研究生: |
薛啟精 CHI-JING SHIUE |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
連鎖通路門市經理人推廣新產品之認知分析 A Cognitive Analysis for Chain Stores Managers in Promoting New Products |
指導教授: |
周子銓
Tzu-Chuan CHOU |
口試委員: |
陳昭蓉
none 羅乃維 none |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 84 |
中文關鍵詞: | 社會認知理論 、連鎖通路 、新產品推廣績效 |
外文關鍵詞: | social cognitive theory, chain store channel, new products promoting performance |
相關次數: | 點閱:251 下載:2 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
一般連鎖通路業者都在不同區域擁有許多門市,這些門市所處的商圈具有不同的屬性,加上門市經營人員不同,以及其他影響因素,所以,門市的營運成果往往就不一樣,甚至差距很大。這種現象非常普遍,也是連鎖通路營運管理高層在意之處。有些業者會進一步分析商品層面,意圖發覺不同商品品項在不同商圈販售差異之原因,這些分析對於某些連鎖通路有一定的適用,但對於倚重面銷的連鎖通路可能有所不足,主要差異原因在於當產品倚重面銷時,銷售人員的綜合能力對於產品銷售成果的影響非常明顯。進一步以門市為研究單位來觀察,如果銷售的產品係屬新產品,且其產品屬性絕然不同於以往時,門市經理的個人認知或態度會左右銷售人員綜合能力培養的成果,並嚴重影響門市新產品推廣的績效。而這個人認知或或態度,即是本研究探索之重點。
因此,本研究以深度訪談方式,藉由質性分析的方法,以國內倚重面銷的連鎖通路業者-某眼鏡公司的新產品推廣過程為例,來探索分析其門市經理面對新產品時的個人認知或態度的差異,再將這差異萃取濃縮其構念,並由社會認知論的觀點來加以檢視。研究結果發現社會認知論可以解釋連鎖通路門市間新產品推廣績效的差異現象,也因此可將此理論擴展至商業應用的範圍。
For a chain store has many branches located in different areas, the performances between branches are usually different. Sometimes there even exists a huge gap. This becomes a very important concern for the chain store operating manager. Some companies will focus on analyzing their commodities. This kind of analysis, which focuses on commodity, is effective in some chain store but not suitable for the face-to-face selling channel. In the face-to-face selling channel, the ability of salesperson becomes the key to the performance instead of the commodity itself. More precisely, when promoting a new product, the personal cognition and attitude of the branch manager will influence the ability development of salespeople and the performance of this branch. This research focuses on how personal cognition and attitude of the branch manager influence the performance of a chain store branch when promoting a new product.
This research used the qualitative analysis method on a local optical company which relies on the face-to-face selling channel, and the process has three steps: 1) gathering data by interviewing branch managers, 2) coding the raw data, and 3) abstracting constructs from codes. This research used social cognitive theory to analyze the constructs we got, and the results show that social cognitive theory can explain the difference of performances between branches when promoting a new product. It also shows that social cognitive theory can be applied to business world.
中文部分:
1. 陳向明(1999) 社會科學質的研究,五南。
2. 蕭瑞麟(2008) 不用數字的研究,培生。
3. 葉光輝 譯(2007) 性格心理學 理論與研究,雙葉。
4. 梁家瑜 譯(2009) 社會心理學,心理。
5. 李玉琇 蔣文祁 合譯(2009) 認知心理學,雙葉。
6. 何亞蘋(2000) 連鎖經營體系管理控制與協調機制之研究-以咖啡連鎖店為例,文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7. 呂怡瑩(2010) 連鎖通路之之多角化經營-以管理控制系統為分析觀點,台灣科技大學管理學院研究所碩士論文。
英文部分:
1. Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. Annuals of Child Development, 6, 1-60.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agnatic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
7. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effect of goal system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017-1028.
8. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
9. Baron, R. A., Byrne, D., & Branscombe, N. R. (2007). Mastering Social Psychology, 1st ed., Pearson Education.
10. Bernard, W. (1989). “Instrumental Rationality and Cognitive Rationality”, Theory and Dicision.
11. Cantor, N. & Kihlstorm, J. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735-750.
13. Fontana, A. and Frey, J. H. (1998), “Interviewing:The art of science.”, In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln(Eds), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp47-60), London:Sage.
14. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). A Framework for Marketing Management, 4th ed., Pearson Education.
15. Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995). In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman.
16. Mischel, W. (1976). Introduction to personality. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
17. Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades. In L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 111-134). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Mischel, W. (1999). Personality coherence and dispositions in a cognitive-affective processing system (CAPS) approach. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 37-60). New york: Guilford Press.
19. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing the invariances in personality and the role of situations. Psychological Review, 102, 246-186.
20. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258.
21. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics withing a unified theory of personality: The cognitive-affective personality system. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 197-218). New York: Guilford Press.
22. Pervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Personality Theory and Research, 9th ed., John Wiley & Sons.
23. Ramanujam and Varadarajan. (1989). Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 523-551
24. Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 117-128.
25. Rowe, W. G. and P. M. Wright. (1997). “Related and Unrelated Diversification and Their Effect on Human Resource Management Controls”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), pp.329-338
26. Rumelt, R. P. (1974). “Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance”, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
27. Rumelt, RP. (1982). “Diversification strategy and profitability”, Strategic Management Journal, 3(4):359-369
28. Shoda, Y. (1999). Behavioral expressions of personality system: Generation and perception of behavioral signatures. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 155-181). New york: Guilford Press.
29. Stock, J., & Cervone, D. (1990). Proximal goal-setting and self-regulatory process. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 483-498.
30. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA.