基因改造食農作物是增加全球糧食產出以及提升全球農業效率的手段之一。這不僅有助於開發國家的農民，同時也幫助全球暖化而被影響的發展中和未開發國家解決糧食短缺的問題。由於基改食品相較於傳統農作物具有抵抗病蟲害以及高產出之特性，市場開始大量產出基因改造食品。本研究的目的是要了解有關基因改造農作物的發展。探索社會大眾對基因改造農作物的看法以及基因改造農作物對環境的影響。透過科學文獻資料庫(WOS)取得文獻資訊，探討基因改造食品在社會、倫理和環境方面的影響並探討基因改造農作物的知識擴散路徑。以文獻彼此之間的引證關係為基礎建立基因改造農作物的學術發展路徑，並進行主路徑分析和集群分析。由此了解不同國家在基因改造知識網路中所扮演的角色及其影響力，並藉此了解各國之間的合作關係。
研究發現，已開發國家具有較高的文獻發表。而未開發及開發中國家則在種植基因改造農作物這方面有著較迅速的成長。主路徑分析結果顯示，主要文獻的知識網路大多集中在研究基因改造植物對生態的影響和基因改造農作物會對環境造成的結果。根據集群分析結果，在二十組群中尋找出三個最顯著的群組類別作為此研究分析項目。第一、指出關於基因改造農作物所產生的健康問題，包括造成過敏的原因。第二、基因改造農作物對環境的影響。第三、公眾對基因改造食品的看法。此外迴歸模型結果表示，英國在基因改造農作物的道德、社會和環境問題領域中的研究表現出相對其他國家更為重要的地位。
最後，希望透過此研究可以幫助了解基因改造所探討的議題，並且了解這個領域所面臨的問題，藉此改善基因工程和生物技術，嘗試將基因食品的資訊公開，同時提供更優良，更安全的食品。

Genetic Engineering is a means to increase the global food surplus as well as increase the efficiency of global farming. This not only helps farmers in developed nations, it also greatly helps those impoverished in developing and undeveloped nations and those affected the most by global climate change. Because of GM foods’ resistance to pests, viruses, and its capability for a higher output than traditional crops, great quantities of GM foods began to be grown and sold on the market. This research aims to provide an explanation about genetically engineered crops by providing research results related to the effects genetically modified plants have on society and the environment globally. The literature network of genetically modified food related to social, ethical, and environmental criteria will be explored. First, a scientific literature database (WOS) will be searched, after that a citation-based approach will be applied in order to conduct a scientific main path analysis and cluster analysis. Ultimately, this research aims to understand the leadership and influence of different countries in the GM knowledge network and to understand the relationship of collaboration between various countries.
According to the data collected from the web of science, developed and developing countries have higher literature citations while undeveloped countries have a higher growth rate of genetically engineered crops. The main path analysis results reveal that the main literature network mostly focuses on the environmental impact of genetically modified plants and its overall ecological concerns. However, based on the cluster analysis results, twenty groups of clusters were discovered. Out of those discovered, the three most significant clusters are mentioned in this research pointing out the most important topics relating to the development of genetically engineered crops. These topics include the health concerns of GM plants, the environmental consequences of GM crops and the public perceptions of GM food. Furthermore, the regression model constructed in this research shows that the United Kingdom has the most significant literature in ethical, social and environmental concerns of genetically modified crops.
Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that there is still room for improvement in regards to genetic engineering and biotechnology. Further research can help to discover related problems and issues so that these fields may be bettered and the overall safety of the public may be increased.

1.Adel-Patient, K., Guimaraes, V. D., Paris, A., Drumare, M.-F., Ah-Leung, S., Lamourette, P., . . . Bernard, H. (2011). Immunological and metabolomic impacts of administration of Cry1Ab protein and MON 810 maize in mouse. Plos One, 6(1), e16346.
2.Ali, M. M. (2011). Holy Quran: Ahmadiyya Anjuman Ishaat Islam Lahore USA.
3.Andow, D. A., & Hilbeck, A. (2004). Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic crops. BioScience, 54(7), 637-649.
4.Aris, A., & Leblanc, S. (2011). Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada. Reproductive Toxicology, 31(4), 528-533.
5.Babendreier, D., Kalberer, N. M., Romeis, J., Fluri, P., Mulligan, E., & Bigler, F. (2005). Influence of Bt-transgenic pollen, Bt-toxin and protease inhibitor (SBTI) ingestion on development of the hypopharyngeal glands in honeybees. Apidologie, 36(4), 585-594.
6.Bäckström, A., Pirttilä-Backman, A.-M., & Tuorila, H. (2003). Dimensions of novelty: a social representation approach to new foods. Appetite, 40(3), 299-307.
7.Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv preprint cs/0309023.
8.Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17): Sage.
9.Bennett, R., Phipps, R., Strange, A., & Grey, P. (2004). Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide‐tolerant sugar beet: a life‐cycle assessment. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2(4), 273-278.
10.Bernstein, J. A., Bernstein, I. L., Bucchini, L., Goldman, L. R., Hamilton, R. G., Lehrer, S., . . . Sampson, H. A. (2003). Clinical and laboratory investigation of allergy to genetically modified foods. Environmental health perspectives, 111(8), 1114.
11.Bieberstein, A., Roosen, J., Marette, S., Blanchemanche, S., & Vandermoere, F. (2013). Consumer choices for nano-food and nano-packaging in France and Germany. European review of agricultural economics, 40(1), 73-94.
12.Bredahl, L., Grunert, K. G., & Frewer, L. J. (1998). Consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to genetically engineered food products–a review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research. Journal of consumer Policy, 21(3), 251-277.
13.Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2014). Economic impact of GM crops: the global income and production effects 1996–2012. GM crops & food, 5(1), 65-75.
14.Chaiken, S., & Pliner, P. (1987). Women, but not Men, Are What They Eat The Effect of Meal Size and Gender on Perceived Femininity and Masculinity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(2), 166-176.
15.Cheo, H. Y. (2014). Analyzing Developmental Trajectories and Knowledge Diffusion Networks In Genetically Modified Food Technology.
16.Conner, A. J., Glare, T. R., & Nap, J. P. (2003). The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. The Plant Journal, 33(1), 19-46.
17.Cornetta, K., Moen, R. C., Culver, K., Morgan, R. A., McLachlin, J. R., Sturm, S., . . . Anderson, W. F. (1990). Amphotropic murine leukemia retrovirus is not an acute pathogen for primates. Human gene therapy, 1(1), 15-30.
18.Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M., & Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food policy, 33(2), 99-111.
19.Craig, W., Tepfer, M., Degrassi, G., & Ripandelli, D. (2008). An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica, 164(3), 853-880.
20.De Steur, H., Feng, S., Xiaoping, S., & Gellynck, X. (2014). Consumer preferences for micronutrient strategies in China. A comparison between folic acid supplementation and folate biofortification. Public health nutrition, 17(06), 1410-1420.
21.De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Blancquaert, D., Lambert, W., Van Der Straeten, D., & Qaim, M. (2012). Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of multi-biofortified rice in China. New Biotechnology, 29(3), 432-442.
22.De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Feng, S., Rutsaert, P., & Verbeke, W. (2012). Determinants of willingness-to-pay for GM rice with health benefits in a high-risk region: Evidence from experimental auctions for folate biofortified rice in China. Food Quality and Preference, 25(2), 87-94.
23.De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Storozhenko, S., Liqun, G., Lambert, W., Van Der Straeten, D., & Viaene, J. (2010). Willingness-to-accept and purchase genetically modified rice with high folate content in Shanxi Province, China. Appetite, 54(1), 118-125.
24.Demont, M., & Stein, A. J. (2013). Global value of GM rice: a review of expected agronomic and consumer benefits. New Biotechnology, 30(5), 426-436.
25.Ellstrand, N. C. (2003). Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1434), 1163-1170.
26.Ellstrand, N. C. (2003). Dangerous liaisons?: when cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives: JHU Press.
27.FDA, U. (1992). Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties; notice. Federal Register, 57(104), 22,984-923,005.
28.Felke, M., & Langenbruch, G. (2003). Effect of Bt-maize-pollen on caterpillars of Inachis io in a laboratory assay. Gesunde Pflanzen, 55, 1-7.
29.Fernandez, A., Mills, E., Lovik, M., Spoek, A., Germini, A., Mikalsen, A., & Wal, J. (2013). Endogenous allergens and compositional analysis in the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 62, 1-6.
30.Finamore, A., Roselli, M., Britti, S., Monastra, G., Ambra, R., Turrini, A., & Mengheri, E. (2008). Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 maize ingestion in weaning and old mice. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 56(23), 11533-11539.
31.Freese, W., & Schubert, D. (2004). Safety testing and regulation of genetically engineered foods. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 21(1), 299-324.
32.Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1996). The influence of realistic product exposure on attitudes towards genetic engineering of food. Food Quality and Preference, 7(1), 61-67.
33.Fu, T. J. (2002). Digestion stability as a criterion for protein allergenicity assessment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 964(1), 99-110.
34.Goodman, R. E., Panda, R., & Ariyarathna, H. (2013). Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 61(35), 8317-8332.
35.Goodman, R. E., & Tetteh, A. O. (2011). Suggested improvements for the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants used in foods. Current allergy and asthma reports, 11(4), 317-324.
36.Gregorowius, D., Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Huppenbauer, M. (2012). Ethical discourse on the use of genetically modified crops: a review of academic publications in the fields of ecology and environmental ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(3), 265-293.
37.Hancock, J. F. (2003). A framework for assessing the risk of transgenic crops. BioScience, 53(5), 512-519.
38.Harwood, J. D., Wallin, W. G., & Obrycki, J. J. (2005). Uptake of Bt endotoxins by nontarget herbivores and higher order arthropod predators: molecular evidence from a transgenic corn agroecosystem. Molecular Ecology, 14(9), 2815-2823.
39.Herman, R. A., & Ladics, G. S. (2011). Endogenous allergen upregulation: transgenic vs. traditionally bred crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49(10), 2667-2669.
40.Hesketh, J., Chase, S., & Nanda, D. (1969). Environmental and genetic modification of leaf number in maize, sorghum, and Hungarian millet. Crop Science, 9(4), 460-463.
41.Hossain, F., & Onyango, B. (2004). Product attributes and consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28(3), 255-267.
42.Hossain, F., Onyango, B., Schilling, B., Hallman, W., & Adelaja, A. (2003). Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(5), 353-365.
43.Hudson, J., Caplanova, A., & Novak, M. (2015). Public attitudes to GM foods. The balancing of risks and gains. Appetite, 92, 303-313.
44.Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social networks, 11(1), 39-63.
45.Ho, M. H. C., & Verspagen, B. (2006). The role of national border and regions in knowledge flows. In N. Lorenz & A. Lundvall (Eds.), How Europe’s Economies Learn,”. UK: Oxford University Pres.
46.Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. the Quarterly journal of Economics, 577-598.
47.Jonas, M. S., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998). Functional foods: Consumer perceptions in Denmark and England.
48.Jonas, M. S., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998). Functional foods: consumer perceptions in Denmark and England” Mapp working paper, no. 55. Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus, Denmark.
49.Kajanne, A., & Pirttilä-Backman, A.-M. (1996). Toward an understanding of laypeople's notions about additives in food: Clear-cut viewpoints about additives decrease with education. Appetite, 27(3), 207-222.
50.Kikulwe, E. M., Wesseler, J., & Falck-Zepeda, J. (2011). Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda. Appetite, 57(2), 401-413.
51.Komparic, A. (2015). The Ethics of Introducing GMOs into sub‐Saharan Africa: Considerations from the sub‐Saharan African Theory of Ubuntu. Bioethics, 29(9), 604-612.
52.Kronberger, N., Dahinden, U., Allansdottir, A., Seger, N., Pfenning, U., Gaskell, G., . . . Wagner, W. (2001). " The Train Departed without Us". Public Perceptions of Biotechnology in Ten European Countries. Notizie di politeia, 17(63), 26-36.
53.Ladics, G. S., Budziszewski, G. J., Herman, R. A., Herouet-Guicheney, C., Joshi, S., Lipscomb, E. A., . . . Ward, J. M. (2014). Measurement of endogenous allergens in genetically modified soybeans–Short communication. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 70(1), 75-79.
54.Lähteenmäki, L., Grunert, K., Ueland, Ø., Åström, A., Arvola, A., & Bech-Larsen, T. (2002). Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative. Food Quality and Preference, 13(7), 523-533.
55.Lang, A., & Vojtech, E. (2006). The effects of pollen consumption of transgenic Bt maize on the common swallowtail, Papilio machaon L.(Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Basic and applied ecology, 7(4), 296-306.
56.Lassen, J., Madsen, K., & Sande, P. (2002). Ethics and genetic engineering–lessons to be learned from GM foods. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 24(5), 263-271.
57.Lindvall, O., Kokaia, Z., & Martinez-Serrano, A. (2004). Stem cell therapy for human neurodegenerative disorders–how to make it work.
58.Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-542.
59.Lövei, G., & Arpaia, S. (2005). The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies. Entomologia Experimentalis et applicata, 114(1), 1-14.
60.Lu, Z. b., HAN, N.-s., TIAN, J.-c., PENG, Y.-f., Cui, H., GUO, Y.-y., . . . YE, G.-y. (2014). Transgenic cry1Ab/vip3H+ epsps rice with insect and herbicide resistance acted no adverse impacts on the population growth of a non-target herbivore, the white-backed planthopper, under laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(12), 2678-2689.
61.Lu, Z. b., Liu, Y. E., Han, N. S., Tian, J. C., Peng, Y. F., Hu, C., . . . Ye, G. Y. (2015). Transgenic cry1C or cry2A rice has no adverse impacts on the life‐table parameters and population dynamics of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Pest management science, 71(7), 937-945.
62.Lusk, J. L. (2003). Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 840-856.
63.Lusk, J. L., & Coble, K. H. (2005). Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 393-405.
64.Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Valli, C., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., Morrow, B., & Traill, W. B. (2005). Consumer welfare effects of introducing and labeling genetically modified food. Economics letters, 88(3), 382-388.
65.Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Valli, C., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., Morrow, J., & Traill, W. B. (2004). Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France. European review of agricultural economics, 31(2), 179-204.
66.Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., & Bieberstein, A. (2014). Consumer acceptance of new food technologies: causes and roots of controversies. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 6(1), 381-405.
67.Martinelli, A. (2012). An emerging paradigm or just another trajectory? Understanding the nature of technological changes using engineering heuristics in the telecommunications switching industry. Research Policy, 41(2), 414-429.
68.McComas, K. A., Besley, J. C., & Steinhardt, J. (2014). Factors influencing US consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease. Appetite, 78, 8-14.
69.McFarlane, T., & Pliner, P. (1997). Increasing willingness to taste novel foods: effects of nutrition and taste information. Appetite, 28(3), 227-238.
70.Miller, R. (1993). Nontarget and ecological effects of transgenically altered disease resistance in crops‐possible effects on the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Molecular Ecology, 2(5), 327-335.
71.Mori, D., Chaiken, S., & Pliner, P. (1987). " Eating lightly" and the self-presentation of femininity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(4), 693.
72.Morris, S. (2001). Wu z, YenG. A SOMmappingtechniquefor visuali—zing documents in a database. Proceedings International Joint Con—ference on Neural Networks.
73.Moseley, B. E. (1999). The safety and social acceptance of novel foods. International journal of food microbiology, 50(1), 25-31.
74.Nakai, S., Hoshikawa, K., Shimono, A., & Ohsawa, R. (2015). Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops. Transgenic Research, 24(6), 929-944.
75.Newman, M. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 103(23), 8577-8582.
76.Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2002). Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read the labels? Economics letters, 75(1), 47-53.
77.Obrist, L., Dutton, A., Romeis, J., & Bigler, F. (2006). Biological activity of Cry1Ab toxin expressed by Bt maize following ingestion by herbivorous arthropods and exposure of the predator Chrysoperla carnea. BioControl, 51(1), 31-48.
78.Onyango, B. M., Govindasamy, R., & Nayga Jr, R. M. (2004). Measuring US consumer preferences for genetically modified foods using choice modeling experiments: the role of price, product benefits and technology. Retrieved from
79.Onyango, B. M., Hossain, F., Hallman, W., Schilling, B., & Adelaja, A. (2003). Public perception of food biotechnology: Uncovering factors driving consumer acceptance of genetically modified food. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 34(1), 36-42.
80.Panda, R., Ariyarathna, H., Amnuaycheewa, P., Tetteh, A., Pramod, S., Taylor, S. L., . . . Goodman, R. E. (2013). Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety. Allergy, 68(2), 142-151.
81.Panda, R., Tetteh, A. O., Pramod, S. N., & Goodman, R. E. (2015). Enzymatic hydrolysis does not reduce the biological reactivity of soybean proteins for all allergic subjects. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 63(43), 9629-9639.
82.Paoletti, M. G., & Pimentel, D. (2000). Environmental risks of pesticides versus genetic engineering for agricultural pest control. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(3), 279-303.
83.Parrott, W., Chassy, B., Ligon, J., Meyer, L., Petrick, J., Zhou, J., . . . Levine, M. (2010). Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48(7), 1773-1790.
84.Perlak, F. J., Stone, T. B., Muskopf, Y. M., Petersen, L. J., Parker, G. B., McPherson, S. A., . . . Biever, D. (1993). Genetically improved potatoes: protection from damage by Colorado potato beetles. Plant Molecular Biology, 22(2), 313-321.
85.Phipps, R., & Park, J. (2002). Environmental benefits of genetically modified crops: global and European perspectives on their ability to reduce pesticide use. Journal of Animal and Feed sciences, 11(1), 1-18.
86.Prescott, V. E., Campbell, P. M., Moore, A., Mattes, J., Rothenberg, M. E., Foster, P. S., . . . Hogan, S. P. (2005). Transgenic expression of bean α-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 53(23), 9023-9030.
87.Ramirez-Romero, R., Desneux, N., Decourtye, A., Chaffiol, A., & Pham-Delègue, M. (2008). Does Cry1Ab protein affect learning performances of the honey bee Apis mellifera L.(Hymenoptera, Apidae)? Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 70(2), 327-333.
88.Raybould, A., Tuttle, A., Shore, S., & Stone, T. (2010). Environmental risk assessments for transgenic crops producing output trait enzymes. Transgenic Research, 19(4), 595-609.
89.Raybould, A., & Vlachos, D. (2011). Non-target organism effects tests on Vip3A and their application to the ecological risk assessment for cultivation of MIR162 maize. Transgenic Research, 20(3), 599-611.
90.Richard, S., Moslemi, S., Sipahutar, H., Benachour, N., & Seralini, G.-E. (2005). Differential effects of glyphosate and roundup on human placental cells and aromatase. Environmental health perspectives, 716-720.
91.Roberts, A., Devos, Y., Raybould, A., Bigelow, P., & Gray, A. (2014). Environmental risk assessment of GE plants under low-exposure conditions. Transgenic Research, 23(6), 971-983.
92.Roberts, A., Finardi-Filho, F., Hegde, S., Kiekebusch, J., Klimpel, G., Krieger, M., . . . Rubinstein, C. (2015). Proposed criteria for identifying GE crop plants that pose a low or negligible risk to the environment under conditions of low-level presence in seed. Transgenic Research, 24(5), 783-790.
93.Rogers, H., & Parkes, H. (1995). REVIEW ARTICLE Transgenic plants and the environment. Journal of Experimental Botany, 46(5), 467-488.
94.Romeis, J., Hellmich, R. L., Candolfi, M. P., Carstens, K., De Schrijver, A., Gatehouse, A. M., . . . Raybould, A. (2011). Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants. Transgenic Research, 20(1), 1-22.
95.Romeis, J., Lawo, N., & Raybould, A. (2009). Making effective use of existing data for case‐by‐case risk assessments of genetically engineered crops. Journal of Applied Entomology, 133(8), 571-583.
96.Sanvido, O., Romeis, J., & Bigler, F. (2007). Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation Green gene technology (pp. 235-278): Springer.
97.Sanvido, O., Romeis, J., Gathmann, A., Gielkens, M., Raybould, A., & Bigler, F. (2012). Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 82-91.
98.Savadori, L., Savio, S., Nicotra, E., Rumiati, R., Finucane, M., & Slovic, P. (2004). Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1289-1299.
99.Saxena, D., Flores, S., & Stotzky, G. (2002). Vertical movement in soil of insecticidal Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34(1), 111-120.
100.Schmitt, J., & Linder, C. (1994). Will escaped transgenes lead to ecological release? Molecular Ecology, 3(1), 71-74.
101.Schrope, M. (2001). US to take temperature of mercury threat. Nature, 409(6817), 124-124.
102.Smith, J. M. (2003). Seeds of Deception. Exposing Industry and Government Lies about the Safety of the Genetically Engineered Food You’re Eating. Fairfield, Iowa: Yes.
103.Taylor, S. L. (1997). Food from genetically modified organisms and potential for food allergy. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology, 4(1), 121-126.
104.Taylor, S. L. (2006). Review of the development of methodology for evaluating the human allergenic potential of novel proteins. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 50(7), 604-609.
105.Taylor, S. L., & Hefle, S. L. (2001). Will genetically modified foods be allergenic? Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 107(5), 765-771.
106.Thomas, K., Aalbers, M., Bannon, G., Bartels, M., Dearman, R., Esdaile, D., . . . Hatzos, C. (2004). A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 39(2), 87-98.
107.Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen, L., & Lotti, L. (2001). Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 12(1), 29-37.
108.Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(01), 93-115.
109.Waley, A. (2005). The analects of Confucius (Vol. 28): Psychology Press.
110.Williamson, M., Perrins, J., & Fitter, A. (1990). Releasing genetically engineered plants: present proposals and possible hazards. Trends in ecology & evolution, 5(12), 417-419.
111.Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal, 6(6), 842-851.
112.Yagami, T., Haishima, Y., Nakamura, A., Osuna, H., & Ikezawa, Z. (2000). Digestibility of allergens extracted from natural rubber latex and vegetable foods. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 106(4), 752-762.
113.Yu, H. L., Li, Y. H., & Wu, K. M. (2011). Risk Assessment and Ecological Effects of Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Crops on Non‐Target OrganismsF. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 53(7), 520-538.