簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉宜學
Yi-Hsueh Liu
論文名稱: 代工到自有品牌之路:跨業研發平台發展個案
From OEM to OBM:Case Study on A Cross-Disciplinary Platform
指導教授: 盧希鵬
Hsi-Peng Lu
口試委員: 黃世禎
Sun-Jen Huang
羅天一
Tain-Yi Luor
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 管理學院MBA
School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 70
中文關鍵詞: 組織變革品牌建構跨業結盟資源基礎商業生態
外文關鍵詞: organizational change theory, brand strategy, cross-disciplinary collaboration, resource-based theory, business ecosystem theory
相關次數: 點閱:285下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本教學型個案論文包含個案本文與個案教學指引兩部分。個案本文以敘述方式呈現企業案例,個案教學指引則從管理理論與教學角度進行個案分析與討論。個案本文介紹個案公司創立自主品牌的過程,面對國際汽車市場整併,但國內汽車市場相對穩定的市場環境中,個案公司思量是否再度踏上品牌之路,發展自有品牌,最終決定同步發展品牌與代工領域,藉由分割重組,整合集團資源,發展自主技術,創立自有品牌,透過政府資源整合台灣優勢產業,結合資訊科技產業、綠能科技產業與汽車產業,輔以財團法人、研究單位與學術單位的技術資源,運用協同合作的槓桿效應,共同發展整車與車用電子技術,將汽車產業的中央-衛星體系轉型為研發平台,更進一步轉化為創意平台,期望藉由多元創意整合應用,結合資訊科技技術發展移動價值鏈,豐富汽車使用體驗。

    個案教學指引則以管理理論討論決策過程,企業藉由分析當前產業內外部環境,發動組織變革,掌握產業轉型的契機,整合內外部產業資源來為企業注入全新的企業能量,探討的問題包括:面臨當時產業環境,如何檢視現有資源及產業狀況,來擬定相關經營策略,成立研發團隊發展品牌的過程,過程中原有供應鏈的轉型,導入資訊科技產業的技術,為汽車產業與資訊科技產業帶來改變,創造更多的價值,希望能藉此個案作為企業異業結盟、跨業整合之參考。


    There are two parts in this Business Review – the Business Case and Teaching Note. The Business Case provides the reality of managerial decision making – which includes resource-constrained, time constraints, and conflicting goals, and is accompanied by a Teaching Note that outlines objectives and teaching plans. This case introduces the procedure of how X Group built up its own brand. While facing the integration of international automobile market and the stable national market growth, the business and technology evolution of the global environment in the past decade pose a great opportunity. To seize the opportunity, X Group decided to build up its own brand again and established the Y Company to provide a cross-disciplinary platform for Taiwan's automotive industries. Inheriting the R&D experience from X Group, Y Company is unparalleled in building intelligent cars, electronic subsystems and components. Y Company united Taiwan privileged industry through the government support, including Legal Foundations, IT Companies and synergy development systems.
    How X Group develops a cross-disciplinary platform for self-own automotive brand? Issues can be discussed in this case including the conflicts between original design manufacturer (ODM) and original Brand manufacturer (OBM), the resource allocation strategy, the brand positioning and the development of cross-disciplinary organization.

    目錄 摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 壹、 個案本文 1 一、 代理V.S.自有品牌 1 二、 產業概況 3 三、 資源在哪裡? 7 四、 我們還有什麼 7 五、 IA計畫,契機 9 六、 跨業合作 10 七、 閉門造車 11 八、 差異化優勢,塑造產品定位 11 九、 以體驗行銷取道未來 13 十、 開始與未來 15 貳、 個案教學指引 16 一、 教學總覽 16 二、 教學目標與適用課程 17 三、 學生課前討論問題 19 四、 個案背景 19 五、 個案分析 21 六、 教學建議 44 七、 板書規劃 45 參、 參考文獻 55

    中文部分
    [1] 許士軍(1993),管理學,東華書局
    [2] 吳秉恩(1999),分享式人力資源管理,翰蘆書局。
    [3] 毛治國(2001),談中華電信的組織變革,交通大學EMBA講義。
    [4] 黃郁卿(2005),企業分割策略效益-以閎暉公司為個案探討,國立政治大學經營管理學程碩士論文。
    [5] 吳思華(2000),策略九說,臉譜文化出版社。
    [6] 陳意文(2009),創新產品的資源拼湊與價值實現之研究:採新資源基礎觀點之定性與定量分析,國立政治大學科技管理研究所博士論文。
    [7] 陳意文、吳思華、項維欣(2010),資源基礎觀點下之資源拼湊與價值創造:以台灣翅帆開發創新產品為例,科技管理學刊,15(2),1-19。
    [8] 盧希鵬(2011),戰略模式(9):策略是一種生態思維,經理人月刊2012年10月號。
    [9] 盧希鵬(2011),為什麼無法控制我的狗?,商周出版。
    [10] 賴金鼎(2011),資源拼湊及共同創造理論的應用-以新產品智慧型綠能電磁鎖開發為例,國立臺灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    [11] 黃繼德(2011),中衛體系之夥伴關係對經營績效之影響,國立高雄第一科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    [12] 克雷登.克里斯汀生(Clayton M. Christensen)(2012),創新者的兩難,譯者 吳凱琳,二版,商周出版。
    [13] 陳明哲(2013),商業生態系統:超越產業疆界的競爭,哈佛商業評論 全球繁體中文版,2013年4月號,P.30

    英文部分
    [1] A. G. Tansley. (1935), “The Use and Abuse of Vegetation Concepts and Terms, Ecology”, Vol. 16, No. 3.,pp. 284-307.
    [2] Aaker, David A.(1989), “Managing assets and skills: The key to a sustainable competitive advantage”, California Management Review, Vol.31, 91-106.
    [3] Baker,Ted and Nelson,R.E.(2005), “Creating Something from Nothing :Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage.” Administrative Science Quarterly,50:329-366.
    [4] Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003), “Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process.” Research Policy, 32(2), 255–276.
    [5] Berry, J. W., and Irvine, S. H. (1986), “Bricolage: Savages do it daily. In R.J. Sternberg & R.K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world “(pp. 271–306). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [6] Cummings and Huse (1989), “Organization Development and Change”. (4th Ed.). St. Paul: West Publishing Company.
    [7] Cunha, M. P. (2005), “Bricolage in organization FUENL Working Paper Series,” No 474, Uninversidad Nova de Lisboam, Faculdada de Economia.
    [8] Dessler, G. (1992), “Organizational Theory: Integrating Structure and Behavior”, Prentice-Hall.
    [9] Dessler, G. (1995), “Managing Organizations in an Era of Change”, Harcourt Brace College Publishing.
    [10] Ettlie, J.E. and Reza, E.M.(1992), “Organizational Integration and Process Innovation”, Academy Management Journal, Vol.35, No.4, pp795~827
    [11] Gossain, S. and Kandiah, G. (1998), “Reinventing Value: The New Business Ecosystem”, Strategy & Leadership. Vol. 26(5), pp. 28-33.
    [12] Graeme P. Maxton and John Wormald (2004),”Time for a Model Change: Re-engineering the Global Automotive Industry”, p. 118
    [13] Grant, R. M. (1991), “The Resource-Based Theory of competitive advantage: Implication for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, pp. 114-135.
    [14] Hill, Charles W. L. and Jones, Gareth R.(2001), “Strategic management: an integrated approach”, Fifth Edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [15] Iansiti, M. & Levien, R., (2004),”Strategy as Ecology”, Harvard Business Review, 82 (3), 68-78.
    [16] Iansiti, M. & Levien, R., (2004), “The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability”, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    [17] Levi-Strauss, C. (1966), “The savage mind”. London: Weidenfeld & Niolson.
    [18] Lewin,K., “Frontiers in Group Dynamics:Concept, Method, and Reality in Social Science” Human Relations 1,1947.
    [19] Louridas, P. (1999), “Design as bricolage: anthropology meets design thinking.” Design Studies, 20(6), 517–535.
    [20] Moore, J.F. (1996), “The Death of Competition: Leadership & Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems”, New York: Harper Business.
    [21] Peteraf, M. A(1993), "The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based View," Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), Mar., 179-191.
    [22] Prahalad CK and Hamel G.(1990), “The core competence of the corporation. ”, Harvard Business Review , May/Jun 68(3): 79-92.
    [23] Robbins, S.P. (2001), “Organizational Behavior”9th Ed., NJ:Prentice Hall."
    [24] Tansley, A. G., (1935), “The Use and Abuse of vegetation Concepts and Terms,” Ecology, 16 (3), 284-307.
    [25] Tencati, A. and Zsolnai, L. (2008), “The Collaborative Enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics”, Vol. 85, pp. 367-376.
    [26] Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2004), “Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, January, pp. 1-17.
    [27] Wernerfelt, B.(1984), “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal, 1984. 5(2): p. 171-180

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2019/07/02 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE