簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 李羽晨
Yu-chen Li
論文名稱： 主路徑方法與傳統法學研究方法之比較:以商標淡化為例
Comparing the Main Path Analysis and the Legal Research Method: Trademark Dilution as an Example
指導教授： 陳曉慧
Hsiao-hui Chen
劉顯仲
John S. Liu
口試委員: 何秀青
Mei H.C. Ho
盧文民
Wen-Min Lu
王怡蘋
Yi-ping Wang
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年： 2014
畢業學年度： 102
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 84
中文關鍵詞： 傳統法學研究方法 、主路徑研究方法 、引證 、商標淡化
外文關鍵詞： legal research methods, mainpath analysis, citation, trademark dilution
相關次數： 點閱：355  下載：24 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 案例有總結司法經驗、推動法學發展的作用，傳統法學研究方法研究判例法(case law) 係由專家學者依其經驗選擇重要案例，對問題提出推論，通常需要耗費大量人力與時間。主路徑方法依據引證關係選出重要案例，取代人為判讀，與傳統法學方法相比較，有輔助傳統法學研究之功效。隨經濟發展，商標侵權行為由相類似商品擴張到不相類似的商品，使商標擁有人商標權無法受商標侵權保護，因此立法者將未經允許使用商標權人商標於與原本不相同類別的產品或服務的行為，單獨拉出以商標淡化來處理。因美國實務案例有完整引證資料庫，故以美國商標淡化實務案例為本研究主題。

    本研究擷取Westlaw 資料庫中關於商標淡化在美國最高法院､聯邦上訴法院及聯邦巡迴法院，共538個案例，然後依其引證關係，以時間為順序，繪出商標淡化案例的主要發展軌跡。而後分析此軌跡，比對與傳統法學研究結果之契合度，藉以了解主路徑方法在法學研究領域的效用。

    本研究發現，兩研究方法在商標淡化發展三階段關注的重要爭點相似。主路徑研究方法能快速繪出法學概念的重要發展歷程，比以往專家學者之人工搜尋有效率。本研究發現專家學者對研究主題遺漏的重要部分，且能看出每階段最熱門討論議題，足見主路徑研究與傳統法學研究方法有相輔相成的效果。

    This study compares two methods: the main path analysis and traditional legal research. Law cases have the functions of integrating judicial experiences and advancing the development of law. In the realm of legal research methods, experts have to sort out the issues from a collection of law cases. The task usually takes enormous human efforts. The citation-based main path analysis is a potential alternative to alleviate the efforts.

    As some famous trademarks were being used to unrelated goods, trademark dilution becomes more important nowadays. This study selects cases of Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit Court and Supreme Court (CTAF, CTA, SCT) in trademark dilution from the Westlaw database (total 538 cases). We employ the main path analysis to explore the referring relationships of these cases and trace the development of legal opinions on trademark dilution. Finally, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of the legal research method and the main path analysis method.

    The development of trademark dilution can be identified into three periods, the critical cases which we find by main path analysis is consistent with the results of the legal research methods. We conclude that the main path analysis can be a complimentary facilitator to the legal research method. Researchers who adopt the main path analysis will have the advantage of being more efficient, building a holistic framework of the specific issues, and organizing the major legal issues by time.

    目錄 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第貳章 文獻探討 4 第一節 商標淡化 4 2.1.1美國傳統商標保護的困境 4 2.1.2 美國商標淡化的延革 4 2.1.3 商標淡化的意義 6 第二節 傳統法學研究方法 7 第三節 主路徑分析 10 第參章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究架構 20 3.1.1資料來源 22 3.1.2資料蒐集與關鍵字檢索 23 3.1.3法律引證和引證網路建構 24 3.1.4主路徑分析與Pajek 25 第肆章 研究結果 27 第一節 總體關鍵延伸主路徑分析 27 4.1.1 總體延伸關鍵主路徑(Key route 5) 29 4.1.2 總體延伸關鍵主路徑(Key route 25) 45 第二節 傳統法學的商標淡化研究與主路徑研究方法的比較 57 4.2.1 美國聯邦淡化法訂定前(1996年以前) 59 4.2.2 美國聯邦淡化法訂定後(1996年~2006年) 60 4.2.3 美國聯邦淡化法修正案通過後(2006年之後) 62 第伍章 研究結論與建議 64 第一節 研究結論 64 第二節 研究限制與未來建議 66 5.2.1 研究限制 66 5.2.2 未來建議 66 參考文獻 67 附錄 71

    1. Barrett, M. (2008). Intellectual Property, Aspen Publishers Online.
    2. Beebe, B. (2007). "Continuing Debacle of US Antidilution Law: Evidence from the First Year of Trademark Dilution Revision Act Case Law." The Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ 24: P.449.
    3. Bible, P. M. (1999). "Defining and quantifying dilution under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995: Using survey evidence to show actual dilution." U. Colo. L. Rev. 70: P.295.
    4. Calero , M. C. and E. C. M. Noyons (2008). "Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific developement :The case of the absorptive capacity field." journal of Informetrics 2(4): P.272-279.
    5. Cane, S., P. Kritzer and H. M. (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, Oxford Univ Press, P.567-577.
    6. Carley , K. M., N. P. Hummon and H. M. (1993). "Scientific influence:An analysis of the main-path structure in the Journal of Conflict Resolution." Science Communication 14: P.417-447.
    7. Carp, R. A. and R. Stidham (2001). Judicial Process in America CQ Press ,P.123-125.
    8. Derenberg, W. J. (1956). "The problem of Trademark Dilution and the Antidilution Statutes." California Law Review 44: P.439-488.
    9. Dinwoodie, G. B. (2008). Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Dopson, N. A. (1997). "Federal Trademark Dilution Act and Its Effect on Parody: No Laughing Matter." J. Intell. Prop. L. 5: P.539.
    11. Eisenberg, T. (2000). "Empirical Methods and the Law". Journal of the American Statistical Association vol. 95: P.450.
    12. Elias, S. (2007). Legal Research: How to Find & Understand the Law, NOLO, P.524-546.
    13. Epstein, M. A. (2008). Epstein on Intellectual Property, Aspen Publishers Online ,P.678-688.
    14. Fhima, I. S. (2011). Trade Mark Dilution in Europe and the United States, Oxford University Press ,P.235-246.
    15. Fink, A. (2009). Conducting Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper, SAGE ,P.213-222.
    16. Fontana, R., A. Nuvolari and B. Verspagen (2008). "Mapping Technological trajectories as patent citataion networks. An application to data communication standards. ." Economic of Innovation and New Technology 18(4): P.311-336.
    17. Fowler, J. H. and J. Sangick (2008). "The authority of Supreme Court precedent,." Social Networks 30: P.16-30.
    18. Galvano, J. J. (2003). "Why the FTDA’s “Actual Harm” Requirement Should Not Be Interpreted: The Same Way for Dilution Caused by Blurring as It Is for Dilution Caused by Tarnishing." Hofstra L.Rev. 31: P.1213-1216.
    19. Gerhardt, D. R. (2006). "2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act Rolls out a Luxury Claim and a Parody Exemption." NCJL & Tech 8: P.205.
    20. Ginsburg, J. C., J. Litman and M. L. Kevlin (2007). Trademark and Unfair Competition Law: Cases and Materials, Foundation Press ,P.345-377.
    21. Golinveaux, J. (1998). "What's in a domain name: Is cybersquatting trademark dilution." USFL Rev. 33: P.641.
    22. Greenbaum, A. (1990). Current Developments in Trademark Law and Unfair Competition, Practising Law Institute, P.235-255.
    23. Hacking, J. F. (2003). "Trademark Dilution: Setting the Dilution Standard Under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act." Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 5: P.115.
    24. Hummon, N. and P. Doreain (1989). "Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory." Social network 11(1): P.39-63.
    25. Jo , S. J., C. W. Jeung, S. Park. and H. J. Yoon (2009). "Who is citing whom : Citation network analysis among HRD publications from 1990 to 2007." Human Resource Development Quarterly 20(4): P. 503-537.
    26. Klieger, R. N. (1996). "Trademark Dilution: The Whitling Away of the Rational Basis for Trademark Protection." U. Pitt. L. Rev. 58: P.789.
    27. Krafte-Jacobs, L. (1997). "Judicial Interpretation of the Fedreal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995." U. Cin. L. Rev. 66: P.659.
    28. Landes, W. M., L. Lessig and M. E. Solimine (1998). "Judicial influence: A citation analysis of federal courts of appeals judges." Journal of Legal Studies 27(2): P.271-332.
    29. Lemley, M. M. (2010). Intellectual Property In The New Technology Age, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business , P.236-278.
    30. Liu, J. S., H. H. Chen, M. H. C. Ho and Y. C. Li (2013). "Citations with Different Levels of Relevancy: Tracing the Main Paths of Legal Opinions. ." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. (10)
    31. Liu, J. S. and L. Y. Y. Lu (2012). "An Integrated Approach for Main Path Analysis: Development of the Hirsch Index as an Example." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, No. 3: P.528-542.
    32. Liu, J. S. and L. Y. Y. Lu (2012). "An Integrated Approach for the Main Path Analysis: The Development of the Hirsch Index as an Example." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(3): P. 528-542.
    33. Liu, J. S. and L. Y. Y. Lu (2013). "An Innovative Approach to Identify the Knowledge Diffusion Path: The Case of Resource-based Theory." Scientometrics 94(1): P. 225-246.
    34. Liu, J. S. and L. Y. Y. Lu (2013). "The Knowledge Diffusion Paths of Corporate Social Responsibility – From 1970 to 2011." Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management ,P.456-478.
    35. Liu, J. S., L. Y. Y. Lu, W. M. Lu and B. J. Y. Lin (2013). "A Survey of DEA Applications. Omega." The International Journal of Management Science 41(5): P.893-902.
    36. Lucio, A. D. and L. Leydesdroff (2008). "Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite-based historiograms." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(12): P.1948-1962.
    37. Marroletti, W. (1999). "Dilution, Confusion, or Delusion- The Need for a Clear International Standard to Determine Trademark Dilution." Brooklyn Journal of International Law 25: P.659.
    38. Marseden, P. and E. Laumann (1984). "Mathmatical ideas in socail structure analysis." Journal of Mathmatic Sociology 10: P.271-294.
    39. McCarthy, J. T. (2012). McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, Thomson Reuters.
    40. McConville, M. and W. H. Chui (2007). Research Methods for Law, Edinburgh University Press. ,P.765
    41. McKenna, M. P. (2008). "Teaching Trademark Theory through the Lens of Distinctiveness." St. Louis University Law Journal 52: P.843.
    42. Merges , R. P., P. S. Menell and M. A. Lemley (2010). Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age,, ASPEN ,P.125.
    43. Mermin, J. (2000). "Interpreting the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 The Logic of the Actual Dilution Requirement." Boston College. L.Rev 42: P.211-221.
    44. Michaels, A. (2002). A Practical Guide to Trade Mark Law, Sweet & Maxwell , P.345.
    45. Myers, G. (1999). "The Nature and Limits of Protection in Trademark Dilution, Trade Dress, and Product Configuration Cases " Columbia VLA Journal of Law & the Arts 23: P.241-242.
    46. Nguyen, X.-T. (1999). "The New Wild West: Measuring and Proving Fame and Dilution Under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act." Albany Law Review 63: P.201-239.
    47. Pote, D. R. (1996). Domain by Any Other Name: The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 Applied to Internet Domain Names, Jurimetrics,P.112.
    48. Putman, W. H. (2009). Legal Research, Cengage Learning ,P.243.
    49. Roban, R. (2009) "Using KeyCite On Westlaw. U.S.A." ,P.345.
    50. Schechter, F. I. (1927). "The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection " Harvard. L. Rev., 40: P.813-833.
    51. Schlosser, S. M. (2001). "High Price of (Criticizing) Coffee: The Chilling Effect of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act on Corporate Parody, The." Ariz. L. Rev. 43:P. 931.
    52. Scott, M. D. (2008). Scott on Multimedia Law, ASPEN PUBLISHERS.
    53. Thronson, M. J., Roth, G. S. and J. D. Grossman (2006). Intellectual Property Legal Opinions, ASPEN ,P.125.
    54. Torremans, P. (2008). Intellectual Property and Human Rights, Wolters Kluwer,P.145.
    55. Vassallo, E. E. and S. Dickey (1998). " Protection in the United States for Famous Marks: The Federal Trademark Dilution Act Revisited." Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. LJ(9): P.503.
    56. Versepagen, B. (2007). "Mapping technological trajectories as patent citataion network : A study on the history of fuel cell research " Advances in Complex Systems 10(1): P.93-115.
    57. Welkowitz, D. S. (1991). "Reexamining Trademark Dilution." Vand. L. Rev. 44: P.531.
    58. Welkowitz, D. S. (1996). "Oh Deere, What's to Become of Dilution (A Commentary on the New Federal Trademark Dilution Act)." UCLA Ent. L. Rev. 4: 1 P.123.
    59. 侯猛 (2008). "法律引證的制度意義社會科學研究(2)." 訴訟法學・司法制度 1-12: P.94-97.
    60. 曾祐強 (2011). 磷酸鋰鐵電池發展趨勢---學術論文之主路徑分析, 國立台灣科技大學.
    61. 曾陳明汝 (2007). 商標法原理, 新學林出版股份有限公司P.164-165.
    62. 蔡明誠 (2000). "論商標之抽象識別性與具體識別性要件-以行政法院八十九年判字第二五一號判決為例." 法令月刊 51(10): P.532.
    63. 鄭玉波 (2005). 法學緒論, 三民書局P.223-224.
    64. 賴清陽、冷耀世 (2008). 美國商標案例解析, 五南圖書出版公司P.19-24, P.96, P.128-131.

    QR CODE