簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃曦葦
Hsi-wei Huang
論文名稱: 道德自我概念與利社會行為之關係:社會衝擊與道德推理的調節效果
The Relationship among Moral Self-concept and Prosocial Behavior:The Moderating Effect of Social Impact and Moral Reasoning
指導教授: 吳宗祐
Tsung-yu Wu
口試委員: 葉穎蓉
Ying -jung Yeh
楊君琦
Chun-chi Yang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 111
中文關鍵詞: 道德自我概念道德潔淨道德許可社會衝擊道德推理利社會行為
外文關鍵詞: Moral self-concept, Moral cleansing, Moral licensing, Social impact, Moral reasoning, Prosocial behavior
相關次數: 點閱:388下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

過去組織行為的研究,多著重於職場上個人的不道德選擇,卻鮮少有研究從自我概念的觀點來探討道德相關的議題,特別是道德潔淨與道德許可兩機制。以往已有研究顯示,道德潔淨的機制可以用來解釋較好的結果,而道德許可的機制則可以用來解釋較不好的結果。因此,本研究試圖使用兩機制去說明道德自我概念與利社會行為之關係。最後,本研究亦探討情境因素(社會衝擊)與人格特質因素(道德推理),對於道德自我概念與利社會行為是否有調節的效果。
實驗一共計58位大學生參與此實驗。研究結果顯示,道德自我概念不會影響利社會行為。實驗二共計124位大學生參與此實驗。研究結果顯示,道德推理可以調節道德自我概念與利社會行為之關係,在道德推理低的情況下,高道德自我概念的利社會行為會少於低道德自我概念的利社會行為。但是,社會衝擊未能調節道德自我概念與利社會行為之關係。研究結果之意涵、研究限制、未來研究方向及實務運用,也在最後提出討論。


Most organization behavior literature on moral issues focuses on individual unethical choices in the workplace, but few studies explored the moral issue from the aspect of self-concept, especially from moral cleansing and moral licensing mechanisms. Several studies showed moral cleansing mechanism can be used to explain the positive results, while moral licensing mechanism can be used to explain the negative results. Therefore, Our study intended to use these two mechanisms to explain the relationship between moral self-concept and prosocial behavior. In addition, we also proposed that social impact and moral reasoning serve as moderate variables on the moral self-concept prosocial behavior relationship.
In Study 1, fifty eight university students participated in the experiment. The results showed that moral self-concept does not affect prosocial behavior. In Study 2, one hundred and twenty four university students participated in the experiment. The results showed that moral reasoning is found to moderate the relationship between moral self-concept and prosocial behavior. When individuals have high moral reasoning, moral self-concept is not associated with the display of prosocial behavior. When individuals have low moral reasoning, moral self-concept is associated with the display of prosocial such that high moral self-concept (low guilty) lead to less prosocial behavior compared to low moral self-concept (high guilty). However, social impact dose not moderate the relationship between moral self-concept and prosocial behavior.
The implications of the findings, limitations, future research directions, and managerial implications are discussed at the end of this paper.

謝誌...................................................................I 摘要.................................................................III Abstract..............................................................IV 目錄...................................................................V 圖目錄................................................................VI 表目錄...............................................................VII 第一章 緒論............................................................1 第一節 前言............................................................1 第二章 實驗一:道德自我概念對利社會行為的影響..........................5 第一節 文獻探討........................................................5 第二節 研究方法.......................................................11 第三節 研究結果與分析.................................................20 第四節 討論...........................................................22 第三章 實驗二:道德自我概念、社會衝擊、道德推理對利社會行為的影響.....23 第一節 文獻探討.......................................................23 第二節 研究方法.......................................................31 第三節 研究結果與分析.................................................38 第四章 討論...........................................................41 第一節 研究結果之討論.................................................41 第二節 研究限制及未來研究方向.........................................44 第三節 理論與實務意涵.................................................47 第四節 結論...........................................................49 參考文獻..............................................................50 附錄..................................................................62

中文部分
趙小軍、汪鳳炎 (2005)。加強學校道德教育中道德自我的本土化研究。道德教育研究,2,1-6。
蘇清守 (1990)。國中學生的助人行為及其在道德教育上的涵義。教育心理學報,23,99-118。
施承孫、錢銘怡 (1999)。羞恥和內疚的差異。心理學動態,7,35-38。
張曉賢、徐琴美 (2010)。人際因素促進5-9歲兒童內疚情緒理解的研究。心理科學,33,942-945。
楊牧貞、陳沐新 (2011)。利他意願在調節負向情緒上的效果。教育心理學報,42(4),701-718。
陳秉華 (2003)。重建台灣華人諮商倫理的文化思考。亞洲輔導學報,10(1),11-32。
楊俊明、周逸衡、凌儀玲 (2008)。以社會影響理論探討其他顧客的惡質行為對目標顧客的影響。行銷評論,5(3),305-346。
潘玲菁 (2008)。青少年學生所知覺媒體自殺報導對心理健康影響之研究的相關因素探討-以某個一人自殺事件為例。教育心理學報,39(3),357-376。
李雪莉 (2008)。「高失業年代大學生準備度調查 大學生,你準備好了嗎?」。天
下雜誌,410,130-139。
張鳳燕 (1980)。性別、道德判斷及情境變項對我國高中生誠實行為的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
沈其泰、黃敏萍、鄭伯壎 (2004)。團隊共享心智模式與知識分享行為:成員性格特質與性格相似性的調節效果。管理學報,21(5),553-570。
楊國樞 (1992)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編):《中國人的心理行為--理念及方法篇》,87-129。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
劉兆明 (1991)。「報」的概念分析及其在組織研究上的意義。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編):《中國人的心理行為--理念及方法篇》,293-318。台北:桂冠圖
書公司。

英文部分
Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71,319-342.
Argo, Jennifer J., Dahl, & Rajesh V. Manchanda (2005). The influence of a mere
social presence in a retail context, Journal of consumer research, 32(2),207-212.
Ayal, S., & Gino, F. (2011). Honest rationales for dishonest behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality:Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 149-166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374.
Bar-Tal, D. (1976). Prosocial behavior: Theory and research. Washington, DC:
Hemisphere Publishing Co.
Bar-Tal, D. (1982). Sequential development of helping behavior: A cognitive-learning approach. Developmental Review, 2, 101-124.
Bassett, R. L., & Latané, B. (1976). Social influences and new stories. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association,Washington, DC.
Bierhoff, H. W., Klein, R., & Kramp, P. (1991). Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research. Journal of Personality, 59, 263-280.
Blake, R. R., Berkowitz, H., Bellamy, R. Q., & Mouton, J. S. (1956). Volunteering as an avoidance act. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 154-156.
Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1-45.
Bourne, L. E., & Russo, N. F. (1998). Psychology: Behavior in context. New York: Norton.
Bradley-Geist, J. C., King, E. B., Skorinko, J., Hebl, M. R., & McKenna, C. (2010). Moral credentialing by association: The importance of choice and relationship closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1564-1575.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-culture psychology (pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 232-239.
Chang, K., & L. Lu. (2007). Characteristics of organizational culture, Stressors and well-being—The case of taiwanese organizations, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 549-568.
Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. K., & Vincent, J. E. (1973). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 502-516.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic, Personality and Individual Difference, 13, 653-665.
Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Speicher, B., Hewer, A., Candee, D., Gibbs, J., & Power, C. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. England: Cambridge University Press.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg. L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. England :
Cambridge University Press.
Crain, W. C. (1985). Theories of development: Concepts and applications. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3),
414-446.
Cruz, C. A., Shafer, W. E., & Strawser, J. R. (2000). A multidimensional analysis of tax practitioner’s ethical judgements. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 223-244.
Cummings, W. H., & Venkatesan, M. (1976). Cognitive dissonance and consumer
behavior: A review of the evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(3), 303-308.
Darlington, R. B., & Macker, C. E. (1966). Displacement of guilt-produced altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(4), 442-443.
Deutsch, F. M., & Lamberti, D. M. (1986). Does social approval increase helping? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 149-157.
Doise, W. (1986). Level of explanation in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Donnelly, J. H., Gibson, J. L., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1992). Fundamentals of
management. Boston: Richard D. Irwin.
Dunning, D. (2007). Self-image motives and consumer behavior: How sacrosanct
self-beliefs sway preferences in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 237-249.
Effron, D. A., Cameron, J. S., & Monin, B. (2009). Endorsing Obama licenses
favoring whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 590-593.
Eisenberg, N., & Shell, R. (1986). The relation prosocial moral judgment and behavior in children: The mediating role of cost. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 426-433.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425,
785-791.
Fitts, W. H. (1965). Tennessee self concept scale: Manual. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Test, Department of Mental Health.
Flynn, F. J., & Schaumberg, R. L. (2012). When feeling bad leads to feeling good: Guilt-proneness and affective organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 124-133.
Freud, S. (1954). The origins of psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
Gerard, H. B., Wilhelmy, R. A., & Conolley, E. S. (1968). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 79-82.
Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S. & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Gore, P. M., & Rotter, J. B. (1963). A personality correlate of social action. Journal of Personality, 31, 58-64.
Gottlieb, J.Z., & Sanzgiri, J. (1996). Towards an ethical dimension of decision
making in organizations, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1275-1285.
Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving
interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
Hass, R. G. (1981). Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion, In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive in persuasion (pp. 141-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hardin, G. (1988). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
Helkama, K. (1979). The development of the attribution of responsibility: A criticalsurvey of empirical research and a theoretical outline. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Howard, P. J., & Howard, J. M. (1995). The big five quickstart: An introduction to the five-factor model of personality for human resource professionals. Charlotte,NC: Center for Applied Cognitive Studies.
Jackson, J. M., & Latané, B. (1981). Strength and number of solicitors and the urge toward altruism, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 415-422.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20-31.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspective, In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102-138). New York:Guilford Press.
Jones T. M., Felps W., & Bigley G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture, Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137-155.
Jordan, J., Mullen, E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2009). On the pendulum of moral action: Contrasting effects of own and others’ past moral behavior on future moral behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Kenny, D. A. (1987). Social behavior at multiple levels, Social Science, 72, 104-106.
Krebs, D. L. (1970). Altruism- An examination of the concept and a review of the literature, Psychologically Bulletin, 73(4), 258-302.
Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259-266.
Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2007). Where there is a way, is there a will? The effect offuture choices on self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
136(2), 277-288.
Khanna, R., Singh, P., & Rushton, J. P. (1993). Development of the hindi version of a self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 267-270.
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad case, or bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1-31.
Klass, E. T. (1978). Psychological effects of immoral actions: The experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 756-771.
Knowles, E. S. (1980). An affiliative conflict theory of personal and group spatial behavior. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 133-188).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kohlberg. L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive development approach to
socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and
research(pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral Stages and Moralization. In R. Lickona (Eds.), Moral development and behavion: Theory, research and issues. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston,.
Kohlberg. L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: Moral Stages, their
nature and validity. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
Kuhmerker, L., Gielen, U., & Hayes, R. L. (1991). The Kohlberg legacy for the
helping professions. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
Lapsley, D. K. (2006). Moral stage theory. In M. Killen & J. D. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp.37-66). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence
ErlbaumAssociates.
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist , 36, 343-356.
Latané, B., & Darely, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215-221.
Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1980). Social impact theory and group influence: A social engineering perspective, In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence(pp. 3-34) . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities.
Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
Lee, S. W. S. & Schwarz, N. (2010). Washing away post-decisional dissonance.
Science , 328,709.
Levav, J., & McGraw, A. P. (2009). Emotional accounting: How feelings about money influence consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 66-80.
Marsh, H. W.(1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept:
Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2,
77-172.
Marsh, H. W.,& Redmayne, R. S.(1994). A multidimensional physical self-concept
and its relations to multiple components of physical fitness. Journal of Sport
and Exercise Psychology, 16, 43-55.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A.Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102-153). New York: Guilford Press.
McNamee, S. (1977). Moral behavior, moral development, and motivation. Journal of Moral Education, 7, 27-31.
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. & B. Monin (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being
good frees us to be bad, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344-357.
Merritt, A. C., Fein, S., & Savitsky, K. (2009) The strategic accumulation of moral credentials. Manuscript in preparation.
Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note on the drawing power of
crowds of different size, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13,
79-82.
Moberg, A. (2006). Environmental systems analysis tools for decision-making.
Licentiate thesis, Stockholm: KTH.
Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.
Moore, S. G. (1982). Prosocial behavior in the early year: Parents and peer influence.In B, Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Early Childhood Education (pp.65-81). New York: Free Press.
Nowak, S. (1976). Understanding and prediction: Essays in the methodology of social and behavioral theories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375-413.
Penner, L. A. (2002). The causes of sustained volunteerism : An interactionist
perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447-468.
Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178-193.
Reidenbach, R. E., Robin, D. P. & Dawson, L. (1991). An application and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale to selected marketing practices and marketing groups. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 83-92.
Reynolds, B., (2006). A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling. Behavioural Pharmacology, 17, 651-667.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, L. (1997). Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestation, and its causes. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 6,
3-27.
Ross, A. S. (1971). Effects of increased responsibility on bystander intervention: The presence of children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 306-310.
Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychology Science, 20, 523-528.
Schwartz, S. H., & Gottlieb, A. (1980). Bystander anonymity and reactions to
emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 418-430.
Sears, D. O., Peplau, L. A., Freedman, J. L., & Taylor, S. E. (1988). Social psychology (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sedikides, C., & Jackson, J. M. (1990). Social impact theory: A field test of source strength, source immediacy and number of targets, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(3), 273-281.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C.(1976). Validation of construct and interpretations. Review of educational research, 46, 407-441.
Shaver, P. R., Wu, S., & Schwartz, J. C. (1992). Cross cultural similarities and differences in emotion and its representation: A prototype approach. In M. S.Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 175-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sims, R. R. & Brinkmann, J. (2003), Enron ethics (Or: Culture matters more than
codes), Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243-256.
Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 100-110.
Tsai, W. C. (2001). Determinants and consequence of employee displayed positive emotions. Journal of management, 27, 495-512.
Tetlock, P.E., Kristel, O.V., Elson, S.B., Green, M.C., & Lerner, J.S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and
heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,
853-870.
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545-607.
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organization: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-607.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in
organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951-990.
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
Vispoel,W. P. (1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An extension of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal Educational Psychology, 87, 134–153.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Wilcox, K., Vallen, B., Block, L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2009). Vicarious goal
fulfillment: When the mere presence of a healthy option leads to an ironically
indulgent decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 380-393.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational
commitment predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors,
Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology : The modern synthesis. Cambridge MA : Harvard University Press.
Winter, D. G., & Barenbaum, N. B. (1999). History of modern personality theory and research. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory
J. V., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Positive self-statements: Power to some, peril for others. Psychological Science, 20, 860-866.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation, Science, 149, 269-274.
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. A., (2006). Washing away your sins:Threatened
morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452.
Zhong, C. B., Liljenquist, K. A., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation:
Licensing and compensation. In D. De Cremer(Ed.), Psychological perspectives
on ethical behavior and decision making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2017/07/18 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE