簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 尤瑟夫
Mochamad - Yusuf Santoso
論文名稱: 運用模糊增益調度PID於非線性艦艇之舵穩定搖擺控制
Nonlinear Rudder Roll Stabilization Using Fuzzy Gain Scheduling Fuzzy Gain Scheduling - PID Controller for Naval Vessel
指導教授: 蘇順豐
Shun-Feng Su
口試委員: 陶金旺
C. W. Tao
王文俊
Wen-June Wang
徐勝均
Sheng-Dong Xu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電資學院 - 電機工程系
Department of Electrical Engineering
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 121
中文關鍵詞: 舵穩定搖擺控制模糊增益調度PID 控制艦艇
外文關鍵詞: rudder roll stabilization, fuzzy gain scheduling, PID controller, naval vessel
相關次數: 點閱:193下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

通常,一個方向舵被用作致動器的船舶自動駕駛儀,以實現期望的標題。然而,這種執行器將產生不希望的橫搖運動這將影響到船的性能。有些方法船舶減搖如舭龍骨,減搖鰭或舵減搖( RRS)被利用。在RRS , PID控制器或LQR固定控制器參數通常被認為是。在這項研究中,一個RRS為維持船舶航向,並使用模糊增益調度PID ( FGS- PID)控制基於非線性模型船同時減少橫搖運動進行了研究。有考慮了兩種FGS- PID控制器。第一控制器是原始FGS- PID(稱為FGS- PID) ,第二個是修改後的FGS- PID(稱為FGS- PID2 ),其中一個基於另一個試驗和錯誤PID控制器和一些規則的理由是由導致更滿意的控制效果。修改應用於由規則的理由模糊規則和模糊輸入的範圍。這兩個控制器在四個不同的海況測試,性能與PID的齊格勒 - 尼科爾斯( PID1 ) , PID的試錯( PID2 )和LQR比較。根據仿真結果,原來的FGS- PID與線性對應,特別是在受干擾的海況下,當船舶參數被改變相比具有優越的性能在自動駕駛儀。對於側傾減小,所有的控制器都具有相當的性能。一種改進的FGS- PID控制器的工作原理不是在所有情況下的線性同行都為自動駕駛儀和滾動控制更好。相平面穩定性分析FGS- PID2顯示, FGS- PID2響應可以收斂到一個固定點。這些結果表明,所設計的FGS -PID可以執行適應設置控制器的參數很好。


Usually, a rudder is used as the actuator for ship autopilot to achieve the desired heading. However, this actuator will produces undesired roll motion which will affect to the ship performance. Some methods for ship roll reduction such as bilge keels, fin stabilizer or rudder roll stabilization (RRS) are utilized. In RRS, a PID controller or LQR with fixed controller parameters is generally considered. In this research, a RRS for maintaining the ship heading and reduce the roll motion simultaneously using fuzzy gain scheduling PID (FGS-PID) control based on nonlinear ship model is studied. There are two FGS-PID controllers considered. The first controller is the original FGS-PID (called FGS-PID) and the second one is the modified FGS-PID (called FGS-PID2), which a based on another trial and error PID controller and some rule justifications are made to result in more satisfactory control performance. The modification is applied to the fuzzy rule by rule justification and to the range of fuzzy inputs. These two controllers are tested in four different sea conditions and the performance is compared with PID Ziegler-Nichols (PID1), PID Trial and error (PID2) and LQR. Based on simulation results, the original FGS-PID has superior performance in autopilot compared with the linear counterparts, especially in disturbed sea condition and when the ship parameter is changed. For roll reduction, all controllers have comparable performance. A modified FGS-PID controller works better than the linear counterparts both for autopilot and roll controller in all conditions. Phase plane stability analysis for FGS-PID2 shows that FGS-PID2 response can converge to a fixed point. Those results indicate that the designed FGS-PID can perform adaptation to set the controller parameters very well.

ABSTRACT ii CONTENTS iii LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 The Organization of the Thesis 3 CHAPTER 2 SYSTEMS DESCRIPTIONS 4 2.1 Multi Role Naval Vessel Dynamics 4 2.2 Rudder Dynamics 8 2.3 Wind Generated Waves 9 2.4 Rudder Roll Stabilization 11 2.5 PID Controller 12 2.6 Fuzzy Logic Control 14 2.7 Fuzzy Gain Scheduling (FGS) of PID Controller 17 2.8 Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) 22 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 23 3.1 Research Flowchart 23 3.2 Literatures Review 24 3.3 Data collections 24 3.4 Ship Dynamics Modeling 25 3.4.1 Ship Model 25 3.4.2 Steering Machine Model 26 3.4.3 Wave Modeling 26 3.5 Linear Controllers Design 27 3.6 Fuzzy Gain Scheduling (FGS)-PID Controller Design 28 3.7 Modified FGS-PID Design 32 3.8 Testing and Analyzing the Designed Controller 36 CHAPTER 4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 38 4.1 Open Loop Response 38 4.2 FGS-PID Control Performances 39 4.2.1 Normal Condition 39 4.2.2 Calm Sea 44 4.2.3 Moderate Sea 46 4.2.4 Rough Sea 48 4.2.5 Tracking Control 50 4.3 Performance in Ship Speed Change 51 4.3.1 Normal Sea Condition 51 4.3.2 Calm Sea Condition 55 4.3.3 Moderate Sea Condition 59 4.3.4 Rough Sea Condition 62 4.4 Performance in Ship Mass Change 66 4.4.1 Normal Sea Condition 66 4.4.2 Calm Sea Condition 68 4.4.3 Moderate Sea Condition 70 4.4.4 Rough Sea Condition 71 4.5 The Modified FGS-PID Performances 73 4.5.1 Normal Sea Condition 74 4.5.2 Calm Sea Condition 76 4.5.3 Moderate Sea Condition 77 4.5.4 Rough Sea Condition 79 4.6 Performance of Modified FGS-PID in Ship Speed Change 82 4.6.1 Normal Sea Condition 82 4.6.2 Calm Sea Condition 84 4.6.3 Moderate Sea Condition 86 4.6.4 Rough Sea Condition 88 4.7 Performance of Modified FGS-PID in Ship Mass Change 90 4.7.1 Normal Sea Condition 90 4.7.2 Calm Sea Condition 91 4.7.3 Moderate Sea Condition 93 4.7.4 Rough Sea Condition 94 4.8 Stability of FGS-PID2 96 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK 100 5.1 Conclusion 100 5.2 Future Work 101 REFERENCE 102 APPENDIX A 105 APPENDIX B 106

[1] T. Perez and M. Blanke, "Ship roll damping control," Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 129-147, 2012.
[2] P.G.M. van der Klugt, "Rudder roll stabilization," Delft University of Techonlogy, Delft, PhD Thesis 1987.

[3] J. Amerongen and V.N. Lemke, "Optimum steering of ships with an adaptive autopilot," in Fifth Ship Control Systems Symposium, Annapolis, USA, 1978.
[4] T. Lauvdal and T.I. Fossen, "Rudder roll stabilization of ships subject to input rate saturation using a gain scheduled control law," in Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems (CAMS'98), Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 121-127, 1998.
[5] J.N. Sgobbo and M. Parsons, "Rudder/fin roll stabilization of the USCG WMEC 901 class vessel," Marine Technology and SNAME News, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 157-170, 1999.
[6] G. Goodwin, T. Perez, M. Seron, and C.Y. Tzeng, "On the fundamental limitations for rudder roll stabilization of ships," in 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, pp. 4705-4710, 2000.
[7] H.H. Chun, S.H. Chun, and S.Y. Kim, "Roll damping characteristics of a small fishing vessel with a central wing," Ocean Engineering, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1601–1619, 2001.
[8] F. Alarcin and K. Gulez, "Rudder roll stabilization for fishing vessel using neural network approach," Ocean Engineering, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1811–1817, 2007.
[9] L. Fortuna and G. Muscato, "A roll stabilization system for a monohul ship: modeling, identification, and adaptive control," IEEE Transaction on Control System Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18-28, 1996.
[10] Y. Yang, C. Zhou, and X. Jia, "Robust adaptive fuzzy control and its application to ship roll stabilization," Information Science, vol. 142. no. 1-4, pp. 177-194, 2002.
[11] T. Lauvdal and T.I. Fossen, "Nonlinear rudder-roll damping of non-minimum phase ships using sliding mode control," in European Control Conference, Brussels, Belgium, 1997.
[12] M.C. Fang and J.H. Luo, "On the track keeping and roll reduction of the ship in random waves using different sliding mode controllers," Ocean Engineering, vol. 34, no. 3-4, pp. 479-488, 2007.
[13] H. Tanguy and G. Lebret, "Fin rudder roll stabilization of ship: a gain scheduling control methodology," in 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, pp. 3011-3016, 2004.
[14] V. Chereau, H. Tanguy, and G. Lebret, "Interpolated versus polytopic gain scheduling control laws for fin/rudder roll stabilization of ships," in 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 2005 European Control Conference, Seville, Spain, pp. 2284-2289, 2005.
[15] S. Nejim, "Rudder roll damping system for ships using fuzzy logic control," in OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition, Providence, RI, pp. 1137-1143, 2000.
[16] A.S. Aisjah, A.A. Masroeri, M.A. Efendi, E.B. Djatmiko, W.D. Ariyawan, and F.A. Iskandariyanto, " Fuzzy Control for Optimizing Ship Tracking in Karang Jamuang – Tanjung Perak," The Journal for Technology and Science, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 118-125, 2012.
[17] P. Raspa, E. Torta, G. Ippolity, M. Blanke, and S. Longhi, "Optimised Output Sensitivity Loop Shaping Controller for Ship Rudder Roll Damping," in 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano (Italy), pp. 13660-13665, 2011.
[18] Z. Y. Zhao, M. Tomizuka, and S. Isaka, "Fuzzy gain scheduling of PID controllers," IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cyberetics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1392-1398, 1993.
[19] SNAME, "Nomenclature for treating the motion of a submerged body through a fluid," New York, USA, 1950.
[20] T.I. Fossen, Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, 1st ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
[21] T. Perez and M. Blanke, "Mathematical Ship Modeling for Control Application," Technical University of Denmark, Technical Report, 1998.
[22] J. van Amerongen, "Adaptive steering of ships - A model reference approach to improved maneouvering and economic course keeping," Delft University of Techonlogy, Delft, PhD Thesis, 1982.
[23] W.J. Pierson and L. Moskowitz , "A proposed spectral form for fully developed wind seas based on the similarity theory of S. A. Kitaigorodsku," Technical Report U.S. Naval Oceanograhic Office Contract 62306-1042, 1963.
[24] S. Saelid, N.A. Jenssen, and J.G. Balchen, "Design and analysis of a dynamic positioning system based on Kalman Filtering and Optimal Control," IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 331-339, 1983.
[25] Upper Ocean Thermal DAC. WMO Code Tables.[Online].http://woce.nodc.noaa.gov/woce_v3/wocedata_1/woce-uot/document/wmocode.htm, 2002.
[26] G. Goodrich, Development and design of passive roll stabiliser. Transactions of The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, pp. 81–88, 1969.
[27] H. Oda et al., "Rudder roll stabilization control system through multivariable auto regressive model," in 3rd IFAC Workshop on Control Applications in Marine Systems (CAMS’92), Genova, Italy, pp. 113-127, 1992.
[28] M. Araki, "PID Control," Control System, Robotics, and Automation, vol.2, 2002.
[29] J.G. Ziegler and N.B. Nichols, "Optimum settings for automatic controllers," Transactions of the ASME, vol. 64, pp. 759–768, 1942.
[30] L.A. Zadeh, "Fuzzy sets," Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.
[31] C.C. Lee, "Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller. I," IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 20 no. 2 pp. 404 – 418, 1990.
[32] R.Sivan, R. Sivan, and R.S.H. Kwakernaak, Linear Optimal Control Systems. First Edition, Wiley-Interscience, ISBN 0-471-51110-2, 1972.

[33] Y.T. Juang, Y.T. Chang, and C.P. Huang, "Design of fuzzy PID controllers using modified triangular membership function," Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1325-1333, 2008.
[34] A. Fadaei and K. Salahshoor, "Design and implementation of a new fuzzy PID controller for networked control systems," ISA Transaction, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 351-361, 2008.
[35] G.L.O. Serra, C.C.T. Ferreira, and J.A. Silva, "Development method for a robust PID fuzzy controller of LPV systems," in IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 2009, Jeju Island, pp. 826 – 830, 2009.
[36] B. Fang and D. Zhang, "Realization of phase plane for higher order nonlinear control system," Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, vol. 33, pp. 590-593, 2004.
[37] Z. Li, Z. Wang, Z. Sun, and Y. Lv, "A stability determining algorithm on fuzzy rules based on the theory of phase track," in Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, Shanghai, China, pp. 37-41, 2008.

QR CODE