簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王子阜
Tzu-fu Wang
論文名稱: 網頁美學與消費者瀏覽行為之研究:以台灣和巴西之渡假旅館業為例
A Study on Website Design Aesthetics and Intention to Transaction:A Comparison of Taiwan and Brazil in the Resort Hotel Industry
指導教授: 盧希鵬
Hsi-Peng Lu
口試委員: 欒斌
none
林娟娟
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 管理學院MBA
School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 46
中文關鍵詞: 渡假旅遊網站網頁瀏覽行為美學設計文化差異
外文關鍵詞: resort hotel website, purchasing intention, design aesthetics, cultural differences
相關次數: 點閱:330下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著網路應用普及,許多渡假旅館業透過網站行銷以吸引各地消費者。本研究以台灣和巴西的渡假旅館為例,從導航設計、資訊設計與視覺設計等構面,探討網頁美感與消費者瀏覽行為之關係,以及文化差異對網頁美感的影響。另外,透過問卷與網站個案分析的比較,本研究彙整消費者對美感設計元素偏好的跨文化差異。
    本論文以台灣與巴西為標的進行資料收集與分析。研究發現渡假旅館網站美感皆顯著地影響消費者忠誠度。但美感的因素則有文化差異:對台灣人而言,網頁美感的解釋變異主要為導航設計與視覺設計,巴西人則以視覺設計為主。本論文的研究模式具有41.8% (台灣樣本)與46.8% (巴西樣本)的解釋變異程度。
    透過量化問卷與實務網站之個案分析,本論文發現美感設計元素的偏好差異。除共同偏愛水平式排版、圖多於文、社群連結外,台灣人偏好網狀式導航、圖標示按鈕、網頁紀錄功能、暖色系且柔和色調、首頁無動畫、圖片置中等;巴西人則偏好階層式導航、純文字按鈕、無網頁紀錄功能、規則型選單設計。但個案分析卻發現現存網站的設計元素與消費者偏好的美感元素仍有所落差。
    具體而言,本論文驗證美學設計對渡假旅遊業網站的交易意圖具有顯著的影響,且美感會因跨文化而不同,因此實務上應根據不同文化的族群設計符合其偏好的網站。


    With the developing of Internet, lots of resort hotels attract their customers though website marketing. This study took resort hotel in Taiwan and Brazil as target to discuss the relationship between aesthetics of website and customers’ intention to transaction and the influences on website aesthetics from culture differences by navigation design, information design and visual design. Besides, through the comparison of on-line questionnaire and case study, this current study realized the different preferences of aesthetics website elements from different cultures.
    This sturdy took Taiwan and Brazil as target to collect and analyze the data and found out that aesthetics of resort hotel website distinctively influence customers’ intention to transaction. However, different culture has different preferences. For Taiwanese, navigation and visual design are the two main factors can influence website aesthetics but for Brazilian, visual design is the only one. The research model of this study, there is 41.8% explanation ability for Taiwanese sample and 46.8% for Brazilian sample.
    Through the analyze of quantitative questionnaire and real website case study, this study discovered that the different preferences of aesthetics website elements. Except they both prefer horizontal layout, higher percentage of photo and the link of social network, Taiwanese prefer network navigation design, button with image, recording function, warm and soft color, without animation before front page and central photo position; Brazilian prefer hierarchy navigation design, button with pure text, without recording function and regular icon design but in real website case study, the website design of resort hotel is not match with customers’ preferences.
    Generally speaking, this study proved that aesthetics of website do has significant influence on intention to transaction in resort hotel industry and the preferences of aesthetics influence by different cultures. Therefore, when people are trying to design a website, they should think more about culture differences in order to match their preferences.

    1.Introduction1 2.Research model and hypotheses4 2.1.Aesthetics and Intention to transaction5 2.2.Navigation Design, Information Design, Visual Design6 2.2.1. Navigation Design7 2.2.2. Information Design8 2.2.3. Visual Design9 2.3.Cultural differences in aesthetic perception10 3.Methodology13 3.1.Hypothesis evaluation13 3.2.Construct measurement13 3.3.Survey Samples14 3.3.1. Sampling14 4.Result15 4.1.Descriptive statistics15 4.1.1 Demographic statistics15 4.1.2 Web design preference statistics17 4.2.Measurement model – reliability and validity21 4.3.Structure model – hypotheses testing26 5.Case Study28 5.1.Subjects28 5.2.Procedures28 5.3.Findings28 6.Discussion30 6.1.Limitations and Future Research32 References43

    1.Agarwal, R. and Viswanath Venkatesh (2002), “Assessing a firm’s Web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for measurement of usability,” Information Management Research, 13 (2), 168-186.
    2.Ahmed, Tanveer, Haralambos Mouratidis and David Preston (2008), “Website Design and Localisation: A Comparison of Malaysia and Britain,” International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 1 (1), 3-16.
    3.Anderson, Rolph E. and Srini S. Srinivasan (2003), “E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework,” Psychology & Marketing, 20 (2),123-138.
    4.Aslam, M. M. (2006), “Are You Selling the Right Colour? A Cross-culture Review of Colour as a Marketing Cue,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 12 (1), 15-30.
    5.Barber, W. and A. N. Badre (1998), Culturability: the merging of culture and usability,” In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, New Jersey: Basking Ridge.
    6.Burgmann, Inga, Philip J. Kitchen and Russell Williams (2006), “Does culture matter on the Web?,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24 (1), 62-66.
    7.Chiou, Wen-Chih, Chin-Chao Lin and Chyuan Perng (2010), “A strategic website evaluation of online travel agencies,” Tourism Management, 32 (6), 1463-1473.
    8.Cyr, D., M. Head and A. Ivanov (2006), "Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce." Information and Management, 43(8), 950-963.
    9.Cyr, Dianne (2008), “Modeling Web Site Design Across Cultures: Relationships to Trust, Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty,” Journal of Management Information System, 24 (4), 47-72.
    10.Cyr, Dianne and Carole Bonanni (2005), “Gender and website design in e-business,” International Journal of Electronic Business, 3(6), 565-582.
    11.Cyr, Dianne and Haisley Trevor Smith (2004), “Localization of Web Design: An Empirical Comparison of German, Japan, and United States Web Site Characteristics,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (13), 1199-1208.
    12.Cyr, Dianne, Milena Head and Hector Larios (2010), “Colour appeal in website in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 1-21.
    13.Dailey, Lynn (2004), “Navigational web atmospherics Explaining the influence of restrictive navigation cues,” Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 795-803.
    14.Dave Chaffey, PR Smith (2008), Emarketing eXcellence: Planning and optimising your digital marketing, 3rd Ed., US. : Butterworth-Heinemann.
    15.Fang, Xiang and Clyde W. Holsapple (2007), “An empirical study of web site navigation structures impacts on web site usability,” Decision Support System, 43(2), 476-491.
    16.Fang, Xiang and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau (2003), “Culture differences in design of portal sites,” Ergonomics, 46(1-3), 242-254.
    17.Flavian, C., M. Guinaliu and R. Gurrea (2006), “The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on Website loyalty,” Information & Management, 43(1), 1-14.
    18.Garrett, Jesse James (2002), The Elements of user experience : user-centered design for the web, Indianapolis, Ind. : New Riders.
    19.Gevorgyan, Gennadi and Naira Manuchrova (2009), “Does Culturally Adapted Online Communication Work? A Study of American and Chinese Internet Users’ Attitudes and Preferences Toward Culturally Customized Web Design Elements,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 393-413.
    20.Grimes, Anthony and Isobel Doole (1998), “Exploring the relationships Between Colour and Internationl Branding: A Cross Culture Comparison of the UK and Taiwan,” Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 799-817.
    21.Hedberge, John G. and Ian Brown (2002), “Understanding Cross-Culture Meaning through Visual Media,” Education Media International, 39(1), 23-30.
    22.Hermeking, Marc (2006), “Culture and Internet Consumption: Contribution from Cross-Culture,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (1), 192-216.
    23.Hupka, R. B., Z. Zaleski, J. Otto, L. Reidl and N. V. Tarabrina (1997), “The colors of anger, envy, fear and jealousy: a cross-cultural study,” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 28 (2), 156–171.
    24.Jacobs, L., C. Keown, R. Worthley and K. Ghymn(1991), “Cross-cultural colour comparisons: global marketers beware!,” International Marketing Review, 8 (3), 21–30.
    25.Kang, Doo Syen and Teresa Mastin (2008), “How cultural difference affects international tourism public relations websites: A comparative analysis using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions,” Public Relations Review, 34, 54-56.
    26.Kim, Jiyoung, Byoungho Jin and Jane L. Swinney (2009), “The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 239-247.
    27.Kull, Thomas J. and John G. Wacker (2010), “Quality management effectiveness in Asia: The influence of culture,” Journal of Operations Management,28, 223-239.
    28.Li, Yung-Ming and Yung-Shao Yen(2010), “Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics,” Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (4), 673-684.
    29.Lindgaad, Gitte, Gary Fernandes, Cathy Dudek and J. Brown(2006), “Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 Milliseconds to Make a Good First Impression,” Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(2), 115-126.
    30.Madden, Thomas J., Kelly Hewett and Martin S. Roth (2000), “Managing Image in Different Cultures: A Cross-National Study of Color Meaning and Preferences,” Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 90-107.
    31.Mazaheri, Ebrahim, Marie-Odile Richard and Michel Laroche (2011), “Online consumer behavior: Comparing Canadian and Chinese website visitors,” Journal of Business Research 64, 958-965.
    32.Martin, Hector San, Angel Herrero (2011), “Influence of the user’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework,” Tourism Management,33 (2), 341-350.
    33.Meggs, Philip B. (2006), Meggs' history of graphic design, 3rd, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
    34.Moshagen, Morten and Meinald T. Thielsch (2010), “Facets of visual aesthetics,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (10), 689-709.
    35.Reichheld, F. F., R. G. Markey and C. Hopton (2000), “E-customer loyalty-applying the traditional rules of business for online success,” EuropeanBusinessJournal,12 (4), 173-180.
    36.Robbins, Stephanine S. and Antonis C. Stylianou (2001), “A Study of Cultural Differences in Global Corporate Web Sites,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, winter 2001-2002, 3-9.
    37.Robins, David and Jason Holmes (2008), “Aesthetics and Credibility in Web Site Dedign,” Information Processing and Management, 44(1), 386-399.
    38.Rosen, D. E. and E. Purinton (2004), "Website design: viewing the web as a cognitive landscape," Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 787-794.
    39.Sanchez-Franco, Manuel J. and Francisco Javier Rondan-Cataluna (2010), “Virtual travel communities and customer loyalty: Customer purchase involvement and web site design,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9 (2), 171-182.
    40.Simon, Steven John (2001), “The impact of culture and gender on Web sites: An empirical study,” Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 32(1), 18-37.
    41.Srinivasan, S. S., R. Anderson and K. Ponnavolu (2002), “Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences,” Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 41-50.
    42.Usunier, J. C. (1993), “International marketing: A cultural approach”, New York: Prentice Hall.
    43.Usunier, Jean Claude, Nicolas Roulin and Bjorn Sven Ivens (2010), “Cultural, National, and Industry-Level Differences in B2B Web Site Design and Content,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14(2), 41-87.
    44.Yen, Benjamin P. C. and Y. W. Wan (2010), “Design and evaluation of improvement method on the web information navigation - A stochastic search approach,” Decision Support System, 49 (1), 14-23.

    QR CODE