Author: |
林詩庭 SHIH-TING LIN |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
金融控股公司法前後之銀行效率暨金融海嘯前後之金融控股公司效率比較分析-應用資料包絡分析法 A Comparative Analysis of Banks’ Efficiency with Financial Holding Company Act and FHCs’ Efficiency with Financial Crisis-An Application of the DEA |
Advisor: |
徐中琦
JON-CHI SHYU |
Committee: |
劉邦典
PANG-TIEN LIEU 陳俊男 CHUN-NAN CHEN |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
管理學院 - 企業管理系 Department of Business Administration |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2016 |
Graduation Academic Year: | 104 |
Language: | 中文 |
Pages: | 59 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 資料包絡分析法 、金融控股公司法 、金融海嘯 |
Keywords (in other languages): | Data Envelopment Analysis, Financial Holding Company Act, Financial Crisis |
Reference times: | Clicks: 701 Downloads: 0 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
本研究應用資料包絡分析法對本國銀行和金融控股公司進行效率評估,透過效率值分析、Mann-Whitney U 檢定及 Tobit 迴歸分析金融控股公司法前後本國銀行效率之實證結果顯示:(1)非金控銀行之技術效率值高於金控銀行,顯示銀行加入金控在經營上並未具有優勢。(2) 金控銀行於金控法實施後之技術效率值低於實施前,顯示出實施金控法對金控銀行提升技術效率是沒有幫助的。(3)金控法實施前,分行家數與技術效率、純技術效率皆有顯著的正向關係,但在金控法實施後則與純技術效率值呈顯著負相關;而不論金控法前後,政府持股比率皆與純技術效率值呈顯著負相關。
金融海嘯前後金融控股公司效率之實證結果顯示:(1)發生金融海嘯後,景氣甚差,市場面之技術效率值低於金融海嘯前(2)在獲利面的觀點下,認為規模較大的金控會比規模較小的金控更具規模效率,但在市場面的觀點下,投資人卻青睞規模較小的金控;以保險為經營主體的金控在獲利面效率值最高,銀行為主體的金控在純技術效率值則最低,證券為主體的金控在技術效率及規模效率最低,但其在市場面的效率值卻最高。(3)資本適足率對獲利面的所有效率值皆呈顯著正相關,但卻與市場面的規模效率值有顯著的負向關係;負債淨值比與獲利面的技術效率值、規模效率值有顯著的正向關係,但與市場面卻呈顯著負相關。
In this study, the main purpose is to explore relative efficiency of banks and financial holding companies (FHCs) in Taiwan. We use efficiency analysis, Mann-Whitney U test and Tobit regression to compare the efficiency of domestic banks before and after the Financial Holding Company Act. Empirical results show:(1) Non-Financial Holding Banks’ efficiency were higher than Financial Holding Banks, indicating that banks join the FHCs did not have an advantage. (2) Financial Holding Banks’ technical efficiency was lower than after the implementation of the Financial Holding Act, showing the implementation of the Act to enhance efficiency is not helpful. (3) Before the Act, Number of branches and efficiency had significant positive relationship, but after the Act, there were significantly negatively correlated; regardless before and after the Act, ratio of government ownership and pure technical efficiency was significantly negatively correlated.
The empirical results of FHCs’ efficiency before and after the financial crisis: (1) After the financial crisis, marketability efficiency is lower than before the financial crisis (2) In view of profitability efficiency, big FHCs were more efficient than smaller ones, but in marketability efficiency, investors favored smaller FHCs; FHCs with the main body of insurance had the highest profitability efficiency, but FHCs with the main body of securities had the lowest marketability efficiency. (3) BIS and profitability efficiency had significant positive correlation, but it had significant negative relationship with marketability efficiency; Debt/Equity Ratio and profitability efficiency had significant positive relationship, but was significantly negatively correlated with the marketability efficiency.
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper (1984). "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis." Management Science 30(9): 1078-1092.
Boussofiane, A., R. G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis (1991). "Applied data envelopment analysis." European Journal of Operational Research 52(1): 1-15. Bowlin, W. F. (1987). "Evaluating the efficiency of us air force real-property maintenance activities." The Journal of the Operational Research Society 38(2): 127-135.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978). "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units." European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.
Chen, T.-Y. (2002). "Measuring operation, market and financial efficiency in the management of taiwan's banks." Services Marketing Quarterly 24(2): 15-27.
Chen, Y.-C., L. Sun and C.-W. Peng (2005). "Commercial banks' performance in taiwan." International Journal of Business Performance Management 7(4): 444-463.
Chiou, C.-C. (2009). "Effects of financial holding company act on bank efficiency and productivity in taiwan." Neurocomputing 72(16-18): 3490-3506. Eccles, R. G. and P. J. Pyburn (1992). "Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance." Management Accounting 74(4): 41--44.
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1992). "The cross-section of expected stock returns." The Journal of Finance 47(2): 427-465.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency, University of Cambridge, Department of applied Economics.
Fried, H., S. Schmidt and S. Yaisawarng (1999). "Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency." Journal of Productivity Analysis 12(3): 249-267.
Fried, H. O., C. a. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency. The measurement of productive efficiency : Techniques and applications: Techniques and applications. New York, Oxford University Press.
Ho, C.-T. and D.-S. Zhu (2004). "Performance measurement of taiwan's commercial banks." International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 53(5): 425-434.
Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND ALLOCATION.
Kumar, S. and R. Gulati (2010). "Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and performance of indian public sector banks." International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 59(1): 51-74.
Lewin, A. Y., R. C. Morey and T. J. Cook (1982). "Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts." Omega 10(4): 401-411.
Li, C.-F. (2009). "Using frontier efficiency analysis to measure impacts of financial holding company system on operational performance of subsidiary banks." Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences 4(4): 259-270.
Lo, S.-F. and W.-M. Lu (2006). "Does size matter? Finding the profitability and marketability benchmark of financial holding companies." Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 23: 229-246.
Lotfi, F. H., A. T. Eshlaghy, M. Shafiee, H. Saleh, H. Nikoomaram and S. M. Seyedhoseini2 (2012). "A new two-stage data envelopment analysis (dea) model for evaluating the branch performance of banks." African Journal of Business Management 6(24): 7230-7241.
Luo, X. (2003). "Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis." Journal of Business Research 56(8): 627-635.
Miller, S. M. and A. G. Noulas (1996). "The technical efficiency of large bank production." Journal of Banking & Finance 20(3): 495-509.
Morey, R. D. B. R. C. (1989). Incorporating value judgments in efficiency analysis. Research in governmental and nonprofit accounting: 245-268. Norman, M. and B. Stoker (1991). Data envelopment analysis: The assessment of performance, John Wiley & Sons.
Paradi, J. C. and C. Schaffnit (2004). "Commercial branch performance evaluation and results communication in a canadian bank - a dea application." European Journal of Operational Research 156(3): 719-735. Seiford, L. M. and J. Zhu (1999). "Profitability and marketability of the top 55 u.S. Commercial banks." Management science : journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences 45(9): 1270.
Shyu, J., J.-C. Lin and C.-K. Wu (2014). "Determinants of operational efficiency in asian banking: A two-stage banking model analysis." Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting 6(2): 469.
Thompson, R. G., F. D. Singleton, Jr., R. M. Thrall, A. S. Barton and M. Wilson (1986). "Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in texas." Interfaces 16(6): 35-49.
Tobin, J. (1958). "Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables." Econometrica 26(1): 24-36.
Tsai, H.-Y., C.-R. Wu and Y.-M. Wang (2011). "Operating strategies of banks in china: Analysis of operational and profitability efficiency." African Journal of Business Management 5(4): 1136-1145.
Wu, C.-R., M.-S. Lin and Y.-M. Wang (2009). "Marketing and operational efficiency in a two-stage data envelopment analysis: The application of financial holding companies in taiwan." Journal of Statistics and Management Systems 12(1): 29-45.
Wu, C.-R. and Y.-M. Wang (2009). Operating strategic of financial holding companies in taiwan: Application of two stage data envelopment analysis. 2009 年海峽兩岸創新與永續經營學術研討會暨 2009 管理創新與科際整合 學術研討會. 新竹.
Zhu, D.-S., Y.-K. Chen and L. P. White (2014). "A study on profitability and marketability of taiwanese bank firms before and after the financial holding company act." International Journal of Business Performance Management 15(3): 207-228.
Zhu, J. (2000). "Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to fortune 500 companies." European Journal of Operational Research: 105-124.
朱一衛、洪緯典、姚政文 (2009). 台灣金融控股公司獲利效率與市場效率之評估. 2009 年海峽兩岸創新與永續經營學術研討會暨 2009 管理創新與科際 整合學術研討會. 新竹.
江婕寧 (2003). 美國金融控股公司與非金融控股公司經營績效之比較─dea 之 應用. 碩士, 國立臺灣大學.
吳中峻、郭育珍 (2007). 應用多階段超效率 dea 模型於銀行合併績效研究. 2007 第 11 屆科際整合管理研討會: 167-186.
胡均立、費吳琛、張嘉雯 (2005). 影響台灣地區銀行經營效率之因素. 第九屆 科際整合管理研討會: 213-236.
袁云峰、郭莉 (2006). "基於多階段超效率 dea 模型的銀行業效率研究." 中央財 經大學學報(6): 46-51.
高國賡、蕭景楷 (2006). "台灣金控與非金控銀行經營效率之分析." 財金論文叢刊(5): 42-57.
高強、黃旭男、T. Sueyoshi (2003). 管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法.
許志義、嚴珮瑜 (2008). "台灣本土銀行經營效率比較分析:dea、malmquist 生產力指數及 sfa方法之應用." 臺灣銀行季刊 59(4): 1-46.
許鈺珮、張錫介 (2005). "金融控股公司法實施對台灣銀行業經營效率影響之分析." 金融風險管理季刊 1(2): 33-56.
陳美燁 (2005). 以 dea 法評估台灣金控子銀行之經營績效. 碩士, 國立交通大學.
陳凌雯 (2005). 金控銀行與非金控銀行經營績效之探討. 碩士, 國立政治大學.
陳達新、陳維寧、盧耀晟 (2005). "銀行民營化與金控公司成立對經營效率影響與併購企圖心之研究." 東海管理評論 7(1): 87-108.
彭智偉 (2004). 商業銀行加入金融控股公司前後之經營績效分析. 碩士, 靜宜大學.
黃惠鈴 (2012). 台灣金控公司旗下銀行部門之經營績效評估-以兩階段資料包絡法分析. 碩士, 國立屏東商業技術學院.
劉松瑜、謝燧棋、溫育芳 (2006). "台灣銀行業在金控與非金控架構下之效率分析." 金融財務季刊 7(3): 127-174.
賴呈昌 (2004). 台灣地區金控銀行與非金控銀行績效之評估-dea方法之應用. 碩士, 國立中正大學.