一家資訊系統歷史悠久的醫院，資訊單位運用何種方式協助營養部門再造達到創新呢？從最初的資訊系統的更新再造完成推展上線，提昇內部的工作效能及協助食材資源有效管控，到面對緊急天然災害及食安問題時能妥善即時處理。又如何藉由資訊科技行動裝置運用與營養團隊的知識整合，創造出以病人或顧客為中心豐富多元創意餐點選餐服務。如今資訊科技時代，資訊系統已成為各部門作業的運作樞紐，在營養相關部門可提昇全院飲食供應及食材運用的管理，若其停擺將會造成醫院膳食供應與管理的衝擊。近年來，更致力於「健康餐飲新文化」的推展，建立符合衛生、安全、營養與美味之供膳環境，運用生活化飲食實務模式灌輸健康營養知識，達到教育的功能，由院內到鄰近社區，營造健康之餐飲新概念。

本研究係以哈佛個案方案進行，針對共識結構、跨界知識整合、價值共創、左右開弓等議題理論進行討論；研究一個醫院部門與資訊單位合作完成資訊系統再造創造新功能應用，運用個人與跨領域團隊背景的多元化，從摸索、交流、快速轉換的整合過程中獲取知識價值發揮最佳效果，透過健康促進成果驗證達到活化管理永續經營。

How should the IT unit of a medical center reinvent the established information system to bring innovation to the Dietetics and Nutrition Department? The initial overhaul of the information system allows a huge increase in workflow efficiency and enables effective ingredient management. An establishment of standard protocol in face of natural disaster outbreaks and food safety incidents ensures fast response. By utilizing mobile devices, we came up with new patient/customer-centered meal plans that provide diverse, innovative choices. In the current era, the information system serves as the central hub of every department, playing a pivotal role in managing supply/demand and utilization of ingredients. Its importance is evident in the fact that disruptions to the system could lead to a total shut down of daily affairs.

In recent years, we’ve devoted ourselves to the Healthy Eating movement. This entails a comprehensive review of the current landscape in dietetics and nutrition to ensure foods in accordance to the current nutrition knowledge are provided. By focusing on establishment of healthy eating patterns, we hope to spread the campaign beyond the hospital to the surrounding communities.

This research is inspired by the 「Harvard Case Study」 model, and delves into the theories of consensus structure, field integration, shared value, and the ambidextrous organization. It provides the findings that we stumbled upon when the IT department cooperated with a clinical unit of the hospital in the form of an information system. We hope to further develop a blueprint to ensure continuous growth in the field.

一、英文部份
[1] Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System. Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68.
[2] Afuah, A., & Tucci, C.L. (2013). Value capture and crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Review,38(3), 457-460.
[3] Beckett-Camarata, E. J., Camarata, M. R. and Barker, R. T. (1998). Integrating internal and external customer relationships through relationship management: a strategic response to a changing global environment, Journal of Business Research, 41, 71-81.
[4] Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
[5] Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-568.
[6] Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Systems Approach and its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.
[7] Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
[8] de Boer, M., Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex, Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379-398.
[9] Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3, 179-202.
[10] Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 375-387.
[11] Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209.
[12] Hemetsberger, A., & Reinhardt, C. (2009). Collective development in open-source communities: An activity theoretical perspective on successful online collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(9), 987-1008.
[13] Hermes, N., Lensink, R. and Mehrteab, H.T. (2005). ÔPeer monitoring, social ties and moral hazard in group lending programmes: evidence from EritreaÕ, World Development, vol. 33(1), 149–69.
[14] J. Habermas (1989) Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt: Schrkamp,573–74.
[15] Keil, M., Carmel, E. (1995) Customer-Developer-Links in Software Development. In Communications of the ACM, 38, 5, 33-45.
[16] Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, integration capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
[17] Krueger, R.A. （1993）. Quality Control in Focus Group Research. In D. L. Morgan (ed.) Suc Focus Group, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 65-85.
[18] Morgan, D. L. & Krueger, R. A (1993). When to Use Focus Groups and Why. In D. L. Morgan (ed.) Focus, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 3-19.
[19] Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 5-14.
[20] Ramírez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Tntellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49-65.
[21] Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
[22] Sivadas, E. and Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes, Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-49.
[23] Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, A Shuen(1997).Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal,18(7),509-533.
[24] Tushman, Michael L (1977). Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process.
Administrative Science Quarterly. 22 (4), 587-605.
[25] Tushman, M. L., &; O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1-23.
[26] Yan, A., &; Louis, M. R. (1999). The Migration of Organizational Functions to the Work Unit Level: Buffering, Spanning, and Bringing up Boundaries. Human Relations, 52(1), 25-47.
二、中文部份
[1] Daniel Levi(2012)，「團體動力學-團隊工作的運用」，蔡春美、蘇韋列、蕭景容、魏慧珠譯，洪葉文化事業。
[2] Kim Erwin(2015)，「溝通前瞻思維」，劉美玲譯，桑格文化。
[3] 林文寶、吳萬益(2005)，「以組織學習觀點探討知識整合及運作特性對核心能力影響之研究」，臺大管理論叢，15(2)，165－197
[4] 林雪梅(2012)，組織跨界管理能力研究-以M公司為例，國立臺灣科技大學管理研究所EMBA碩士論文。
[5] 周雅容(1997)，焦點團體法在調查研究上的應用。調查研究－方法與應用，3，51-73。
[6] 杜鵬、李慶芳、周信輝、方世杰(2017)，「（創）串新」的服務模式：以價值共創觀點探索尚品宅配的服務流程與本質，管理學報，34卷3期，401 - 430。
[7] 張秀樺、盧龍泉(2012)，價值共創調節效果之實證研究：以我國文化創意產業為例。人文暨社會科學期刊，8（1），47-58。
[8] 泰德．謝德勒、喬許．柏納夫、茱莉．阿斯科(2015)，「行動思維時代」，簡美娟、林奕伶、沈耿立譯，商周出版。
[9] 凱文‧莫瑞(2014)，《別再管了！溝通才是最好的領導》，吳書愉譯，漫遊者文化。
[10] 劉容秀、 黃國祥、 吳采逸 、 許瑋芬、 楊妹鳳(2013) ，醫院膳食作業資訊系統再造 ，臺灣膳食營養學雜誌，49-58。
[11] 蔡望怡(2014)，國會議事系統需求分析，國立臺灣科技大學管理研究所EMBA碩士論文。
[12] 蔡鶯鶯、徐永年、林永隆(2003)，參與行動研究：921地震後中嵙社區健康營造研究案例。新聞學研究，77期，23 – 65。
[13] 鄭景華、湯宗益(2004)。知識整合能力模式之研究。資訊、科技與管理學刊，4（1），19-45。
[14] 賴賢宗(1999) ，「共識與共識理論危機的當代論諍」，思與言，第37卷第3期，119-139。
三、參考網站
[1] Ambidexterity定義-wiki百科https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambidexterity
[2] 知識螺旋- MBA智庫百科http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/知識螺旋。
[3] 隱性知識- MBA智庫百科http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/隱性知識。