研究生: |
Alexander Ivan Tandri Alexander Ivan Tandri |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
Damage Quantification Model for High-Strengh Reinforced Concrete Columns With Flexure Failure and Flexure-Shear Failure Damage Quantification Model for High-Strengh Reinforced Concrete Columns With Flexure Failure and Flexure-Shear Failure |
指導教授: |
邱建國
Chien-Kuo Chiu |
口試委員: |
鄭敏元
Min-Yuan Cheng 洪崇展 Chung-Chan Hung 王勇智 Yung-Chih Wang 林克強 Ker-Chun Lin |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
工程學院 - 營建工程系 Department of Civil and Construction Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 258 |
中文關鍵詞: | Damage quantification 、High-strength 、Reinforced Concrete 、Finite element |
外文關鍵詞: | Damage quantification, High-strength, Reinforced Concrete, Finite element |
相關次數: | 點閱:512 下載:8 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
A total of six full-scale high strength reinforced concrete (HSRC) columns were tested under axial and cyclic lateral loading. The specified concrete compressive strength was 70 MPa and the specified yield strength was 685 MPa and 785 MPa for the longitudinal and transverse reinforcements, respectively. The main variables considered in the study are the transverse reinforcements ratio and axial load ratio. Although such HSRC columns have gradually transformed in use and scope, the damage quantification method is less understood. The main purpose of this study is to propose a damage quantification model for HSRC columns.
An analytical backbone curve model for predicting force-deformation behavior of HSRC columns is described. Column stiffness is also measured from the experiment to obtain stiffness reduction factors that are necessary to calculate member deformation. Based on experiment results, a new limiting value of residual crack width is defined to determine damage level. Then, a new drift ratio limit of each damage level is also proposed. Experiment results are presented and used to investigate the application of the proposed damage quantification model.
To increase the accuracy of the proposed model, this study also performs Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of previous tested specimens with addition of specimens from other studies. Using FEA results, the damage quantification model is modified based on the stiffness reduction factor, the unloading stiffness, and the ratio of shear deformation to total deformation. The proposed model is then used to quantify the damage of the observed specimens.
A total of six full-scale high strength reinforced concrete (HSRC) columns were tested under axial and cyclic lateral loading. The specified concrete compressive strength was 70 MPa and the specified yield strength was 685 MPa and 785 MPa for the longitudinal and transverse reinforcements, respectively. The main variables considered in the study are the transverse reinforcements ratio and axial load ratio. Although such HSRC columns have gradually transformed in use and scope, the damage quantification method is less understood. The main purpose of this study is to propose a damage quantification model for HSRC columns.
An analytical backbone curve model for predicting force-deformation behavior of HSRC columns is described. Column stiffness is also measured from the experiment to obtain stiffness reduction factors that are necessary to calculate member deformation. Based on experiment results, a new limiting value of residual crack width is defined to determine damage level. Then, a new drift ratio limit of each damage level is also proposed. Experiment results are presented and used to investigate the application of the proposed damage quantification model.
To increase the accuracy of the proposed model, this study also performs Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of previous tested specimens with addition of specimens from other studies. Using FEA results, the damage quantification model is modified based on the stiffness reduction factor, the unloading stiffness, and the ratio of shear deformation to total deformation. The proposed model is then used to quantify the damage of the observed specimens.
1.ACI 318-19, American Concrete Institute, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. 2019: Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
2.ACI 363R-10, American Concrete Institute, Report on High-Strength Concrete. 2010: Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
3.ACI 363R-92, American Concrete Institute, State-of-the-Art Report on High-Strength Concrete. 1992: Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
4.AIJ, Architectural Institute of Japan, Standard for Structural Calculation of Reinforced Concrete Structures. 2010: Tokyo, Japan
5.Aoyama, H., Design Modern of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures. 2001, Imperial College: London, UK.
6.Bentz, E.C., Vecchio, F.J., and Collins, M.P., Simplified Modified Compression Field Theory for Calculating Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Elements. ACI Structural Journal, 2006. 103(4): 614-624.
7.Bhayusukma, M.Y., Behavior of High-Strength RC Columns Subjected to High-Axial and Cyclic Lateral Loads. 2016, National Taiwan University (Doctoral Dissertation): Taipei, Taiwan.
8.Carrasquillo, R. L., Nilson, A.H., and Slate, F.O., Properties of High Strength Concrete Subject to Short-Term Loads. ACI Journal, 1981. 78(3): 171-178.
9.Chang, F.C., Study on the Confining Effect of Reinforced Concrete Columns Using High Strength Material. 2010, National Taiwan University (Master Thesis): Taipei, Taiwan.
10.Chen, Y.C., Design of Seismic Confinement of RC Columns Using High Strength Materials. 2011, National Taiwan University (Master Thesis): Taipei, Taiwan.
11.Chiu, C.K. and Tandri, A.I., Experimental Investigation on the Force-Crack Quantification Model for HSRC Columns with Flexure-shear and Shear Failure Modes. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2020.
12.Chiu, C.K., Sihotang, F.M.F, and Darwin, Crack-Based Damage Assessment Method for HSRC Shear-Critical Beams and Columns. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2015. 18(1): 119-135
13.Chiu, C.K., Chi, K.N., and Lin, F.C., Experimental Investigation on the Shear Crack Development of Shear-Critical High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Beams. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2014. 12(7): 223–238.
14.DIANA Documentation 10.4. 2020: Delft, Netherlands.
15.Elwood, K.J. and Moehle, J.P., Axial Capacity Model for Shear-Damaged Columns. ACI Structural Journal, 2005. 102(4): 578-587.
16.FIP/CEB, Coomitte Euro-International du Beton, High Strength Concrete, State of the Art Report. 1990: Lausanne, Switzerland.
17.Gerin, M. and Adebar, P., Accounting for Shear in Seismic Analysis of Concrete Structures. 2004, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
18.Huang, Z., Engström, B., and Magnusson, J., Experimental and Analytical Studies of the Bond Behavior of Deformed Bars in High Strength Concrete. 1996, In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Utilization of High Strength/High Performance Concrete: Paris, France.
19.JBDPA, Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation. 2001: Tokyo, Japan.
20.JBDPA, Standard for seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings, guidelines for seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings, and technical manual for seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings. 2015: Tokyo, Japan.
21.JSCE Guidelines for Concrete No.15, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures – 2007 “Design”. 2007: Tokyo, Japan.
22.Liao, W.C. and Hu, W.X., Study of Prediction Equation for Modulus of Elasticity of High Strength Concrete in Taiwan. Structural Engineering, 2017. 32(2): 5-26.
23.Lu, Z.H. and Zhao, Y.G., Empirical Stress-Strain Model for Unconfined High-Strength Concrete under Uniaxial Compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010. 22(11): 1181-1186.
24.Maeda, M. and Kang, D.E., Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation for Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2009. 7(3): 327-335.
25.MC2010, Federation Internationale du Beton, FIB Model Code for Concrete Structures. 2010: Lausanne, Switzerland.
26.NCREE-19-001, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering of Taiwan, Design Guideline for High–Strength Reinforced Concrete Structures. 2019: Taipei, Taiwan.
27.Park, R. and Paulay, T., Reinforced Concrete Structures. 1975, John Wiley & Sons: New Jersey, USA.
28.Patwardhan, C. Shear Strength and Deformation Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Column. 2005, Ohio State University (Master Thesis): Ohio, USA.
29.RTD 1016-1, Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Infrastructure, Guidelines for Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures. 2017: Utrecht, Netherlands.
30.Setzler, E.J., Modeling the Behavior of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Columns Subjected to Lateral Loads. 2005, Ohio State University (Master Thesis): Ohio, USA.
31.Sezen, H., Seismic Behavior and Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Building Columns. 2002, University of California (Doctoral Dissertation): Berkeley, USA.
32.Sugano, S., Application of High Strength and High Performance Concrete in Seismic Region. 2008, Invited Lecture in the 8th International Symposium on Utilization of High-Strength and High-Performance Concrete: Tokyo, Japan.
33.Thorenfeldt, E., Jensen, J.J., and Tomaszewics, A., Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Concrete and Applications in Design. 1987, Proc. Symp. Utilization of High-Strength Concrete: Stavanger, Norway.
34.Vecchio, F.J. and Collins, M.P., The Modified Compression Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear. ACI Journal, 1986. 83(2): 219-231.
35.Wang, M., Study of the Cyclic Behavior of New RC Columns with Different Types of Hoops. 2014, National Taiwan University (Master Thesis): Taipei, Taiwan.
36.Watanabe, F. and Ichinose, T., Strength and Ductility Design of RC Members Subjected to Combined Bending and Shear. 1991, Proceedings of Workshop on Concrete Shear in Earthquake: Houston, USA.
37.Xiao, Y. and Martirossyan, A., Seismic Performance of High-Strength Concrete Columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998. 124(3): 241-251.
38.Yoshimura, M. and Takaine, Y., Formulation of post-peak behavior of reinforced concrete columns including collapse drift. Japan Structural Construction Engineering, 2005. 587: 163-171.