合作力量大？現今學者們經常以合作的模式進行學術研究，除了與相同領域學者合作外，亦會有跨領域及跨國之合作。透過合作，學者間可互相分享知識、研究工具以及經驗等此合作模式會形成一個學者間之關係網路，而在這社會關係網路中，學者可獲得更多的關係資本。合作所增加的關係資本是否會影響學者的整體學術影響力是值得探究的問題，因此本研究目的為探討學者的關係資本與知識擴散的關聯性。
本研究自Web of Science資料庫中取得情緒勞動相關文獻973筆資料，建構出共同作者網路、文獻引證網路以及作者引證網路，從此三個網路中取得知識擴散過程中學者的關係資本、重要性指標以及扮演中介角色次數為變數，並運用迴歸分析探討關係資本與知識擴散的關聯性。
本研究發現在情緒勞動學術研究中，學者的關係資本以及國際合作的次數，皆對於學者整體科學影響力有顯著的正相關，且扮演對外傳播者的次數愈多，學者的影響力愈大。學者透過合作增加其關係資本的同時，亦提昇其自身於學術研究傳播的影響力。本研究採用之方法可應用至其他科學研究領域，檢驗關係資本是否也在該領域知識擴散的過程中扮演重要的角色；對從事研究之學者，本研究提供有助於提升其學術影響力之工作模式。

Nowadays, many scholars usually have academic research collaboration with other scholars in different field or countries. Through the collaboration, scholars can share knowledge、research equipment and experience with each other and build relations among these scholars. As more as relationships are created by every collaboration, scholars will gain more relational capital. It’s worthy to discuss whether the scholars have more relational capital to enhance their research impact as well. This study aims to discuss the correlation between relational capital and the scholar’s research impact.
This study collects 973 data from Web of Science database to construct the coauthor network, citation network and author citation network. From these three networks, we can acquire the index of relational capital and scholar’s research impacts as independent variable and use the method of Regression Analysis to discuss the correlation between relational capital and scholar’s research impacts.
This study finds that the research’s impact of scholars will be increased when they have more relational capital and times of cross-countries collaboration. In another word, the scholars can enhance their research impacts by collaboration with other scholars especially from different countries. The methods of this study can be applied to other academic research fields to examine the importance of relational capital.

一、中文文獻
1.涂貞如 (2009)， 「關係資本對知識整合能力與組織績效創新之影響：以吸收能力為干擾變項」，台灣企業績效學刊13(1):121-149。
2.林尚平、吳建明、湯大緯 (2006)，「情緒勞務人力資源管理措施對改善負面情緒效應之配適研究」，中華管理評論國際學報 9(3):1-42。
3.鄭仁偉、陳春希、袁梅玲、李姿瑩 (2011)，「威權領導與情緒勞務之關聯研究 -以某公立醫院為例」。 TOPCO崇越論文大賞，報名編號：EH0014。
4.宋敬德 (2003)，「情緒價值與情緒行銷及情緒勞務管理之關聯性研究─以國際觀光旅館為例」，雲林科技大學企業管理系未出版碩士班碩士論文。
5.吳宗祐 (2013)，「主管與部屬互動中情緒勞動：回顧、釐清、及前瞻」，人力資源管理學報13(3):57-105。
二、英文文獻
1.Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 594-607. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007
2.Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88-115.
3.Barger, P. B., & Grandey, A. A. (2006). Service with a smile and encounter satisfaction: Emotional contagion and appraisal mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1229-1238.
4.Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek-program for large network analysis. Connections, 21(2), 47-57.
5.Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital,(w:) JG Richardson (red.), Handbook of theory and research fort he sociology of education (241-258): Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
6.Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work". Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), 17-39. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1815
7.Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001
8.Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
9.Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality In Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
10.Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University's publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251-265. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0343-8
11.Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 89-126.
12.Grandey, & Gabriel, A. (2015). Emotional labor at a crossroads: Where do we go from here? Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 323-349.
13.Grandey, A. A. (2003). When "the show must go on": Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 86-96.
14.Hülsheger, U. R., Lang, J. W., & Maier, G. W. (2010). Emotional labor, strain, and performance: Testing reciprocal relationships in a longitudinal panel study. Journal of occupational health psychology, 15(4), 505.
15.Hülsheger, U. R., & Schewe, A. F. (2011). On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: a meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of occupational health psychology, 16(3), 361.
16.Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
17.Ho, M. C. H., & Verspagen, B. (2006). The role of national borders and regions in knowledge flows. In N. Lorenz & A. Lundvall (Eds.). How Europe’s Economies Learn, 50-73.
18.Hochschild. (1983). The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling." Berkeley. Univ. of California Press.
19.Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63.
20.Humphrey. (2012). How do leaders use emotional labor? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 740-744. doi: 10.1002/job.1791
21.Humphrey, R. H. (2008). The right way to lead with emotional labor. Affect and emotion: New directions in management theory and research, 1-17.
22.Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165. doi: 10.5465/amr.2005.15281445
23.Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1-2), 105-136.
24.James, N. (1989). Emotional labour: skill and work in the social regulation of feelings. The sociological review, 37(1), 15-42.
25.Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747-767. doi: 10.1002/smj.248
26.Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00917-1
27.Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2003). Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 297-317.
28.Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052359
29.Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
30.Lin, & Chen. (2011). How does the online community sharing research conceptualize social capital: A literature review. J Library Inform Stud, 9(2), 55-89.
31.Lin, N. (2001). A network theory of social capital.
32.Lin, N. (2008). A network theory of social capital. The handbook of social capital, 50, 69.
33.Liu, & Lu. (2012). An Integrated Approach for Main Path Analysis: Development of the Hirsch Index as an Example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-542. doi: 10.1002/asi.21692
34.Liu, Lu, L. Y. Y., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2012). Total influence and mainstream measures for scientific researchers. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.04.005
35.McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735-746.
36.Mentzer, J. T., Min, S., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2000). The nature of interfirm partnering in supply chain management. Journal of Retailing, 76(4), 549-568.
37.Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 986-1010. doi: 10.2307/259161
38.Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. doi: 10.2307/259373
39.Narin, F. (1991). Globalization of research, scholarly information, and patents–ten year trends. The Serials Librarian, 21(2-3), 33-44.
40.Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432.
41.Pugliesi, K. (1999). The consequences of emotional labor: Effects on work stress, job satisfaction, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 23(2), 125-154.
42.Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The expression of emotion in organizational life. Research in organizational behavior, 11(1), 1-42.
43.Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Aulakh, P. S. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4), 358-373. doi: 10.1177/03079450094216
44.Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative Behavior. Free Press.
45.Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756-770. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
46.Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital. Journal of Business Research, 60(7), 698-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.026
47.Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Mis Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
48.Wu, T.-Y., & Hu, C. (2013). Abusive supervision and subordinate emotional labor: The moderating role of openness personality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(5), 956-970. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12060