研究生: |
祝尚駿 Shang-chun Chu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
從動態能力觀點探討套裝軟體廠商發展路徑-以台灣睿智為例 Exploring the development path of Package Software Vendor based on Dynamic Capabilities Perspective-A case study of Strategy Companion Corporation |
指導教授: |
郭庭魁
Ting-Kuei Kuo |
口試委員: |
郭建志
none 林士平 none 何秀青 none |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 管理學院MBA School of Management International (MBA) |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 107 |
中文關鍵詞: | 動態能力 、競爭優勢 、新創事業 |
外文關鍵詞: | Dynamic Capabilities, Competitive advantages, New Ventures |
相關次數: | 點閱:293 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在現今的社會,隨著時間的演進,科技的發展呈現一種快速變動以及高度不穩定的特性,這樣的產業結構及環境創造了機會卻也同時產生了競爭與威脅。科技產業在面臨到這樣不確定及變動的環境下,已不能如傳統產業般可尋找一套最佳營運模式,以追求規模經濟的方式便可在產業中立足。科技產業需要累積更多的核心能力,並根據環境的趨勢加以調整及改變。因此,如何在變動快速的環境中,更新自我本身的優勢,以配合環境的變動及需求,便成為應重視的議題。
自策略管理理論發展以來,如何維持廠商的競爭優勢一直是各界相當關心的議題。Teece et al.(1997)提出的「動態能力」觀點,主張企業應建立、整合與重新配置其資源與能力,以回應環境快速變動。動態能力強調組織內部與組織外部變動的配置,及更明確的指認出組織競爭優勢的所在及其究竟如何形成。
本研究採用個案研究法,以動態能力的三種能力(感知、獲取以及轉換能力)出發,結合其微觀基礎以及後續研究發現為架構,探究套裝軟體廠商如何在快速變遷的環境中創造競爭力、持續成長。在結論針對動態能力在新創事業發展過程中所扮演的角色、不同動態能力之間的相互關係提出看法,期望能為台灣的新創資訊軟體服務企業提供參考案例,協助其訂定發展策略。
In today’s society, as time evolves, the development of technology is moving towards a rapidly changing and highly unstable nature. This kind of Industrial structure and environment creates not only opportunities but also competition and threats. When facing the environment mentioned above, firms in technology industry need to accumulate as many core competencies as possible and adjust themselves according to the changing trends in the environment. Therefore, how to increase and update one’s strength and advantages to cope with the rapidly changing market environment and demands becomes an important topic. Since the development of Strategy Management theories, the topic on how to maintain a firm's competitive advantage has been one of the most discussed topics. In year 1997, Teece proposed the Dynamic Capabilities perspective, he advocates that in order to respond to the rapid changing environment, firms should establish, integrate and reconfigure its resource base and capabilities.
This paper adopts the case study method by using the three different dynamic capabilities; sensing, seizing and transforming as the framework to explore how a package software firm creates competencies and continue to grow in a rapidly changing environment. In conclusion, this paper highlights the role of dynamic capabilities during the development progress of a new venture and to provide a point of view on the relationship between the three different dynamic capabilities. This paper also aims to contribute an example for future new ventures in Taiwan’s software industry to assist them in setting up their initial business development strategy.
中文部分
1.甘兆欽 (2010)。 動態策略定位與創業之研究-以統一企業為例。南台科技大學,台南市。
2.李凌芸(2012) 策略創業之個案研究:以鑫承智慧科技股份有限公司為例。台灣科技大學,台北市。
3.巫立宇(1996),資源、社會資本、路徑相依與動態能力之研究,管理評論,第28 卷第1 期,121~140。
4.侯嘉政、白如玲 (2007)。 企業策略創業程序之個案研究:動態能力理論。 創業管理研究 Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 2(4), 89-112。
5.侯嘉政 (2008)。 企業動態能力與創業管理之研究。 創業管理研究 Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 3(2), 1-28。
6.許煥彬(2012)。從動態能力微觀基礎架構探討企業轉型製造服務化-以光通訊公司為例。台灣科技大學,台北市。
7.陳姿伶 (2004)。 個案研究法 (Case Study)。國立中興大學,台中市。
8.陳萬淇 (1995)。 個案研究法。台北:華泰書局。
英文部分
1.Ambrosini, V. & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29-49.
2.Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C. & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: an exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management. 20(1), 9-24.
3.Augier, M. & Teece, D.J. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review, 47, 175–192.
4.Aoki, M. (1990). The participatory generation of information rents and the theory of the firm. The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties. Sage, New York.
5.Argyres, N. S. (1995). Technology strategy, governance structure and
interdivisional coordination. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,28(3), 337-358.
6.Bowman, C. & Ambrosini, V. (2003). How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. British Journal of Management, 14(4), 289–303.
7.Barreto (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future, Journal of Management 2010 36: 256-281.
8.Eisenhardt, K. & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic Capability: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (1), 1105-1121.
9.Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the globalized world in the 21st century. London: Allen Lane.
10.Helfat, C.E. & Peteraf, M.A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
11.Helfat, C. E. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations: Wiley-Blackwell
12.Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378.
13.O'Reilly, C. A., Tushman, M. L., & Research, H. B. S. D. o. (2007). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
14.Pavlou, (2004). IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities in the New Product Development: Building a Competitive Advantage in the Turbulent Environments, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California
15.Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press: New York.
16.Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press: New York.
17.Prieto, I.M., Revilla, E., & Rodrı’guez-Prado, B. (2009). Building dynamic capabilities in product development: How do contextual antecedents matter? Scandinavian Journal of Management, doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2009.05.005
18.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
19.Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. . (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
20.Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and corporate change, 3(3), 537-556.
21.Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(3), 223-247.
22.Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct
firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(1), 39-63.
23.Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193-224.
24.Teece, D. J.(2000). Managing intellectual capital: Organizational,
strategic, and policy dimensions: Taylor & Francis.
25.Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
26.Teece, D. J. (2006). Reflections on “profiting from innovation”. Research Policy,35(8), 1131-1146.
27.Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and
microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
28.Teece, D. J. (2010). “Technological Innovation and the Theory of the Firm: The Role of Enterprise-level Knowledge, Complementarities, and (Dynamic) Capabilities.” In N. Rosenberg and B. Hall (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Volume 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
29.Teece, D. J. (2011). Dynamic Capabilities: A Framework for Profitability. Ivey Business Journal
30.Zahra, S., Sapienza, H. & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43,917–955.
31.Zollo, M. & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
32.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.