簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄧友福
Dang - Huu Phuoc
論文名稱: Excavation Behavior and Adjacent Building Response Analyses Using User Defined Soil Models in PLAXIS.
Excavation Behavior and Adjacent Building Response Analyses Using User Defined Soil Models in PLAXIS.
指導教授: 林宏達
Horn-Da Lin
口試委員: 謝佑明
Y. M. Hsieh
歐章煜
C. Y. Ou
王建智
C. C. Wang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 135
中文關鍵詞: 深開挖鄰房反應使用者定義土體模式Plaxis
外文關鍵詞: Deep Excavation, Adjacent Building Response, User Defined Soil Model, Plaxis
相關次數: 點閱:254下載:17
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

Recently, most of deep excavation cases in Taipei were practically analyzed by adopting commercial software called FLAC that was based on finite different method. In order to explore the feasibility of using new analytical software called PLAXIS and also to verify its accuracy, this study used PLAXIS to analyze two deep excavation cases located in Taipei.
To employ advanced soil models that are not available in PLAXIS, user-defined models were developed. The advanced models included hyperbolic model that was developed by Duncan and Chang (1970), and pseudo plasticity model, modified pseudo plasticity that were proposed by doctoral students of NTUST-Taiwan Tech. The validations of the user defined models were performed by utilizing the experimental results of former studies. An excavation case named TNEC was then analyzed to examine the applicability of those soil models in the excavation analysis. Moreover, in order to investigate the interaction of building and a nearby excavation, this study also conducted the building modeling in the second excavation analysis. A previously proposed building simulation method was investigated. More relative factors such as the stiffness and the weight of the building were added to the original approach to investigate the simulation method. Furthermore, in this study, the effect of building location on the behavior of the retaining wall and ground movement was finally examined.
The analytical results exhibited that the user defined soil models incorporated in PLAXIS by this study were reasonable and applicable for the numerical analysis including experimental and excavation simulation. In addition, numerical results indicated that to obtain reasonable prediction of ground settlement, the weight of the building should be taken into account and the stiffness need to be reinvestigated.


Recently, most of deep excavation cases in Taipei were practically analyzed by adopting commercial software called FLAC that was based on finite different method. In order to explore the feasibility of using new analytical software called PLAXIS and also to verify its accuracy, this study used PLAXIS to analyze two deep excavation cases located in Taipei.
To employ advanced soil models that are not available in PLAXIS, user-defined models were developed. The advanced models included hyperbolic model that was developed by Duncan and Chang (1970), and pseudo plasticity model, modified pseudo plasticity that were proposed by doctoral students of NTUST-Taiwan Tech. The validations of the user defined models were performed by utilizing the experimental results of former studies. An excavation case named TNEC was then analyzed to examine the applicability of those soil models in the excavation analysis. Moreover, in order to investigate the interaction of building and a nearby excavation, this study also conducted the building modeling in the second excavation analysis. A previously proposed building simulation method was investigated. More relative factors such as the stiffness and the weight of the building were added to the original approach to investigate the simulation method. Furthermore, in this study, the effect of building location on the behavior of the retaining wall and ground movement was finally examined.
The analytical results exhibited that the user defined soil models incorporated in PLAXIS by this study were reasonable and applicable for the numerical analysis including experimental and excavation simulation. In addition, numerical results indicated that to obtain reasonable prediction of ground settlement, the weight of the building should be taken into account and the stiffness need to be reinvestigated.

Abstract Acknowledgement Content List of table List of figure List of figure Chapter 1.INTRODUCTION 1.1Background 1.2Objectives 1.3Thesis structure Chapter 2.LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1Characteristic of wall deflection and ground movement of an excavation 2.1.1Wall deflection 2.1.2Ground movement 2.2Allowable settlement and angular distortion of buildings 2.3Building responses and building damage due to vicinity excavation 2.4Advanced soil models for an excavation analysis 2.5PLAXIS and user define model Chapter 3.RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1General procedure 3.2Procedure of creating user defined model 3.3Procedure of TNEC analysis 3.4Procedure of Hsinchuang analysis Chapter 4.HYPERBOLIC USER DEFINED MODEL 4.1Introduction of hyperbolic model 4.2Flow chart for programming hyperbolic model in PLAXIS 4.3Validation of hyperbolic model in triaxial tests 4.4Summary Chapter 5.PSEUDO PLASTICITY AND MODIFIED PSEUDO PLASTICITY USER DEFINED MODELS 5.1Introduction 5.1.1Pseudo plasticity model 5.1.2Modified pseudo plasticity model 5.1.3Total stress analysis in PLAXIS 5.2Flowchart of programming in PLAXIS 5.2.1Pseudo plasticity model 5.2.2Modified pseudo plasticity model 5.3Validation of pseudo plasticity model and Modified Plasticity model 5.3.1Pseudo plasticity model 5.3.2Modified pseudo plasticity model 5.4Summary Chapter 6.APPLICATION OF USER-DEFINED MODELS IN TAIPEI NATIONAL ENTERPRISE CENTER (TNEC) EXCAVATON ANALYSIS 6.1Introduction of TNEC site 6.2Properties of soils and structure components 6.3Observation of wall deflection and ground settlement 6.4Simulation and numerical results 6.4.1Simulation 6.4.2Numerical results 6.5Summary Chapter 7.HSINCHUANG EXCAVATION STUDY 7.1Introduction 7.2Properties of soils and structure components 7.2.1Soil properties 7.2.2Structure component properties 7.3Observation results of wall displacement and ground settlement under greenfield condition 7.4Numerical simulation and results under greenfield condition 7.4.1Numerical simulation 7.4.2Numerical results 7.5Numerical simulation and results under building consideration condition 7.5.1Building consideration 7.5.2Numerical results 7.5.3Effect of building location on the behavior of retaining wall and ground movement Chapter 8.CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH 8.1Conclusion 8.1.1Advanced soil models 8.1.2Building consideration 8.2Future research REFERENCES Appendix A

Boscardin, M. D., and Cording, E. J. (1989). “Building response to excavation induced settlement.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp1-21.
Compaq Visual Fortran version 6 manual.
Duncan, J. M., and Chang, C. Y. (1970). “Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 637-659.
Duncan, J. M., and Dunlop, P. (1969). “Behavior of soils in simple shear tests.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico, Vol. 1, pp. 101-109.
Finno, R. J, Voss, F., Rossow, E., and Blackburn J. T. (2005). “Evaluating damage potential in buildings affected by excavations.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 10, pp.1199-1210.
Hsieh, P. G., Kung, T. C., Ou, C. Y., and Tang, Y. G. (2003). “Deep excavation analysis with consideration of small strain modulus and its degradation behavior of clay.” Proceedings of the 12th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Singapore, Vol. 1, pp. 785–788.
Hsieh, P. G, Kung, T. C., and Ou, C. Y. (2005). “Simulation of stress-strain curve under undrained condition with small strain stiffness of clay considered.” Journal of Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society, pp. 91-95.
Hsieh, P. G., and Ou, C. Y., (2000). “Use of Pseudo-Plasticity model in deep excavation analysis under undrained condition in clay.” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 703-713.
Kung, T. C. (2003). “Surface settlement induced by excavation with consideration of small strain behavior of Taipei silty clay.” Ph.D. dissertation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
Lai, M. H. (2005). “Field monitoring study of soft ground and adjacent building response due to cut and cover deep excavation.” Master dissertation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
Lin, F. C. (2008). “Analysis of ground displacement and adjacent building’s response due to long-shape excavation.” Master dissertation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
Ou, C. Y (2006). Deep Excavation-Theory and Practice. Taylor&Francis.
Ou, C. Y., Liao, J. T., and Cheng, W. L. (2000). “Building response and ground movements induced by a deep excavation.” Geotechnique 50, No. 3, pp. 209-220.
Ou, C. Y., Liao, J. T., and Lin, H. D. (1998). “Performance of diaphragm wall constructed using top-down method.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 9, pp. 798-808.
PLAXIS 2D Version 8 manual
Potts, D. M., and Addenbrooke, T. I (1997). “A structure’s influence on tunneling-induced ground movements.” Proc. Instn Civ. Engrs Geoech. Engng, pp 109-125.
Son, M. and Cording, E. J. (2005). “Estimation of building damage due to excavation-induced ground movement.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp.162-177.
Son, M. and Cording, E. J. (2007). “Evaluation of building stiffness for building response analysis to excavation-induced ground settlement.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 133, No. 8, pp.995-1002.

QR CODE