簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林姿秀
Zih-siou Lin
論文名稱: 家族企業控制的公司、公司特徵與賄賂的關係:以柬埔寨為例
Examining the relationships among family-controlled firms, characteristics and bribery: The case study of Cambodia
指導教授: 陳崇文
Chung-wen Chen
口試委員: 曾盛恕
Seng-su Tsang
張譯尹
Yi-ying Chang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 48
中文關鍵詞: 家族企業威嚇理論失序理論賄賂
外文關鍵詞: Family-controlled firms, Deterrence theory, Anomie theory, Bribery
相關次數: 點閱:225下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來有愈來愈多的學者關注於公司偏差行為的議題,唯過去的研究著重於以一般企業特性來預測公司偏差行為,如:公司績效、公司大小、公司年紀…等。過去的研究較少以公司的所有構結構與公司偏差行為做一探討。故本研究以家族企業、財務限制、競爭強度來探討其和公司偏差行為賄賂之關係,並以公司特徵如:公司大小、公司成立時間做為調節變項,來探討其與家族企業和賄賂之間的交互作用。本研究以威嚇理論來探討家族企業和賄賂之間的關係。以失序理論來檢驗公司財務限制、競爭強度和賄賂之間的關係。本研究樣本來自於世界銀行資料庫於1999年在柬埔寨所做的調查(World Bank Environment Survey,2000),其包含了當地326家公司。
    研究結果如下:

    1.研究發現,家族企業和賄賂呈現負向關係。
    2.財務限制和賄賂呈現正向關係。
    3.競爭強度和賄賂呈現正向關係。
    4.公司年紀與家族企業、賄賂具有顯著的正向調節效果。

    本研究提供研究者對於柬埔寨當地公司的賄賂行為有更深入的了解。


    This research examines the relationships among family firms, financial constraints, competitive intensity and bribery, and discusses the moderating effects of firm characteristics, which contain firm size and firm age, affect the relationship between family firms and bribery. Base on deterrence theory to investigate the relationship between family firms and bribery. Anomie theory is used to examine the relationships among financial constraints, competitive intensity and bribery.
    The data set from WBES, was analyzed using hierarchical regression. WBES contains 326 firms from Cambodia. The results of this study indicated that 1) As to family firms, they are found to be negatively related to bribery.2) As to financial constraints, they are found to be positively related to bribery; 3) As to competitive intensity, they are found to be positively related to bribery; 4) The hypotheses of moderators of firm age, has interaction effect to family firms and bribery. This research offers insights that are salient to the researchers interested in understanding the drivers of firm-level factors on bribery in Cambodia.

    ABSTRACT II CONTENTS IV LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF FIGURES VI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESIS 4 2.1 BRIBERY IN CAMBODIA 4 2.2 DETERRENCE THEORY AND FAMILY FIRMS 7 2.3 ANOMIE THEORY AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS AND COMPETITIVE INTENSITY 10 2.4 THE MODERATE OF FIRM SIZE AND FIRM AGE 13 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHOD 15 3.1 SURVEY INSTRUMENT AND SAMPLE 15 3.2 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS 17 3.3 MEASURES AND OPERATIONAL DEFINITION 19 3.4 METHOD OF ANALYSIS 23 3.4.1 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ANALYSIS 23 3.4.2 CORRELATION ANALYSIS 23 3.4.3 RELIABILITY ANALYSIS 24 3.4.4 REGRESSION ANALYSIS 24 CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 25 4.1 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 25 4.2 CORRELATION ANALYSIS 26 4.3 HYPOTHESIS ANALYSIS RESULTS 29 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 36 5.1 CONCLUSIONS 36 5.2 REVIEW OF RESEARCH FINDINGS 38 5.3 MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS 40 5.4 LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH SUGGESTION 40 REFERENCES 42 APPENDIX 47

    Arvis, J.-F. and R. Berenbeim (2003). Figthing Corruption in East Asia: Solutions from the Private Sector. The World Bank, Washington, D.C

    Barnett, W. P. 1997. The dynamics of competitive intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 128–160.

    Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A (1986). The moderator-moderating variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), pp. 1173-1182.

    Black, B., R. Kraakman and A. Tarassova (2000), “Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong.” Stanford Law Review 52: 1731-1808.

    Bernberg, J. G. 2002. Anomie, social change and crime. British Journal of Criminology, 42: 729–742.

    Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. 1991. Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 9–36.

    Bailey, Peter (2008) “Cambodian Small and Medium sized Enterprises Constraints, Policies and Proposals for their Development”, in Hank Lim (ed.), ‘Asian SMEs and Globalization’, ERIA Research Project Report 2007 No. 5, March, Bangkok/Tokyo: IDE-JETRO.

    Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265.

    Cherniak C (1986) Minimal rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Clark, L. A., Watson, D. & Reynolds, S. (1995). Diagnosis and classification in psychopathology: Challenges to the current system and future directions.( Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 121—153.)

    Clarke, G. R. G., & Xu, L. C. 2002. Privatization, competition and corruption: How characteristics of bribe takers and payers affect bribe payments to utilities. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, nota di lavoro82.2002 [available at http://www.feem.it/web/activ/_wp.html].

    Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Hoegl, M. 2004. Crossnational differences in managers’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors: A test of institutional anomie theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 411–421.

    Cool, K., & Dierickx, I. 1993. Rivalry, strategic groups and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 47–59.

    Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Who cares about corruption? Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 807-822.

    Claessens, S., S. Djankov and L. H. P. Lang (2000b), The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 58,81-112.

    Chea L. (2007). Informality, Tax Evasion and Constraints to Development in Cambodia.Http://dspace.lib.niigata-u.ac.jp:8080/dspace/bitstream/10191/6410/1/01_0064.pdf

    Hughes, C. (2003), The political economy of Cambodia’s transition, 1991-2001, Routledge Curzon.

    Habib, M. and L. Zurawicki, “Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2):291-307, 2002.

    Daboub, A. J., Rasheed, A. M. A., Priem, R. L., & Gray, D. A. 1995. Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20: 138–170.

    Durkheim, E. 1897/1966. Suicide: A study in sociology. New York: Free Press.
    Daboub, A. J., Rasheed, A. M. A., Priem, R. L., & Gray, D. A. 1995. Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20: 138–170.

    Devarajan, S. and Nabi, I: 2006. Economic Growth in South Asia: Promising, Un-equalizing, ...Sustainable? South Asia Region, The World Bank.

    Fries, S., Lysenko, T., & Polanec, S. (2003). The 2002 business environment and enterprise performance survey: Results from a survey of 6,100 firms. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Working Paper 84.

    Litz, R. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Academy of Management Journal.

    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer (1999), Corporate Ownership Around the World, Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.

    Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C.K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression, 72. Newsbury Park, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S. J. 1999. Does grease money speed up the wheels of commerce? World Bank policy research working paper no. 2254.

    Kimberly, J. 1976. Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 571–597.

    Mauro P., 1995. “Corruption and growth”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CX, Issue 3.

    Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., & Parboteeah, K. P. 2007. Deciding to bribe: a cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50:1401-1422.

    McNamara, G., Deephouse, D. L., & Luce, R. A. 2003. Competitive positioning within and across a strategic group structure: The performance of core, secondary, and solitary firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 161–181.

    Merton, R. K. 1964. Anomie, anomia, and social interaction. In M. B. Clinard (Ed.), Anomie and deviant behavior: 213–242. New York: Free Press.

    Merton, R. K. 1968. Social theory and structure. New York: Free Press.

    Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: The McCraw-Hill Companies.

    Paternoster,Raymond, & Sally Simpson (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law& Society Review, 30, 553.

    Peng. Mike W.(2000).Controlling the foreign agent: How goverments deal with a multinationals in a transition economy. Management International Review, 40(2):141-165.

    Report on the observance of standards and codes (ROSC) (2007). Accounting and auditing. http://www.worldbank.org/ifa/Cambodia_aa.pdf.

    Savolainen, J. 2000. Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38: 1021–1042.

    Svensson, J. 2003. Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross section of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111: 204–40.

    Jayaraman, N., Korona, A., Nelling, E., & Covin, J. (2000). CEO founder status and firm financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21,215-224.

    Jong, G. D., Tu, P.A., and Ees, H. V. (2010). Which Entrepreneurs Bribe and What
    Do They Get From It? Exploratory Evidence From Vietnam. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Baylor University Press.

    Transparency International, (2008). Business Principles for Countering Bribery-Small Business Edition.

    Transparency International, (2009). Overview of corruption in Cambodia. U4 expert answers.

    Transparency International, 2010.
    http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/results

    USAID, (2004). Cambodia corruption assessment. Report No.801.

    Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance, Journal of Finance, 52,737-783.

    Wu, X. (2005). Corporate governance and corruption: Across-country analysis. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, administration, and Institutions, 18, 151-170.

    Wu, X. (2009). Determinants of bribery in asian firms:Evidence from the World Business Environment Survey. Journal of business ethics, 87(1),75-88.

    Wong, C., Hui, C., & Law, K.S. (1995). Causal relationships between attitudinal antecedents to turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 342-346.

    Wei, S.-J., “How Taxing Is Corruption on International Investors?,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1):1-11, February 2000.

    World Values Study Group. 2000. World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1981–1984 and1990–1993, and 1995–1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter- University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    World Bank(2004) Cambodia seizing the global opportunity: Investment Climate Assessment and Reform Strategy.

    World Bank(2010). Cambodia 1998-2008.Policy research working paper 5271.

    Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee and T. Woidtke (2001), Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence form Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2, 21-48.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2016/07/27 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE