簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 何俊慶
Chun-Ching Ho
論文名稱: 以預期因子解釋台灣上市公司股價報酬率之研究
The Study of Expectation Factors for Explaining Taiwan Stock Returns
指導教授: 莊文議
Wen-I Chuang
林丙輝
Bing-Huei Lin
口試委員: 張光第
Guan-gdi Chang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 45
中文關鍵詞: 股價報酬淨值市價比股東權益報酬率基本價值風險性代理變數
外文關鍵詞: stock returns, book-to-market, ROE, fundamental valuation, risk proxy
相關次數: 點閱:345下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

依據Colin Clubb 和 Mounir Naffi (2007)所建立的模型,本研究主要目的是想驗證預期因子對於台灣上市公司之股價報酬是否具有解釋能力之實證分析。研究資料取自民國八十五年至九十七年,共13年,其中估計期間為七年且其使用之資料至少為九年,而預測期間為六年。本研究以預期BM、ROE及BM之自然對數迴歸模型中,考量風險因子(BM、公司規模、研究發展費、益本比及動能指標)之比較下,驗證其基本評價股價報酬因子是否具有解釋能力。另外亦根據Pettengill 等學者 (1995)之研究,將大盤報酬之正負將樣本分為兩個子樣本去討論基本價值之因子能否再次提供解釋能力。實證結果分別敘述如下:
1. 從調整後判定係數(Adj R^2)之實證結果發現,基本價值因子在台灣實證上仍有相當程度的股價解釋能力,但遺憾的是預期ROE卻出現了負向(不正確符號)且為不顯著之解釋作用。引發我們利用杜邦方程式原理將預期ROE分割成預期之純益率(FPM_t)、資產週轉率(FAR_t)、權益乘數(FLE_t)三者進而加以分析其問題所在,結果發現有二,FAR_t和FLE_t為最為主要造成預期ROE不顯著之因素;而促使預期ROE出現不正確的符號原因起於FLE_t大都呈現負向指標之關係。
2. 在分為上漲與下跌市場之兩個子樣本分析中發現,原則上兩個市場皆支持基本價值因子作為衡量權益資金成本的變數,但隨著風險因子的增加突顯價值因子之解釋能力愈薄弱。


In this paper, the primary objective is to investigate the explanatory power of fundamental valuation regarding the cross-sectional expected stock returns in Taiwan stock market based on the research models by Clubb and Naffi (2007). Our sample is over the period of 15 years from 1996 to 2008. The 7 years is an examination period using sample data at least 9 years (1996-2002) and the 6 years is a forecast period (2003-2008). This study utilizes a fundamental valuation of future stock returns to develop the loglinear regressions ROE and BM expectations in addition to current BM for explaining stock returns whether jointing the risk variables of BM, size, R&D capital ratio, E/P ratio and momentum. Following the research of Pettengill et al. (1995), we decompose the sample into periods according to whether the market returns of Taiwan stock exchange is positive or negative to discuss that the fundamental valuation (FV) perspective remains explanatory power for expected equity returns. The results are shown as follows:
1. From the adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj R^2) , the results support the FV perspective for robustness alternative explanations to future stock returns, but the expected ROE appear negative (incorrectly sign) statistically insignificance. We extend DuPont equation as FPM_t (future profit margin on sales), FAR_t (future assets turnover ratio) and FLE_t (future financial leverage) to further analyze inefficiency of expected ROE, and find that both FAR_t and FLE_t are the major results to cause no relationship with stock returns, only FLE_t makes expected ROE have negative sign.
2. In principle, the fundamental valuation variables play key explaining roles in Taiwan stock market whether up- or down- market. The more risk proxies, the weaker explanatory power for expectation factors to future stock returns.

1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 3 2.1 The CAPM and extension of the CAPM 3 2.2 The literature of discussing and applying RP perspective about stock returns 6 2.3 The literature of FV perspective about stock returns 8 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 10 3.1 Empirical models specifications for explaining the cross-section of stock returns 11 3.2 Checking our data for the sample period 12 3.3 Variable definitions 14 4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS 20 4.1 Estimate Forecasted Variables and Descriptive Statistics 20 4.2 Analysis of Results for Forecast Regression 25 4.3 Additional Robustness Tests for Two Subsample on up-markets and down-market 36 5. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 40 REFERENCES 43

Arshanapalli, B., J. Doukas and T. Coggin (1998), “Multufactor Asset Pricing Analysis of International Value Investment Strategies,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol.24, pp.10-23.
Ball, R. (1978), “Anomalies in Relationships Between Security Yields and Yields Surrogates,” European Finance Review, Vol.7, pp.27-46.
Banz, R. (1981), “The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stock,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.9, pp.3-18.
Beaver, W. and S. Ryan (2000), “Biases and Lags in Book Value and Their Effects on the Ability of the Book-to-Market Ratio to Predict Book Rate of Return on Equity,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.38, pp.127-48.
Berk, J. (1995), “A Critique of Size Related Anomalies,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol.8, pp. 275-86.
Berk, J. (1997), ‘Does Size Really Matter?,’ Financial Analysts’ Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 12-28.
Billings, B. and R. Morton (2001), “Book-to- Market Components Future Security Returns, and Errors in Expected Earnings,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.39, pp.197-219.
Black, F. (1972), “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing,” Journal of Business, Vol.45, pp.444-455.
Black, F., M. Jensen, and M. Scholes (1972), “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests,” in: M. Jensen, ed., Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets.
Black, F. and M. Scholes (1973), “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.81, pp.637-654.

Breeden, D. (1979), “An Interemporal Asset Pricing Model with Stochastic Consumption and Investment,’’ Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.7, pp.265-296.
Carhart M. (1997), “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance,” Journal of Finance, Vol.52, pp.57-82.
Chan, L., N. Jegadeesh and J. Lakonishok (1996), “Momentum strategies,” Journal of Finance, Vol.51, pp.1681-1713.
Clubb. C. and M. Naffi (2007), “The Usefulness of Book-to-Market and ROE Expectations for Explaining UK Stock Returns,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol.34, pp.1-32.
Fama, E. and K. French (1992), “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol.47, pp.427-465.
Fama, E. and K. French (1993), “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.33, pp.3-56.
Fama, E. and K. French (1995), “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol.50, pp.131-151.
Feltham, G. and J. Ohlson (1995), “Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol.11, pp.689-731.
Hon, M. and I. Tonks (2003), ‘Momentum in the UK Stock Market,’ Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol.13, pp.43-70
Hung, D., M. Shackleton and X. Xu (2004), ‘CAPM, Higher Co-moment and Factor Models of UK Stock Returns,’ Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol.31, pp.87-112.
Jegadeesh, N. and S. Timan (1993), “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency,” Journal of finance, Vol.48, pp 65-91.
La Porta, R (1996), “Expectations and the Cross Section of Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, pp.1715-41.
Lev. B. and T. Sougiannis (1996), “The Capitalization, Amortization Andvalue-Relevance of R&D,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.21, pp.107-138.
Liu, W., N. Strong and X. Xu (1999), “The Profitability of Momentum Investing,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol.26, pp.1043-91.
Malkiel, B. and X. Yexiao (1997), “Risk and Return Revisited,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol.23, pp.9-14.
Markowits, H. (1952), “Portfolio Selection,” Journal of Finance, Vol.7, pp. 77-91.
Merton, R. (1973), “An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model,” Econometrica, Vol.41, pp.867-87.
Miles, D. and A. Timmerman (1996), “Variation in Expected Stock Returns: Evidence on the Pricing of Equities from a Cross-Section of UK Companies,” Economica, Vol.63, pp.369-82.
Ohlson, J. (1995), “Earnings, Book Values and Dividends in Equity Valuation,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol.11, pp.661-87.
Pettengill, G., S. Sundaram and I. Mathur (1995), “The Conditional Relation to Beta and Returns,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.30, pp.101-16.
Pontiff, J. and L. Schall (1998), ‘Book-to-Market Ratios as Predictors of Market Returns,’ Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.49, pp.141-60.
Ross, S. (1976), “The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.13, pp.341-360.
Vuolteenaho, T. (2000), “Understanding the Aggregate Book-to-Market Ratio and its Implication for Current Equity-Premium Expectations,” Working Paper (Harvard University).

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2014/07/07 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE