在這個日益競爭的時代，市場需求快速變遷，組織所要面臨的問題挑戰越來越多元，除了要維持以往的品質和控制成本外，效率儼然成為一個夠能夠使自身突破重圍的因素。想要在大環境之中不被忽略，組織一定要具備相當的彈性，才得以敏捷的應對顧客需求變化，然而如何讓組織獲得更佳的彈性，是當今組織所要關心的。當組織面臨一個史無前例的新挑戰時，且在現階段無法靠自身能力來解決的情況下，決定要從頭開始設計、規劃解決方案，既耗費成本又耗時，顯然不符合現今的社會趨勢。因此如果要讓自身擁有更多的能力，去面對各式的問題挑戰，借重他人的知識和專業能力做整合，是一個值得實行的方式，如此一來便能使組織的能力跨足更多領域，敏捷的因應各式的問題挑戰。
本研究將以2010台北國際花卉博覽會未來館為個案研究對象，將模組化理論的設計規範(架構、標準、介面)和原則，帶入其資源整合流程，增加資源整合運用的彈性，因為這是台灣第一次舉辦國際性的展覽會，無論是對主辦單位臺北市政府或者是共同申辦單位財團法人台灣區花卉發展協會來說，都是史無前例的一次，事前規劃很難完整，過程備具挑戰。本研究希望透過分析此個案，提出一套具彈性的資源整合的流程架構，以提供往後組織作資源整合時的參考依據。

Accompanied with the fast shifting market in this more and more competing era, organizations and business are facing more diverse and different challenges and tasks. In addition to maintain both good quality and low cost of products, efficiency without doubt becomes a vital factor that can help the business itself to cross the dilemma. In order not to be ignored by the society, the businesses should also possess some flexibility so that they can make a response to their client agilely. As a result how a business possesses the maximum flexibility is the priority issue that we concerned about. For example, if a business or a corporation is dealing a task that they have never met before all they can do is to start all over from the beginning to analyze the problems and then to team up the people within the group to get through it. It is not wise enough for a business to do so since it is time consuming and would waste a lot of money. It is cleverer for the business to integrate the professional supports and knowledge from others. It is a worthwhile way the business should adapt to, it will help the corporation to have the ability to solve the problems from all kinds of fields agilely in the end.
This thesis is based on the case study of Pavilion of Future in Taipei International Flora Exposition and incorporating the Modular designing principles (Architecture, standard, and interface) and the process of resource integration to make it more flexible. It is pretty challenging since it is the first time that Taipei city government and Taiwan Floriculture Development Association holds the international event. My work will provide a flexible set of resource Integration process model for the business and corporation.

中文文獻
1.徐震、林萬億(1986). 當代社會工作. 臺北：五南.
2.朱永昌(1990). 組織網路之結構性影響因素的探討-以臺灣醫療組織為例. 碩士, 臺灣大學.
3.陳品玲(1996). 護理研究導論：事後回溯研究法. 台北：華杏.
4.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996). 一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何收集資料、登錄與分析？載於胡幼慧編：質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例. P141-158. 台北：巨流.
5.王舒芸、余漢儀(1996). 現代奶爸難為乎？雙工作家庭中父直角色之初探.博士，國立台灣大學.
6.徐宗國(1997). 質性研究概論. 台北：巨流.
7.陳菁雯、葉銘元、許文柏(譯)(1998). 政治學方法論. 台北：韋伯文化.
8.Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research, 8th ed. 李美華等譯：「社會科學研究方法」. 台北：時英.
9.元庚鮮(1999). 非營利民間團體推動成人教育之研究. 碩士,國立高雄師範大學.
10.劉弘煌(2000). 社區資源的開拓、整合與分配.社區發展季刊. P35-52.
11.葉重新(2001). 教育研究法. 台北：心理.
12.翁懿涵、許瀛方、黃瓈葳(2000). 紮根理論. 摘自http://web.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/~panhu/groundedtheory.pdf .
13.吳重禮、楊樹源(2001). 台灣地區縣市層級「分立政府」與「一致政.府」之比較：以新竹縣市與嘉義縣市為例. 人文及社會科學集刊，13(3). P251-340.
14.陳昺麟(2001). 社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹. 勤益學報，19. P327-342
15.陳向明(2002). 社會科學質的研究. 台北：五南圖書.
16.江明洲(2003). 模組化理論與實務之研究-以資訊電子業B公司為例. 碩士，國立台灣政治大學.
17.林克昌(2004). 政行專題論述修正版. 台北：秀威資訊科技股份有限公司.
18.黃茂在、陳文典(2004). 「問題解決」的能力. 科學教育月刊. P21-41.
19.卓素絹(2005). 探討節慶活動促進地方行銷之資源整合模式 ─以「大甲媽祖國際觀光文化節」為例. 碩士，靜宜大學.
20.司徒達賢(2005).策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法. 智勝文化事業有限公司.21.閻紀澤譯(2005). 強國論. 台北：時報文化公司.
22.齊力(2005). 質性研究方法與資料分析. 齊力和林本炫編：質性研究方法改論. P1-20.
23.林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005). 質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析.身心障礙研究，3(2). P122-136.
24.戴安林譯(2006). Steven Dynasty著. 1+1＞3─資源整合是企業提昇競爭力的必備手段. 台北：前景文化.
25.柯寬治(2006). 榮民服務地區資源整合之研究：台北市榮民服務之個案分析.碩士,佛光人文社會學院.
26.賴怡珍(2006). 從社區資源整合觀點探討社教館與社區組織之合作關係.碩士,國立中正大學.
27.安乃駒(2007). 二階層供應鏈下最佳退貨價格與模組化設計之探討. 碩士，國立成功大學.
28.謝秀芬(2011). 從資源管理觀點探討資訊科技促進組織敏捷性-以長春企業為例. 碩士，國立台灣科技大學.

英文文獻
1.Allen, K.R. & Carlson-Skalak, S. (1998),Defining product architecture during conceptual design.
2.Barney, J. B. & Arikan, A. M. (2001), The Resource-Based View : Origins and Implications. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, &J. S. Harrison (eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management,124–188, Oxford: Blackwell.
3.Bremner, R. (1999), Cutting edge platforms. Financial Times Automotive World,30-38.
4.Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Kim B. Clark.(1997),Managing in an Age of Modularity , Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 84-93.
5.Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S.(2007), Business research methods (10th ed.),New York : McGraw-Hill.
6.Creswell, J. W. (1998), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.Civil Engineering Research Foundation(1996), Bridging the globe: engineering and construction solutions for sustainable development in the twenty-first century, highlight of the engineering and construction for sustainable development in the twenty-first century: An international research symposium and technology show case.
8.Clark, K. B. (1985), The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution, Research Policy, 14(5), 235-251.
9.Erixon, G. (1998), Modular Function Deployment - A method for Product Modularisation, Stockholm: KTH.
10.Gershenson, J.K. & Prasad, G.J., Zhang, Y. (2003), Product modularity: definitions and benefits. Journal of Engineering Design, 14(3), 295-313.
11.Gershenson, J.K. & Prasad, G.J. & Allamneni, S.(1999),Modular product design: a life-cycle view, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 3, 3-26.
12.Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967),The discovery of grounded theory, Chicago: Aldine.
13.Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J. (1989), Organizational ecology, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.Hasenfeld, Yeheskel & Richard A. English (1974),Human Service Organizations : A Book of Readings, The University of Michigan Press.
15.J. Nandigram (1995),A Measure for Module Cohesion.
16.Kusiak, A. & Huang, C. C. (1996),Development of Modular Products, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology-Part A, 19(4), 523-538.
17.Kahn, R. L. & C. F. Cannell. (1957),The Dynamics of Interviewing: Theory, Technique, and Cases. , New York, John Wiley & Sons: 22-64.
18.Lee, K. & Jung, S. J. & Kim, S. D. (2001), Component Identification Method with Coupling and Cohesion, Software Engineering Conference, APSEC 2001, Eighth Asia-Pacific, 79- 86.
19.Levine, S., & White, P. (1961), Exchangeas Conceptual Framework for The Study of Interorganizational Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 583-601.
20.McKechnie, J. L. (1976), Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary(2nd ed.). Collins, New York.
21.Minichiello V. & Aroni R. & Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995), In-depth Interviewing, (2nd ed.),South Melbourne: Longman.
22.Newcomb, P.J. & Bras, B. & Rosen, D.W. (1996), Implications of modularity on product design for the life-cycle.
23.Overby, E. & Bharadwaj, A. & Sambamurthy, V. (2006), Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology, European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120-131.
24.Pierre J. Richard & Timothy M. Devinney (2005), Modular Strategies: B2B Technology and architectural knowledge.
25.Pamas, D. L. (1972), On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules, Communications of the ACM, 15, 1053-1058.
26.Piore, M. J. (2006), Qualitative Research: Does It Fit in Economics? European Management Review. 3. 17-23.
27.Richard N. Langlois (2000), Modularity in technology and organization.
28.Ron Sanchez &Joseph T. Mahoney(1996), Modularity flexibility and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal. 17. 353-370.
29.Sirmon, D.G. & Hitt, M.A. &Ireland, R.D. (2007), Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box,Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-292.
30.Stone, R. B. & Wood, K. L .& Crawford, R. H.(2000), A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures, Design Studies,21, 5-31.
31.Sosale, S. & Hashemian, M. & Gu, P. (1997), Product modularization for reuse and recycling, Concurrent Product Design and Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing, 94, 195-206.
32.Spender, J. C. & Grinyer, P. H. (1995),Organizational renewal: Top management's role in a loosely coupled system, Human Relations, 48(8),909-926.
33.Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1990),Basics of qualitative research : grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, Calif. : Sage Publications.
34.Starr, Martin K. (1965), Modular Production - A New Concept. Harvard Business Review,43(6),131–42.
35.Simon, H. A. (1962), The architecture of complexity, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467-482.
36.Thomas D. Miller & Elgar P. (1998), Defining Modules, Modularity and Modularization.
37.Tesch, R. C. (1990),Qualitative Research：Analysis types &software tools, New York : Falmer.
38.Van Oosterhout, M. & Waarts, E. & van Hillegersberg, J. (2006), Change Factors Requiring Agility and Implications for IT, European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2),132-145.
39.Worren N. & Moore K. & Cardona P. (2002),Modularity, strategic flexibility and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry, Strategic Management Journal,23,1123-1140.
40.Williams M.(1997), Social Surveys: Design to Analysis. In: T. May (ed.) Social Research Issues, Methods and Process, Buckingham: Open University Press.
41.Wheelwright, S. C. & K. B. Clark (1992), Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leapsin Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. , Free Press, New York.
42.Wolcott , H. F.(1992),Posturing in qualitative inquiry in M.D. Lecompte, W.L.
43.Yin, R. K.(1994), Case study research : design and methods (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.