簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 賴信延
Sin-yan Lai
論文名稱： 在閉環式供應鏈中考慮政府補助與徵稅之定價與再製策略
Pricing and remanufacturing policies in a closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy and fee
指導教授： 陳正綱
Cheng-Kang Chen
口試委員: 葉瑞徽
Ruey-Huei Yeh
洪大為
Ta-wei Hung
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年： 2013
畢業學年度： 101
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 45
中文關鍵詞： 閉環式供應鏈 、Stackelberg 、政府
外文關鍵詞： Closed-Loop Supply Chain, Stackelberg, Government
相關次數： 點閱：197  下載：8 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •  上一筆

    • 在這篇論文中，我們考慮了一個閉環式供應鏈包含了一個製造商、一個獨立的回收商和數個消費者。製造商賣產品給消費者，回收商回收消費者使用過的產品並且賣給製造商。我們假設製造商是 Stackelberg 領導者、回收商是Stackelberg 追隨者，並且以數學公式求得到封閉式的均衡解。基於均衡解，政府給予回收商獎勵金並且向製造商徵稅使得總社會福利最大化。此外，對於製造商的製造策略，我們討論了兩種情況，其一為逐批製造策略，另一個為非逐批製造策略。在此模式架構下，此篇論文呈現了在閉環式供應鏈中政府補助與徵稅的影響。最後利用一些數值範例來說明問題的特性。

    In this paper, we consider a closed-loop supply chain which includes a manufacturer, an independent collector and numerous consumers. The manufacturer sells products to consumers and the collector collects used products from consumers then sells those collected used products to the manufacturers. By assuming the manufacturer is a Stackelberg leader and the collector is a Stackelberg follower, the objective functions are mathematically formulated and equilibrium solutions are obtained in closed-form format. Base on the equilibrium solutions, the government tries to maximize the total social welfare by determining the subsidy to the collector and the tax fee to the manufacturer. Furthermore, two production policies for the manufacturer are discussed, one is “lot-for-lot policy” and the other is “not-lot-for-lot policy”. Under this modeling framework, this paper shows the impacts of government subsidy and fee on the closed-loop supply chain. Several interesting managerial insights and observations are provided.

    摘要 I Abstract II 致謝 III Content IV List of Tables V List of Figures VI Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Literature Review 4 Chapter 3. Model Formulation and Solution Procedure 7 3.1 Assumptions 7 3.2 Notation 7 3.3 Closed-Loop Supply Chain Model 8 Chapter 4. Mathematical Formulation (lot-for-lot policy) 12 4.1 Mathematical formulation for the collector 12 4.2 Mathematical formulation for the manufacturer 13 4.3 Mathematical formulation for the government 18 4.4 Cardano’s formula approach 19 4.5 Numerical example (lot-for-lot policy) 23 4.5.1 23 4.5.2 25 4.5.3 26 4.5.4 and 27 4.5.5 and 28 Chapter 5. Mathematical Formulation (not-lot-for-lot policy) 29 5.1 Mathematical formulation for the manufacturer (not-lot-for-lot) 30 5.2 Mathematical formulation for the government (not-lot-for-lot) 35 5.3 Numerical example (not-lot-for-lot policy) 37 5.3.1 37 5.3.2 39 5.3.3 40 5.3.4 and 41 Chapter 6. Conclusion and further research 42 Reference 43

    1. Benton, W.C., 2000. Supply-chain management for recoverable manufacturing systems. Interface 30, 125-142.
    2. Chung, S.L., Wee, H.M., Yang, P.C., 2008. Optimal policy for a closed-loop supply chain inventory system with remanufacturing. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 48, 867-881.
    3. Deng, Y.H., 2009. An optimal replenishment policy for two-echelon inventory system with remanufacturing.
    4. Guide, D., Harrison, T., Wassenhove, L.V., 2003. The challenge of Closed-Loop supply Chains. Interface 33 (6). 3-6.
    5. Hatcher, G.D., Ijomah, W.L., Windmill, J.F.C., 2011. Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 2004-2014.
    6. Hong, I.H., Yeh, J.S., 2012. Modeling closed-loop supply chains in the electronics industry: A retailer collection application. Transportation Research Part E 48 (4), 817-829.
    7. Lee, K.J., 2008. Closed loop supply chains with variable remanufacturability and the impact of subsidy and penalty by government.
    8. Lin, C.F., 2010. Optimal policies for the closed-loop supply chain inventory systems with product remanufacturing under price-sensitive demand consideration.
    9. Luther, L., 2008. Managing Electronic Waste: An Analysis of State E-Waste Legislation. CRS Report for Congress.
    10. McCormick, B., Stone, I. and Corporate Analytical Team., 2007. Economic costs of obesity and the case for government intervention. Obesity reviews 8 (1), 161–164.
    11. Min, J.M., 2008. Government's subsidies and fees on closed-loop supply chains and their economic implications.
    12. Mohsen, S.S., Mohammad, R.A.J., 2009. Optimizing shipment, ordering and pricing policies in a two-stage supply chain with price-sensitive demand. Transportation Research Part E (45), 564-571.
    13. Nie, J., Huang, Z., Zhao, Y., Shi, Y., 2013. Collective Recycling Responsibility in Closed-Loop Fashion Supply Chains with a Third Party: Financial Sharing or Physical Sharing? Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013.
    14. Qina, Y., Tanga, H., Guoa, C., 2007. Channel coordination and volume discounts with price-sensitive demand. Int. J. Production Economics (105), 43-53.
    15. Sakon, W., Bordin, R., 2011. The determination of high cost and low cost spare parts by using the comparison between EOQ model and lot-for-lot inventory model: A case study of slow moving item. IEEE, 115 – 121.
    16. Savaskan, R.C., Bhattacharya, S., Wassenhove, L.V., 2004. Close-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science 50 (2), 239-252.
    17. Savaskan, R.C., Wassenhove, L.V., 2006. Reverse Channel Design: The Case of Competing Retailers. Management Science 52 (1), 1-14.
    18. Schrady, D.A., 1967. A deterministic inventory model for reparable items. Naval Research Logistics 14 (3), 391-398.
    19. Schwarz, l.b., 1972. Economic order quantities for products with finite demand horizons. AIIE Transactions 4 (3).
    20. Seegrid Corporation. 2008. GENCO Supply Chain Solutions. Seegrid Corporation.
    21. Teierry, M., Salomon, M., Nunen, J.V., Wassenhove, L.V., 1995. Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review 37(2), 114-135.
    22. Teunter, R., 2004. Lot-sizing for inventory systems with product recovery. Computers & Industrial Engineering (46), 431-441.
    23. Timothy, H.B., Dinesh, S.D., Kathy, E.F., Melvin, R.R., 1997. Economic lot size model for price-dependent demand under quantity and freight discounts. Int. J. Production Economic (48), 141-155.
    24. Webster, S., Mitra, S., 2007. Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws. Journal of Operations Management 25, 1123-1140.
    25. Weiss, N.E., 2008. Government Interventions in Financial Markets: Economic and Historic Analysis of Subprime Mortgage Options. CRS Report for Congress.
    26. ZHAO, X.F., ZHAO, X.M., 2011. Pricing Decision and Performance Analysis of Closed-loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Reverse Logistics.

    QR CODE