簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳旭源
Hsu-Yuan Chen
論文名稱: 十年級生對於蘇花高爭論議題之非制式推理:兼探知識觀信念、學習概念及個人目標導向之相關性
Tenth grades’ informal reasoning on the controversial issue of Su-Hua highway construction, with relations to their epistemological beliefs, conceptions of learning and personal goal orientation.
指導教授: 蔡今中
Chin-Chung Tsai
口試委員: 梁至中
Chih-Chung Liang
吳穎沺
Ying-Tien Wu
蔡孟蓉
Meng-Jung Tsai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 應用科技學院 - 應用科技研究所
Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 118
中文關鍵詞: 社會性科學議題非制式推理知識觀信念學習概念個人目標導向
外文關鍵詞: Socio-scientific issue, informal reasoning, epistemological beliefs, conceptions of learning, personal goal orientation
相關次數: 點閱:480下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   本研究主要探討十年級生在面對社會性科學議題時,所展現的非制式推理和學習者的知識觀信念、學習概念及個人目標導向間的相互關係。為了解十年級生非制式推理,本研究以蘇花高議題的開放式社會性科學議題問卷,將學習者填答的內容,藉由質性分析,進而轉換成量化指標,來分析學習者的判斷標準、推理品質及推理模式等三種面向非制式推理。本研究的有效樣本共138人,並以封閉式問卷檢視這138位學習者的知識觀信念、學習概念及個人目標導向,其知識觀信念問卷包含四個面向:知識的來源、知識的確定性、知識的發展和知的判斷;學習概念問卷包括六個面向:記憶、測驗、計算和練習、增加知識、應用、理解和獲得新觀點;個人目標導向包含四個面向:趨向精熟目標、逃避精熟目標、趨向表現目標、逃避表現目標。
      本研究發現:知識觀信念和學習概念皆能預測個人目標導向,其中又以學習概念較能有預測個人目標導向,結果顯示,有較成熟的知識觀信念或學習概念也越有可能會持有較佳的個人目標導向。此外,在探討非制式推理時,結果顯示,僅有知的判斷能預測推理模式之總數。最後,本研究也建議教學者在教學時,應強調對知識理解的深度,以促使學習者能持有較佳的個人目標導向。


    This study first explored 138 tenth graders’ informal reasoning on the Socio-scientific issue, and then investigated the relationships among their informal reasoning, their epistemological beliefs, their conceptions of learning, and their personal goal orientations. An open-ended questionnaire was utilized to probe the students’ informal reasoning on the issue regarding whether to construct Su-Hua highway. The students were asked to fill in the questionnaire, and their responses were transformed into qualitative data for analyzing their evaluative criteria formation, reasoning quality and reasoning modes. In addition to the open-ended questionnaire, this study also used three close-ended questionnaires to investigate students’ epistemological beliefs, conceptions of learning and personal goal orientation. First, the questionnaire of epistemological beliefs included four dimensions: source of knowledge, certainty of knowledge, development of knowledge, and justification for knowing. The second questionnaire of conceptions of learning included six dimensions: memorizing, testing, calculating and practicing, increasing one’s knowledge, applying, and understanding and seeing in a new way. The third questionnaire of personal goal orientation also included four dimensions: mastery-approach goal, mastery-avoidance goal, performance-approach goal, and performance-avoidance goal.
    The results of this study indicated that both the epistemological belief and the conception of learning were significant predictors for the students’ personal goal orientation, though the conception of learning was a better predictor than the epistemological belief. The findings also revealed that students who held more sophisticated epistemological beliefs or conceptions of learning tended to posses more advanced personal goal orientations. Moreover, regarding the students’ informal reasoning, only the justification for science knowing could significantly predict the amount of their reasoning modes. Finally, this study suggests that, in order to improve students’ personal goal orientation, teachers should put more emphases on the depth of the knowledge content.

    中文摘要 I 英文摘要 II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 非制式推理 6 第二節 知識觀信念 10 第三節 學習概念 16 第四節 目標導向 20 第五節 總結 25 第三章 研究方法 28 第一節 研究對象 28 第二節 研究設計與工具 29 第三節 研究流程 38 第四節 資料處理與分析 39 第四章 研究結果 45 第一節 非制式推理 46 第二節 科學知識觀信念、科學學習概念與目標導向 53 第三節 科學知識觀信念、科學學習概念與非制式推理 68 第四節 目標導向與非制式推理 77 第五節 整理與討論 80 第五章 討論與建議 83 第一節 討論 83 第二節 教學上的建議 88 參考文獻 90 附錄一 科學知識觀信念量表 100 附錄二 科學學習概念量表 102 附錄三 目標導向量表 104 附錄四 社會性科學議題問卷 106

    彭淑玲 (2004)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。國 立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
    Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
    Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
    Bartholome, T., Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 113-129.
    Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
    Boldrin, A. & Mason, L. (2009). Distinguishing between knowledge and beliefs: students’ epistemic criteria for differentiating. Instructional Science, 37, 107-127.
    Braten, I. & Stromso, H. I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371-388.
    Braten, I. & Stromso, H. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539-565.
    Buehl, M. M. & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology, Review, 13(4), 325-351.
    Burr, J. E. & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199-224.
    Butler, R. & Neuman, O. (1995). Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 261-271.
    Chan, K.-W. (2007). Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and their relations with conceptions of learning and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Educational Research, 16(2), 199-214.
    Chan, K.-W. & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817-831.
    Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43-54.
    Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.
    Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: the perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331-345.
    Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). University mathematics students’ conceptions of mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23(1), 87-94.
    Dahl, T. I., Bals, M., & Turi, A. L. (2005). Are students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning associated with their reported use of learning strategies? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 257-273.
    Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., & Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 262-270.
    Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
    Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
    Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35, 299-316.
    Elby, A. (2009). Defining personal epistemology: A response to Hofer & Pintrich (1997) and Sandoval (2005). Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 138-149.
    Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
    Elliot, A. J. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 968-980.
    Elliot, A. J. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
    Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
    Evans, J. St. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 978-996.
    Evans, J. St. B. T. & Thompson, V. A. (2004). Informal reasoning: Theory and method. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 69-74.
    Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Elliot, A. J., Tauer, J. M., & Carter, S. M. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goal: predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316-330.
    Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562-575.
    Hofer, B. K. (1994, August). Epistemological beliefs and First-Year college students: motivation and cognition in different instructional context. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association annual meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
    Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
    Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383.
    Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning. Review of Educational research, 67(1), 88-140.
    Jehng, J.-C., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23-35.
    Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.-P. & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation an decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171-1190.
    Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-184.
    Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 569-581.
    Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition. Human Development, 26, 222-232.
    Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 243-255.
    Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., et al. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90, 632-655.
    Kuhn, D. (1993). Connecting scientific and informal reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(7), 74-103.
    Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
    Lee, M.-H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92,191-220.
    Lin, C.-C. & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). The relationships between students’ conceptions of learning engineering and their preferences for classroom and laboratory learning environments. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 193-204.
    Lonka, K. & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 5-24.
    Marshall, D., Summer, M., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Students’ conceptions of learning in an engineering context. Higher Education, 38, 291-309.
    Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: the interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291-309.
    Mclean, M. (2001). Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 399-413.
    Means, M. L. & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139-178.
    Minasian-Batmanian, L. C., Lingard, J., & Prosser, M. (2006). Variation in student reflections on their conceptions of and approaches to learning biochemistry in a First-year health sciences’ service subject, International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1887-1904.
    Moore, W. S. (2002). Understanding learning in a Postmodern World: Reconsidering the Perry Scheme of ethical and intellectual development. In B. Hofer & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 17-36). Erlbaum: Mahwah, N.J.
    Newman, R. S. (1998). Students’ Help Seeking During Problem Solving: Influences of Personal and contextual Achievement Goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 644-658.
    Ozkal, K., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Sungur, S. (2009). A conceptual model of relationships among constructivist learning environment perceptions, epistemological beliefs, and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 71-79.
    Patronis, P. T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754.
    Paulsen, M. B. & Feldman, K. A. (1999). Student motivation and epistemological beliefs. New directions for teaching and learning, 78, 17-25.
    Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2005). The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Motivational Strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 731-768.
    Paulsen, M. B., & Wells, C. T. (1998). Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 365-384.
    Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597.
    Perkins, D. N. (1985). Post-primary education has little impact upon informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 562-571.
    Phan, H. P. (2008). Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-93.
    Pintrich, P. R.(1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Future challenges and directions for theory and research on personal epistemology. In B. Hofer & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 389-414). Erlbaum: Mahwah, N.J.
    Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
    Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
    Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 87-100.
    Qian, G.. & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282-292.
    Rodriguez, L., & Cano, F. (2006). The epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and study orchestrations of university students. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 617-636.
    Ryan, M. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 248-258.
    Ryan, A. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in Adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329-341.
    Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 112-138.
    Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409.
    Sadler, T. D. & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488.
    Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005a). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
    Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005b). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89, 71-93.
    Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs About the Nature of Knowledge on Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
    Schommer, M. (1993a). Comparisons of beliefs about the nature of knowledge and learning among postsecondary students. Research in Higher Education, 34(3), 355-370.
    Schommer, M. (1993b). Epistemological Development and Academic Performance Among Secondary Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406-411.
    Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing Epistemological Belief Research: Tentative Understandings and Provocative Confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293-319.
    Schommer, M. (2008). Applying the theory of an epistemological belief system to the investigation of students’ and professors’ Mathematical beliefs. In M.S. Khine (Eds.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: epistemological studies across diverse cultures. (pp. 303-323). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological Beliefs and Mathematical Text Comprehension: Believing It Is Simple Does Not Make It So. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 435-443.
    Schommer, M., & Walker, K. (1995). Are Epistemological Beliefs Similar Across   Domains? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 424-432.
    Shaw, V. F. (1996). The cognitive processes in informal reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 2(1), 51-80.
    Somuncuoglu, Y. & Yildirim. A. (1999). Relationship between achievement goal orientations and use of learning strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(5), 267-277.
    Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319-338.
    Tanaka, A., Murakami, Y., Okuno, T., & Yamauchi, H. (2002). Achievement goals, attitudes toward help seeking, and help-seeking behavior in the classroom. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 23-35.
    Tsai, C. -C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82, 473-489.
    Tsai, C.-C. (1999). “Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths”: A study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654-674.
    Tsai, C.-C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42(2), 193-205.
    Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733-1750.
    Tsai, C.-C. & Kuo, P.-C. (2008). Cram school students’ conceptions of learning and learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 353-375.
    Vermunt, J. D. & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359-384.
    Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238.
    Wu, Y.-T. (2007). High school students’ informal reasoning on the debates of nuclear power usage, with an investigation on the effects of on-line inquiry activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Wu, Y.-T. & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). High school students’ informal reasoning on a Socio-scientific Issue: qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1163-1187.
    Yang, F.-Y. (2004). Exploring high school students’ use of theory and evidence in an everyday context: the role of scientific thinking in environmental science decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1345-1364.
    Yang, F.-Y. & Anderson, O. R. (2003). Senior high school students’ preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 221-244.
    Yang, F.-Y. & Tsai, C.-C. (in press). Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues
    and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional Science.
    Zeidler, D. L. & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7-38). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101.
    Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377.
    Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367.
    Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2014/07/20 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE