Basic Search / Detailed Display

Author: 馬祖瑞
Tsu-Jui Ma
Thesis Title: 書目對與共被引文獻之知識擴散路徑:主路徑分析
Knowledge Diffusion Paths of Bibliographic Coupling and Co-citation Literature: The Main Path Analysis
Advisor: 李國光
Gwo-Guang Lee
Committee: 周子銓
Tzu-Chuan Chou
黃元鶴
Yuan-Ho Huang
溫演福
Yean-Fu Wen
柯皓仁
Hao-Ren Ke
呂育誠
Yu-Cheng Lu
Degree: 博士
Doctor
Department: 管理學院 - 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
Thesis Publication Year: 2022
Graduation Academic Year: 110
Language: 中文
Pages: 96
Keywords (in Chinese): 書目對書目耦合共被引知識擴散路徑主路徑分析書目分析引文直接引文間接引文引文分析引文網路
Keywords (in other languages): Bibliographic coupling, Bibliometric coupling, Co-citation, Cocitation, Knowledge diffusion path, Citation, Direct citation, Indirect citation
Reference times: Clicks: 284Downloads: 3
Share:
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report
  • 本論文係運用獨特的引文為基礎之方法—主路徑分析,分析書目對與
    共被引主題自首論以來之發展軌跡文獻,由各該主題論文所構成二組引文
    網路之研究問題,映射其學術關鍵文獻之基本書目計量與知識擴散路徑。

    文獻回顧係探討書目對與共被引之概念與相互比較,並論述其發展;
    再探討主路徑分析之概念,並論述主路徑分析之發展與知識擴散路徑。

    研究方法係運用主路徑分析,從Web of Science 資料庫之科學引文索
    引擴展版與社會科學引文索引中,檢索書目對與共被引二組主題文獻,以
    其書目資料進行引文網路之分析,其分析包括基本書目計量(含出版與引
    文趨勢、高影響作者與期刊)與主路徑分析二部分。

    研究結果在書目對文獻中,由1,136 名作者在220 種期刊中,出版439
    篇論文合計13,128 次被引用,其主路徑由28 篇節點論文所組成,依出版
    年序分成:興起期(1963 年至1984 年)、開放期(1984 年至2010 年)與
    鞏固期(2010 年至2022 年)三時期;另在共被引文獻中,由5,028 名作者
    在770 種期刊中,出版2,265 篇論文合計84,968 次被引用,其主路徑由64
    篇節點論文所組成,依出版年序分成:興起期(1973 年至1982 年)、成長
    期(1982 年至2005 年)、開放期(2005 年至2016 年)與鞏固期(2010 年
    至2022 年)四時期。

    研究討論與結論係以二組主題文獻之研究問題,論述書目對與共被引
    之基本書目計量(含出版與引文趨勢、高影響作者與期刊)與知識擴散路
    徑;最後並綜論本論文之書目對與共被引文獻研究與進一步之研究建議。


    This study employed a unique citation-based method—main path
    analysis—to reveal the development trajectory of research on bibliographic
    coupling and co-citation since their introduction. Topics discussed in the two
    fields of research formed into two separate citation networks, which mapped the
    basic bibliometrics of key papers and the knowledge diffusion path in each field.

    A literature review was conducted to investigate and compare the
    concepts of bibliographic coupling and co-citation, examine their
    development, discuss the concept of main path analysis, and describe the
    development and knowledge diffusion path of the analysis.

    Through main path analysis, we retrieved papers on bibliographic coupling
    and co-citation from the Science Citation Index Expanded and the Social
    Sciences Citation Index of Web of Science. The bibliographic data of these
    papers were then used to analyze their respective citation networks with regards
    to the basic bibliometrics (e.g., publication trend, citation trend, high-impact
    authors, and publications in high-impact journals) and the main path in each
    network.

    The results showed that 439 papers on bibliographic coupling were
    published by a total of 1,136 authors in 220 journals and were cited 13,128 times
    collectively. The main path consisted of 28 nodes (i.e., papers), which were
    categorized into three periods by their publication years: the emergence (1963–
    1984), opening (1984–2010), and consolidation (2010–2022) periods. For the
    co-citation field of research, 2,265 papers were published by 5,028 authors in
    770 journals and were cited 84,968 times altogether. The main path comprised
    64 nodes (i.e., papers), which were categorized into four periods by their
    publication years: the emergence (1973–1982), growth (1982–2005), opening
    (2005–2016), and consolidation (2010–2022) periods.

    According to topics studied in the bibliographic coupling and co-citation
    fields of research, discussions were performed and conclusions drawn on the
    basic bibliometrics (publication trend, citation trend, high-impact authors, and
    publications in high-impact journals) and knowledge diffusion path in each field.
    Finally, we conducted a comprehensive discussion on the two fields of research
    and proposed suggestions for future research.

    中文摘要 ....................................................................i Abstract ...................................................................ii 誌謝 ......................................................................iii 目錄 ...................................................................... iv 表索引 .................................................................... vi 圖索引 ................................................................... vii 第一章 緒論 ................................................................ 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ....................................................... 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 ....................................................... 3 第三節 研究流程 ............................................................ 4 第四節 研究範圍、限制與架構 ................................................. 6 第五節 名詞釋義 ............................................................ 8 第二章 文獻回顧 ........................................................... 10 第一節 書目對與共被引 ...................................................... 10 一、書目對與共被引之概念與比較............................................... 10 二、書目對與共被引之發展 ................................................... 15 第二節 主路徑分析與知識擴散路徑 ............................................. 20 一、主路徑分析之概念 ....................................................... 20 二、主路徑分析發展與知識擴散路徑 ............................................ 20 第三章 研究方法 ............................................................ 24 第一節 樣本資料來源與分析項目 ............................................... 24 一、書目對文獻之資料與基本書目計量 ........................................... 24 二、共被引文獻之資料與基本書目計量 ........................................... 25 第二節 主路徑分析 .......................................................... 26 一、主路徑分析之程序 ........................................................ 26 二、運用三軟體於主路徑分析之參數設定與執行 .................................... 28 第四章 結果 ................................................................ 34 第二節 書目對文獻 .......................................................... 34 一、書目對文獻之出版與引文趨勢................................................ 34 二、書目對文獻之高影響作者與期刊.............................................. 37 三、書目對文獻之知識擴散路徑.................................................. 39 第二節 共被引文獻 ........................................................... 47 一、共被引文獻之出版與引文趨勢................................................ 47 二、共被引文獻之高影響作者與期刊.............................................. 50 三、共被引文獻之知識擴散路徑.................................................. 52 第五章 討論與結論 ........................................................... 68 第一節 研究討論 ............................................................. 68 一、書目對文獻之研究討論 ..................................................... 68 二、共被引文獻之研究討論 ..................................................... 71 三、書目對與共被引文獻之綜合研究討論 .......................................... 74 第二節 研究結論 ............................................................. 76 一、書目對文獻之研究結論 ..................................................... 76 二、共被引文獻之研究結論 ..................................................... 77 三、書目對與共被引文獻之綜合研究結論 .......................................... 79 第三節 研究建議 ............................................................. 81 參考文獻 ................................................................... 82 中文部分 ................................................................... 82 西文部分 ................................................................... 83

    中文部分
    何光國(1994)。文獻計量學導論。三民書局。
    張郁蔚(2012a)。書目耦合∕書目對(Bibliographic coupling)。圖書館
    學與資訊科學大辭典(雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網)。國家
    教育研究院。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678906/?index=1
    張郁蔚(2012b)。共被引(Co-citation)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典
    (雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網)。國家教育研究院。
    http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678905/?index=1
    蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。國立編譯館。

    西文部分
    Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009). Document-document similarity
    approaches and science mapping: Experimental comparison of five
    approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 49-63.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.003
    Ahlgren, P., & Jarneving, B. (2008). Bibliographic coupling, common abstract
    stems and clustering: A comparison of two document-document similarity
    approaches in the context of science mapping. Scientometrics, 76(2), 273-
    290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1935-1
    Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a
    cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's
    correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information
    Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242
    Amsler, R. A. (1972). Applications of citation-based automatic classification
    (Internal Technical Report, 72-12). Linguistics Research Center,
    University Texas at Austin.
    Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive
    science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
    Association for Information Science & Technology (2022a, June 19). Journal
    of the American Society for Information Science. JASIST.
    https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/23301643/year/2000
    Association for Information Science & Technology (2022b, June 19). Journal
    of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. JASIST.
    https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/23301643/year/2013
    Å ström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time‐ sliced cocitation
    analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American
    Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20567
    Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis.
    University of Ljubljana, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics
    Department of Theoretical Computer Science, Preprint Series, 41, 897.
    Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek: Program for large network analysis.
    Connections, 21(2), 47–57.
    Bichteler, J., & Eaton III, E. A. (1980). The combined use of bibliographic
    coupling and cocitation for document retrieval. Journal of the American
    Society for Information Science, 31(4), 278-282.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630310408
    Börner, K., Chen, C.-M., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge
    domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-
    255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
    Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2007). What do we know about the h index?
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
    58(9), 1381-1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
    Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Topical connections between the
    institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct
    citation links and co-citations). Scientometrics, 102(1), 455-463.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1425-1
    Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic
    coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the
    research front most accurately?. Journal of the American Society for
    Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
    Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic,
    global model and map of science. Journal of the Association for
    Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 670-685.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22990
    Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of
    science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-
    005-0255-6
    Boyack, K. W., Wylie, B. N., & Davidson, G. S. (2002). Domain visualization
    using VxInsight® for science and technology management. Journal of the
    American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 764-
    774. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10066
    Cai, R., & Guo, J.-L. (2021). Finance for the environment: A scientometrics
    analysis of green finance. Mathematics, 9(13), 1537.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/math9131537
    Cancino, C. A., Merigó, J. M., Coronado, F., Dessouky, Y., & Dessouky, M.
    (2017). Forty years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A
    bibliometric analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 614-629.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.033
    Chen, C.-M. (1999). Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation
    networks in digital libraries. Information Processing & Management,
    35(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00068-5
    Chen, C.-M., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion.
    Scientometrics, 59(2), 199-211.
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018528.59913.48
    Chen, C.-M., & Paul, R. J. (2001). Visualizing a knowledge domain's
    intellectual structure. Computer, 34(3), 65-71.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/2.910895
    Chen, C.-M., Cribbin, T., Macredie, R., & Morar, S. (2002). Visualizing and
    tracking the growth of competing paradigms: Two case studies. Journal of
    the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 678-
    689. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10075
    Chen, C.-M., Hu, Z.-G., Liu, S.-B., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in
    regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert
    Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593-608.
    https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
    Chen, C.-M., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J.-H. (2010). The structure and
    dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation
    analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
    Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
    Chen, C.-M., Kuljis, J. (2003). The rising landscape: A visual exploration of
    superstring revolutions in physics. Journal of the American Society for
    Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 435-446.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10229
    Chen, C.-M., Kuljis, J., & Paul, R. J. (2001a). Visualizing latent domain
    knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part C
    (Applications and Reviews), 31(4), 518-529.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/5326.983935
    Chen, C.-M., Paul, R. J., & O'Keefe, B. (2001b). Fitting the jigsaw of citation:
    Information visualization in domain analysis. Journal of the American
    Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 315-330.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-2890(2000)9999:9999<::Aidasi1074>
    3.0.Co;2-2
    Chen, Y.-B., Liu, J. S., & Lin, P. (2013). Recent trend in graphene for
    optoelectronics. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(2), 1454.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1454-3
    Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011).
    Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study
    among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
    Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
    Colliander, C., & Ahlgren, P. (2012). Experimental comparison of first and
    second-order similarities in a scientometric context. Scientometrics, 90(2),
    675-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0491-x
    Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its
    relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of
    Informetrics, 1(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001
    Culnan, M. J. (1986). The intellectual development of management information
    systems, 1972-1980: A co-citation analysis. Management Science, 32(2),
    156-172. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.156
    Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A
    cocitation analysis. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 341-353.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/248680
    De Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., CoreraÁ
    lvarez, E., Munoz-Fernández, F. J., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007).
    Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for
    Information Science and Technology, 58(14),2167-2179.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20683
    De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2018). Exploratory social network
    analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software
    (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    Ding, Y. (1998). Visualization of intellectual structure in information retrieval:
    Author cocitation analysis. International Forum on Information and
    Documentation, 23(1), 25-36.
    Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure
    of information retrieval studies: An author co-citation analysis, 1987-
    1997. Journal of Information Science, 25(1), 67-78.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159902500107
    Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021a). A retrospective evaluation of
    Marketing Intelligence and Planning: 1983-2019. Marketing Intelligence
    & Planning, 39(1), 48-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-02-2020-0066
    Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021b).
    How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines.
    Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
    Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1),
    131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
    Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a
    characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55(3), 349-
    361. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020458612014
    Emerald Publishing Limited (2022, June 19). CMS at 13: A retrospective of
    the journey. Emerald insight: Discover journals, books & case studies.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CMS-07-2020-
    0291/full/html
    Eom, S. B. (1996). Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision
    support systems through author cocitation analysis (1971-1993). Decision
    Support Systems, 16(4), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-
    9236(95)00026-7
    Eom, S. B., Lee, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (1993). The intellectual structure of
    decision support systems (1971–1989). Decision Support Systems, 10(1),
    19-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(93)90003-l
    Farrukh, M., Meng, F- C., Wu, Y.-H., & Nawaz, K. (2020a). Twenty-eight
    years of business strategy and the environment research: A bibliometric
    analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2572-2582.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2521
    Farrukh, M., Meng, F.-C., Raza, A., & Tahir, M. S. (2020b). Twenty-seven
    years of Sustainable Development Journal: A bibliometric analysis.
    Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1725-1737.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2120
    Farrukh, M., Raza, A., Meng, F.-C., & Wu, Y.-H. (2022). CMS at 13: A
    retrospective of the journey. Chinese Management Studies, 16(1), 119-
    139. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-07-2020-0291
    Farrukh, M., Shahzad, I. A., Meng, F.-C., Wu, Y.-H., & Raza, A. (2021). Three
    decades of research in the technology analysis & strategic management: a
    bibliometrics analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,
    33(9), 989-1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1862413
    Fujita, K., Kajikawa, Y., Mori, J., & Sakata, I. (2014). Detecting research
    fronts using different types of weighted citation networks. Journal of
    Engineering and Technology Management, 32, 129-146.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.07.002
    Gao, P., Meng, F.-C., Mata, M. N., Martins, J. M., Iqbal, S., Correia, A. B.,
    Dantas, R. M., Waheed, A., Rita, J. X., & Farrukh, M. (2021). Trends and
    Future Research in Electronic Marketing: A Bibliometric Analysis of
    Twenty Years. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce
    Research. 16(5), 1667-1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050094
    Gao, X., & Guan, J. (2009). Networks of scientific journals: An exploration of
    Chinese patent data. Scientometrics, 80(1), 283-302.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2013-4
    Gao, Y., Qu, B., Shen, Y., Su, X.-J., Dong, X.-Y., Chen, X.-M., Zhou, Y.-H.,
    & Pi, H.-Y. (2015). Bibliometric profile of neurogenic bladder in the
    literature: A 20-year bibliometric analysis. Neural Regeneration Research,
    10(5), 797-803. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.156985
    Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing, historio-bibliography, and the sociology
    of science. In Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Medical
    Librarianship (Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica), 187-204.
    Garfield, E. (1988). Announcing the SCI compact disk edition: CD-ROM
    gigabyte storage technology, novel software, and bibliographic coupling
    make desktop research and discovery a reality. Current Contents, 22, 3-
    13.
    Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new
    approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In
    ISSI’09: 12th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics
    (Brazil: Rio de Janeiro), 571-575.
    Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to
    bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and
    institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195-221.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02093621
    Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011). Using ‘core documents’ for the representation
    of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297-309.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0347-4
    Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and
    labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, 91(2), 399-416.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7
    Goodell, J. W., Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., & Pattnaik, D. (2021). Artificial
    intelligence and machine learning in finance: Identifying foundations,
    themes, and research clusters from bibliometric analysis. Journal of
    Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32, 100577.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100577
    Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research
    output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
    States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
    Hjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to
    knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 49(6),
    1313-1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001
    Huang, C.-H., Chou, T.-C., & Liu, J. S. (2021). The development of pandemic
    outbreak communication: A literature review from the response
    enactment. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 525-
    535. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.1915195
    Huang, C.-H., Liu, J. S., Ho, M. H.-C., & Chou, T.-C. (2022). Towards more
    convergent main paths: A relevance-based approach. Journal of
    Informetrics, 16(3), 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101317
    Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The
    development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8
    Hummon, N. P., Doreian, P., & Freeman, L. C. (1990). Analyzing the structure
    of the centrality-productivity literature created between 1948 and 1979.
    Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 11(4), 459-480.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107554709001100405
    Hung, S.-C., Lai, J.-Y., & Liu, J. S. (2022). Mapping technological
    trajectories as the main paths of knowledge flow: Evidence from printers.
    Industrial and Corporate Change, dtab072.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab072
    Hung, S.-C., Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2014). Technological
    change in lithium iron phosphate battery: The key-route main path
    analysis. Scientometrics, 100(1), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-
    014-1276-9
    Janssens, F., Zhang, L., De Moor, B. & Glänzel, W. (2009). Hybrid clustering
    for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes.
    Information Processing & Management, 45(6), 683-702.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.06.003
    Jarneving, B. (2001). The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular
    research. Scientometrics, 50(3), 365-389.
    https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010546312154
    Jarneving, B. (2007a). Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: A test of
    the applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of
    cognitive cores on the field level. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 338-356.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.08.001
    Jarneving, B. (2007b). Bibliographic coupling and its application to researchfront
    and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 287-307.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004
    Kessler, M. M. (1963a). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers.
    American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
    Kessler, M. M. (1963b). Bibliographic coupling extended in time: Ten case
    histories. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1(4), 169-187.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(63)90016-0
    Kessler, M. M. (1965). Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and
    analytic subject indexing. American Documentation, 16(3), 223-233.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160309
    Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2011). Using global mapping to create more
    accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American
    Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 1-18.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21444
    Kleminski, R., Kazienko, P., & Kajdanowicz, T. (2020). Analysis of direct
    citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling in scientific topic
    identification. Journal of Information Science, 0165551520962775.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520962775
    Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., Pandey, N., & Westland, J. C. (2021). 20 years of
    Electronic Commerce Research. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(1), 1-
    40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09464-1
    Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Mukherjee, D. (2022). Cross Cultural and Strategic
    Management: a retrospective overview using bibliometric analysis. Cross
    Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(1), 171-194.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-08-2021-0147
    Laengle, S., Modak, N. M., Merigó, J. M., & De La Sotta, C. (2018b). Thirty
    years of the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing:
    A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Computer Integrated
    Manufacturing, 31(12), 1247-1268.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2018.1529434
    Laengle, S., Modak, N. M., Merigó, J. M., & Zurita, G. (2018a). Twenty-five
    years of Group Decision and Negotiation: A bibliometric overview. Group
    Decision and Negotiation, 27(4), 505-542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-
    018-9582-x
    Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Clusters and maps of science journals based on biconnected
    graphs in Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation,
    60(4), 371-427. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410410548144
    Leydesdorff, L., & Ràfols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI
    subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information
    Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
    Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y.-Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path
    analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the
    American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-
    542. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21692
    Liu, J. S., Chen, H.-H., Ho, M. H.-C., & Li, Y.-C. (2014). Citations with
    different levels of relevancy: Tracing the main paths of legal opinions.
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
    65(12), 2479-2488. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23135
    Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2019). A few notes on main path
    analysis. Scientometrics, 119(1), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-
    019-03034-x
    Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2020). A note on choosing traversal
    counts in main path analysis. Scientometrics, 124(1), 783-785.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03469-7
    Liu, M.-X. (1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation
    studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370-408.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026920
    Liu, X.-H., Yu, S., Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., Moreau, Y., & De Moor, B.
    (2010). Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and
    bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database. Journal of the American
    Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(6), 1105-1119.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21312
    Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Liu, J. S. (2014). The knowledge diffusion paths of corporate
    social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
    Management, 21(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1309
    Ma, R. (2012). Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a
    Chinese academic database. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 532-534.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.04.006
    Ma, T.-J., Lee, G.-G., Liu, J. S., Lan, R., & Weng, J.-H. (2022). Bibliographic
    coupling: A main path analysis from 1963 to 2020. Information Research:
    An International Electronic Journal, 27(1), paper 918.
    http://informationr.net/ir/27-1/paper918.html
    Ma, V. C., & Liu, J. S. (2016). Exploring the research fronts and main paths of
    literature: A case study of shareholder activism research. Scientometrics,
    109(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2035-x
    Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (1973). System of document connections based on
    references (in Russian). Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, 2(6), 3-8.
    Martínez-López, F. J., Merigó, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Nicolás, C.
    (2018). Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric
    analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1-2), 439-468.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853
    Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20(4),
    236. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026352
    McCain, K. W. (1983). The author co-citation structure of macroeconomics.
    Scientometrics, 5(5), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02147224
    McCain, K. W. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping: The changing
    structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American Society for
    Information Science, 35(6), 351-359.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630350607
    Merigó, J. M., Blanco-Mesa, F., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2017).
    Thirty years of the International Journal of Intelligent Systems: A
    bibliometric review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(5),
    526-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21859
    Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-
    Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Á lvarez, E., & Munoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A
    new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the
    cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145.
    https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Scie.0000037368.31217.34
    Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L. L., Hecht, P. K., & Kick, E. L. (1977). The group
    structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American
    Sociological Review, 42(4), 552-562. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094554
    Ni, C. Q., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2013). Visualizing and comparing
    four facets of scholarly communication: Producers, artifacts, concepts, and
    gatekeepers. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1161-1173.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0849-8
    Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2015). Bibliometric evolution: Is the Journal
    of the Association for Information Science and Technology transforming
    into a specialty journal?. Journal of the Association for Information
    Science and Technology, 66(5), 1082-1085.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23224
    Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business
    Review, 69(6), 96-104.
    Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited:
    Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management
    Research & Practice, 1(1), 2-10.
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001
    Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-
    1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-
    38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::Aidasi4>
    3.0.Co;2-g
    Rowlands, I. (1999). Patterns of author cogitation in information policy:
    Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure. Scientometrics,
    44(3), 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458494
    Sandstrom, P. E. (2001). Scholarly communication as a socioecological system.
    Scientometrics, 51(3), 573-605. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019655305286
    Schneider, J. W., & Borlund, P. (2007). Matrix comparison, part 1: Motivation
    and important issues for measuring the resemblance between proximity
    measures or ordination results. Journal of the American Society for
    Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1586-1595.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20643
    Sen, S. K., & Gan, S. K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of
    bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and
    Documentation, 30(2), 78-82.
    http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/28008
    Shen, S., Zhu, D., Rousseau, R., Su, X., & Wang, D. (2019). A refined method
    for computing bibliographic coupling strengths. Journal of Informetrics,
    13(2), 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.012
    Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative
    study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of
    citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
    Technology, 60(3), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20994
    Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of
    relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for
    Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
    Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of
    Science 8(3), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277800800305
    Small, H. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms
    Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183-196.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026695
    Small, H. G. (1977). Co-Citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal
    study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139-166.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700202
    Small, H. G. (1979). Co-citation context analysis: The relationship between
    bibliographic structure and knowledge. Proceedings of the American
    Society for Information Science Annual Meeting, 16, 270-275.
    Small, H. G., & Koenig, M. E. D. (1977). Journal clustering using a
    bibliographic coupling method. Information Processing & Management,
    13(5), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(77)90017-6
    Small, H., & Greenlee, E. (1980). Citation context analysis of a co-citation
    cluster: Recombinant-DNA. Scientometrics, 2(4), 277-301.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016349
    Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of the scientific literature I:
    Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400102
    Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review
    on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda. European
    Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335-360.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2017-0188
    Teng, J. T. C., & Galletta, D. F. (1990). MIS research directions: A survey of
    researchers' views. Data Base, 21(2-3), 1-10.
    https://doi.org/10.1145/109022.109024
    Thelwall, M., & Wilkinson, D. (2004). Finding similar academic Web sites
    with links, bibliometric couplings and colinks. Information Processing &
    Management, 40(3), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-
    4573(03)00042-6
    Thijs, B., Schiebel, E., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Do second-order similarities
    provide added-value in a hybrid approach?. Scientometrics, 96(3), 667-
    677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0896-1
    Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation
    networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in
    Complex Systems, 10(1), 93-115.
    https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525907000945
    Viglia, G., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Joshi, Y. (2022). Forty years of The
    Service Industries Journal: a bibliometric review. Service Industries
    Journal, 42(1-2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.2003341
    Vladutz, G. & Cook, J. (1984). Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness.
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science Annual
    Meeting, 21, 204-207.
    Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic
    management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of
    Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
    Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a
    publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American
    Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22748
    Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to
    mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics,
    4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
    Wei, F.-W., Grubesic, T. H., & Bishop, B. W. (2015). Exploring the GIS
    knowledge domain using CiteSpace. The Professional Geographer, 67(3),
    374-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.983588
    Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information
    Storage and Retrieval, 10(5-6), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-
    0271(74)90058-8
    White, H. D. (1983). A cocitation map of the social indicators movement.
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(5), 307-312.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630340502
    White, H. D. (2003a). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A
    remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the
    American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423-
    434. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10228
    White, H. D. (2003b). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the
    American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1250-
    1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10325
    White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure
    of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information
    Science, 32(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
    White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1982). Authors as markers of intellectual
    space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology and society. Journal of
    Documentation, 38(4), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026731
    White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual
    Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99-168.
    White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation
    analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the
    American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AIDASI4>
    3.0.CO;2-4
    Xiao, Y., Lu, L. Y.-Y., Liu, J. S., & Zhou, Z.-L. (2014). Knowledge diffusion
    path analysis of data quality literature: A main path analysis. Journal of
    Informetrics, 8(3), 594-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.05.001
    Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic
    coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical
    networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each
    other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
    Technology, 63(7), 1313-1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22680
    Yan, E., Ding, Y., Milojević, S., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). Topics in dynamic
    research communities: An exploratory study for the field of information
    retrieval. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 140-153.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.10.001
    Yu, D.-J., & Pan, T.-X. (2021). Tracing knowledge diffusion of TOPSIS: A
    historical perspective from citation network. Expert Systems with
    Applications, 168, 114238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114238
    Yu, D.-J., Li, D.-F., Merigó, J. M., & Fang, L.-C. (2016). Mapping
    development of linguistic decision making studies. Journal of Intelligent
    & Fuzzy Systems, 30(5), 2727-2736. https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-152026
    Zhao, D.-Z., & Strotmann, A. (2008a). Information science during the first
    decade of the web: An enriched author cocitation analysis. Journal of the
    American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 916-
    937. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20799
    Zhao, D.-Z., & Strotmann, A. (2008b). Evolution of research activities and
    intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing
    author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society
    for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20910
    Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and
    organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

    QR CODE