J. S. (2016). Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: building a resilient supply chain. Management Decision.
    Leppäaho, T., & Ritala, P. (2022). Surviving the coronavirus pandemic and beyond: Unlocking family firms’ innovation potential across crises. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(1), 100440.
    Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
    Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. (2011). Long–term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149-1169.
    March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
    Marcus, A. A., & Anderson, M. H. (2013). Commitment to an emerging organizational field: An enactment theory. Business & Society, 52(2), 181-212.
    Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Challenge versus advantage in family business. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 127-134.
    Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73-87.
    Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829-858.
    Miller, D., Le Breton‐Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non‐family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78.
    Miller, D., Lee, J., Chang, S., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2013). Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family versus non-family technology firms in emerging markets. In Handbook of Research on Family Business, Second Edition (pp. 40-61). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1988). Management ownership and market evaluation: An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 842-852.
    Noor, K. B. M. (2008). Case study: A strategic research methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602-1604.
    O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
    O’Toole, J. (2001). When leadership is an organizational trait. The Future of Leadership, 158-174.
    Park, J., & Park, M. (2016). Qualitative versus quantitative research methods: Discovery or justification? Journal of Marketing Thought, 3(1), 1-8.
    Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455-477.
    Patel, P. C., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 617-627.
    Patel, P. C., & Fiet, J. O. (2011). Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1179-1197.
    Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949-969.
    Rondi, E., Überbacher, R., von Schlenk-Barnsdorf, L., De Massis, A., & Hülsbeck, M. (2022). One for all, all for one: A mutual gains perspective on HRM and innovation management practices in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(2), 100394.
    Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956-974.
    Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. sage.
    Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 1-440.
    Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179-194.
    Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99-116.
    Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, P. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21(4), 331-345.
    Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 389-408.
    Sirmon, D. G., Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., & Webb, J. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 979-998.
    Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339-358.
    Starman, A. B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Pedagogika, 64(1).
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques.
    Stubner, S., Blarr, W. H., Brands, C., & Wulf, T. (2012). Organizational ambidexterity and family firm performance. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 217-229.
    Teece, D. J. (2020). Fundamental issues in strategy: Time to reassess. Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 103-144.
    Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
    Tseng, M.-L., Bui, T.-D., Lim, M. K., Fujii, M., & Mishra, U. (2022). Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity. International Journal of Production Economics, 245, 108401.
    Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29.
    Vahlne, J.-E., & Jonsson, A. (2017). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA. International Business Review, 26(1), 57-70.
    Van Doorn, S., Tretbar, T., Reimer, M., & Heyden, M. (2022). Ambidexterity in family firms: The interplay between family influences within and beyond the executive suite. Long Range Planning, 55(2), 101998.
    Veider, V., & Matzler, K. (2016). The ability and willingness of family-controlled firms to arrive at organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(2), 105-116.
    Ventura, M., Vesperi, W., Melina, A. M., & Reina, R. (2020). Resilience in family firms: a theoretical overview and proposed theory. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 19(2), 164-186.
    Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417.
    Webb, J. W., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), 67-77.
    Welter, F., Xheneti, M., & Smallbone, D. (2018). Entrepreneurial resourcefulness in unstable institutional contexts: The example of European Union borderlands. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 23-53.
    Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., Hellerstedt, K., & Nordqvist, M. (2011). Implications of intra‐family and external ownership transfer of family firms: short‐term and long‐term performance differences. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(4), 352-372.
    West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355-387.
    Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19(4), 301-316.
    Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.
    Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2002). Replication of organizational routines. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, 207-221.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and Methods (Vol. 5). sage.
    Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications. Sage.
    Zaefarian, R., Eng, T.-Y., & Tasavori, M. (2016). An exploratory study of international opportunity identification among family firms. International Business Review, 25(1), 333-345.
    Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23-40.
    Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non–family firms: A resource–based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363-381.
    Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97-125.

    QR CODE