簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 段英維
DUY ANH DOAN
論文名稱: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG VIETNAMESE PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ SCIENCE EPISTEMIC BELIEFS, APPROACHES TO LEARNING SCIENCE AND CONCEPTIONS OF TEACHING
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG VIETNAMESE PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ SCIENCE EPISTEMIC BELIEFS, APPROACHES TO LEARNING SCIENCE AND CONCEPTIONS OF TEACHING
指導教授: 蔡今中
Chin-Chung Tsai
口試委員: 邱國力
GUO-LI CHIOU
張欣怡
HSIN-YI CHANG
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 114
中文關鍵詞: Science Epistemic BeliefsPersonal EpistemologyApproaches to Learning ScienceConceptions of TeachingVietnam Education
外文關鍵詞: Science Epistemic Beliefs, Personal Epistemology, Approaches to Learning Science, Conceptions of Teaching, Vietnam Education
相關次數: 點閱:295下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

Existing research looking into pre-service science teachers’ Science Epistemic Beliefs (SEB), Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) and Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) in Vietnam is apparently scarce. In this situation, this preliminary study aimed at sketching a picture of the current views of those three constructs, i.e. SEB, ALS and CoT, of student teachers in Vietnam by conducting a survey in the context of one education university in Danang City – the biggest city in the central region of Vietnam. In specific, this study inquired Vietnamese pre-service science teachers’ views concerning SEB, ALS and CoT to investigate the inter-relationship among those three constructs. Besides, the study was also to identify the differences in participants’ SEB, ALS and CoT in terms of two demographic data types selected as independent variables, namely gender and educational level (sophormores and juniors).

In this study, 328 Vietnamese pre-service science teachers participated in the survey. The study took a quantitative research approach in which a paper-based composite questionnaire (SEB, ALS and CoT scales included into one surveying tool) was adopted from previous studies with an acceptable validity and reliability for assessing personal views concerning SEB, ALS and CoT.

The general findings indicated a difference in Vietnamese pre-service science teachers’ science epistemic beliefs and approaches to learning science regarding gender and educational level. However, the study failed to discover any difference in participants’ conceptions of teaching in terms of both gender and educational level. In addition to the difference concerning those demographic data, the study also found very noticeable inter-relationship among SEB, ALS and CoT in which SEB played a certain role on guiding ALS and both SEB and ALS were found to be predictive of CoT. Besides, the study found that epistemic beliefs concerning justification of science knowledge plays a critical role in guiding student teachers’ approaches to learning science and in shaping their conceptions towards a constructivist pedagogical belief. Justification and deep learning strategy were found to be ‘catalysts’ for fostering a constructivst conception of teaching. Furthermore, the study also revealed a mixed-motive approach to learning science as well as a perceived strong inclination of the student teachers towards a constructivst teaching style. Based on the findings, the current research contributed to the field with some implications for science teacher education in specific and for science teaching in general.


Existing research looking into pre-service science teachers’ Science Epistemic Beliefs (SEB), Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) and Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) in Vietnam is apparently scarce. In this situation, this preliminary study aimed at sketching a picture of the current views of those three constructs, i.e. SEB, ALS and CoT, of student teachers in Vietnam by conducting a survey in the context of one education university in Danang City – the biggest city in the central region of Vietnam. In specific, this study inquired Vietnamese pre-service science teachers’ views concerning SEB, ALS and CoT to investigate the inter-relationship among those three constructs. Besides, the study was also to identify the differences in participants’ SEB, ALS and CoT in terms of two demographic data types selected as independent variables, namely gender and educational level (sophormores and juniors).

In this study, 328 Vietnamese pre-service science teachers participated in the survey. The study took a quantitative research approach in which a paper-based composite questionnaire (SEB, ALS and CoT scales included into one surveying tool) was adopted from previous studies with an acceptable validity and reliability for assessing personal views concerning SEB, ALS and CoT.

The general findings indicated a difference in Vietnamese pre-service science teachers’ science epistemic beliefs and approaches to learning science regarding gender and educational level. However, the study failed to discover any difference in participants’ conceptions of teaching in terms of both gender and educational level. In addition to the difference concerning those demographic data, the study also found very noticeable inter-relationship among SEB, ALS and CoT in which SEB played a certain role on guiding ALS and both SEB and ALS were found to be predictive of CoT. Besides, the study found that epistemic beliefs concerning justification of science knowledge plays a critical role in guiding student teachers’ approaches to learning science and in shaping their conceptions towards a constructivist pedagogical belief. Justification and deep learning strategy were found to be ‘catalysts’ for fostering a constructivst conception of teaching. Furthermore, the study also revealed a mixed-motive approach to learning science as well as a perceived strong inclination of the student teachers towards a constructivst teaching style. Based on the findings, the current research contributed to the field with some implications for science teacher education in specific and for science teaching in general.

ABSTRACT ……... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vvi LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1. The Aim of This Study 3 2. The Rationale of This Study 3 3. The Approach of This Study 4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 1. Science Epistemic Beliefs (SEB) 6 1.1. Personal Epistemology 6 1.2. Dimensionality of Personal Epistemology 7 1.3. The Implications of Personal Epistemology 10 1.4. Science Epistemic Beliefs (SEB) 12 2. Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) 12 2.1. Approaches to Learning 12 2.2. The Implications of Approaches to Learning 14 2.3. Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) 14 3. Conception of Teaching (CoT) 15 3.1. The comparison between traditional and constructivist classrooms 15 3.2. Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) 15 3.3. The Implications of Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) 18 4. The Role of Gender and Educational Level on Science Epistemic Beliefs (SEB), Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) and Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) 19 4.1. The role of gender 19 4.2. The role of educational level 21 5. The Relationship among Science Epistemic Beliefs (SEB), Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) and Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) 22 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH PURPOSES, RESEARCH HYPOTHESES & RESEARCH QUESTIONS 26 1. Research Purposes 26 2. Research Hypotheses 26 3. Research Questions 27 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY 28 1. Participants 28 2. Information to be Collected – Variables to be Defined 29 3. Instrumentations 29 4. Time Schedule and Procedure for Data Collection 35 5. Data Analysis 35 CHAPTER 5 RESULT & COMMENT 37 1. KMO Statistics, Skewness and Kurtosis Values for SEB, ALS and CoT Scales 37 2. Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scientific Epistemological Beliefs (SEB) Scale 38 3. Exploratory Factor Analysis for Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) Scale 40 4. Exploratory Factor Analysis for Conception of Teaching (CoT) Scale 42 5. Research Question 1 – Gender Difference among Subscales of SEB, ALS and CoT 43 5.1. Gender difference among subscales of SEB 43 5.2. Gender difference among subscales of ALS 45 5.3. Gender difference among subscales of CoT 48 6. Research Question 2 – Educational Level Difference among Subscales of SEB, ALS and CoT 49 6.1. Educational level difference among subscales of SEB 49 6.2. Educational level difference among subscales of ALS 50 6.3. Educational level difference among subscales of CoT 52 7. Research Question 3 – Pearson’s Correlation among Subscales of SEB, ALS and CoT 53 8. Research Question 4 – Stepwise Regression for Predicting Student Teachers’ Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) 56 9. Research Question 5 – Stepwise Regression for Predicting Student Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) 57 CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION 60 1. A Glance at the Education Context in Vietnam 61 2. The Predictions for ALS and CoT based on the Results of Stepwise Regression Analysis 64 2.1. The prediction for ALS 65 2.2. The prediction for CoT 68 3. The Critical Role of Justification in Shaping Approaches to Learning Science (ALS) and Conceptions of Teaching (CoT) 69 4. A Mixed-Motive Approach to Learning Science Recorded in Vietnamese Pre-Service Science Teachers 70 5. The Catalysts for a Constructivist Conception of Teaching 71 6. A Preference towards Constructivist Conceptions of Teaching rather than Traditional Conceptions of Teaching 72 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION 74 1. The Findings Relating to the Research Questions 75 1.1. Research Question 1 75 1.2. Research Question 2 76 1.3. Research Question 3 77 1.4. Research Question 4 78 1.5. Research Question 5 79 2. Implications of the Research 79 3. Limitations of the Research 81 4. Recommendations for Future Research 82 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………………………………85 APPENDIX A …………………………………………………………………………………………94 APPENDIX B …………………………………………………………………………………………95 APPENDIX C …………………………………………………………………………………………97 APPENDIX D …………………………………………………………………………………………98

Aypay, A. (2010). Teacher education student’s epistemological beliefs and their conceptions about teaching and learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2599-2604.

Aypay, A. (2011). The adaptation of the teaching-learning conceptions questionnaire and its relationships with epistemological beliefs. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 21-29.

Baxter Magolda, MB. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, J. (1988). Approaches to learning and to essay writing. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 185-228). New York: Plenum Press.

Biggs, J. (1994). Approaches to learning: Nature and measurement of. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 319 – 322). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

Brauer, H., & Wilde, M. (2017). Do Science Teachers Distinguish Between Their own Learning and the Learning of Their Students? Research in Science Education, doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9561-7.

Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 58–85.

Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Burkell, J., Schneider, B., & Pressley, M. (1990). Mathematics. In M. Pressley & Associates (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (pp. 147–177). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Burr, J. E., & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199–224.

Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221.

Cavallo, A. M. N. & Schafer, L. E. (1994). Relationships between students’ meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 393-418.

Chai, C. S. (2010). The relationships among Singaporean preservice teachers’ ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387 – 400.

Chai, C. S., & Lim, C. P. (2007). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807 – 828.

Chan K. W. (2003). Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Research in Education, 69, 36-50.

Chan K. W. (2007). Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and their relations with conceptions of learning and learning strategies. The Asia Pacific-Education Researcher, 16, 199- 214.

Chan, K-W, & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817 – 831.

Chen, J., Brown, G. T. L., Hattie, J. A. C., & Millward, P. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions of excellent teaching and its relationships to self-reported teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 936-947.

Cheng, M. H., Chan, K-W., Tang, Y. F., & Cheng, Y. N. (2009). Pre-service teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 319–327.

Chin, C. (1999). Psychology for teachers: Students’ approaches to learning science. Paper presented at MERA-ERA Joint Conference, Malacca, Malaysia, 1-3 December 1999. Retrieved from
https://repository.nie.edu.sg/handle/10497/13769

Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109 – 138.

Chiou, G.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Undergraduate Students’ Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning in Biology: A study of their structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 167-195.

Clinton, V. (2014). The relationship between students’ preferred approaches to learning and behaviors during learning: An examination of the process stage of the 3P model. Instructional Science, 42, 817–837.

Conley, A. M., M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186–204.

Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campell, J., & Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the class environment, and approaches to learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 262–270.

Deng, F, Chai, C. S., Tsai, C.-C, & Lee, M.-H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245 – 256.

Ding, L. (2014). Verification of causal influences of reasoning skills and epistemology on physics conceptual learning. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 10, 023101– 023105.

Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72.

Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609

Edmunds, R., & Richardson, T. E. (2009). Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 295–309.

Entwistle, N. J. & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.

Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings (Occasional Report 1). Retrieved from Enhancing Teaching and Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses Project website: http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl

Entwistle, N. & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19(2), 169-194.

Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.

Field, A. (2000). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for the Beginner. London, England: Sage Publications Ltd

Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358-376.

Gao, L. & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P.R. China: Identification and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 61-79.

Hegarty-Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1991a). Relationship between students’ conceptual knowledge and study strategies--part 1: Student learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 303-312.

Hegarty-Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1991b). Relationship between students’ conceptual knowledge and study strategies--part 2: student learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 421-429.

Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499-1509.

Hewson, P. W. & Hewson, M. G. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching: Implications for teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 425-440.

Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378–405.

Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.

Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

Hoy, A. W., Davis, H., & Pape, S. J. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.). Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 715-737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hsieh, Y.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Students’ scientific epistemic beliefs, online evaluative standards, and online searching strategies for science information: The moderating role of cognitive load experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 299–308.

Hsu, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Epistemic beliefs, online search strategies, and behavioral patterns while exploring socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 471–480.

Huibregtse, I., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (1994). Physics teachers’ conceptions of learning, teaching and professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 16(5), 539-561.

Huong, P. L., & Fry, G. W. (2004). Education and Economic, Political, and Social Change in Vietnam. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(3), 199-222.

Jamieson, N. L. (1995). Understanding Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press

Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and student’s epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 23–35

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2014). Determinism and underdetermination in genetics: Implications for students’ engagement in argumentation and epistemic practices. Science & Education, 23(2), 465–484.

Kang, N.-H. & Keys, C. W. (2000) An Investigation of Secondary School Science Teachers’ Beliefs About and the Practices of Hands-on Activities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

Kardash, C. M., and Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates’ cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 524–535.

Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation, and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99–121

Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261 – 280.

Kember, D. & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58-74.

Kind, V. (2016). Preservice science teachers’ science teaching orientations and beliefs about science. Science Education, 100(1), 122-152.

King, P. M. (1992). How do we know? Why do we believe? Learning to make reflective judgments. Liberal Education, 78(1), 2–9.

King, P.M, & Kitchener, K.S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 243-255.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practise of structural equation modeling, New York: Guilford Press

Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., Upson, L., & Coleman, D. C. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(4), 287-308.

Komives, S. R., & Tan, T. K. (2016). Student and Community Characteristics. New Directions for Higher Education, 175, 75-83.

Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–26.

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245–1260.

Laurillard, L. (2008). Digital technologies and their role in achieving our ambitions for education. Retrieved from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/628/1/Laurriard2008Digital_technologies.pdf

Lee, M-H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese High School Students’ Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning Science Through a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191 – 220.

Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Teachers’ scientific epistemological views, conception of teaching science, and their approaches to teaching science – An exploratory study of in-service science teachers in Taiwan. In Personal Epistemology and Teacher Education (edited by Jo Brownlee, Gregory Schraw, Donna Berthelsen) (pp. 246–262). Routledge.

Lee, S. W.-Y., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). Do sophisticated epistemic beliefs predict meaningful learning? Findings from a structural equation model of undergraduate biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2327-2345.

Li, W-T., Liang, J-C., & Tsai, C-C. (2013). Relational analysis of college chemistry-major students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 555-565.

Liang, J.-C., Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). The relations between scientific epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning science among science-major undergraduates in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 43–59.

Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Relational Analysis of College Science‐Major Students’ Epistemological Beliefs Toward Science and Conceptions of Learning Science, International Journal of Science Education, 32:17, 2273-2289

Lin, T.-J., Deng, F., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, motivation in learning science, and their relationships: A comparative study within the Chinese culture. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(1), 37–47.
Lin, T.-J, & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Developing instruments concerning scientific epistemic beliefs and goal orientations in learning science: a validation study, International Journal of Science Education, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1384593

Lin, Y.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). The relationships between epistemic beliefs in biology and approaches to learning biology among biology-major university students in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 796–807.

Lising, L., & Elby, A. (2005). The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 372–382.

Liu, S.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Differences in the scientific epistemological views of undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1055–1073.

López‐Íñiguez, G. & Pozo, J. I. (2014). The influence of teachers’ conceptions on their students’ learning: Children’s understanding of sheet music. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 311-328.

Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318-1347.

Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Marton, F. (1983). Beyond individual differences. Educational Psychology, 3, 289 – 303.

Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.

Meece, J. L., & Jones, M. G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use: are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 393–406.

Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 305–324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nguyen, C. T. (2010). What are the perceptions of Vietnamese students in approaching the teaching and learning process in Australia? Journal of Administration and Development Mahasarakham University (Thailand), 2(1), 8–33.

Nguyen, C. T. (2011). Impacts of socio-culture on the development of autonomous learning: a lens of Vietnamese context. Journal of Studies in Education, 1(1: E2), 1–10.

Paulsen, M. B., & Wells, C. T. (1998). Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 365–384.

Phuong-Mai, N., Terlouw, C. & Pilot, A. (2005). Cooperative learning vs Confucian heritage culture’s collectivism: Confrontation to reveal some cultural conflicts and mismatch. Asia Europe Journal, 3(3), 403–419.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Future challenges and directions for theory and research on personal epistemology. In: Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (eds), Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 389–414

Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (2000). Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 59–74.

Ramsden, P. (1984). The context of learning in academic departments. In: Marton, F., Hounsell, D., Entwistle, N. (Ed) The experience of learning. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, pp 198–216.

Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Educcation, 19(3), 309–325

Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 7-27.

Retzbach, A., Marschall, J., Rahnke, M., Otto, L., & Maier, M. (2011). Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: The roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(12), 6231–6244.

Rodriguez, L., & Cano, F. (2006). The epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and study orchestrations of university students. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 617-636.

Rodriguez, L., & Cano, F. (2007). The learning approaches and epistemological beliefs of university students: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 647-667.

Sahin, E. A., Deniz, H., & Topcu, M. S. (2016). Predicting Turkish Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Orientations to Teaching Science with Epistemological Beliefs, Learning Conceptions, and Learning Approaches in Science. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(5), 515-534.

Saito, E. & Tsukui, A. (2008). Challenging common sense: Cases of school reform for learning community under an international cooperation project in Bac Giang province, Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(5), 571–584

Sampson, V., & Schleigh, S. (2013). Scientific argumentation in biology: 30 classroom activities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association – NSTA Press.

Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372.

Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.

Schommer, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schommer, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schommer, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39, 19–29.

Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 435–443.

Schommer, M., & Walker, K. (1997). Epistemological beliefs and valuing school: considerations for college admissions and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38, 173–186

Smith, S. N., & Miller, R. J. (2005) Learning approaches: examination type, discipline of study, and gender. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 43–53.

Solomon, M., & Ket, V. D. (2007). Doi Moi, Education and Identity Formation in Contemporary Vietnam. A Journal of Comparative Education, 37(3), 345-363.

Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Stofflett, R. T. & Stoddart, T. (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 31-51.

Teo, T. & Chai, C. S. (2008). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the conception for teaching and learning questionnaire (CTLQ). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(2), 215 – 224.

Thanh, P. T. H. (2011). "Doi Moi" (Renovation) and Higher Education Reform in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Reform, 20(3), 210-225.

Thao-Do, T. P., Bac-Ly, D. T., & Yuenyong, C. (2016). Learning environment in Vietnamese physics teacher education programme through the lens of constructivism: A case study of a state university in Mekong Delta region, Vietnam. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 55-79.

Thao-Do, T. P., & Hang-Nguyen, T. T. (2015). Phát triển hiểu biết và kỹ năng về quan sát và suy luận của học sinh trong dạy học Vật Lý. Scientific Journal of Can Tho University, 36, Part C, 8–17.

Thao-Do, T. P., & Yuenyong, C. (2017). Dilemmas in examining understanding of nature of science in Vietnam. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 271–274.

Thu-Hang, N. V., Meijer, M. A., Astrid, M. W. B., Pilot, A. (2015). The implementation of a social constructivist approach in primary science education in Confucian heritage culture: the case of Vietnam. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 665-693.

Tikva, J. B. (2010). Socratic teaching is not teaching, but direct transmission is: Notes from 13 to 15-year olds’ conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 656-664.

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.

Tsai, C.-C. (1998). Science learning and constructivism. Curriculum and Teaching, 13, 31–52.

Tsai, C.-C. (1999). “Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths”: A study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83(6), 654–674.

Tsai, C.-C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42, 193–205.

Tsai, C-C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771-783.

Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733–1750.

Tsai, C.-C., Ho, H. N. J., Liang, C.-J., & Lin, H.-M. (2011). Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students. Learning and Instruction, 21, 757-769.

Tsai, C.-C, & Huang, C.-M. (2001). Development of cognitive structures and information processing strategies of elementary school students learning about biological reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 21–26.

Tsai, C.-C., & Liu, C. T. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621–1638.

Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57, 89-99.

UED. (2014). Introduction of Danang University of Education, information retrieved from http://ued.udn.vn/tong-quan.html

UNESCO & International Bureau of Education. (2010/11). World data on education (7th Ed): Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en.html

van Beek, J. A., de Jong, F. P. C. M., Wubbels, T., & Minnaert, A. E. M. G. (2014). Measuring teacher regulating activities concerning student learning in secondary education classrooms: Reliability and validity of student perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 206-213.

Yang, F. Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31, 65–84.

Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Personal epistemology and science learning: A review on empirical studies. In Second International Handbooks of Science Education. Springer Science.

Yum, J. O. (1996). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (8th ed., pp. 78–88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Zeegers P., (2001), Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 115–132.

QR CODE