本論文係運用獨特的引文為基礎之方法—主路徑分析，分析書目對與
共被引主題自首論以來之發展軌跡文獻，由各該主題論文所構成二組引文
網路之研究問題，映射其學術關鍵文獻之基本書目計量與知識擴散路徑。

文獻回顧係探討書目對與共被引之概念與相互比較，並論述其發展；
再探討主路徑分析之概念，並論述主路徑分析之發展與知識擴散路徑。

研究方法係運用主路徑分析，從Web of Science 資料庫之科學引文索
引擴展版與社會科學引文索引中，檢索書目對與共被引二組主題文獻，以
其書目資料進行引文網路之分析，其分析包括基本書目計量（含出版與引
文趨勢、高影響作者與期刊）與主路徑分析二部分。

研究結果在書目對文獻中，由1,136 名作者在220 種期刊中，出版439
篇論文合計13,128 次被引用，其主路徑由28 篇節點論文所組成，依出版
年序分成：興起期（1963 年至1984 年）、開放期（1984 年至2010 年）與
鞏固期（2010 年至2022 年）三時期；另在共被引文獻中，由5,028 名作者
在770 種期刊中，出版2,265 篇論文合計84,968 次被引用，其主路徑由64
篇節點論文所組成，依出版年序分成：興起期（1973 年至1982 年）、成長
期（1982 年至2005 年）、開放期（2005 年至2016 年）與鞏固期（2010 年
至2022 年）四時期。

研究討論與結論係以二組主題文獻之研究問題，論述書目對與共被引
之基本書目計量（含出版與引文趨勢、高影響作者與期刊）與知識擴散路
徑；最後並綜論本論文之書目對與共被引文獻研究與進一步之研究建議。

This study employed a unique citation-based method—main path
analysis—to reveal the development trajectory of research on bibliographic
coupling and co-citation since their introduction. Topics discussed in the two
fields of research formed into two separate citation networks, which mapped the
basic bibliometrics of key papers and the knowledge diffusion path in each field.

A literature review was conducted to investigate and compare the
concepts of bibliographic coupling and co-citation, examine their
development, discuss the concept of main path analysis, and describe the
development and knowledge diffusion path of the analysis.

Through main path analysis, we retrieved papers on bibliographic coupling
and co-citation from the Science Citation Index Expanded and the Social
Sciences Citation Index of Web of Science. The bibliographic data of these
papers were then used to analyze their respective citation networks with regards
to the basic bibliometrics (e.g., publication trend, citation trend, high-impact
authors, and publications in high-impact journals) and the main path in each
network.

The results showed that 439 papers on bibliographic coupling were
published by a total of 1,136 authors in 220 journals and were cited 13,128 times
collectively. The main path consisted of 28 nodes (i.e., papers), which were
categorized into three periods by their publication years: the emergence (1963–
1984), opening (1984–2010), and consolidation (2010–2022) periods. For the
co-citation field of research, 2,265 papers were published by 5,028 authors in
770 journals and were cited 84,968 times altogether. The main path comprised
64 nodes (i.e., papers), which were categorized into four periods by their
publication years: the emergence (1973–1982), growth (1982–2005), opening
(2005–2016), and consolidation (2010–2022) periods.

According to topics studied in the bibliographic coupling and co-citation
fields of research, discussions were performed and conclusions drawn on the
basic bibliometrics (publication trend, citation trend, high-impact authors, and
publications in high-impact journals) and knowledge diffusion path in each field.
Finally, we conducted a comprehensive discussion on the two fields of research
and proposed suggestions for future research.

中文部分
何光國（1994）。文獻計量學導論。三民書局。
張郁蔚（2012a）。書目耦合∕書目對（Bibliographic coupling）。圖書館
學與資訊科學大辭典（雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網）。國家
教育研究院。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678906/?index=1
張郁蔚（2012b）。共被引（Co-citation）。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典
（雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網）。國家教育研究院。
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678905/?index=1
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。國立編譯館。

西文部分
Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009). Document-document similarity
approaches and science mapping: Experimental comparison of five
approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 49-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.003
Ahlgren, P., & Jarneving, B. (2008). Bibliographic coupling, common abstract
stems and clustering: A comparison of two document-document similarity
approaches in the context of science mapping. Scientometrics, 76(2), 273-
290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1935-1
Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a
cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's
correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242
Amsler, R. A. (1972). Applications of citation-based automatic classification
(Internal Technical Report, 72-12). Linguistics Research Center,
University Texas at Austin.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive
science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Association for Information Science & Technology (2022a, June 19). Journal
of the American Society for Information Science. JASIST.
https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/23301643/year/2000
Association for Information Science & Technology (2022b, June 19). Journal
of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. JASIST.
https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/23301643/year/2013
Å ström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time‐ sliced cocitation
analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20567
Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis.
University of Ljubljana, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics
Department of Theoretical Computer Science, Preprint Series, 41, 897.
Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek: Program for large network analysis.
Connections, 21(2), 47–57.
Bichteler, J., & Eaton III, E. A. (1980). The combined use of bibliographic
coupling and cocitation for document retrieval. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 31(4), 278-282.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630310408
Börner, K., Chen, C.-M., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge
domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-
255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2007). What do we know about the h index?
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
58(9), 1381-1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Topical connections between the
institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct
citation links and co-citations). Scientometrics, 102(1), 455-463.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1425-1
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic
coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the
research front most accurately?. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic,
global model and map of science. Journal of the Association for
Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 670-685.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22990
Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of
science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-
005-0255-6
Boyack, K. W., Wylie, B. N., & Davidson, G. S. (2002). Domain visualization
using VxInsight® for science and technology management. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 764-
774. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10066
Cai, R., & Guo, J.-L. (2021). Finance for the environment: A scientometrics
analysis of green finance. Mathematics, 9(13), 1537.
https://doi.org/10.3390/math9131537
Cancino, C. A., Merigó, J. M., Coronado, F., Dessouky, Y., & Dessouky, M.
(2017). Forty years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A
bibliometric analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 614-629.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.033
Chen, C.-M. (1999). Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation
networks in digital libraries. Information Processing & Management,
35(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00068-5
Chen, C.-M., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion.
Scientometrics, 59(2), 199-211.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018528.59913.48
Chen, C.-M., & Paul, R. J. (2001). Visualizing a knowledge domain's
intellectual structure. Computer, 34(3), 65-71.
https://doi.org/10.1109/2.910895
Chen, C.-M., Cribbin, T., Macredie, R., & Morar, S. (2002). Visualizing and
tracking the growth of competing paradigms: Two case studies. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 678-
689. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10075
Chen, C.-M., Hu, Z.-G., Liu, S.-B., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in
regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert
Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593-608.
https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
Chen, C.-M., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J.-H. (2010). The structure and
dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation
analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
Chen, C.-M., Kuljis, J. (2003). The rising landscape: A visual exploration of
superstring revolutions in physics. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 435-446.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10229
Chen, C.-M., Kuljis, J., & Paul, R. J. (2001a). Visualizing latent domain
knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part C
(Applications and Reviews), 31(4), 518-529.
https://doi.org/10.1109/5326.983935
Chen, C.-M., Paul, R. J., & O'Keefe, B. (2001b). Fitting the jigsaw of citation:
Information visualization in domain analysis. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 315-330.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-2890(2000)9999:9999<::Aidasi1074>
3.0.Co;2-2
Chen, Y.-B., Liu, J. S., & Lin, P. (2013). Recent trend in graphene for
optoelectronics. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(2), 1454.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1454-3
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011).
Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study
among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Colliander, C., & Ahlgren, P. (2012). Experimental comparison of first and
second-order similarities in a scientometric context. Scientometrics, 90(2),
675-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0491-x
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its
relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of
Informetrics, 1(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001
Culnan, M. J. (1986). The intellectual development of management information
systems, 1972-1980: A co-citation analysis. Management Science, 32(2),
156-172. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.156
Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A
cocitation analysis. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 341-353.
https://doi.org/10.2307/248680
De Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., CoreraÁ
lvarez, E., Munoz-Fernández, F. J., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007).
Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 58(14),2167-2179.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20683
De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2018). Exploratory social network
analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software
(3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ding, Y. (1998). Visualization of intellectual structure in information retrieval:
Author cocitation analysis. International Forum on Information and
Documentation, 23(1), 25-36.
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure
of information retrieval studies: An author co-citation analysis, 1987-
1997. Journal of Information Science, 25(1), 67-78.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159902500107
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021a). A retrospective evaluation of
Marketing Intelligence and Planning: 1983-2019. Marketing Intelligence
& Planning, 39(1), 48-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-02-2020-0066
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021b).
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines.
Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1),
131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a
characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55(3), 349-
361. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020458612014
Emerald Publishing Limited (2022, June 19). CMS at 13: A retrospective of
the journey. Emerald insight: Discover journals, books & case studies.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CMS-07-2020-
0291/full/html
Eom, S. B. (1996). Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision
support systems through author cocitation analysis (1971-1993). Decision
Support Systems, 16(4), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-
9236(95)00026-7
Eom, S. B., Lee, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (1993). The intellectual structure of
decision support systems (1971–1989). Decision Support Systems, 10(1),
19-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(93)90003-l
Farrukh, M., Meng, F- C., Wu, Y.-H., & Nawaz, K. (2020a). Twenty-eight
years of business strategy and the environment research: A bibliometric
analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2572-2582.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2521
Farrukh, M., Meng, F.-C., Raza, A., & Tahir, M. S. (2020b). Twenty-seven
years of Sustainable Development Journal: A bibliometric analysis.
Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1725-1737.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2120
Farrukh, M., Raza, A., Meng, F.-C., & Wu, Y.-H. (2022). CMS at 13: A
retrospective of the journey. Chinese Management Studies, 16(1), 119-
139. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-07-2020-0291
Farrukh, M., Shahzad, I. A., Meng, F.-C., Wu, Y.-H., & Raza, A. (2021). Three
decades of research in the technology analysis & strategic management: a
bibliometrics analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,
33(9), 989-1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1862413
Fujita, K., Kajikawa, Y., Mori, J., & Sakata, I. (2014). Detecting research
fronts using different types of weighted citation networks. Journal of
Engineering and Technology Management, 32, 129-146.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.07.002
Gao, P., Meng, F.-C., Mata, M. N., Martins, J. M., Iqbal, S., Correia, A. B.,
Dantas, R. M., Waheed, A., Rita, J. X., & Farrukh, M. (2021). Trends and
Future Research in Electronic Marketing: A Bibliometric Analysis of
Twenty Years. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce
Research. 16(5), 1667-1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050094
Gao, X., & Guan, J. (2009). Networks of scientific journals: An exploration of
Chinese patent data. Scientometrics, 80(1), 283-302.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2013-4
Gao, Y., Qu, B., Shen, Y., Su, X.-J., Dong, X.-Y., Chen, X.-M., Zhou, Y.-H.,
& Pi, H.-Y. (2015). Bibliometric profile of neurogenic bladder in the
literature: A 20-year bibliometric analysis. Neural Regeneration Research,
10(5), 797-803. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.156985
Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing, historio-bibliography, and the sociology
of science. In Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Medical
Librarianship (Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica), 187-204.
Garfield, E. (1988). Announcing the SCI compact disk edition: CD-ROM
gigabyte storage technology, novel software, and bibliographic coupling
make desktop research and discovery a reality. Current Contents, 22, 3-
13.
Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new
approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In
ISSI’09: 12th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics
(Brazil: Rio de Janeiro), 571-575.
Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to
bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and
institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195-221.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02093621
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011). Using ‘core documents’ for the representation
of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297-309.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0347-4
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and
labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, 91(2), 399-416.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7
Goodell, J. W., Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., & Pattnaik, D. (2021). Artificial
intelligence and machine learning in finance: Identifying foundations,
themes, and research clusters from bibliometric analysis. Journal of
Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32, 100577.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100577
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research
output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to
knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 49(6),
1313-1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001
Huang, C.-H., Chou, T.-C., & Liu, J. S. (2021). The development of pandemic
outbreak communication: A literature review from the response
enactment. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 525-
535. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.1915195
Huang, C.-H., Liu, J. S., Ho, M. H.-C., & Chou, T.-C. (2022). Towards more
convergent main paths: A relevance-based approach. Journal of
Informetrics, 16(3), 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101317
Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The
development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8
Hummon, N. P., Doreian, P., & Freeman, L. C. (1990). Analyzing the structure
of the centrality-productivity literature created between 1948 and 1979.
Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 11(4), 459-480.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107554709001100405
Hung, S.-C., Lai, J.-Y., & Liu, J. S. (2022). Mapping technological
trajectories as the main paths of knowledge flow: Evidence from printers.
Industrial and Corporate Change, dtab072.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab072
Hung, S.-C., Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2014). Technological
change in lithium iron phosphate battery: The key-route main path
analysis. Scientometrics, 100(1), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-
014-1276-9
Janssens, F., Zhang, L., De Moor, B. & Glänzel, W. (2009). Hybrid clustering
for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes.
Information Processing & Management, 45(6), 683-702.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.06.003
Jarneving, B. (2001). The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular
research. Scientometrics, 50(3), 365-389.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010546312154
Jarneving, B. (2007a). Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: A test of
the applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of
cognitive cores on the field level. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 338-356.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.08.001
Jarneving, B. (2007b). Bibliographic coupling and its application to researchfront
and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 287-307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004
Kessler, M. M. (1963a). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers.
American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
Kessler, M. M. (1963b). Bibliographic coupling extended in time: Ten case
histories. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1(4), 169-187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(63)90016-0
Kessler, M. M. (1965). Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and
analytic subject indexing. American Documentation, 16(3), 223-233.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160309
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2011). Using global mapping to create more
accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21444
Kleminski, R., Kazienko, P., & Kajdanowicz, T. (2020). Analysis of direct
citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling in scientific topic
identification. Journal of Information Science, 0165551520962775.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520962775
Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., Pandey, N., & Westland, J. C. (2021). 20 years of
Electronic Commerce Research. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(1), 1-
40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09464-1
Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Mukherjee, D. (2022). Cross Cultural and Strategic
Management: a retrospective overview using bibliometric analysis. Cross
Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(1), 171-194.
https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-08-2021-0147
Laengle, S., Modak, N. M., Merigó, J. M., & De La Sotta, C. (2018b). Thirty
years of the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing:
A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Computer Integrated
Manufacturing, 31(12), 1247-1268.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2018.1529434
Laengle, S., Modak, N. M., Merigó, J. M., & Zurita, G. (2018a). Twenty-five
years of Group Decision and Negotiation: A bibliometric overview. Group
Decision and Negotiation, 27(4), 505-542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-
018-9582-x
Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Clusters and maps of science journals based on biconnected
graphs in Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation,
60(4), 371-427. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410410548144
Leydesdorff, L., & Ràfols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI
subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y.-Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path
analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-
542. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21692
Liu, J. S., Chen, H.-H., Ho, M. H.-C., & Li, Y.-C. (2014). Citations with
different levels of relevancy: Tracing the main paths of legal opinions.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
65(12), 2479-2488. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23135
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2019). A few notes on main path
analysis. Scientometrics, 119(1), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-
019-03034-x
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2020). A note on choosing traversal
counts in main path analysis. Scientometrics, 124(1), 783-785.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03469-7
Liu, M.-X. (1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation
studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370-408.
https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026920
Liu, X.-H., Yu, S., Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., Moreau, Y., & De Moor, B.
(2010). Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and
bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(6), 1105-1119.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21312
Lu, L. Y.-Y., & Liu, J. S. (2014). The knowledge diffusion paths of corporate
social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 21(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1309
Ma, R. (2012). Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a
Chinese academic database. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 532-534.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.04.006
Ma, T.-J., Lee, G.-G., Liu, J. S., Lan, R., & Weng, J.-H. (2022). Bibliographic
coupling: A main path analysis from 1963 to 2020. Information Research:
An International Electronic Journal, 27(1), paper 918.
http://informationr.net/ir/27-1/paper918.html
Ma, V. C., & Liu, J. S. (2016). Exploring the research fronts and main paths of
literature: A case study of shareholder activism research. Scientometrics,
109(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2035-x
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (1973). System of document connections based on
references (in Russian). Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, 2(6), 3-8.
Martínez-López, F. J., Merigó, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Nicolás, C.
(2018). Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric
analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1-2), 439-468.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853
Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20(4),
236. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026352
McCain, K. W. (1983). The author co-citation structure of macroeconomics.
Scientometrics, 5(5), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02147224
McCain, K. W. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping: The changing
structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 35(6), 351-359.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630350607
Merigó, J. M., Blanco-Mesa, F., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2017).
Thirty years of the International Journal of Intelligent Systems: A
bibliometric review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(5),
526-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21859
Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-
Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Á lvarez, E., & Munoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A
new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the
cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145.
https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Scie.0000037368.31217.34
Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L. L., Hecht, P. K., & Kick, E. L. (1977). The group
structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American
Sociological Review, 42(4), 552-562. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094554
Ni, C. Q., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2013). Visualizing and comparing
four facets of scholarly communication: Producers, artifacts, concepts, and
gatekeepers. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1161-1173.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0849-8
Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2015). Bibliometric evolution: Is the Journal
of the Association for Information Science and Technology transforming
into a specialty journal?. Journal of the Association for Information
Science and Technology, 66(5), 1082-1085.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23224
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business
Review, 69(6), 96-104.
Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited:
Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management
Research & Practice, 1(1), 2-10.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-
1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-
38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::Aidasi4>
3.0.Co;2-g
Rowlands, I. (1999). Patterns of author cogitation in information policy:
Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure. Scientometrics,
44(3), 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458494
Sandstrom, P. E. (2001). Scholarly communication as a socioecological system.
Scientometrics, 51(3), 573-605. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019655305286
Schneider, J. W., & Borlund, P. (2007). Matrix comparison, part 1: Motivation
and important issues for measuring the resemblance between proximity
measures or ordination results. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1586-1595.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20643
Sen, S. K., & Gan, S. K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of
bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and
Documentation, 30(2), 78-82.
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/28008
Shen, S., Zhu, D., Rousseau, R., Su, X., & Wang, D. (2019). A refined method
for computing bibliographic coupling strengths. Journal of Informetrics,
13(2), 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.012
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative
study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of
citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 60(3), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20994
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of
relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of
Science 8(3), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277800800305
Small, H. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms
Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183-196.
https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026695
Small, H. G. (1977). Co-Citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal
study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139-166.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700202
Small, H. G. (1979). Co-citation context analysis: The relationship between
bibliographic structure and knowledge. Proceedings of the American
Society for Information Science Annual Meeting, 16, 270-275.
Small, H. G., & Koenig, M. E. D. (1977). Journal clustering using a
bibliographic coupling method. Information Processing & Management,
13(5), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(77)90017-6
Small, H., & Greenlee, E. (1980). Citation context analysis of a co-citation
cluster: Recombinant-DNA. Scientometrics, 2(4), 277-301.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016349
Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of the scientific literature I:
Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400102
Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review
on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda. European
Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335-360.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2017-0188
Teng, J. T. C., & Galletta, D. F. (1990). MIS research directions: A survey of
researchers' views. Data Base, 21(2-3), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1145/109022.109024
Thelwall, M., & Wilkinson, D. (2004). Finding similar academic Web sites
with links, bibliometric couplings and colinks. Information Processing &
Management, 40(3), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-
4573(03)00042-6
Thijs, B., Schiebel, E., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Do second-order similarities
provide added-value in a hybrid approach?. Scientometrics, 96(3), 667-
677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0896-1
Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation
networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in
Complex Systems, 10(1), 93-115.
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525907000945
Viglia, G., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Joshi, Y. (2022). Forty years of The
Service Industries Journal: a bibliometric review. Service Industries
Journal, 42(1-2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.2003341
Vladutz, G. & Cook, J. (1984). Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness.
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science Annual
Meeting, 21, 204-207.
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic
management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of
Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a
publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22748
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to
mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics,
4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Wei, F.-W., Grubesic, T. H., & Bishop, B. W. (2015). Exploring the GIS
knowledge domain using CiteSpace. The Professional Geographer, 67(3),
374-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.983588
Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information
Storage and Retrieval, 10(5-6), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-
0271(74)90058-8
White, H. D. (1983). A cocitation map of the social indicators movement.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(5), 307-312.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630340502
White, H. D. (2003a). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A
remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423-
434. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10228
White, H. D. (2003b). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1250-
1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10325
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure
of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science, 32(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1982). Authors as markers of intellectual
space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology and society. Journal of
Documentation, 38(4), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026731
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual
Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99-168.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation
analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AIDASI4>
3.0.CO;2-4
Xiao, Y., Lu, L. Y.-Y., Liu, J. S., & Zhou, Z.-L. (2014). Knowledge diffusion
path analysis of data quality literature: A main path analysis. Journal of
Informetrics, 8(3), 594-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.05.001
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic
coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical
networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each
other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 63(7), 1313-1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22680
Yan, E., Ding, Y., Milojević, S., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). Topics in dynamic
research communities: An exploratory study for the field of information
retrieval. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 140-153.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.10.001
Yu, D.-J., & Pan, T.-X. (2021). Tracing knowledge diffusion of TOPSIS: A
historical perspective from citation network. Expert Systems with
Applications, 168, 114238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114238
Yu, D.-J., Li, D.-F., Merigó, J. M., & Fang, L.-C. (2016). Mapping
development of linguistic decision making studies. Journal of Intelligent
& Fuzzy Systems, 30(5), 2727-2736. https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-152026
Zhao, D.-Z., & Strotmann, A. (2008a). Information science during the first
decade of the web: An enriched author cocitation analysis. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 916-
937. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20799
Zhao, D.-Z., & Strotmann, A. (2008b). Evolution of research activities and
intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing
author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20910
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and
organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629