簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 楊卓諺
Cho-Yen Yang
論文名稱： 被動及半主動摩擦控制於結構偏心滾動隔震系統之研究
Study on Structural Isolation by Eccentric Rolling Isolation System with Passive and Semi-Active Friction Damping Control Strategy
指導教授： 陳鴻銘
Hung-Ming Chen
口試委員: 鍾立來
Lap-Loi Chung
鄭蘩
Van Jeng
陳瑞華
Rwey-Hua Cherng
王安培
An-Pei Wang
盧煉元
Lyan-Ywan Lu
學位類別： 博士
Doctor
系所名稱： 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年： 2012
畢業學年度： 100
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 162
中文關鍵詞： 隔震 、非線性 、偏心 、摩擦 、被動 、半主動
外文關鍵詞： isolation, nonlinearity, eccentricity, friction, passive, semi-active
相關次數： 點閱：241  下載：4 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 結構隔震系統已被廣泛的運用在土木工程領域。然而，傳統線性隔震系統因具備線性之回復力，若面對到同樣具有低頻特性之近斷層地震力作用下，可能發生共振效應而導致隔震系統失效。針對這樣的情況，本研究提出一具有非線性回復力之偏心滾動隔震系統，該系統考慮隔震層以梢接於圓形隔震器上，且該梢接偏離圓形隔震器之圓心；並配合可調整之摩擦阻尼器，來消散系統之能量；而隔震層之上則可建置隔震標的物，如設備或上部結構。
    於被動隔震，偏心隔震系受到遠域地震力作用時，能夠有相當不錯的隔震效果。而受到近斷層地震力作用下，比起相對應之線性隔震系統，能夠有更低之加速度反應。且受到共振之簡諧波作用下，因非線性之故，也能夠有效降低因共振而產生之放大效應。然被動隔震系統受到非設計地震力作用時，往往不能夠發揮其在設計地震力下同樣之隔震效果，故考慮半主動控制加以改善。於半主動隔震時，考慮具有切換之控制律，藉由適當切換邏輯，來調整增益之高或低。當隔震系統在受到小振幅地震力作用時，系統反應較小，則控制律以較小之增益，來確保隔震系統有較低之加速度反應。在大振幅地震力作用時，系統反應也相對變大，則控制律切換至較大增益，可有效降低隔震層位移，也保有不錯之加速度隔震效果。另外，以連續形式之切換控制律，相較於不連續之切換控制律，能夠有效改善控制力震顫現象。

    Base isolation has been popular by implemented in civil engineering. However, conventional isolation system possessing linear restoring force may be invalid under a near-fault earthquake which possesses low-frequency content and may induce resonance. Therefore, the eccentric rolling isolation system (ERIS) possessing nonlinear restoring is proposed. The base, which can be mounted on a structure or equipment, is eccentrically pinned on a circular isolator; and friction damping, which can be tuned by bolts, is considered.
    In passive case, the ERIS performs as good as conventional linear isolation system under far-field earthquake. Subjected to near-fault earthquake, the ERIS shows better reduction in acceleration than the corresponding linear one. The ERIS also reduced the amplification under resonant sinusoidal excitation due to nonlinearity. However, the passive isolation case under non-design earthquake may not perform as well as itself subjected to design earthquake. Thus, semi-active control is considered to improve the performances of ERIS. Several switch control laws with low and high gain are investigated. The gain mode is switched by appropriate switch logic. When the system is subjected to a small earthquake, the low gain mode is taken to make sure that the system is effective. When the system is subjected to a large earthquake, the high gain mode is taken to reduce the base displacement and provide more energy dissipation. Moreover, the continuous type switch control law can mitigate the chatter and jerk which may occur for some discontinuous switch control law.

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 MOTIVATION AND BACKGROUND 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE THESIS 4 CHAPTER 2 ECCENTRIC ROLLING ISOLATION SYSTEM 8 2.1 EQUATION OF MOTION 8 2.2 SIMPLIFICATION TO SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM 13 2.3 NUMERICAL SIMULATION PROCESS 14 CHAPTER 3 EQUIPMENT ISOLATION OF ECCENTRIC ROLLING ISOLATION SYSTEM 19 3.1 UN-DAMPED FREE VIBRATION OF ERIS 19 3.2. CORRESPONDING LINEAR ISOLATION SYSTEM 21 3.2 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS 22 3.3 SYSTEM PARAMETERS OF ECCENTRICITY ROLLING ISOLATION SYSTEM 23 3.4 SYSTEM PARAMETERS OF CORRESPONDING LINEAR ISOLATION SYSTEM 24 3.5 COMPARISONS OF TWO ISOLATION SYSTEMS UNDER FREE VIBRATION 25 3.6 COMPARISONS OF TWO ISOLATION SYSTEMS UNDER FORCED VIBRATION: SINE WAVE 26 3.7 COMPARISONS OF TWO ISOLATION SYSTEMS UNDER FORCED VIBRATION: SEISMIC EXCITATION 28 3.8. SUMMARY 30 CHAPTER 4 STRUCTURAL ISOLATION BY ECCENTRIC ROLLING ISOLATION SYSTEM 49 4.1 INTRODUCTION OF SYSTEM PARAMETERS 49 4.2 IMPULSE RESPONSE 50 4.3 SEISMIC EXCITATION 52 4.4 SENSITIVITY STUDY 56 4.4.1 Sensitivity of frequency ratio 56 4.4.2 Sensitivity of mass ratio 60 4.4.3 Sensitivity of structural damping ratio 63 4.5 Summary 66 CHAPTER 5 SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL OF ECCENTRIC ROLLING ISOLATION SYSTEM 100 5.1 NONLINEAR VISCOUS DAMPING CONTROL 100 5.2 DISCONTINUOUS SWITCH NONLINEAR VISCOUS DAMPING CONTROL 106 5.3 CONTINUOUS SWITCH NONLINEAR VISCOUS DAMPING CONTROL 110 5.4 SWITCH CONTROL LAW WITH TIME WINDOW 116 5.5 SUMMARY 119 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION 142 6.1 CONCLUSIONS 142 6.2 SUGGESTION OF ADVANCED RESEARCH 146 REFERENCE 148 Appendix 1 156 Appendix 2 157

    1. Naeim F and Kelly JM. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice, John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
    2. Calio I and Marletta M. Passive control of the seismic rocking response of art objects. Engineering Structures 2003; 25: 1009-1018.
    3. Yang YB, Lu LY, Yau JD. Chapter 22: Structure and Equipment Isolation, Vibration and Shock Handbook, edited by C. W. de Silva, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2005.
    4. Myslimaj B, Gamble S, Chin-Quee D, Davies A. Base isolation technologies for seismic protection of museum artifacts. Proceedings of the 2003 IAMFA Annual Conference, San Francisco, California, USA, 2003.
    5. Villaverde R. Aseismic roof isolation system: feasibility study with 13-story building. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128:188-196.
    6. Ryan KL, Kelly JM, Chopra AK. Formulation and implementation of a lead-rubber bearing model including material and geometric nonlinearities. Proceedings of the 17th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2006.
    7. Shen J, Tsai MH, Chang KC, Lee GC. Performance of a seismically isolated bridge under near-fault earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130:861-868.
    8. Sahasrabudhe S, Nagarajaiah S. Experimental study of sliding base-isolated buildings with magnetorheological dampers in near-fault earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering 2005; 131:1025-1034.
    9. Wipplinger LA. Dynamic testing of a masonry structure on a passive isolation system. Journal of Architectural Engineering 2004; 10:15-21.
    10. Yegian MK, Kadakal U. Foundation isolation for seismic protection using a smooth synthetic liner. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2004; 130:1121-1130.
    11. Lu LY and Yang YB. Dynamic Response of Equipment in Structures with Sliding Support. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26(1): 61-76.
    12. Zayas VA, Low S, Mokha AS, Imbsen RA. Seismic isolation of Benicia-Martinez bridge. Proceedings of the Structures 2001, Washington, D.C., USA, 2001.
    13. Imbsen RA. Use of isolation for seismic retrofitting bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering 2001; 6:425-438.
    14. Wang YP, Chung LL, Liao WH. Seismic response analysis of bridges isolated with friction pendulum bearing. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27: 1069-1093.
    15. Butterworth JW. Seismic response of a non-concentric rolling isolator system. Advances in Structural Engineering 2006; 9:39-54.
    16. Lin TW, Chern CC, Hone CC. Experimental study of base isolation by free rolling rods. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1995; 24(12): 1645-1650.
    17. Jangid RS, Londhe YB. Effectiveness of elliptical rolling rods for base isolation. Journal of Structural Engineering 1998; 124:469-472.
    18. Murnal P, Sinha R. Earthquake resistant design of structures using the variable frequency pendulum isolator. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128:870-880.
    19. Jangid RS, Kelly JM. Base isolation for near-fault motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:691-707.
    20. Jangid RS. Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions. Engineering Structures 2005; 27(3): 349-359.
    21. Lu LY, Shih MH, Tzeng SW, Chang Chien CS. Experiment of a sliding isolated structure subjected to near-fault ground motion. Proceedings of the 7th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, February 13-15, 2003, Christchurch, New Zealand.
    22. Dicleli M. Performance of seismic-isolated bridges in relation to near-fault ground-motion and isolator characteristics. Earthquake Spectra 2006; 22(4): 887-907.
    23. Makris N, Chang SP. Effect of viscous, visoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29: 85-107.
    24. Alhan C, Gavin H. A parametric study of linear and non-linear passively damped seismic isolation systems for buildings. Engineering Structures 2004; 26:485-497.
    25. Alhan C, Gavin H. Parametric analysis of passive damping in base isolation. Proceedings of the Structures 2004, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 2004.
    26. Dicleli M. Supplemental elastic stiffness to reduce isolator displacements for seismic-isolated bridges in near-fault zones. Engineering Structures 2007; 29(5): 763-775.
    27. Kelly JM. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:3-20.
    28. Lu LY, Shih MH, Wu CY. Near-fault seismic isolation using sliding bearings with variable curvatures. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 1-6 2004, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Paper no. 3264.
    29. Lu LY, Wang J, Yeh SW. Experimental verification of polynomial friction pendulum isolator for near-fault seismic isolation. Proceedings of the 4th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ISEC-4), September 26-28 2007, Melbourne, Australia.
    30. Virgin LN, Santillan ST and Plaut RH (2008) Vibration isolation using extreme geometric nonlinearity. Journal of Sound and Vibration 315: 721-731.
    31. Cui S, Bruneau M and Kasalanati A (2010) Behavior of bidirectional spring unit in isolation floor systems. Journal of Structural Engineering 8: 994-952.
    32. Ismail M, Rodellar J and Ikhouane F (2009a) An innovative isolation device for aseismic design. Engineering Structures 32: 1168-1183.
    33. Ismail M, Rodellar J and Ikhouane F (2009b) An innovative isolation bearing for motion-sensitive equipment. Journal of Sound and Vibration 326: 503-521.
    34. Krishnamoorthy A (2010) Variable curvature pendulum isolator and viscous fluid damper for seismic isolation of structures. Journal of Vibration and Control. DOI: 10.1177/1077546310384640.
    35. Teng HD and Chen Q (2010) A type of solid and liquid mixture isolator. Journal of Vibration and Control. DOI: 10.1177/1077546309360048.
    36. Zhang B, Billings SA, Lang ZQ and Tomlinson GR (2009) Suppressing resonant vibrations using nonlinear springs and dampers. Journal of Vibration and Control 15(11): 1731-1744.
    37. Nagarajaiah S, Mao YQ and Sahasrabudhe S. Nonlinear, seismic response spectra of smart sliding isolated structures with independently variable MR dampers and variable stiffness SAIVS system. J. of Struct. Eng. And Mech. 2006; 24(3): 375-393.
    38. Nagarajaiah S and Saharabudhe S. Seismic response control of smart sliding isolated buildings using variable stiffness systems: Experimental and numerical study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Journal 2006; 35(2): 177-197.
    39. Saharabudhe S and Nagarajaiah S. Effectiveness of variable stiffness systems in base isolated bridges subjected to near fault earthquakes: Experimental study. Int. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2005; 16(9): 743-756.
    40. Narasimhan S and Nagarajaiah S. STFT algorithm for semiactive control of base isolated buildings with variable stiffness isolation systems subjected to near fault earthquakes. Journal of Engineering Structures 2005; 27: 514-523.
    41. Yang JN and Agrawal AK. Semi-active hybrid control systems for nonlinear buildings against near-field earthquakes. Engineering Structures 2002; 24: 271-280.
    42. Agrawal, A.K., Z. Xu, W.L. He, Ground motion pulse-based active control of a linear base-isolated benchmark building. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3): 792-808.
    43. Erkus, B. and Johnson EA. Smart base-isolated benchmark building Part III: A sample controller for bilinear isolation. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3): 605-625.
    44. Nagarajaiah, S. Structural control benchmark problem smart base isolated building subjected to near fault earthquakes. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3): 571-572.
    45. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA and Gavin HP. Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part I: Problem definition. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3): 573-588.
    46. Leavitt J, Bobrow JE, Jabbari F and Yang JN. Application of a high-pressure gas semi-active resettable damper to the benchmark smart base-isolated building. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3): 748-757.
    47. Lee HJ, Yang G, Jung HJ, Spencer Jr. BF and Lee IW. Semi-active neurocontrol of a base-isolated benchmark structure. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3): 682-692.
    48. Reigles DG and Symans MD. Supervisory fuzzy control of a base-isolated benchmark building utilizing a neuro-fuzzy model of controllable fluid viscous dampers. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3): 724-747.
    49. Xu Z, Agrawal AK and Yang JN. Semi-active and passive control of the phase I linear base-isolated benchmark building model. Structural Control and Health Monitoring2006; 13(2-3): 626-648.
    50. Symans MD and Constantinou MC (1997), “Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review,” Engineering Structures, 21:469-487.
    51. Nagarajaiah S. and Narasimhan S (2007), “Seismic control of smart base isolated buildings with new semiactive variable damper,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36: 729-749.
    52. Lu LY and Lin GL (2008), “A Theoretical Study on Piezoelectric Smart Isolation System for Seismic protection of Equipment in Near-fault Areas,” Journal of Intelligent Material System and Structures, 00:1-16.
    53. Alhan C, Gavin HP and Aldemir U (2006), “Optimal Control: Basis for Performance Comparison of Passive and Semiactive Isolation Systems,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 132: 705-713.
    54. Feng MQ (1993), “Application of Hybrid Sliding Isolation System to Buildings,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119: 2090-2108.
    55. Feng MQ, Shinozuka M and Fujii S (1993), “Friction-Controllable Sliding Isolation System,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119: 1845- 1864.
    56. He WL, Agrawal AK and Yang JN (2003), “Novel Semiactive Friction Controller for Linear Structures against Earthquakes,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 129: 941-950.
    57. Jung HJ, Choi KM, Spencer Jr. BF and Lee IW (2006), “Application of some semi-active control algorithms to a smart base-isolated building employing MR dampers,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 13: 693-704.
    58. Dounis AI and King RE (2003), “Optimum fuzzy sliding mode semi-active control of structures subjected to earthquakes,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 14: 37-47.
    59. Lu LY, Lin CC, Lin GL and Lin CY (2010), “Experiment and analysis of a fuzzy-controlled piezoelectric seismic isolation system,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329:1992-2014.
    60. Yang JN, Wu JC, Reinhorn AM and Riley M (1996), “Control of Sliding-Isolated Buildings Using Sliding-Mode Control,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 122:179-186.
    61. Wang YP, Liao WH and Lee CL (2001) A state-space dynamic analysis of sliding structures. Engineering Structures 23: 790-801.
    62. Lu LY, Chung LL, Wu LY and Lin GL (2006) Dynamic analysis of structure with friction devices using discrete-time state-space formulation. Computers and Structures 84: 1049-1071.
    63. Chopra AK (2001) Dynamic of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering 2/e, Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
    64. Lin WH and Chopra AK (2002) Earthquake response of elastic SDF systems with non-linear fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31: 1623-1642.
    65. Liu Y, Waters, TP and Brennan MJ (2005) A comparison of semi-active damping control strategies for vibration isolation for harmonic disturbances. Journal of Sound and Vibration 280:21-39.

    QR CODE