公共工程所提供之服務與大眾生活相關，其品質與安全格外受人矚目，國內主管機關對於確保工程品質之法令規定與評核作法，亦即強調承包商「施工品質管制系統」、主辦工程單位「施工品質保證系統」及主管機關「工程施工品質評鑑制度」三個層級的品質管理架構，已實施有年。然而透過第三級品管之查核機制檢視國內公共工程施工情形，尤其欠缺專業組織人力之非工程專責單位所辦理之工程例如學校建築等，可知主要性的品管缺失或施工瑕疵仍普遍存在於各工程中，於提升品質之議題上尚有其瓶頸。探究其原因除了國內大多數機關仍以最低標作為取決承商的唯一條件，無從過濾承攬者素質之外，而二級品管之監造單位又往往效能不彰，致使學校等非工程專責單位於施工過程中無法強有力的執行履約管理。
此外，國內執行工程之制度亦偏重於管制施工成果之「末端管理」，雖三級品管法令對於施工管理相關規定鉅細靡遺，惟仍舊缺乏由工程生命週期各階段對於工程品質作整體性思考；例如由中央部會及縣市政府進行之工程查核作業，即欠缺對於規劃設計階段之查核機制，致使查核之功能已受影響。事實上，工程之執行除施工階段以外，前置之規劃設計或發包模式等，亦是不可忽略之生命週期，如上開前置作業能配套完善，或可為工程品質奠定良好之基礎。本研究再藉由部分非以傳統模式操作之學校工程為案例，檢視其運作之情形，並由主辦機關之角度檢視分析其結果，並對於營繕人員辦理工程之規劃設計、發包模式或管理機制作一建議，供執行者做為參考。

Public construction provides services that are relevant to everyday life for the general public; thus, its quality and safety have become a focus of everyone. Regulation and rules to ensure construction quality, the three-level quality management system, by authoritative agencies in the government have been in practice for years as follows: “construction quality control system” for subcontractors, “construction quality guarantee system” for construction sponsoring company, and “construction quality assessment system” for the governing competent authority. However, from the observation of public construction in Taiwan through surveillance mechanism for quality management in the third level, professional and organized manpower are especially in shortage on construction site that non-construction professional organizations handle such as school buildings. It shows that major mistakes in quality management and construction errors generally exist in every construction site so that there is limitation on the issue of improving quality. Due to the reason that most government agencies in Taiwan use the lowest standard as the only condition to choose subcontractor, it is impossible to screen their quality. On the other hand, the supervising organization in the second-level quality management is not effective so that the non-construction professional organization such as schools cannot execute and manage the construction based on the contract during the process of construction.
In addition, the system of administering construction in Taiwan prefers “terminal management” to control construction result. Although three-level quality management regulations list rules in detail concerning construction management, it lacks an integral thinking for construction quality from every stage of construction life cycle; for example, the function of a construction surveillance operated in central government agencies, county and city governments is affected due to lack of surveillance mechanism in the stage of planning and design. In fact, preliminary planning, design, or subcontracting model are life cycles cannot be neglected for the entire execution of construction except the stage of construction. Preliminary operation can be served as a good foundation for construction quality. Using some school constructions as examples that operate in a non-traditional model to examine its execution, this study examines and analyzes the results from the perspective of a government organization that sponsors the construction. This study also proposes suggestions for construction management and workers concerning planning, design, subcontracting model or management mechanism.

[1]蔣逸儒，「台灣地區公共工程施工品質管理制度之研究」，國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，民國89年。
[2]行政院公共工程委員會，「公共工程品質管理訓練班教材」第一單元，民國96出版。
[3]政府採購法第70條。
[4]工程施工查核小組組織準則第5條。
[5]行政院工程會資訊網站「品質管理」項。
[6]工程施工查核小組作業辦法第5條。
[7]工程施工查核小組作業辦法第4條。
[8]工程施工查核小組作業辦法第9條。
[9]工程施工查核小組作業辦法第10條。
[10]張建益，「營建業實施ISO9000品管制度應用在公共工程施工品質評鑑之案例探討」，中華大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，民國91年。
[11]林翔，「公共工程品管制度檢討」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，民國94年。
[12]李正彬，「高雄市公共工程施工品質與監造方式之探討」，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，民國90年。
[13]曾義誠，「公共工程施工品質管理制度問題與對策之研究」，國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，民國90年。
[14]張大千，「統包採購制度對公共工程品質影響之研究」，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，民國91年。
[15]政府採購法第52條第1項第1款。
[16]政府採購法第52條第1項第3款。
[17]政府採購法施行細則第66條。
[18]國立台灣大學總務處資料。
[19]政府採購法第39條。
[20]政府採購法第40條。
[21]政府採購法第25條。
[22]行政院公共工程委員會，「水管、電氣與建築工程合併或分開招標原則」，民國88年。
[23]麥可•波特，「競爭論」，天下遠見出版，高登第、李明軒 譯，民國90年。