研究生: |
曾綉珍 Hsiu-Chen Tseng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
居家物件之處境共同推測: 利用已有的App推測居家物件的三種方法 Situated co-speculation of home objects: Three methods of speculating home objects using existing Apps |
指導教授: |
梁容輝
Rung-Huei Liang |
口試委員: |
蔡文傑
Wenn-Chieh Tsai 余能豪 Neng-Hao Yu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
設計學院 - 設計系 Department of Design |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 100 |
中文關鍵詞: | 推測設計 、物聯網 、纏結 |
外文關鍵詞: | Speculative design, Internet of Things, Entanglement |
相關次數: | 點閱:459 下載:31 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
物聯網(Internet of Things)透過數據收集提高了設計水平,數據為生活提供新的可能,但我們仍不確定科技數據的應用僅是讓生活更便捷優化的創新嗎?在人機互動(Human-computer Interaction, HCI)領域展開一連串人與物的互動經驗探討,透過推測設計(Speculative design)推展出多重可能的未來,本研究透過三種推測方法,進一步探討當前推測設計與科技數據的可能,並設想未來的人機互動(Human-computer Interaction, HCI)如何有效的透過虛擬科技與生活經驗結合,創造出具深度推測思維的產物。
將居家環境、物件用不同的處境方式呈現在實驗中,讓參與者透過第一人稱、第三人稱、詮釋他人物件的三種角度去面對居家物件,視野的不同會造成不同程度的纏結或侷限。
本研究主要貢獻為,比較不同的推測設計研究,重新展開可能的推測設計方法,並利用透過設計做研究的方法,將生活物件、虛擬App貼紙及不同的處境推測方式的素材進行不斷的試驗及檢討,並提出可能的工作坊形式,重新探討居家物件在推測中產生的纏結經驗,最終再分析、詮釋工作坊的產出及質性訪談結果,推測出的四種IoT未來的面向「心靈寄託的想像」、「空間的體現」、「擁有意識的居家幫手」、「食物製造的互動」,展開在四種面向下,了解物件與人在未來可預見的IoT居家想像提案,並結論出對於推測設計工作坊來說纏結的素材,該如何運用才能鉤起人們的生活經驗。
IoT (Internet of Things) improve the level of design through data collection. Although data provide new possibilities for human life, we still can’t make sure whether the use of technology data is merely an innovation for a more convenient life, though. In the field of HCI (Human-computer Interaction), series of discussion of the interaction experience between human and things have been explored. Expanding the multiple possible futures through Speculative design, this thesis steps forward to discuss the possibilities of current speculative design and technology data using three methods of speculation. Furthermore, the research also imaging how the future human-computer interaction effectively integrated with life experience through virtual technology and create products with deep speculative thinking.
Presenting different situations of home environment and things, the research makes participants explore home objects through three perspectives: the first person, the third person and explaining other’s objects. Different visions make various degrees of entanglement or limitation.
The contribution of this thesis is comparing different research of speculative design to reopen a possible method of speculative design. Moreover, using the method of designing the experiment, this thesis keeps exploring and reviewing materials such as life objects, virtual App stickers and different methods of situated speculation. Also, the research proposed new possible form of workshop, re-discussing the entanglement experience of home objects generated by the speculative. Then, we re-analyze and explain the output and qualitative interview results of the workshop.
The four possible futures of IOT have been speculated, including the imagination of commitment to spirit, the reflection of the space, home helper with consciousness, and the interaction of food production, which help us understand the predictable IOT home imagination proposals between human and things. At last, this thesis concluded the results of how to use the material, which is entangled within the speculative design workshops, to recall human’s life experience.
參考文獻
中文
1. 黑山雅之(2002)。設計的未來考古學 (李朝金譯)田園城市文化事業有限公司。
2. 大衛.艾傑頓(2016)。老科技的全球史(尚仁譯李)新北市新店區: 左岸文化出版 : 遠足文化發行 。
3. Robert W. Bly(2017)。文案創作完全手冊(第3版)(劉怡女;袁婧譯) 北京聯合出版公司發行
英文
1. Auger,J.(2013). Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity, 24(1), 11-35.
2. Brown,B. et al.(2016) The IKEA Catalogue: Design Fiction in Academic and Industrial Collaborations. In Proc. GROUP '16 ACM Press,335–344
3. Bressa,N.,Wannamaker,K.,Korsgaard,H.,Willett,W.,Vermeulen,J.(2019) Sketching and Ideation Activities for Situated Visualization Design. In Proc. DIS '19 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, June 2019, Pages 173–185.
4. Dunne,A.,andRaby,F.(2013) Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press.
5. Desjardins,A.,Key,C.,Biggs,H.,Aschenbeck,K.(2019) Bespoke Booklets: A Method for Situated Co-Speculation. In Proc. DIS '19 on Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceJune 2019 Pages 697–709.
6. Desjardins,A.,Biggs,H.,Key,C.,Viny,J.(2020) IoT Data in the Home: Observing Entanglements and Drawing New Encounters. In Proc. CHI '20.ACM Press, 1–13.
7. Daniel L. Schacter, Donna Rose Addis and Randy L. Buckner.(2007 ) Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. In Proc. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8, 657–661
8. Frauenberger,C.(2019) Entanglement HCI The Next Wave? In Proc. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionNovember 2019 Article No.:2.
9. Gorkovenko,K.,Burnett,D.,Thorp,J.,Richards,D.,Rust,D.(2020) Exploring The Future of Data-Driven Product Design. In Proc. CHI '20. on Human Factors in Computing SystemsApril 2020 Pages 1–14.
10. Soro,A., Taylor,J.,Brereton,M.(2019) Designing the Past. In Proc. CHI EA '19 on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMay 2019 Paper No.: alt10 Pages 1–10
11. Wong,R., Wyk,E.,Pierce,J.(2017) Real-Fictional Entanglements: Using Science Fiction and Design Fiction to Interrogate Sensing Technologies. In Proc. DIS '17 on Designing Interactive SystemsJune 2017 Pages 567–579
12. Zimmerman,J.,Forlizzi,J.,&Evenson,S.(2007) Research through designas a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI '07. ACM Press, 493-502.