國內業者將大坪數空間，分隔成數個小型倉儲空間，倉體構造以金屬烤漆鋼浪板相隔開。
本研究參考現況設定條件，進行三種類型倉體之全尺寸火場實驗及電腦模擬撒水分析。倉體分別為第一類型(倉門半開45度，無夾層，火源位置在下方)、第二類型(倉門半開45度、倉門緊閉，有夾層，火源位置在上層)、第三類型(倉門半開45度，有夾層，火源位置在下層)之火災情形，配合探測器動作，實驗自動式滅火球及被動手持式細水霧器具之滅火成效:

一、自動滅火球：實驗第一類型及第二類型倉體，滅火球分別於第37分鐘及第11分鐘瞬間性爆破，乾粉僅覆蓋燃燒物之表面層，內部被未燃燒完全之木角材遮擋，使乾粉未能完全包覆火源，爆破後一分鐘內溫度瞬間下降並且發出巨大聲響警示火災發生，未能控制火勢。

二、手持式細水霧器具：實驗燃燒至兩分半內火警探測器發出警示聲響，本實驗待煤油燃燒至木角材後開始滅火動作，若倉庫倉門為未關閉之情形，三種類型倉體皆於五分鐘內能有效控制火勢，十分鐘左右能完全撲滅火源，若倉庫倉門為關閉之情形，實驗較具危險性之第二類型倉體，於倉門上方20cm縫隙處持細水霧噴頭滅火，由於燃燒物位於較高處，且煙霧及火勢燃燒旺盛，使人員難以在上方撲滅火源，能控制火勢防止閃燃現象，未能完全撲滅火源。

三、以FDS程式模擬三種類型倉體安裝自動撒水設備之情形，皆能有效抑制火源。

Domestic operator was used to partition large space into several small storage spaces and the structure of storehouse is separated by corrugated steel sheet.
This study which is referring to the actual setting conditions will analyze three kind of situation not only in a full-scale fire experiments but also under computer modelling water sprinkler analysis with experimental automatic fire extinguishing ball and passive hand-held water mist. First type (the door is opend 45 degrees, without mezzanine, the fire source is below). Second type (the door is opend 45 degrees or closed, with mezzanine, and fire source located at the upper layer). Third type (the door is opend 45 degrees, with mezzanine, and fire source located at the lower layer). The fire detector will install above all the warehouse.
This is the extinguishing effect.

1. Automatic fire extinguishing ball: First and second type of warehouses were blasted at 37 minute and 11 minute respectively. The dry powder only cover the surface layer of burning material, inside is obscured by unfired angle section so that the dry powder could not clad the fire source completely. After blasting, the temperature drop instantaneously in one minute and making a loud sound to warn the fire is happened. Finally, we can’t control the fire.

2. Hand-held water mist appliance: The fire detector alarm in two a half minutes. We wait for the kerosene burning into the angle section and starting to put out a fire. If the warehouse door is open, all the three situations can be effective to controll in five minutes. extinguish entire fire in ten minutes. The other way around, if the door is close, the second type is dangerous than the others. We only can use water mist to spray door crack upon 20cm . Because burning material is located at a higher place, as well as the fire is flare away, it is difficult to extinguish the fire source. This way can control the fire to prevent flashing, but failing to extinguish the fire source completely.

3. Using FDS to simulate installing automatic sprinkler system in three type of warehouse, all can effective suppress fire sources.

1. 陳子捷，2017，「迷你倉庫火災行為研究」，國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文。
2. CNS 12514-1，2016，「建築物構造部分耐火試驗法-第一部:一般事項要求」。
3. 李玉生，2009，「自動化倉儲防火規定之研究」，內政部建築研究所研究報告。
4. 廖宏章，2005，「工業廠房重大火災災害防救措施及體系之研究」，內政部消防署研究報告。
5. 業世文，2006，「物流倉儲類建築物防火安全評估基準之研究」，內政部建築研究所研究報告。
6. 「臺北市土地使用分區管制自治條例」，2011，法務局，臺北市政府。
7. 「本市自助儲物空間之定義及商業區限制設置及其附條件規定」，2017年4月，商業處，臺北市政府。
8. 「迷你倉營業態樣認定及管理報告」，2016，台北市商業處。
9. 「內政部消防署全球資訊網站」，取自：http://www.nfa.gov.tw/index.aspx。
10. NFPA 1420，1993，「Recommended Practice for Pre-Incident Planning for Warehouse Occupancies」。
11. 「迷你倉內潛在的火警危險及相應改善措施」，香港消防處。
12. 「職業安全及健康條例」，香港勞工處。
13. 「消防法」，內政部，消防署。
14. 「各類場所消防安全設備設置標準」，內政部，消防署。
15. 「建築技術規則，建築設計施工編」，內政部，營建署。
16. 「原有合法建築物防火避難設施與消防設備改善辦法」，內政部，營建署。
17. <NFPA231, NFPA231C>, 1993edition, National Fire Protection Association(NFPA), American.
18. <NFPA 11,NFPA 13, NFPA 15, NFPA 16, NFPA 25, NFPA 30, NFPA 101, NFPA 471>, 2003 edition, National Fire Protection Association(NFPA), American.
19. NFPA15,2000, Standard for Water Spary Fixed Systems for Fire Protection.
20. Herterich,O.,1960, Water as an Extinguishing Agent, Alfred Huthig Publishing Company,Heidelberg.
21. Kaleta,A.,1986, Effect of Drop Size on Extinguishing Effectiveness of a Water Spary, Archivum Combustionis,Vol.3-4,pp.201-212.
22. Braidech, M. M., J. A. Neale, A. F. Matson and R. E. Dufour,1955,
“The mechanism of Extinguishment of Fire By Finely Divided Water” Underwriter Laboratories Inc. for the national Board of Fire Underwriter, New York.
23. Mawhinney,J.R.,Dlugogorski,B.Z. and Kim,A.K.,1994,“A Closer Look at the Fire Extinguishing Properties of Water Mist” Fire Safety Science-Proceedings of Fourth International
Symposium,Ottawa,ON,pp.47.
24. Rasbash, D. J., Z. W. Rogowski and G. W. V. Stark,1960,“Mechanisms of Extinction of Liquid Fuel Fires with Water Sprays,”Combustion and Flame,4,pp 223~224.
25. Fristrom,R.M.,1967, Combustion Suppression, Fire Research Abstracts and Reviews,Vol.9,pp.125-160.
26. 洪聖文，2009，「防煙壁與排煙口位置對煙層高度影響之研究」，國立交通大學，碩士論文。
27. NFPA 750 edition,2010, Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Systems, National Fire Protection Association.
28. Harmathy, T.Z. 1972, “A New Look at Compartment Fire.” PartI, Fire Technology, 8 (3), pp. 197-217.