簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Tommy Sugiarto
Tommy Sugiarto
論文名稱: 運用慣性測量單元之時間空間參數於健 康族群之步態分析驗證暨基於頻域參數 之中風病患步態分類
Validation of the use of Inertial-Measurement-Unit Sensor Based Gait Analysis in Healthy Subjects and the Application in the Gait Classification in Patients with Stroke
指導教授: 許維君
Wei-Chun Hsu
口試委員: 林政宜
Zheng-Yi Lin
周冠年
Guan-Nian Zhou
林立峰
Li-Feng Lin
林淵翔
Yuan-Hsiang Lin
許維君
Wei-Chun Hsu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 應用科技學院 - 醫學工程研究所
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 63
中文關鍵詞: Gait analysisGait classificationfrequency domainfeature selectionSVMspatiotemporal parametersStroke gaitWearable device
外文關鍵詞: Gait analysis, Gait classification, frequency domain, feature selection, SVM, spatiotemporal parameters, Stroke gait, Wearable device
相關次數: 點閱:435下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Spatiotemporal parameters of gait are general gait parameters that can enable the simplest form of objective gait evaluation. These parameters tend to change in most locomotor disabilities and serve as guidelines for evaluating the walking ability of a subject. Wearable devices with sensors, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, have been extensively used not only for gait analysis but also for fall detection and monitoring of physical activity and classification of posture and movement. In gait analysis, wearable technologies are mostly used to extract the spatiotemporal parameters of gait.
    This study aimed to validate the application of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor for calculating the spatiotemporal parameters of gait in healthy young, older adults, and stoke patients. Six healthy young adults, 4 older adults, and 10 stroke patients participated in this study; each wore an IMU sensor on the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) while the sensor was synchronized with a three-dimensional motion capture system. Nineteen gait parameters, including duration, variability, and asymmetry, were calculated from initial contact and final contact event times. The statistical analysis result showed that all three groups has good to excellent agreement for four most commonly reported gait characteristic (stride-, step-, stance-,and swing-duration). Meanwhile, for asymmetry and variability, good agreement between two systems only found on subject with stroke group.
    The second aim for this study is to classified the gait patterns of normal and stroke participants by using time- and frequency-domain features obtained from data provided by an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor placed on the subject’s lower back (L5). Twenty-three participants were included and divided into two groups: healthy group (young and older adults) and stroke group. A feature selection method comprising statistical analysis and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) calculation was used to reduce the number of features. The features were used to train four Support Vector Machine (SVM) kernels, and the results were subsequently compared. The quadratic SVM kernel had the highest accuracy (93.46%), as evaluated through cross validation. Moreover, when different datasets were used on model testing, both the quadratic and cubic kernels showed the highest accuracy (96.55%). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this study’s classification method in distinguishing between normal and stroke gait patterns.


    Spatiotemporal parameters of gait are general gait parameters that can enable the simplest form of objective gait evaluation. These parameters tend to change in most locomotor disabilities and serve as guidelines for evaluating the walking ability of a subject. Wearable devices with sensors, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, have been extensively used not only for gait analysis but also for fall detection and monitoring of physical activity and classification of posture and movement. In gait analysis, wearable technologies are mostly used to extract the spatiotemporal parameters of gait.
    This study aimed to validate the application of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor for calculating the spatiotemporal parameters of gait in healthy young, older adults, and stoke patients. Six healthy young adults, 4 older adults, and 10 stroke patients participated in this study; each wore an IMU sensor on the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) while the sensor was synchronized with a three-dimensional motion capture system. Nineteen gait parameters, including duration, variability, and asymmetry, were calculated from initial contact and final contact event times. The statistical analysis result showed that all three groups has good to excellent agreement for four most commonly reported gait characteristic (stride-, step-, stance-,and swing-duration). Meanwhile, for asymmetry and variability, good agreement between two systems only found on subject with stroke group.
    The second aim for this study is to classified the gait patterns of normal and stroke participants by using time- and frequency-domain features obtained from data provided by an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor placed on the subject’s lower back (L5). Twenty-three participants were included and divided into two groups: healthy group (young and older adults) and stroke group. A feature selection method comprising statistical analysis and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) calculation was used to reduce the number of features. The features were used to train four Support Vector Machine (SVM) kernels, and the results were subsequently compared. The quadratic SVM kernel had the highest accuracy (93.46%), as evaluated through cross validation. Moreover, when different datasets were used on model testing, both the quadratic and cubic kernels showed the highest accuracy (96.55%). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this study’s classification method in distinguishing between normal and stroke gait patterns.

    Abstract i Acknowledgements iii Content iv LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Study Purpose 2 1.3. Research Question 3 2. Literature Review 4 2.1. Gait Analysis 4 2.1.1. `Gait Cycle in Detail 6 2.1.1.1. Initial Contact 6 2.1.1.2. Loading Response 7 2.1.1.3. Opposite Foot Final Contact 7 2.1.1.4. Opposite Foot Initial Contact 8 2.1.1.5. Final Contact 8 2.1.1.6. Terminal Foot Contact 8 2.2. Wearable Device for Gait Analysis 8 2.3. Wearable Device for Gait Analysis on Clinical Population 10 2.4. Gait Pattern Classification with Wearable Device 11 3. Method 14 3.1. Subject 14 3.2. Equipment 14 3.2.1 Wearable Device 14 3.2.2 Laboratory Reference 15 3.3. Experimental Protocol 15 3.4. Data Processing for Spatiotemporal Parameters Calculation 16 3.4.1 Motion Analysis System 16 3.4.2 Wearable Device Algorithm (Spatiotemporal Parameters) 17 3.4.3 Gait Temporal Parameters Calculation from IC/FC Event Time 19 3.4.4 Statistical Analysis for Spatiotemporal Parameters between System 21 3.5. Data Processing for Gait Pattern Classification 22 3.5.1 Data Processing and Feature Extraction 22 3.5.2 Statistical Analysis and Feature Selection 24 3.5.3 Classification with Support Vector Machine (SVM) 25 4. Result and Discussion Part 1 27 4.1. Spatiotemporal Parameters Calculation on Healthy Young and Older Adults Group 27 4.2. Discussion for Statistical Result on HY and OA Groups 28 4.3. Spatiotemporal Parameters Calculation Results on Subject with Stroke Group 30 4.4. Discussion for Spatiotemporal Parameters Calculation Results on Subject with Stroke Group 30 5. Result and Discussion Part 2 38 5.1. Result 38 5.1.1 Feature Extraction and Selection 38 5.1.2 Gait Pattern Classification 40 5.2. Discussion 41 6. Conclusion and future works 44 REFERENCE 45 Appendix 1. 49

    Altilio, R., Paoloni, M., & Panella, M. (2017). Selection of clinical features for pattern recognition applied to gait analysis. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 55(4), 685-695. doi:10.1007/s11517-016-1546-1
    Aodhán, H., Eleanor, G., Lisa, A., Silvia Del, D., Alan, G., Lynn, R., & Brook, G. (2016). Validity of a wearable accelerometer to quantify gait in spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Physiological measurement, 37(11), N105.
    Arora, S., Venkataraman, V., Donohue, S., Biglan, K. M., Dorsey, E. R., & Little, M. A. (2014, 4-9 May 2014). High accuracy discrimination of Parkinson's disease participants from healthy controls using smartphones. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).
    Begg, R. K., Palaniswami, M., & Owen, B. (2005). Support vector machines for automated gait classification. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52(5), 828-838.
    Bergamini, E., Vannozzi, G., Bricca, A., Iosa, M., Paolucci, S., & Cappozzo, A. (2015). Gait stability indices and their relationship with clinical scale scores in stroke patients.
    Brunelli, S., Paolucci, S., & Traballesi, M. (2014). Assessment of gait stability, harmony, and symmetry in subjects with lower-limb amputation evaluated by trunk accelerations. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 51(4), 623.
    Caby, B., Kieffer, S., de Saint Hubert, M., Cremer, G., & Macq, B. (2011). Feature extraction and selection for objective gait analysis and fall risk assessment by accelerometry. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 10(1), 1. doi:10.1186/1475-925x-10-1
    Das, K. D., Saji, A. J., & Kumar, C. S. (2017, 20-21 April 2017). Frequency analysis of gait signals for detection of neurodegenerative diseases. Paper presented at the 2017 International Conference on Circuit ,Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT).
    Del Din, S., Godfrey, A., Galna, B., Lord, S., & Rochester, L. (2016). Free-living gait characteristics in ageing and Parkinson’s disease: impact of environment and ambulatory bout length. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 13(1), 46.
    Del Din, S., Hickey, A., Hurwitz, N., Mathers, J. C., Rochester, L., & Godfrey, A. (2016). Measuring gait with an accelerometer-based wearable: influence of device location, testing protocol and age. Physiological measurement, 37(10), 1785.
    Del Din, S., Hickey, A., Ladha, C., Stuart, S., Bourke, A. K., Esser, P., . . . Godfrey, A. (2016). Instrumented gait assessment with a single wearable: an introductory tutorial. F1000Research, 5.
    Din, S. D., Godfrey, A., & Rochester, L. (2016). Validation of an Accelerometer to Quantify a Comprehensive Battery of Gait Characteristics in Healthy Older Adults and Parkinson's Disease: Toward Clinical and at Home Use. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 20(3), 838-847. doi:10.1109/JBHI.2015.2419317
    Doi, T., Hirata, S., Ono, R., Tsutsumimoto, K., Misu, S., & Ando, H. (2013). The harmonic ratio of trunk acceleration predicts falling among older people: results of a 1-year prospective study. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 10(1), 7.
    Esser, P., Dawes, H., Collett, J., Feltham, M. G., & Howells, K. (2011). Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters using inertial measurement units in neurological populations. Gait & posture, 34(4), 558-560. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.018
    Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175-191.
    Fusco, A., Morone, G., Pratesi, L., Coiro, P., Domenico De Angelis, M., & Paolucci, S. (2012). Assessment of upper-body dynamic stability during walking in patients with subacute stroke. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 49(3), 439.
    Godfrey, A., Conway, R., Meagher, D., & ÓLaighin, G. (2008). Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry. Medical engineering & physics, 30(10), 1364-1386.
    Godfrey, A., Culhane, K., & Lyons, G. (2007). Comparison of the performance of the activPAL™ Professional physical activity logger to a discrete accelerometer-based activity monitor. Medical engineering & physics, 29(8), 930-934.
    Godfrey, A., Del Din, S., Barry, G., Mathers, J., & Rochester, L. (2015). Instrumenting gait with an accelerometer: a system and algorithm examination. Medical engineering & physics, 37(4), 400-407.
    Godfrey, A., Del Din, S., Barry, G., Mathers, J. C., & Rochester, L. (2014). Within trial validation and reliability of a single tri-axial accelerometer for gait assessment. Paper presented at the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE.
    Goh, L., Song, Q., & Kasabov, N. (2004). A novel feature selection method to improve classification of gene expression data. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the second conference on Asia-Pacific bioinformatics-Volume 29.
    Gonzalez, R. C., Alvarez, D., Lopez, A. M., & Alvarez, J. C. (2007). Modified pendulum model for mean step length estimation. Paper presented at the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE.
    Hartmann, A., Luzi, S., Murer, K., de Bie, R. A., & de Bruin, E. D. (2009). Concurrent validity of a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system for gait analysis in older adults. Gait & posture, 29(3), 444-448. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.003
    Hubble, R. P., Naughton, G. A., Silburn, P. A., & Cole, M. H. (2015). Wearable Sensor Use for Assessing Standing Balance and Walking Stability in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review. PloS one, 10(4), e0123705. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123705
    Iosa, M., Marro, T., Paolucci, S., & Morelli, D. (2012). Stability and harmony of gait in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 129-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.031
    Iosa, M., Morone, G., Fusco, A., Pratesi, L., Bragoni, M., Coiro, P., . . . Paolucci, S. (2011). Effects of walking endurance reduction on gait stability in patients with stroke. Stroke research and treatment, 2012.
    Iosa, M., Picerno, P., Paolucci, S., & Morone, G. (2016). Wearable inertial sensors for human movement analysis. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 13(7), 641-659. doi:10.1080/17434440.2016.1198694
    Kavanagh, J. J., Morrison, S., James, D. A., & Barrett, R. (2006). Reliability of segmental accelerations measured using a new wireless gait analysis system. Journal of biomechanics, 39(15), 2863-2872.
    Kirtley, C. (2006). Clinical gait analysis: theory and practice: Elsevier Health Sciences.
    Kobsar, D., Olson, C., Paranjape, R., Hadjistavropoulos, T., & Barden, J. M. (2014). Evaluation of age-related differences in the stride-to-stride fluctuations, regularity and symmetry of gait using a waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer. Gait & posture, 39(1), 553-557. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.008
    Latt, M. D., Menz, H. B., Fung, V. S., & Lord, S. R. (2009). Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis during gait in older people with Parkinson's disease: a comparison of fallers and nonfallers. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, glp009.
    Lau, H.-y., Tong, K.-y., & Zhu, H. (2009). Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions of persons after stroke with dropped foot. Human movement science, 28(4), 504-514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2008.12.003
    Laudanski, A., Brouwer, B., & Li, Q. (2015). Activity classification in persons with stroke based on frequency features. Medical engineering & physics, 37(2), 180-186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.11.008
    Lord, S., Galna, B., Verghese, J., Coleman, S., Burn, D., & Rochester, L. (2013). Independent Domains of Gait in Older Adults and Associated Motor and Nonmotor Attributes: Validation of a Factor Analysis Approach. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 68(7), 820-827. doi:10.1093/gerona/gls255
    Ly, Q. T., Handojoseno, A. M. A., Gilat, M., Chai, R., Martens, K. A. E., Georgiades, M., . . . Nguyen, H. T. (2017, 11-15 July 2017). Detection of gait initiation Failure in Parkinson's disease based on wavelet transform and Support Vector Machine. Paper presented at the 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).
    MacDougall, H. G., & Moore, S. T. (2005). Marching to the beat of the same drummer: the spontaneous tempo of human locomotion. Journal of applied physiology, 99(3), 1164-1173.
    Mannini, A., Trojaniello, D., Cereatti, A., & Sabatini, A. M. (2016). A machine learning framework for gait classification using inertial sensors: application to elderly, post-stroke and huntington’s disease patients. Sensors, 16(1), 134.
    McCamley, J., Donati, M., Grimpampi, E., & Mazzà, C. (2012). An enhanced estimate of initial contact and final contact instants of time using lower trunk inertial sensor data. Gait & posture, 36(2), 316-318. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.019
    Menz, H. B., Lord, S. R., & Fitzpatrick, R. C. (2003). Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking are associated with risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58(5), M446-M452.
    Menz, H. B., Lord, S. R., & Fitzpatrick, R. C. (2003). Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. Gait & posture, 18(1), 35-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00159-5
    Murray, M. P. (1967). GAIT AS A TOTAL PATTERN OF MOVEMENT: INCLUDING A BIBLIOGRAPHY ON GAIT. American Journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 46(1), 290-333.
    Papavasileiou, I., Zhang, W., Wang, X., Bi, J., Zhang, L., & Han, S. (2017, 17-19 July 2017). Classification of Neurological Gait Disorders Using Multi-task Feature Learning. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE).
    Parisi, F., Ferrari, G., Baricich, A., Innocenzo, M. D., Cisari, C., & Mauro, A. (2016, 14-17 June 2016). Accurate gait analysis in post-stroke patients using a single inertial measurement unit. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN).
    Preece, S. J., Goulermas, J. Y., Kenney, L. P., Howard, D., Meijer, K., & Crompton, R. (2009). Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques. Physiological measurement, 30(4), R1.
    Salatino, G., Bergamini, E., Marro, T., Gentili, P., Iosa, M., Morelli, D., & Vannozzi, G. (2016). Gait stability assessment in Down and Prader-Willi syndrome children using inertial sensors. Gait & posture, 49, S16.
    Sejdic, E., Lowry, K. A., Bellanca, J., Redfern, M. S., & Brach, J. S. (2014). A comprehensive assessment of gait accelerometry signals in time, frequency and time-frequency domains. IEEE Transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 22(3), 603-612.
    Simon, S. R. (2004). Quantification of human motion: gait analysis—benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. Journal of biomechanics, 37(12), 1869-1880. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.047
    Sinclair, J., Hobbs, S. J., Protheroe, L., Edmundson, C. J., & Greenhalgh, A. (2013). Determination of gait events using an externally mounted shank accelerometer. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 29(1), 118-122.
    Sugiarto, T., Lin, Y.-J., Chang, C.-C., & Hsu, W.-C. (2017). Gait Analysis Based on an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor: Validation of Spatiotemporal Parameters Calculation in Healthy Young and Older Adults. 2017 IEEE/SICE SII International Symposium on System Integration.
    Tahafchi, P., Molina, R., Roper, J. A., Sowalsky, K., Hass, C. J., Gunduz, A., . . . Judy, J. W. (2017, 11-15 July 2017). Freezing-of-Gait detection using temporal, spatial, and physiological features with a support-vector-machine classifier. Paper presented at the 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).
    Taraldsen, K., Chastin, S. F. M., Riphagen, I. I., Vereijken, B., & Helbostad, J. L. (2012). Physical activity monitoring by use of accelerometer-based body-worn sensors in older adults: A systematic literature review of current knowledge and applications. Maturitas, 71(1), 13-19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.11.003
    Weiss, A., Herman, T., Giladi, N., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2014). Objective assessment of fall risk in Parkinson's disease using a body-fixed sensor worn for 3 days. PloS one, 9(5), e96675.
    Weiss, A., Herman, T., Giladi, N., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2015). New evidence for gait abnormalities among Parkinson’s disease patients who suffer from freezing of gait: insights using a body-fixed sensor worn for 3 days. Journal of Neural Transmission, 122(3), 403-410.
    Whelan, N., Healy, R., Kenny, I., & Harrison, A. J. (2016). A COMPARISON OF FOOT STRIKE EVENTS USING THE FORCE PLATE AND PEAK IMPACT ACCELERATION MEASURES. Paper presented at the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive.
    Whittle, M. W. (2014). Gait analysis: an introduction: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Yang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y.-L. (2010). A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring. Sensors, 10(8), 7772.
    Zeni, J. A., Richards, J. G., & Higginson, J. S. (2008). Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait & posture, 27(4), 710-714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007
    Zhang, J., Lockhart, T. E., & Soangra, R. (2014). Classifying lower extremity muscle fatigue during walking using machine learning and inertial sensors. Annals of biomedical engineering, 42(3), 600-612.
    Zheng, H., Yang, M., Wang, H., & McClean, S. (2009). Machine learning and statistical approaches to support the discrimination of neuro-degenerative diseases based on gait analysis Intelligent patient management (pp. 57-70): Springer.
    Zijlstra, A., & Zijlstra, W. (2013). Trunk-acceleration based assessment of gait parameters in older persons: A comparison of reliability and validity of four inverted pendulum based estimations. Gait & posture, 38(4), 940-944. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.021
    Zijlstra, W., & Hof, A. L. (2003). Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. Gait & posture, 18(2), 1-10. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00190-X

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2023/02/01 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE