知識經濟時代的特質是：知識需要透過分享，才能創造出更大的價值。而一般屬於優質型的組織，特別重視專職性工作的知識產生、知識分類歸檔、知識流通與知識加值。利用知識資料庫、最佳實務研討、以及跨部門團隊合作等方式實現企業知識移轉的工作。
企業為了快速成長、使經營產業項目作垂直以及水平整合，以便超越競爭對手。採用所謂的購併方式，以購併該領域的領先企業，這確實是一個迅速及有效的方法。但是成功的購併案背後，蘊藏文化、策略、溝通、速度、執行力、領導力等多項議題的考驗。其中，整合階段的資訊應用工具建置議題，因牽涉資訊部門的技術能力問題，及是否能滿足公司的自動化營運流程建置等需求，以確保新經營團隊能帶來新的競爭優勢，故顯得異常重要。
本研究之目的在於探討資訊應用工具之建置，在企業購併案中的整合階段，所進行之最佳實務移轉工作的順序與方式。透過知識移轉，得以實現「知識分享，價值成指數成長」的效果，而使新的經營團隊能順利的接手營運。

One of the characteristics of knowledge-based economy nations is knowledge sharing. To make more value from HQ knowledge database is very important after company merger and acquisition.
To speed up the growth of enterprise and enhance its competition, Merger is one of the best ways. Therefore Information Technology (IT) will be the tool to help those activities betweens. The purpose of this research is to analysis one case of IT applications setup. What the sequence and what the methodology and what the challenge are.
The main purpose of this research is as follows:
1. Collecting the contents of knowledge transfer via three steps, first and middle and final steps.
2. Analysis knowledge transfer type through knowledge transfer adjust tree.
3. Summarize the gating on knowledge transfer project and to record the gating removal methods.
There are several suggestions from this research.
1. It should get the support from top managers when knowledge transfer project up. And need recognize the efforts of each teammate.
2. Based on the degree of IT tools, project need be splits into three stages.
3. The cost spending under the deployment need shared by usage.
4. Once the inquiry IT knowledge is over HQ capability, to establish another new knowledge base on subsidiary is must.
5. The TOC is the key factor of project deployment. To save money is an important thing.

1. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E., “Review: knowledge management and knowledge management system: conceptual foundation and research issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), March 2001.
2. Benjamin, R.I., & Blunt, J., ”Critical IT Issues: The Next Ten Years”, Sloan Management Review, 1992.
3. Blumberg, M. and Pringle, C. D., “The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work, Performance,” 1982
4. Clampitt, P.G., Communicating for Managerial Effectiveness, Sage Publications, 1991.
5. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L., Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston., 1998
6. Nancy M. Dixon (2000). "Common knowledge：how companies thrive by sharing what they know"
7. Nonaka, Ikujiro. & Takeuchi, Hirotaka., The Knowledge-creating Company, Oxford University Press, 1995
8. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension. NY: Garden City., 1967
9. Scott Morton, M.S., The Corporation of the 1990s:Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Oxford University Press, 1991.
10. Zmud, R. W. and Apple, M. E., Measuring Information Technology Infusion, unpublished manuscript, 1989.
1. 林東清(2003)，知識管理，台北市，智勝文化。
2. 杉浦司(2004)，企業IT經營學習地圖，台北市，華文網股份有限公司。
3. 薛明玲(2006)，企業併購策略與最佳實務，台北市，資誠教育基金會。
4. 盧希鵬(2004)，電子商務，台北市，雙葉書廊。
5. 盧舜年(2002)，供應鏈管理的第一本書，台北市，商周出版。
6. 謝清佳，吳棕番，資訊管理理論與實務，第四版，智勝，2000